Inman, Brant A

369 Background: MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) uses MRI to target, monitor, and control thermal ablation of prostate tissue with high intensity directional ultrasound, demonstrating favorable histologic control and preservation of genitourinary function in single-arm studies [1,2]. CAPTAIN (NCT05027477) is a post-market, multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) of TULSA vs RARP for intermediate-risk prostate cancer, and is the first such study to meet its enrolment target. Here we compare baseline patient characteristics, treatment parameters, and periprocedural outcomes. Methods: CAPTAIN enrolled men with treatment-naïve, organ-confined, Grade Group 2 or 3 prostate cancer at 23 centers including academic and private clinics in the USA (20), Canada (2), and Finland (1). Patients were randomized 2:1 to TULSA or RARP, without crossover. Endpoints include pad-free urinary continence (EPIC) and erections sufficient for penetration (IIEF Q2) at 1 year, salvage treatment at 3 years, and survival to 10 years. Periprocedural metrics include length of stay, blood loss, catheter time, and 30-day patient diary (EQ-5D-5L, NRS pain score). Results: 211 patients were treated from Jan 2022 to Aug 2025 (70% TULSA, 30% RARP), surpassing the enrolment target of 201. Arms had similar baseline characteristics: median (IQR) age for TULSA vs. RARP was 63 (58–68) vs 65 (60–69) years (p=0.12), PSA was 6.5 (4.9–9.6) vs 7.2 (5.6–9.7) ng/mL (p=0.63), Grade Group 2/3 proportions were 76%/24% vs 77%/23% (p=0.88). RARP involved bilateral, unilateral, or no nerve sparing in 89%, 5.7%, and 5.7% of cases. TULSA ablation plans included whole-gland (68%) and ≥hemi-ablation (32%). Median (IQR) blood loss was lower during TULSA vs RARP: 0 (0–0) vs 100 (100–200) mL (p<0.001). Hospital stay was shorter for TULSA: 0.29 (0.27–0.32) vs 1.24 (1.12–1.36) days (p<0.001). Catheter duration was longer post-TULSA: 13 (11–15) vs 8 (8–10) days (p<0.001). Patients reported lower NRS pain scores after TULSA to post-operative day 6, and less decline in overall health on the EQ-5D-5L 0-100 visual analog scale over 30 days (p<0.05). Fewer patients reported extreme inability on EQ-5D-5L after TULSA vs RARP over the first month for mobility (0% vs 15%), self-care (1% vs 18%), and usual activities (18% vs 38%) (all p<0.05). Conclusions: CAPTAIN is the first multicenter RCT comparing ablation to radical prostate cancer treatment to meet its enrollment target. Early perioperative results from CAPTAIN demonstrate that TULSA had no blood loss or overnight hospitalization, reduced post-procedural pain, and faster return to baseline activities and overall health. Data collection to 1 and 3 years post-treatment continues to readout of the primary safety and oncological outcomes. [1] Klotz et al 2021, JUrol 205(3):769-779. [2] Eggener et al 2024, UrolOnc 42:S83. Clinical trial information: NCT05027477 .

831 Background: Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA)-based genomic profiling has suggested utility to identify a distinct tumor subgroup corresponding to a favorable prognosis in patients with bladder cancer. Here, we further evaluate a genomic classifier in a cohort of patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). Methods: Transcriptome-wide expression profiling using Decipher Bladder was performed on TURBT samples from a cohort of patients with high grade, clinically organ confined (cTa-T2N0M0) UC who subsequently underwent RC without any neoadjuvant therapy (n=226). LncRNA-based luminal favorable status was determined using a previously developed genomic classifier. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) following surgery. Secondary endpoints included cancer-specific mortality and upstaging at RC. Results: In the study, 134 patients were clinical NMIBC (cTa/Tis/T1) and 92 patients were cT2. We identified 60 patients with luminal favorable subtype, all of which showed robust gene expression patterns associated with less aggressive bladder cancer biology. On MVA, patients with the luminal favorable subtype (vs. without) were significantly associated with lower odds of upstaging to pT3+ disease (OR [95% CI] 0.32 [0.12-0.82], p = 0.02), any upstaging (OR [95% CI] 0.41 [0.20-0.83], p = 0.01), and any upstaging and/or pN+ (OR [95% CI] 0.50 [0.25-1.00], p = 0.05). Luminal favorable bladder cancer was significantly associated with better OS (HR 0.33 [95% CI 0.15-0.74], p=0.007). Conclusions: This study validates the performance of the genomic classifier for identifying urothelial carcinomas with a luminal favorable subtype, harboring less aggressive tumor biology.

Objective To further evaluate a genomic classifier (GC) in a cohort of patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), as long non‐coding RNA (lncRNA)‐based genomic profiling has suggested utility in identifying a distinct tumour subgroup corresponding to a favourable prognosis in patients with bladder cancer. Patients and Methods Transcriptome‐wide expression profiling using Decipher Bladder was performed on transurethral resection of bladder tumour samples from a cohort of patients with high‐grade, clinically organ‐confined (cTa–T2N0M0) urothelial carcinoma (UC) who subsequently underwent RC without any neoadjuvant therapy ( n = 226). The lncRNA‐based luminal favourable status was determined using a previously developed GC. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) after RC. Secondary endpoints included cancer‐specific mortality and upstaging at RC. Results In the study, 134 patients were clinical non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (cTa/Tis/T1) and 92 patients were cT2. We identified 60 patients with luminal favourable subtype, all of which showed robust gene expression patterns associated with less aggressive bladder cancer biology. On multivariate analysis, patients with the luminal favourable subtype (vs without) were significantly associated with lower odds of upstaging to pathological (p)T3+ disease (odds ratio [OR] 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12–0.82; P = 0.02), any upstaging (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20–0.83; P = 0.01), and any upstaging and/or pN+ (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25–1.00; P = 0.05). Luminal favourable bladder cancer was significantly associated with better OS (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.15–0.74; P = 0.007). Conclusions This study validates the performance of the GC for identifying UCs with a luminal favourable subtype, harbouring less aggressive tumour biology.

TPS582 Background: The majority of patients with bladder cancer present with non-muscle invasive disease (Chang 2016; Woldu 2017; Kates 2020; Li 2020). The standard of care for treatment of high risk NMIBC involves transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) or chemotherapy. Although the response rate to BCG therapy is high, many patients recur within 1–5 years (Matulay JU 2021). For patients who have BCG unresponsive disease after adequate course of BCG, there are limited options. While radical cystectomy (RC) is still considered the standard of care, most patients are reluctant to undergo RC and their options are limited to intravesical chemotherapy or pembrolizumab. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate directed to Nectin-4, which is highly expressed in bladder tumors. In EV-301, a phase 3 study, EV showed an OS benefit vs chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) who had previously received platinum-based therapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor (Powles NEJM 2021). Based on its demonstrated benefit in la/mUC, EV is currently being evaluated in earlier UC settings. The purpose of this study is to investigate the intravesical administration of EV for patients with NMIBC. Methods: EV-104 (NCT05014139) is a phase 1, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, and antitumor activity of intravesical EV in adults with high-risk BCG-unresponsive NMIBC (carcinoma in situ with or without papillary disease) who are ineligible for or refuse RC. The dose escalation part of the trial aims to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended dose of intravesical EV. The dose expansion part will evaluate patients at the MTD or recommended dose and further characterize safety and antitumor activity of intravesical EV. The study treatment regimen will include an induction phase, where patients will receive intravesical EV weekly for 6 weeks followed by monthly maintenance for a total of 9 additional EV doses. Patients will be assessed for response every 3 months by cystoscopy and urine cytology, while on study. Safety and antitumor activity endpoints will be summarized using descriptive statistics. The study is currently enrolling in the US with additional sites planned in Canada and the EU. Clinical trial information: NCT05014139 .

BackgroundSystemic therapy (ST) can be deferred in patients who have metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and slow‐growing metastases. Currently, this subset of patients managed with active surveillance (AS) is not well described in the literature.MethodsThis was a prospective observational study of patients with mRCC across 46 US community and academic centers. The objective was to describe baseline characteristics and demographics of patients with mRCC initially managed by AS, reasons for AS, and patient outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize demographics, baseline characteristics, and patient‐related outcomes. Wilcoxon 2‐sample rank‐sum tests and χ2 tests were used to assess differences between ST and AS cohorts in continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Kaplan‐Meier survival curves were used to assess survival.ResultsOf 504 patients, mRCC was initially managed by AS (n = 143) or ST (n = 305); 56 patients were excluded from the analysis. Disease was present in 69% of patients who received AS, whereas the remaining 31% had no evidence of disease. At data cutoff, 72 of 143 patients (50%) in the AS cohort had not received ST. The median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 122 months to not estimable) in patients who received AS versus 30 months (95% CI, 25‐44 months) in those who received ST. Quality of life at baseline was significantly better in patients who were managed with AS versus ST.ConclusionsAS occurs frequently (32%) in real‐world clinical practice and appears to be a safe and appropriate alternative to immediate ST in selected patients.

5117 Background: Prognostic nomograms, scoring tools, and risk tables are rapidly accumulating in the prostate cancer (PCa) literature. It is not always clear to whom these tools should apply and how well they predict the outcomes they were designed to forecast. There is need for independent evaluation of these tools. Methods: We used the Mayo Clinic Radical Prostatectomy Registry, a prospective database of radical prostatectomy (RP) outcomes, to assess tools designed to predict RP outcomes. The validation set included 13,313 RP patients from 1990–2005. There were 3,256 PSA failures, 566 metastases, and 1,599 deaths (301 were due to PCa). We assessed the discrimination, calibration and overall accuracy of prediction tools identified through a structured Pubmed search. Results: Tools varied greatly in terms of complexity, width of prediction interval, and method of presentation. Several tools included non-standard variables and were therefore unevaluable, despite an extensive dataset, leaving the 1999 and 2005 Kattan nomograms, the 1998 and 2001 CDPR scores, and the 2001 GPSM score for analysis. Discrimination (quantitated by the c index) was better for PCa-specific survival and metastases than for PSA failure ( Table ). Kaplan-Meier plots demonstrated clustering of risk groups in most tools, most severely in the higher risk groups of the Kattan nomograms. The calibration plots of most tools (excepting GPSM) had a serious discordance between observed and predicted outcomes in the lower probability ranges. This meant that most tools gravely overestimated the probability of RP failure in high-risk patients, by up to 4- fold. Conclusions: The tools showed moderate discriminatory ability for PSA failure but performed much better for non-surrogate outcomes. Most tools (excepting GPSM) were miscalibrated in high risk patients and dramatically underestimated the efficacy of surgery in this cohort. Prognostic tools may not be as accurate as previously reported. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Bladder Cancer focuses on the clinical presentation and workup of suspected bladder cancer, treatment of non–muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer, and treatment of metastatic urothelial bladder cancer because important updates have recently been made to these sections. Some important updates include recommendations for optimal treatment of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the event of a bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage and details about biomarker testing for advanced or metastatic disease. The systemic therapy recommendations for second-line or subsequent therapies have also been revised. Treatment and management of muscle-invasive, nonmetastatic disease is covered in the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Bladder Cancer available at NCCN.org . Additional topics covered in the complete version include treatment of nonurothelial histologies and recommendations for nonbladder urinary tract cancers such as upper tract urothelial carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma of the prostate, and primary carcinoma of the urethra.

Purpose Many patients with high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are either refractory to bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) treatment or may experience disease relapse. We assessed the efficacy and safety of recombinant adenovirus interferon alfa with Syn3 (rAd–IFNα/Syn3), a replication-deficient recombinant adenovirus gene transfer vector, for patients with high-grade (HG) BCG-refractory or relapsed NMIBC. Methods In this open-label, multicenter (n = 13), parallel-arm, phase II study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01687244), 43 patients with HG BCG-refractory or relapsed NMIBC received intravesical rAd–IFNα/Syn3 (randomly assigned 1:1 to 1 × 10 11 viral particles (vp)/mL or 3 × 10 11 vp/mL). Patients who responded at months 3, 6, and 9 were retreated at months 4, 7, and 10. The primary end point was 12-month HG recurrence-free survival (RFS). All patients who received at least one dose were included in efficacy and safety analyses. Results Forty patients received rAd–IFNα/Syn3 (1 × 10 11 vp/mL, n = 21; 3 × 10 11 vp/mL, n = 19) between November 5, 2012, and April 8, 2015. Fourteen patients (35.0%; 90% CI, 22.6% to 49.2%) remained free of HG recurrence 12 months after initial treatment. Comparable 12-month HG RFS was noted for both doses. Of these 14 patients, two experienced recurrence at 21 and 28 months, respectively, after treatment initiation, and one died as a result of an upper tract tumor at 17 months without a recurrence. rAd–IFNα/Syn3 was well tolerated; no grade four or five adverse events (AEs) occurred, and no patient discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. The most frequently reported drug-related AEs were micturition urgency (n = 16; 40%), dysuria (n = 16; 40%), fatigue (n = 13; 32.5%), pollakiuria (n = 11; 28%), and hematuria and nocturia (n = 10 each; 25%). Conclusion rAd—IFNα/Syn3 was well tolerated. It demonstrated promising efficacy for patients with HG NMIBC after BCG therapy who were unable or unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy.