Citations

AbstractWhile most Radiation Oncology clinics have adopted electronic charting in one form or another, no consensus document exists that provides guidelines for safe and effective use of the Radiation Oncology electronic medical records (RO‐EMR). Task Group 262 was formed to provide these guidelines as well as to provide recommendations to vendors for improving electronic charting functionality in future. Guidelines are provided in the following areas: Implementation and training for the RO‐EMR, acceptance testing and quality assurance (QA) of the RO‐EMR, use of the RO‐EMR as an information repository, use of the RO‐EMR as a workflow manager, electronic charting for brachytherapy and nonstandard treatments, and information technology (IT) considerations associated with the RO‐EMR. The report was based on a literature search by the task group, an extensive survey of task group members on their respective RO‐EMR practices, an AAPM membership survey on electronic charting, as well as group consensus.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a low-flow state and may underestimate aortic stenosis (AS) severity. Single-high Doppler signals (HS) consistent with severe AS (peak velocity ≥4 m/s or mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg) are averaged down in current practice. The objective for the study was to determine the significance of HS in AF low-gradient AS (LGAS). Methods: One thousand five hundred forty-one patients with aortic valve area ≤1 cm 2 and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% were identified and classified as high-gradient AS (HGAS) (≥40 mm Hg) and LGAS (<40 mm Hg), and AF versus sinus rhythm (SR). Available computed tomography aortic valve calcium scores (AVCS) were retrieved from the medical record. Outcomes were assessed. Results: Mean age was 76±11 years, female 47%. Mean gradient was 51±12 in SR-HGAS, 48±10 in AF-HGAS, 31±5 in SR-LGAS, and 29±7 mm Hg in AF-LGAS, all P ≤0.001 versus SR-HGAS; HS were present in 33% of AF-LGAS. AVCS were available in 34%. Compared with SR-HGAS (2409 arbitrary units; interquartile range, 1581–3462) AVCS were higher in AF-HGAS (2991 arbitrary units; IQR1978–4229, P =0.001), not different in AF-LGAS (2399 arbitrary units; IQR1817–2810, P =0.47), and lower in SR-LGAS (1593 arbitrary units; IQR945–1832, P <0.001); AVCS in AF-LGAS were higher when HS were present ( P =0.048). Compared with SR-HGAS, the age-, sex-, comorbidity index-, and time-dependent aortic valve replacement-adjusted mortality risk was higher in AF-HGAS (hazard ratio=1.82 [1.40–2.36], P <0.001) and AF-LGAS with HS (hazard ratio=1.54 [1.04–2.26], P =0.03) but not different in AF-LGAS without HS or SR-LGAS (both P =not significant). Conclusions: Severe AS was common in AF-LGAS. AVCS in AF-LGAS were not different from SR-HGAS. AVCS were higher and mortality worse in AF-LGAS when HS were present.

Objective To systematically analyse prior reports of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed in cases of ≤50% carotid stenosis in order to understand patient tolerance and potential benefit. Methods A systematic review and descriptive analysis was performed in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. An English-language search was performed of online databases using librarian-selected search terms. Abstracts were reviewed for relevance which included mention of carotid endarterectomy and stenosis. Prospective or retrospective observational cohort studies that reported series of patients who underwent endarterectomy for minimal (≤50%) luminal stenosis with reported outcomes were included. Results Six studies (which included our institutional series) with a total of 143 patients met the inclusion criteria. The weighted mean age at the time of CEA was 72.3 years; 113 (79.0%) were male. 55.8% of patients with available data had recurrent ipsilateral ischaemic events despite medical therapy. Two patients out of 129 with available perioperative data (1.6%) had perioperative MRI findings of acute ischaemic stroke, both within the hemisphere contralateral to the side of CEA. Of the 138 patients with available follow-up (mean, 36 months), none had recurrent ipsilateral ischaemic events. Conclusions Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid disease causing ≤50% stenosis may be a potentially beneficial strategy to prevent stroke recurrence. Studies with robust methodology are needed to draw more definitive conclusions in terms of the safety and efficacy of endarterectomy for minimal stenosis with vulnerable features relative to intensive medical therapy.

Background and aim First pass effect (FPE) is defined as achieving a complete recanalization with a single thrombectomy device pass. Although clinically desired, FPE is reached in less than 30% of thrombectomy procedures. Multiple device passes are often necessary to achieve successful or complete recanalization. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the recanalization rate after each pass of mechanical thrombectomy and its association with good neurological outcome. Methods A literature search was performed for studies reporting the number of device passes required for either successful (mTICI 2b or higher) or complete (mTICI 2c or higher) recanalization. Using random-effect meta-analysis, we evaluated the likelihood of recanalization and good neurological outcome (measured with the modified Rankin Score <2 at 90 days) after each device pass. Results Thirteen studies comprising 4197 patients were included. Among cases with failed first pass, 24% of them achieved final complete recanalization and 45% of them achieved final successful recanalization. Independently to the total number of previously failed attempts, the likelihood of achieving successful recanalization was 30% per pass, and the likelihood to achieve complete recanalization was about 20% per pass. The likelihood of good neurological outcome in patients with final successful recanalization decreased after each device pass: 55% after the first pass, 48% after the second pass, 42% after the third pass, 36% after the fourth pass, and 26% for 5 passes or more. Conclusion Each pass is associated with a stable likelihood of recanalization but a decreased likelihood of good neurological outcome.

Purpose This study sought to validate whether the signal intensity ratio (SIR) of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) was associated with acute ischemic neurologic events. Methods A retrospective review was completed of consecutive patients that underwent neck magnetic resonance angiography using magnetization prepared-rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) and T1-CUBE sequences between 2017 and 2020. Patients with magnetic resonance evidence of IPH were included. SIRs were measured by comparing the maximum IPH signal with the mean intramuscular signal from the adjacent sternocleidomastoid. Patients were stratified into ischemic or non-ischemic groups based on the presence of acute ipsilateral ischemic events (stroke, retinal artery occlusion). Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if increasing IPH SIR was associated with an increased risk of ipsilateral ischemic events. Results Of 85 included patients (85 arteries), 66 were male (77.6%). Mean age was 71.0 (SD ± 11.1). There were 70 arteries with IPH that were ipsilateral to an ischemic event, and 15 that belonged to patients without an ischemic event. No association was found between increasing IPH SIR seen on MP-RAGE (odds ratio (OR): 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58–1.4; P = 0.43) or T1-CUBE sequences (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.53–1.5; P = 0.56). Conclusions There was no association between the SIR of IPH and acute ischemia on either MP-RAGE or T1-CUBE sequences. Further investigation is required prior to widespread acceptance of SIR as a predictive imaging marker of symptomatic carotid plaque.

Introduction: Morbidity and mortality attributable to hypertension are higher in African American (AAEH) compared to Caucasian essential hypertensive (EH) patients, possibly related to a differential effect on vascular injury and repair. While circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) preserve endothelial integrity IEC detach from sites of injury and represent markers of vascular damage. We hypothesized that plasma levels of IEC and inflammatory markers would be higher in AAEH compared to EH patients. METHODS: Inferior vena cava levels of CD34+/KDR+ (EPC) and VAP-1+ (IEC) cells were measured by FACS in EH and AAEH under fixed sodium intake (150 mEq/d) and blockade of the renin-angiotensin-system, and compared to systemic levels in normotensive control subjects (n=19 each). Systemic levels of inflammatory cytokines and EPC homing factors were measured by Luminex. Results: Blood pressure, serum creatinine, lipids, antihypertensive medications, and EPC levels did not differ between EH and AAEH patients. Circulating IEC were higher in AAEH, and inversely correlated with EPC levels (Figure). Systemic levels of inflammatory cytokines and EPC homing factors were higher in AAEH compared to EH patients (Table), and correlated directly with IEC. Conclusion: Despite preserved kidney function and controlled BP, circulating inflammatory markers were elevated in AAEH and correlated with increased IEC and decreased EPC levels. Increased release of cytokines and IEC in AAEH may impair EPC reparative capacity and predispose to hypertensive vascular injury. This process may aggravate vascular damage and accelerate hypertension-related morbidity/mortality rates in AAEH.