Khan, Sana

e24003 Background: Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy suffer from a variable degree of cancer therapy–related cardiac dysfunction and heart failure (HF). It is known that sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with HF independent of diabetes mellitus and left ventricular ejection fraction; our study aims to investigate the potential benefits of SGLT2 inhibitory therapy specifically in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: We performed an electronic search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, from the inception of databases till January 29, 2024, to identify all the articles that compared the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in adult (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus and exposure to cardiotoxic antineoplastic therapy, subsequently diagnosed with cardiomyopathy, heart failure, or LVEF < 40%. The data was extracted and pooled using a random effects model to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with a respective 95% confidence interval (CI). R software (v.4.3) was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Our search identified three observational studies with a total of 3,164 patients (SGLT2- inhibitor group: 1,550; Control group: 1,614). We found that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (OR: 0.25 [0.20, 0.31]; I2 = 16%; p < 0.001), hospitalizations from heart failure (OR: 0.25 [0.10, 0.62]; I2 = 0%; p = 0.003), and acute exacerbation of heart failure (OR: 0.35 [0.27, 0.47]; I2 = 0%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest a favorable association between the use of SGLT2 inhibitors and reduced mortality, as well as improved cardiac clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. However, further validation through large-scale studies and randomized controlled trials across diverse malignancies is warranted to establish the efficacy of these drugs. [Table: see text]

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a low-flow state and may underestimate aortic stenosis (AS) severity. Single-high Doppler signals (HS) consistent with severe AS (peak velocity ≥4 m/s or mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg) are averaged down in current practice. The objective for the study was to determine the significance of HS in AF low-gradient AS (LGAS). Methods: One thousand five hundred forty-one patients with aortic valve area ≤1 cm 2 and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% were identified and classified as high-gradient AS (HGAS) (≥40 mm Hg) and LGAS (<40 mm Hg), and AF versus sinus rhythm (SR). Available computed tomography aortic valve calcium scores (AVCS) were retrieved from the medical record. Outcomes were assessed. Results: Mean age was 76±11 years, female 47%. Mean gradient was 51±12 in SR-HGAS, 48±10 in AF-HGAS, 31±5 in SR-LGAS, and 29±7 mm Hg in AF-LGAS, all P ≤0.001 versus SR-HGAS; HS were present in 33% of AF-LGAS. AVCS were available in 34%. Compared with SR-HGAS (2409 arbitrary units; interquartile range, 1581–3462) AVCS were higher in AF-HGAS (2991 arbitrary units; IQR1978–4229, P =0.001), not different in AF-LGAS (2399 arbitrary units; IQR1817–2810, P =0.47), and lower in SR-LGAS (1593 arbitrary units; IQR945–1832, P <0.001); AVCS in AF-LGAS were higher when HS were present ( P =0.048). Compared with SR-HGAS, the age-, sex-, comorbidity index-, and time-dependent aortic valve replacement-adjusted mortality risk was higher in AF-HGAS (hazard ratio=1.82 [1.40–2.36], P <0.001) and AF-LGAS with HS (hazard ratio=1.54 [1.04–2.26], P =0.03) but not different in AF-LGAS without HS or SR-LGAS (both P =not significant). Conclusions: Severe AS was common in AF-LGAS. AVCS in AF-LGAS were not different from SR-HGAS. AVCS were higher and mortality worse in AF-LGAS when HS were present.

Grading severity of AS in AF is complicated by varying stroke volumes associated with fluctuating maximum velocities and pressure gradients across the aortic valve. Current guidelines recommend averaging five continuous‐wave peak velocity and mean gradient (MG) Doppler signals across the aortic valve when estimating severity of AS in AF. However, it is unknown when grading severity of AS how the average of multiple Doppler signals vs the highest Doppler signal in AF compares to the Doppler signals when the patient is in normal sinus rhythm. We present a series of patients with AS who had two echocardiograms performed within 2‐4 months of each other, one when in normal sinus rhythm and one when in AF, and compare the aortic valve hemodynamics associated with the two rhythms.