Citations

Abstract Background Staging disease severity in dementia research requires input from an informant. The Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR) is the most used instrument for staging in Alzheimer's Disease (AD); but has been expanded to stage patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD. An informant effect on the CDR has been reported in AD. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether informant characteristics influence the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD in a large cohort of participants with frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Method We included participants with a FTLD‐related syndrome from the ALLFTD study. We included participants with a CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD higher than 0, information on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q). We performed a conditional growth model using multilevel linear regression analysis. We performed an exploratory stratified analysis by patient sex. Result We included 1411 participants, totalling 2063 visits. The patient's age at the initial visit was 64.7±9.4 years and 44.0% were females. Females were 69.2% of the informants, and the relationship was 79.1% spouse or partner, 10.6% children, 4.1% were siblings and 6.2% other. The CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores were affected by informant characteristics. The CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores were 0.41 (CI 95%:0.08 to 0.75) higher with female informants. The frequency of visits was associated with a CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD score 0.86 higher (CI 95%:0.17 to 0.56) when visiting at least once a week, 1.46 higher (CI 95%:0.46 to 2.47) when visiting daily, and 0.83 higher (CI 95%:0.06 to 1.60) when living with the patient compared with visiting less than once a week. As expected, CDR‐FLTD scores increased with lower MoCA and higher NPI‐Q scores. In the stratified analysis by sex, we found that female informant was associated with higher CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores only when patients were male. Conclusion We found that the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD is influenced by informant sex and frequency of visits in patients with FTLD‐related syndromes. These results are similar to those observed in AD patients and underscore the need to recognize that informant characteristics may impact dementia severity scales.

Abstract Background The quantification of Neurofilament Light chain (NfL) in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has proven valuable for diagnosing and prognosing various neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, parkinsonism, multiple sclerosis, and ischemic damage. However, there is considerable variability in clinical and laboratory practices between centers, primarily due to different contexts of use (COU), analytical methods, and the application of cutoffs or scales. Additionally, for the same biochemical profile, the interpretation and reporting of results may vary from one center to another, raising concerns about the commutability of the tests. To date, no consensus has been reached among laboratories to define the most appropriate use of cutoffs or conclusions/comments based on NfL profiles. Method This international project involves 38 laboratories across 18 countries, all specialized in the biochemical diagnosis of neurological disorders. Using a questionnaire, we obtained descriptions from each center regarding their COU, pre‐analytical and analytical protocols (including the biological fluid and methods used to quantify NfL). Through a consensus approach, we developed a harmonized strategy for the use and reporting of NfL results across different centres according to their respective COU. Results Among the centers, 63% quantified NfL in the CSF, 87% in blood and 53% in both fluids. COU were as follow: frontotemporal dementia (71%), Alzheimer disease (71%), multiple sclerosis (61%), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (61%), psychiatric syndrome (45%), Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (32%), Parkinson disease (39%), peripheral neuropathy (29%), traumatic brain injury (21%), Huntington's disease (13%), amyloid transthyretin related (11%) and cardiac arrest (8%). Most of the centers define pathological cutoffs based on publications (50%) and take age into account for this purpose (42%). Reporting is mostly transmitted through numeric results (95%). Conclusion Harmonizing cutoffs, reporting, and interpretation across various clinical contexts will facilitate the incorporation of this biomarker into routine clinical practice.

Abstract Background Clinically available plasma p ‐tau217 assays may be utilized in the determination of eligibility for amyloid‐lowering therapies. Our institution recently introduced a plasma p ‐tau217 assay in clinical practice using a two‐cutpoint approach that optimizes the accuracy while minimizing false positive risk and categorizing ≤20% of results as intermediate. In this study, we prospectively evaluate the performance of a plasma p ‐tau217 assay for detection of amyloid pathology using these predefined cutpoints. Method Patients recruited were being considered for lecanemab therapy at a tertiary care subspecialty clinic. Plasma p ‐tau217 was measured using the clinically available Fujirebio Lumipulse p ‐tau217 assay at Mayo Clinic, and results (pg/mL) were classified as either negative (≤0.185), intermediate (0.186–0.324) or positive (≥0.325). Amyloid pathology was determined by amyloid‐PET and/or CSF p ‐tau181/Aβ42. Result Ninety‐three patients were recruited between November 2023 and December 2024. Of these, 49 underwent amyloid‐PET, 4 had CSF p ‐tau181/Aβ42 measurements, and 40 had both PET and CSF results (with 3/40 discordant cases), for use in the assessment of amyloid pathology. The three discordant cases were considered amyloid positive for purposes of plasma p ‐tau217 comparison. Overall amyloid positivity was 90%. Plasma p ‐tau217 results were positive in 83% (77/93), negative in 6% (6/93), and intermediate in 11% (10/93) of patients. An elevated p ‐tau217 predicted the presence of amyloid positivity with a diagnostic accuracy of 96% (95% CI 90% − 99%). In the intermediate range, 80% of patients were positive for amyloid pathology. In patients with a definitive p ‐tau217 result (positive or negative), the positive and negative predictive values were 97% and 83%. There were three patients with discordant results: one PET+/p‐tau217‐, one PET‐/p‐tau217+, and one CSF‐/p‐tau217+. Clinical presentation of these discordant cases was examined, and relevant findings will be discussed. Conclusion The Lumipulse plasma p ‐tau217 assay exhibited acceptable diagnostic accuracy for the determination of amyloid pathology when compared to either amyloid‐PET or CSF p ‐tau181/Aβ42. This prospective study confirms the utility a two‐cutpoint approach for interpreting plasma p ‐tau217 for the assessment of amyloid pathology eligibility for amyloid‐lowering therapies in a heterogenous clinical cohort.

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers (BBMs) are increasingly used in clinical trials and clinical practice. However, widespread adoption of BBMs requires further understanding of factors that might influence the interpretation of these biomarkers which would allow for the development of standardized sample collection protocols. For example, studies of the effect of fasting on AD BBM concentrations have yielded inconsistent findings. In this study, we evaluated plasma concentrations of amyloid‐beta(Aβ) 42, Aβ40, phosphorylated Tau ( p ‐tau) 181, p ‐tau217, and neurofilament light chain (NfL) in cognitively normal individuals under fasting and non‐fasting conditions. Method EDTA‐plasma was collected from healthy donors ( n = 14; age >55yrs old) two weeks apart, at the same time of day. The first sample collection was under fasting conditions in which donors did not eat or drink (except water) for at least 12 hours prior to collection. The second sample collection was under non‐fasting conditions in which donors were instructed to eat a meal in the morning, approximately half an hour prior to collection. Plasma Aβ42, Aβ40, p ‐tau181, p ‐tau217, and NfL concentrations were measured on the Fujirebio Lumipulse G1200 analyzer. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used to compare values between the fasting and non‐fasting results. Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess biomarker correlation between fasting status. Result Moderate to strong correlation was observed between the fasting and non‐fasting measurements: p ‐tau217 (r s : 0.86), p ‐tau181 (r s : 0.89), NfL (r s : 0.94), p ‐tau217/Aβ42 (r s : 0.80), Aβ42/40 (r s : 0.66), Aβ42 (r s : 0.77), and Aβ40 (r s : 0.92). Average percent difference between the 2 conditions was: p ‐tau217 27%, p ‐tau181 6%, NfL 9%, p ‐tau217/ Aβ42 25%, Aβ42/40 4%, Aβ42 2%, and Aβ40 ‐6%. Statistically significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) between fasting and non‐fasting measurements were observed for p ‐tau217, NfL, p ‐tau217/Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40, and Aβ42; but not for Aβ40 or p ‐tau181. Conclusion This data suggests that for some AD BBMs, there may be statistically significant differences in concentrations of samples collected in fasting versus non‐fasting conditions. However, further studies are needed to determine if the observed differences may affect the clinical interpretation of these BBMs in individuals with amyloid related pathology.

Abstract Background Anti‐amyloid therapy trials have reported changes in some Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers (BBMs) suggesting that these BBMs may be useful minimally invasive measures of amyloid clearance and treatment outcomes. However, a better understanding of how AD BBMs changes at the individual level reflect treatment response in relation to other relevant clinical endpoints is necessary before they can be adopted for treatment monitoring. Here, several AD BBMs were assessed longitudinally in patients undergoing lecanemab therapy. Method Patients undergoing lecanemab therapy at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN were recruited to participate in this study. Patients were asked to provide an EDTA‐plasma sample before treatment initiation during the first infusion visit and thereafter at 3‐, 6‐, 12‐, and 18 months post‐treatment. p ‐tau217, p ‐tau181, GFAP, NfL, Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ42/40, and p ‐tau217/Aβ42 measurements were obtained using Fujirebio Lumipulse assays. Biomarker median differences were assessed between all time points. Patients were grouped into three categories: a decreased biomarker (median decrease of at least 10%), an increased biomarker (median increase of at least 10%), and a stable biomarker (median change < +/−10%.) Biomarker data up to 6 months after treatment is presented. Result Of forty‐one patients enrolled since November 2023, twenty had time points up to 6 months. None of the biomarkers showed a statistically significant median change from baseline at 3 months ( p >0.05). At 6 months, only Aβ42/40 showed a statistically significant median change (decrease) between 0 and 6 months ( n = 20, p = 0.0058). Table 1 shows patients grouped by median biomarker changes from baseline to 6 months. GFAP, p ‐tau217, and Aβ42/40 exhibited the greatest number of patients with decreased biomarker concentrations (80%, 60%, and 60% of patients with median decreases of ‐25%, ‐26%, and ‐18% respectively), followed by p ‐tau181 (50% of patients; median decrease ‐22%), p ‐tau217/Aβ42 (45% of patients; median decrease ‐40%) and Aβ42 (45% of patients; median decrease ‐18%). None of the patients showed a decreased NfL or Aβ40 concentration. Conclusion Preliminarily analysis revealed that GFAP, p ‐tau217, and Aβ42/40 had the most frequent post‐lecanemab biomarker decreases. Additional sample collection is ongoing to assess the association of AD BBM changes with Amyloid PET over time.

Abstract Background To date, no scoring system has adequately defined clinical efficacy of erectile dysfunction (ED) therapies when evaluating differences between cohorts or in meta-analytic studies. Aim To outline the minimal criteria required for any therapy to be considered clinically effective in the treatment of ED. Methods An analytic review was performed of standardized ED questionnaires, with a particular emphasis placed on the International Index of Erectile Function, Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EFD), and the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) concept. The data were used to create a societal position statement and recommendations on best practices within clinical trials to determine treatment efficacy. Outcomes The SMSNA provided 6 key statements and recommendations to suggest best practices and define minimal thresholds for improvements required for an ED therapy to be considered clinically effective. Results The IIEF-EFD currently represents the preferred standardized questionnaire to evaluate for changes in erectile function post-treatment and is the only questionnaire adequate to assess primary outcomes. To claim efficacy, investigational treatments must demonstrate MCID between cohorts (eg, 2-, 5-, or 7-point median improvements between groups among mild, moderate, or severe ED cohorts) in prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, and adequately powered studies. In studies employing mixed-severity ED populations, a method of calculating an adjusted MCID was proposed based on statistical weighting principles. Similarly, a novel method for analyzing differences between cohorts in meta-analytic studies was presented to incorporate the concept of MCID. Based on these principles, the SMSNA would not support efficacy of a therapy based on statistical significance in a meta-analytic study alone. Similarly, studies claiming efficacy utilizing responder approaches (ie, statistically higher percentage of men achieving MCID between cohorts) would not be acceptable unless the median difference between groups on the IIEF-EFD achieved MCID. Clinical Implications The current position statement provides important, evidence-based data and scientific principles to help define what may be considered as an effective therapy in the treatment of ED. This framework provides a basis that decision-makers, clinicians, and patients may use to help differentiate clinically effective therapies. Strengths & Limitations The published literature is limited by a lack of validated instruments and data defining MCID for ED therapies between cohorts and with meta-analytic studies. The current position statement provides important guidance on these areas of ambiguity pending further, definitive data. Conclusion The current position statement provides detailed guidance on key criteria required to conclude efficacy of therapies used to treat ED.

Abstract Background Ten years after the original publication, the Centiloid framework is now broadly used to harmonize amyloid‐PET quantification, facilitate data sharing and comparison across cohorts, and even assist visual interpretation in clinical settings. We evaluated the global implementation of Centiloids by comparing their distribution and corresponding positivity thresholds across cohorts. Methods We gathered data from publicly available cohorts and reached out to investigators across the world to collect cross‐sectional Centiloids, demographic and clinical information, and visual read data. Gaussian mixture models (GMM, k=2) were fitted to Centiloid values for each cohort and cutoffs were calculated as mean + 2SD of the lower Gaussian. When visual reads were available, we determined Centiloid cutoffs that maximized correspondence with visual reads (Cohen’s kappa). Data was combined across cohorts using random effects meta‐analyses. Results As of January 2025, we included 37 cohorts ( n = 41,678 participants) with heterogeneous pipelines, radiotracers, and clinical and demographic characteristics (Table‐1). The low Gaussian peaks ranged from ‐9 to 10CL; the meta‐analysis identified a common peak at 1CL. The second peaks were more heterogeneous (range=38‐102CL; meta‐analysis outcome=64CL). Across cohorts, the proportion of cognitively unimpaired versus impaired participants impacted the position of both peaks, with better separation in cohorts enriched in impaired individuals (Figure‐1C). The meta‐analysis indicated a GMM‐based cutoff of 19CL (95%CI: 16‐21CL, Figure‐1B); subgroup analyses showed no evidence of significant effect between single versus multicenter settings (17 versus 20CL, p = 0.30), MRI‐based or PET‐only processing (18 versus 19CL, p = 0.88), and no evidence of difference across radiotracers (Flutemetamol: 16CL; PIB: 17CL, Flutafuranol: 18CL, Florbetaben: 19CL, Florbetapir: 20CL, p = 0.78). In a subset of 29,496 participants with visual reads available, binary visual reads corresponded well to Centiloids (common kappa=0.86, Figure‐2A). The visual read‐based cutoff of 24CL (95%CI: 21‐27CL, Figure‐2B) maximized correspondence between visual read and quantification and was slightly higher than the GMM‐based cutoff. All meta‐analysis models showed high non‐random heterogeneity (I 2 >80%) across studies, suggesting non‐random differences in peaks and cutoffs. Conclusions Meta‐analysis‐based cutoffs align well with thresholds from the existing literature. High heterogeneity among studies underscores the need to investigate contributing factors, raising concerns about applying common cutoffs.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has played a critical role in reducing prostate cancer mortality but remains controversial due to concerns regarding overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and inconsistent screening guidelines. In 2012, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued a grade D recommendation against PSA screening, leading to a national decline in PSA testing and prostate biopsy rates. This was followed by an increase in the incidence of metastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis. The USPSTF has since revised its recommendation to grade C, emphasizing shared decision-making for men aged 55 to 69 years. However, variability in screening recommendations across professional societies has resulted in clinical uncertainty, particularly for primary care physicians (PCPs), who frequently initiate PSA testing and urology referrals. This review provides an evidence-based overview of PSA screening tailored for the PCP. We performed a comprehensive literature review using Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, including systematic reviews published between January 2020 and April 2025, and current guidelines from the American Urological Association (AUA), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), European Association of Urology (EAU), and American Cancer Society (ACS). We summarize the evolving landscape of PSA screening and its integration with contemporary tools such as shared decision-making, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and transperineally targeted biopsy. We advocate for initiating PSA screening between the ages of 45 and 49 in men with average or elevated risk, based on long-term evidence demonstrating the value of an early baseline PSA level and risk-stratified follow-up. This approach, coupled with improved diagnostic tools, can help PCPs navigate guideline variability and implement a rational, common-sense strategy to maximize early detection while minimizing harm.

Hearing loss is a highly prevalent disease state affecting almost 1 in 5 individuals globally. Growing research shows that untreated or undertreated hearing loss carries significant long-term sequelae, including increased risk of social isolation, depression, and cognitive decline, among other ramifications. Limited awareness and common misperceptions among the general US adult population and primary care providers contribute to low rates of referral to hearing specialty clinics and underutilization of hearing aids, cochlear implants, and other rehabilitative devices. Comprised of diverse membership, the Hearing Health Collaborative (HHC) was formed in May 2021 to identify and overcome challenges impacting good health care practices and public policy on hearing care in connection with healthy aging. This editorial documents a recent outcome of the HHC derived from a structured A3 process. Specifically, initiative 2, a proposal to develop a simple, clinically anchored staging system primarily for use by frontline providers and patients, is presented. Unlike other common disorders that harbor long-term health sequelae, a corresponding pragmatic clinical staging system—leveraging precedent disease staging convention, based on clinically meaningful outcomes and prognosis for acquired hearing loss—does not exist. The development of this staging system will potentially allow for improved communication across providers and patients, facilitate referral pathways, and ultimately enable patient access to timely and appropriate care.

Abstract Purpose Patients presenting for iliopsoas tendinitis consultation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) often describe a prolonged time to diagnosis and subsequent surgical management. The purpose of this study was to quantify time from symptom onset to diagnosis and subsequent arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening, including number of providers seen. Methods Patients undergoing arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening after THA were prospectively identified between 2023-2025 at a single institution. Time from symptom onset to iliopsoas tendinitis diagnosis as well as arthroscopic lengthening were determined. Number of providers seen, diagnostic relief from preoperative iliopsoas bursal injections, and postoperative satisfaction after fractional lengthening were also evaluated to better quantify indications and outcomes of arthroscopic intervention in this population. Results A total of 44 hips in 41 patients (23 females and 18 males) were included (mean age: 64.7 ± 10.2, mean BMI: 29.9 ± 5.9 kg/m2). Of note, 7 patients (16%) had undergone revision THA prior to iliopsoas symptom onset. Patients had on average 2.2 ± 2.1 years of symptoms and saw 2.5 ± 1.7 [range: 1-8] providers prior to being diagnosed with iliopsoas tendinitis and referred for consideration of arthroscopic fractional lengthening. Preoperatively, 93% of patients underwent at least 1 iliopsoas bursal corticosteroid injection, with an average of 81.1% symptom relief during the diagnostic (anesthetic) phase. The mean time between THA and iliopsoas fractional lengthening was 4.8 ± 3.4 years, whereas the mean time between initial iliopsoas tendinitis symptoms to fractional lengthening was 3.1 ± 2.5 years. At a mean of 11.3 ± 6.8 months postoperatively, mean surgery satisfaction was 8.1 ± 2.6 on a scale of 1 to 10, with the vast majority of patients (89.5%) stating that they would undergo fractional lengthening again. Conclusion Patients often experience a protracted period of symptoms and see multiple clinicians prior to being diagnosed with iliopsoas tendinitis and undergoing arthroscopic management. In patients refractory to conservative management, arthroscopic fractional lengthening can provide high surgery satisfaction, with most patients stating they would undergo the procedure again. These findings highlight the importance of increased recognition and appropriate referral of patients with iliopsoas tendinitis following THA.