Ramanan, Vijay K.

Abstract Background Plasma biomarkers offer improved accessibility compared to established diagnostic modalities for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, current plasma biomarker candidates have not been tested comprehensively in diverse populations, and represent only a fraction of pathways dysregulated in AD. This study seeks to address these knowledge gaps through untargeted plasma biomarker discovery in African Americans (AA), an underrepresented group in AD research despite having a higher risk of developing dementia compared to non‐Hispanic Whites (NHW). Method Untargeted proteomics were generated using the SomaScan 7k platform on plasma samples from AA study participants clinically diagnosed as AD dementia ( n = 181) or cognitively unimpaired (CU; n = 142). Machine learning was implemented to identify a set of plasma proteins to distinguish between AD dementia and CU. Predictive models were constructed by elastic net regression optimized with nested cross‐validation on 6,853 proteins and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The generalizability of plasma protein predictors was evaluated in an external Alzheimer's Disease Research Center cohort of 369 NHW and AA study participants diagnosed as AD dementia or CU. Result Thirty‐six proteins were selected as predictors. Proteins selected by machine learning were enriched for processes previously associated with AD including synaptic dysfunction, inflammation, vascular dysfunction, and amyloid processing. The 36 plasma proteins alone achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 to classify AD dementia in the discovery cohort, representing a 22% improvement over a model including age and sex. The 36 proteins were validated in an external cohort also achieving AUC=0.94, a 35% improvement over age and sex. Conclusion Biomarker discovery combining untargeted proteomics and machine learning identified a set of plasma proteins that could serve as a novel and highly accurate diagnostic plasma biomarker panel for AD. Work is underway to assess the association of the predictive panel with p ‐tau217, medical comorbidities, and social/structural determinants of health.

Abstract Background Clinically available plasma p ‐tau217 assays may be utilized in the determination of eligibility for amyloid‐lowering therapies. Our institution recently introduced a plasma p ‐tau217 assay in clinical practice using a two‐cutpoint approach that optimizes the accuracy while minimizing false positive risk and categorizing ≤20% of results as intermediate. In this study, we prospectively evaluate the performance of a plasma p ‐tau217 assay for detection of amyloid pathology using these predefined cutpoints. Method Patients recruited were being considered for lecanemab therapy at a tertiary care subspecialty clinic. Plasma p ‐tau217 was measured using the clinically available Fujirebio Lumipulse p ‐tau217 assay at Mayo Clinic, and results (pg/mL) were classified as either negative (≤0.185), intermediate (0.186–0.324) or positive (≥0.325). Amyloid pathology was determined by amyloid‐PET and/or CSF p ‐tau181/Aβ42. Result Ninety‐three patients were recruited between November 2023 and December 2024. Of these, 49 underwent amyloid‐PET, 4 had CSF p ‐tau181/Aβ42 measurements, and 40 had both PET and CSF results (with 3/40 discordant cases), for use in the assessment of amyloid pathology. The three discordant cases were considered amyloid positive for purposes of plasma p ‐tau217 comparison. Overall amyloid positivity was 90%. Plasma p ‐tau217 results were positive in 83% (77/93), negative in 6% (6/93), and intermediate in 11% (10/93) of patients. An elevated p ‐tau217 predicted the presence of amyloid positivity with a diagnostic accuracy of 96% (95% CI 90% − 99%). In the intermediate range, 80% of patients were positive for amyloid pathology. In patients with a definitive p ‐tau217 result (positive or negative), the positive and negative predictive values were 97% and 83%. There were three patients with discordant results: one PET+/p‐tau217‐, one PET‐/p‐tau217+, and one CSF‐/p‐tau217+. Clinical presentation of these discordant cases was examined, and relevant findings will be discussed. Conclusion The Lumipulse plasma p ‐tau217 assay exhibited acceptable diagnostic accuracy for the determination of amyloid pathology when compared to either amyloid‐PET or CSF p ‐tau181/Aβ42. This prospective study confirms the utility a two‐cutpoint approach for interpreting plasma p ‐tau217 for the assessment of amyloid pathology eligibility for amyloid‐lowering therapies in a heterogenous clinical cohort.