Citations

TPS1125 Background: Despite the many available treatments for patients (pts) with HR+, HER2– recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (MBC), optimal treatment after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) is unclear. One possible CDK4/6i resistance mechanism is increased expression of Aurora kinase A (AURKA), a key mitosis regulator associated with poor prognosis. Further implicated in CDK 4/6i resistance, high c-Myc or RB1 loss of function (LOF) are associated with transcriptional co-regulation or synthetic lethality, respectively, with AURKA. Alisertib is a highly selective, reversible, ATP-competitive, orally administered, small-molecule AURKA inhibitor with antiproliferative activity in HR+ BC-derived cell lines and BC xenograft models. Models with elevated AURKA or c-Myc expression, or RB1 LOF show greater alisertib sensitivity. Alisertib had activity in phase 1 and 2 trials, including objective response rates (ORRs) of 19.6–20% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.4–5.6 months alone or with fulvestrant in pts with HR+/HER2–, endocrine-resistant MBC. The most common treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia, anemia, and leukopenia. Methods: ALISCA-Breast1 (NCT06369285) is a randomized phase 2 study. Primary objective: to determine the optimal alisertib dose administered with endocrine therapy (ET) based on AEs and serious AEs per CTCAE v5.0 and efficacy (ORR, duration of response, disease-control rate, PFS, overall survival). Secondary objectives: to identify biomarkers of efficacy and alisertib pharmacokinetics (PK). Key inclusion criteria: ≥18 years; ECOG performance status 0 or 1; confirmed HR+, HER2–, recurrent/metastatic breast adenocarcinoma not amenable to curative therapy; available tumor tissue for biomarker analyses; progression on or after ≥2 prior ET lines in recurrent/metastatic setting; prior CDK4/6i with ET in recurrent/metastatic setting. Key exclusion criteria: prior chemotherapy in recurrent/metastatic setting; prior AURKA-specific or pan-Aurora-targeted agents; unstable brain metastases. Eligible pts will be randomized 1:1:1 to alisertib 30 mg, 40 mg, or 50 mg orally twice daily on days 1−3, 8–10, and 15–17 every 28 days, plus physician’s choice of anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, fulvestrant, or tamoxifen not previously used in recurrent/metastatic setting or progressed upon in adjuvant setting; ≤50 pts will be enrolled per arm in the USA and Europe. All pts will undergo sparse PK sampling. Tumor tissue will be centrally assessed for biomarkers, including RB1, MYC, TP53, ESR1, PI3K/AKT pathway, HER2 and AURKA genomic alterations/expression levels. The study will determine the optimal alisertib dose to combine with ET and may identify biomarker(s) defining pts with the greatest benefit from alisertib-based therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT06369285 .

High-grade gliomas, like glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are the most common malignant brain tumors in adults and are treated with the chemotherapy drug temozolomide (TMZ). In humans, a retrospective analysis of patients’ overall survival suggests that morning dosing may confer a benefit over evening dosing. Circadian variation in O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene expression and promoter methylation has been implicated in increased tumor cell sensitivity to TMZ in the morning. Although patient compliance with timed oral administration of TMZ was high in a prospective trial, it is not known whether differences in daily sleep patterns of patients impact the biological time of drug administration or overall survival. Using wrist actigraphy collected from 10 high-grade glioma patients, we quantified the moment of oral TMZ delivery in terms of wall clock time and internal biological time during the months after surgical tumor resection. We found that variation of daily rhythms within and between individuals caused dosing times to vary more in their internal biological time than wall clock time so that, for example, some doses taken by patients assigned for the evening (2000 h) were closer to the patient’s internal biological morning. We conclude that wrist actigraphy provides a reliable and non-invasive estimate of personal circadian time that could improve efficacy and precision of TMZ delivery. These findings may inform personalized circadian medicine and optimized times for TMZ delivery in the clinic.

ABSTRACTObjectiveThere is currently not a marker of disease severity in idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS). Our objective was to characterize iSGS patients' disease severity using endoscopic surgery rates.MethodsThis was a two‐center retrospective analysis of iSGS patients with a minimum of 4 years of follow up following an initial endoscopic procedure (laser wedge excision (LWE) or endoscopic dilation (ED)). Disease severity was classified into Groups A–C, based on whether patients had fewer (Group A), the same number (Group B), or more surgeries (Group C) in years 3–5 compared to years 1 and 2. Disease severity proportions were compared across institutions using chi‐square analysis. Nonparametric testing compared clinical characteristics such as age, BMI, and GERD across severity groups.ResultsThere were 104 patients from institution 1 and 53 patients from institution 2 that were all female and predominantly Caucasian. Both institutions had clinically and statistically similar proportions of patients in Group A (64% vs. 62%), Group B (20% vs. 19%), and Group C (16% vs. 19%) disease (p > 0.05). No clinical characteristic (e.g., age, sex, race, BMI, GERD) was associated with disease severity.ConclusionAcross tertiary care institutions there is a consistent proportion of iSGS patients who either demonstrate nonrecurrent/decelerating (Group A), stable but persistent (Group B), or rapidly recurring disease (Group C). Two‐year surgery rates appear to be an important timepoint for providing expectations to patients on the likelihood of possessing severe disease.Level of Evidence4

Craniofacial surgery requires a multidisciplinary care approach in the perioperative period. In an effort to guide clinical decision making and standardize care, many institutions have implemented craniofacial surgical pathways, describing numerous variables to monitor and specific actions that must be completed by each involved discipline in the perioperative period. Adherence to these pathways can be challenging given the complexity of the protocol and the multiple disciplines involved. In an effort to improve adherence to our institution’s perioperative pathway, the authors implemented a quarterly, multidisciplinary craniofacial operative team meeting to review the pathway and improve the quality of care. The authors report results from a retrospective review of craniosynostosis suturectomy operations at a single site in the 2 years before and 2 years after the start of our team meeting to review perioperative care. A total of 141 operations were included (70 before the meeting and 71 after). Perioperative outcomes and adherence to our surgical pathway were compared. Following the start of our team meetings, there was a significant decrease in the time under anesthesia, patients requiring blood transfusion, and total hospital length of stay ( P <0.05). There was also improved adherence to the craniofacial pathway, with significantly more operations applying peripheral nerve blocks to all locations specified in our pathway with the proper drug contents ( P <0.05). Our findings suggest that craniofacial operative team meetings with a goal of reviewing the surgical pathway and discussing improvements in care plans with all involved providers can significantly improve adherence to operative pathways and surgical outcomes.

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe diagnosis of antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) requires input from several transplant professionals. Bringing clinical and laboratory experts together may help standardize care. Yet, little is known about current global practices of multidisciplinary meetings for AMR management.MethodsThe Banff Antibody‐Mediated Injury Working Group approached professional societies worldwide to distribute a survey on the availability, content, participants, perceived value, and barriers to the implementation of multidisciplinary meetings.ResultsFour hundred two transplant professionals from six continents caring for kidney (90.55%), liver (21.14%), pancreas (20.65%), heart (15.17%), and lung (14.18%) transplant recipients participated in the survey, and 302 (75.12%) reported attending multidisciplinary meetings. Multidisciplinary meetings were more prevalent in academic centers, in high‐ versus low‐to‐middle‐income regions (81.03% and 65.99%, respectively; p < 0.001), and in mid‐to‐large size transplant programs compared to smaller programs. Perceived value included continued professional development (97.68%) and trainee education (95.70%). AMR was reported to be discussed at these meetings by 217 respondents with case presentations reviewing patient characteristics, histology, and HLA antibody data. A third of the respondents reviewed non‐HLA/pathogenic autoantibodies and/or molecular diagnostics, with the latter being more frequently applied in high‐ versus low‐to‐middle‐income regions (46.71% and 12.31%, respectively; p < 0.001). AMR case presentations allowed diagnosis revision, actionable management plans and were perceived as improving care. The primary barrier to the implementation of multidisciplinary meetings (63.27%) was the unavailability of transplant professionals (e.g., transplant immunologists).ConclusionFacilitating multidisciplinary meetings through the remote participation of pertinent experts and incentivizing participation through remuneration, protected time, or continued medical education may help standardize AMR diagnosis and harmonize its management.

Background Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a protein-coding gene crucial for B cell development. It is found on Xq21.3-Xq22 of the long arm of the X chromosome and belongs to the Tec family of cytoplasmic protein tyrosine kinases consisting of 5 structural domains: PH, TH, Src3, Src2, and TK. Pathogenic variants in the BTK gene can fully or partially block B cell development. BTK has been linked to various antibody deficiencies beyond agammaglobulinemia, including CVID. In hypomorphic BTK variants, there are detectable B cells in the periphery that may result in variable levels of serum immunoglobulins and clinical phenotype. Objective Investigate the impact of a missense pathogenic hypomorphic BTK variant (p.Arg525Gln) observed in a large kindred. Results We plan to assess by flow cytometry BTK protein expression in specific B cell subsets in hypomorphic XLA patients in this kindred. The flow cytometry revealed a uniformly reduced BTK expression in B cells (B cells evaluation is limited by low cell counts). BTK expression was decreased with an unexpected bimodal distribution in monocytes. Since both patients were male, XXY syndrome was initially considered but deemed less likely. The unexpected monocyte expression pattern in the current patient suggests possible somatic mosaicism or other genetic factors, or the two peaks are related to BTK protein degradation, and this may differ in specific cellular compartments or change with age, warranting further investigation. Conclusions This highlights the challenges of diagnosing hypomorphic XLA, especially in patients with detectable B cell counts and atypical BTK expression. Flow cytometric analysis of two patients with BTK mutations identified bimodal mosaic patterns of BTK expression in monocytes. This bimodal expression pattern may reflect cellular mosaicism like in mothers who are obligate carriers of XLA. BTK biology with hypomorphic variants remains incompletely understood, particularly how these variants affect B cell development and result in milder antibody deficiency phenotypes, warranting further investigation. This emphasizes the importance of genetic screening in kindreds with XLA and the need for increased awareness of partial XLA among healthcare providers to ensure timely diagnosis and treatment.