Dailey, Seth H.

ABSTRACT Objectives Investigate synchronous lower airway findings during bronchoscopy in idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS). Methods Retrospective analysis of bronchoscopic images from adult iSGS patients (January 2018–June 2021). Images were reviewed for pits, depressions, nodules, and striations distal to the cricotracheal junction. Results Forty‐eight female patients; mean age 56 years. Comorbidities: gastroesophageal reflux 34%, hypertension 34%, diabetes mellitus 25%. All patients had pits and depressions; striations in 48/48, with both longitudinal and transverse in 32/48 (66.7%), transverse only in 13/48 (27.1%), and longitudinal only in 3/48 (6.3%). Spirometry available in 32; 60% showed normal or mild–moderate fixed obstruction. Four patients had FEV 1 /FVC < 0.7; two had asthma, one COPD, and one no obstructive diagnosis; none were smokers. Conclusion Bronchial mucosal abnormalities are prevalent in iSGS and may indicate distal airway involvement. Routine flexible bronchoscopy should be considered during evaluation and surveillance. Level of Evidence 4.

ABSTRACT Background Managing idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) during pregnancy presents distinct clinical challenges. As pregnancy is a naturally dyspneic state, the development of iSGS may exacerbate respiratory symptoms and compromise the airway—potentially impacting pregnancy and delivery decisions. This study characterizes surgical management strategies and outcomes in pregnant patients with symptomatic iSGS. Methods We conducted the largest known multi‐institutional retrospective review of pregnant patients who underwent endoscopic intervention for iSGS. Demographics, procedural details, anesthesia and medication use, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. Results Twelve patients underwent 15 endoscopic procedures during pregnancy: 9 laser wedge excisions (8 CO 2 laser and 1 coblator) and 6 balloon dilations. Three additional procedures in different patients occurred postpartum (2–11 months after delivery). Higher‐risk pregnancies included two twin gestations, one patient with multiple surgeries during two different pregnancies, and two patients over age 35. Most interventions (87%) occurred in the second trimester. Fetal monitoring was performed preoperatively and postoperatively. Fentanyl and propofol were used in 88% and 94% of cases, respectively; rocuronium was the most common neuromuscular blocker (70%). One patient underwent balloon dilation via flexible bronchoscopy without anesthesia. Jet ventilation was used in 53% of cases, and Size C Kleinsasser laryngoscopes in 47%. Median procedure times were 75, 19, and 18 min for laser wedge excision, balloon dilation, and coblation, respectively. Most patients delivered full‐term with no surgical or postpartum complications. Conclusions Endoscopic intervention for iSGS during pregnancy appears safe and effective, even in high‐risk cases. These findings support individualized airway management and inform future practice. Level of Evidence 4.

ABSTRACTObjectiveThere is currently not a marker of disease severity in idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS). Our objective was to characterize iSGS patients' disease severity using endoscopic surgery rates.MethodsThis was a two‐center retrospective analysis of iSGS patients with a minimum of 4 years of follow up following an initial endoscopic procedure (laser wedge excision (LWE) or endoscopic dilation (ED)). Disease severity was classified into Groups A–C, based on whether patients had fewer (Group A), the same number (Group B), or more surgeries (Group C) in years 3–5 compared to years 1 and 2. Disease severity proportions were compared across institutions using chi‐square analysis. Nonparametric testing compared clinical characteristics such as age, BMI, and GERD across severity groups.ResultsThere were 104 patients from institution 1 and 53 patients from institution 2 that were all female and predominantly Caucasian. Both institutions had clinically and statistically similar proportions of patients in Group A (64% vs. 62%), Group B (20% vs. 19%), and Group C (16% vs. 19%) disease (p > 0.05). No clinical characteristic (e.g., age, sex, race, BMI, GERD) was associated with disease severity.ConclusionAcross tertiary care institutions there is a consistent proportion of iSGS patients who either demonstrate nonrecurrent/decelerating (Group A), stable but persistent (Group B), or rapidly recurring disease (Group C). Two‐year surgery rates appear to be an important timepoint for providing expectations to patients on the likelihood of possessing severe disease.Level of Evidence4

ABSTRACTObjectiveWhile endoscopic laser wedge excision (LWE) for iSGS demonstrated lower surgical recurrence rates compared to endoscopic dilation (ED), ED remains the primary technique employed. Additionally, serial intralesional steroid injections (SILSIs) also demonstrate benefits in controlling disease. We aimed to compare surgical recurrence rates following ED, ED + SILSI, and LWE following a patient's first operation.MethodsThis was a two‐center retrospective analysis of iSGS patients who underwent either ED, ED + SILSI, or LWE. Patients were followed to their last follow‐up date or reoperation. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards were used to evaluate the recurrence times across the different surgical groups with additional stratification by age, compliance to medical adjuvant therapy, and percentage of stenosis rated at reoperation.ResultsA total of 126 patients from Institution 1 underwent LWE, while at Institution 2, ED and ED + SILSI were performed on 32 and 23 patients, respectively. One‐year recurrence estimates were 9%, 53%, and 0% for LWE, ED, and ED + SILSI, respectively, while 5‐year recurrence estimates were 45%, 90%, and 19%, respectively. Adjusted Cox‐proportional hazard ratios demonstrated a greater risk of surgical recurrence with ED compared to LWE (2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31–3.88) and no difference between ED + SILSI and LWE (0.84; 95% CI: 0.32–2.25).ConclusionLWE demonstrates reduced recurrence times compared to ED when controlling for surgery number, age, triple therapy compliance, and percentage of stenosis at reoperation. The application of postoperative SILSI appears to similarly reduce recurrence rates comparable to LWE and warrants further investigation.

AbstractObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the impact of parity on the severity and recurrence rates of idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) in premenopausal females.Study DesignA retrospective cohort study.SettingTwo tertiary care centers from 2002 to 2024.MethodsWe analyzed premenopausal iSGS patients under 40 years who underwent balloon dilation or laser wedge excision. Clinical features, including demographics and pregnancy history, were examined. Recurrence rates between nulliparous and parous patients were compared using Poisson regression, adjusting for age and follow‐up duration. Linear regression assessed the relationship between pregnancy and iSGS recurrence.ResultsForty‐eight patients were included, with 36 parous and 12 nulliparous. Adjusting for age and follow‐up, the mean recurrence rate was 2.6 times higher in parous patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.5, 4.8], P = .0008). Each additional pregnancy was associated with 0.81 additional recurrences (95% CI: [0.05, 1.57], P = .0375). No significant differences in surgery‐free time were observed between groups.ConclusionParity and pregnancy significantly increase the risk of iSGS recurrence, although they do not accelerate subsequent recurrences. Health care providers should counsel women of childbearing age about these risks in family planning discussions, emphasizing shared decision‐making regarding potential surgical interventions.Level of evidence3.

Abstract The North American Airway Collaborative (NoAAC) previously published a 3‐year multi‐institutional prospective cohort study showing variation in treatment effectiveness between 3 primary surgical techniques for idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS). In this report, we update these findings to include 5 years of data evaluating treatment effectiveness. Patients in the NoAAC cohort were re‐enrolled for 2 additional years and followed using the prespecified published protocol. Consistent with prior data, prospective observation of 487 iSGS patients for 5 years showed treatment effectiveness differed by modality. Cricotracheal resection maintained the lowest rate of recurrent operation (5%), followed by endoscopic resection with adjuvant medical therapy (30%) and endoscopic dilation (50%). These data support the initial observations and continue to provide value to providers and patients navigating longitudinal decision‐making. Level of evidence: 2—prospective cohort study.

Objectives: To examine whether social determinants of health (SDH) factors are associated with time to diagnosis, treatment selection, and time to recurrent surgical intervention in idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) patients. Methods: Adult patients with diagnosed iSGS were recruited prospectively (2015-2017) via clinical providers as part of the North American Airway Collaborative (NoAAC) and via an online iSGS support community on Facebook. Patient-specific SDH factors included highest educational attainment (self-reported), median household income (matched from home zip code via U.S. Census data), and number of close friends (self-reported) as a measure of social support. Main outcomes of interest were time to disease diagnosis (years from symptom onset), treatment selection (endoscopic dilation [ED] vs cricotracheal resection [CTR] vs endoscopic resection with adjuvant medical therapy [ERMT]), and time to recurrent surgical intervention (number of days from initial surgical procedure) as a surrogate for disease recurrence. Results: The total 810 participants were 98.5% female, 97.2% Caucasian, and had a median age of 50 years (IQR, 43-58). The cohort had a median household income of $62 307 (IQR, $50 345-$79 773), a median of 7 close friends (IQR, 4-10), and 64.7% of patients completed college or graduate school. Education, income, and number of friends were not associated with time to diagnosis via multivariable linear regression modeling. Univariable multinominal logistic regression demonstrated an association between education and income for selecting ED versus ERMT, but no associations were noted for CTR. No associations were noted for time to recurrent surgical procedure via Kaplan Meier modeling and Cox proportional hazards regression. Conclusions: Patient education, income, and social support were not associated with time to diagnosis or time to disease recurrence. This suggests additional patient, procedure, or disease-specific factors contribute to the observed variations in iSGS surgical outcomes.

Objective:This guideline provides evidence‐based recommendations on managing hoarseness (dysphonia), defined as a disorder characterized by altered vocal quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort that impairs communication or reduces voice‐related quality of life (QOL). Hoarseness affects nearly one‐third of the population at some point in their lives. This guideline applies to all age groups evaluated in a setting where hoarseness would be identified or managed. It is intended for all clinicians who are likely to diagnose and manage patients with hoarseness.Purpose:The primary purpose of this guideline is to improve diagnostic accuracy for hoarseness (dysphonia), reduce inappropriate antibiotic use, reduce inappropriate steroid use, reduce inappropriate use of anti‐reflux medications, reduce inappropriate use of radiographic imaging, and promote appropriate use of laryngoscopy, voice therapy, and surgery. In creating this guideline the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation selected a panel representing the fields of neurology, speech‐language pathology, professional voice teaching, family medicine, pulmonology, geriatric medicine, nursing, internal medicine, otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, pediatrics, and consumers.ResultsThe panel made strong recommendations that 1) the clinician should not routinely prescribe antibiotics to treat hoarseness and 2) the clinician should advocate voice therapy for patients diagnosed with hoarseness that reduces voice‐related QOL. The panel made recommendations that 1) the clinician should diagnose hoarseness (dysphonia) in a patient with altered voice quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort that impairs communication or reduces voice‐related QOL; 2) the clinician should assess the patient with hoarseness by history and/or physical examination for factors that modify management, such as one or more of the following: recent surgical procedures involving the neck or affecting the recurrent laryngeal nerve, recent endotracheal intubation, radiation treatment to the neck, a history of tobacco abuse, and occupation as a singer or vocal performer; 3) the clinician should visualize the patient's larynx, or refer the patient to a clinician who can visualize the larynx, when hoarseness fails to resolve by a maximum of three months after onset, or irrespective of duration if a serious underlying cause is suspected; 4) the clinician should not obtain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the patient with a primary complaint of hoarseness prior to visualizing the larynx; 5) the clinician should not prescribe anti‐reflux medications for patients with hoarseness without signs or symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease; 6) the clinician should not routinely prescribe oral corticosteroids to treat hoarseness; 7) the clinician should visualize the larynx before prescribing voice therapy and document/communicate the results to the speech‐language pathologist; and 8) the clinician should prescribe, or refer the patient to a clinician who can prescribe, botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of hoarseness caused by adductor spasmodic dysphonia. The panel offered as options that 1) the clinician may perform laryngoscopy at any time in a patient with hoarseness, or may refer the patient to a clinician who can visualize the larynx; 2) the clinician may prescribe anti‐reflux medication for patients with hoarseness and signs of chronic laryngitis; and 3) the clinician may educate/counsel patients with hoarseness about control/preventive measures.Disclaimer:This clinical practice guideline is not intended as a sole source of guidance in managing hoarseness (dysphonia). Rather, it is designed to assist clinicians by providing an evidence‐based framework for decision‐making strategies. The guideline is not intended to replace clinical judgment or establish a protocol for all individuals with this condition, and may not provide the only appropriate approach to diagnosing and managing this problem.