Ali, Hawa

ABSTRACTObjectiveThere is currently not a marker of disease severity in idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS). Our objective was to characterize iSGS patients' disease severity using endoscopic surgery rates.MethodsThis was a two‐center retrospective analysis of iSGS patients with a minimum of 4 years of follow up following an initial endoscopic procedure (laser wedge excision (LWE) or endoscopic dilation (ED)). Disease severity was classified into Groups A–C, based on whether patients had fewer (Group A), the same number (Group B), or more surgeries (Group C) in years 3–5 compared to years 1 and 2. Disease severity proportions were compared across institutions using chi‐square analysis. Nonparametric testing compared clinical characteristics such as age, BMI, and GERD across severity groups.ResultsThere were 104 patients from institution 1 and 53 patients from institution 2 that were all female and predominantly Caucasian. Both institutions had clinically and statistically similar proportions of patients in Group A (64% vs. 62%), Group B (20% vs. 19%), and Group C (16% vs. 19%) disease (p > 0.05). No clinical characteristic (e.g., age, sex, race, BMI, GERD) was associated with disease severity.ConclusionAcross tertiary care institutions there is a consistent proportion of iSGS patients who either demonstrate nonrecurrent/decelerating (Group A), stable but persistent (Group B), or rapidly recurring disease (Group C). Two‐year surgery rates appear to be an important timepoint for providing expectations to patients on the likelihood of possessing severe disease.Level of Evidence4

ABSTRACTObjectiveWhile endoscopic laser wedge excision (LWE) for iSGS demonstrated lower surgical recurrence rates compared to endoscopic dilation (ED), ED remains the primary technique employed. Additionally, serial intralesional steroid injections (SILSIs) also demonstrate benefits in controlling disease. We aimed to compare surgical recurrence rates following ED, ED + SILSI, and LWE following a patient's first operation.MethodsThis was a two‐center retrospective analysis of iSGS patients who underwent either ED, ED + SILSI, or LWE. Patients were followed to their last follow‐up date or reoperation. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards were used to evaluate the recurrence times across the different surgical groups with additional stratification by age, compliance to medical adjuvant therapy, and percentage of stenosis rated at reoperation.ResultsA total of 126 patients from Institution 1 underwent LWE, while at Institution 2, ED and ED + SILSI were performed on 32 and 23 patients, respectively. One‐year recurrence estimates were 9%, 53%, and 0% for LWE, ED, and ED + SILSI, respectively, while 5‐year recurrence estimates were 45%, 90%, and 19%, respectively. Adjusted Cox‐proportional hazard ratios demonstrated a greater risk of surgical recurrence with ED compared to LWE (2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31–3.88) and no difference between ED + SILSI and LWE (0.84; 95% CI: 0.32–2.25).ConclusionLWE demonstrates reduced recurrence times compared to ED when controlling for surgery number, age, triple therapy compliance, and percentage of stenosis at reoperation. The application of postoperative SILSI appears to similarly reduce recurrence rates comparable to LWE and warrants further investigation.

AbstractIntroductionDespite a recent drive to increase diversity, the global academic workforce is skewed in favor of authors from high‐income countries, and women are under‐represented in the published medical literature.ObjectivesTo explore the trends in authorship of three high‐impact otolaryngology journals over a ten‐year period (2011–2020).MethodsJournals selected: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Laryngoscope and Rhinology. Articles were reviewed from four issues per journal per year, and data was collected on: time of publication; subspeciality; number of authors; sex of first and last authors; country of practice of first author and country where each study was conducted. Trends were examined though univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.Results2998 articles were included. 93.9% of first authors and 94.2% of studies were from high‐income countries.Women were first authors in 31.5% (n = 912) and senior authors in 18.4% (n = 524) of articles. Female first authorship significantly increased between 2011 and 2020 however female senior authorship remained the same. There have been no significant changes in the proportion of published articles from low‐and middle‐income countries (LMIC) over time (p = .65). Amongst the LMIC articles, 72% came from Brazil, Turkey or China and there were no published papers from countries with a low‐income economy (gross national income per capita of $1085 or less).ConclusionsAlthough female first authorship has increased in the last decade, there has been minimal other demographic change in authorship over this time. High‐impact otolaryngology journals poorly represent academia in low‐and‐middle income countries. There is a need for increased advocacy promoting gender and geographical research equity in academic medicine.Level of EvidenceIII.