Jashek‐Ahmed, Farizeh

Purpose of review Identify patient-perceived barriers to head and neck cancer care and compare differences in barriers by country income status. Recent Findings Of the 37 articles, 51% (n = 19) were from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), while 49% (n = 18) were from high-income countries. Of the papers from high-income countries, unspecified head and neck cancer (HNC) subtype (67%, n = 12) were the most common cancer type, while upper aerodigestive tract mucosal malignancies (58%, n = 11) were more common in LMICs (P = 0.02). Based on World Health Organization barriers, level of education (P = < 0.01) and alternative medicine use (P = 0.04) were greater barriers in LMICs compared to high-income countries. At least 50% of articles listed barriers at all three ‘Three Delays’ timepoints. There were no significant differences by country income status for the ‘Three Delays’ timepoints of deciding to seek care (P = 0.23), reaching the healthcare facility (P = 0.75), or receiving care (P = 1.00). Summary Patients face barriers to care for head and neck cancer regardless of country income status. There is overlap in several barriers and a need for systemic improvement in access. The differences in education and alternative medicine may guide region-specific interventions to improve the provision of head and neck services.

AbstractIntroductionDespite a recent drive to increase diversity, the global academic workforce is skewed in favor of authors from high‐income countries, and women are under‐represented in the published medical literature.ObjectivesTo explore the trends in authorship of three high‐impact otolaryngology journals over a ten‐year period (2011–2020).MethodsJournals selected: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Laryngoscope and Rhinology. Articles were reviewed from four issues per journal per year, and data was collected on: time of publication; subspeciality; number of authors; sex of first and last authors; country of practice of first author and country where each study was conducted. Trends were examined though univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.Results2998 articles were included. 93.9% of first authors and 94.2% of studies were from high‐income countries.Women were first authors in 31.5% (n = 912) and senior authors in 18.4% (n = 524) of articles. Female first authorship significantly increased between 2011 and 2020 however female senior authorship remained the same. There have been no significant changes in the proportion of published articles from low‐and middle‐income countries (LMIC) over time (p = .65). Amongst the LMIC articles, 72% came from Brazil, Turkey or China and there were no published papers from countries with a low‐income economy (gross national income per capita of $1085 or less).ConclusionsAlthough female first authorship has increased in the last decade, there has been minimal other demographic change in authorship over this time. High‐impact otolaryngology journals poorly represent academia in low‐and‐middle income countries. There is a need for increased advocacy promoting gender and geographical research equity in academic medicine.Level of EvidenceIII.

ObjectivesTo explore the impact of female sex on the experiences of trainees and surgeons in otolaryngology from LMIC and HIC.MethodsThis study includes perspectives of five consultants and two resident physicians from the United States, United Kingdom, Uganda, Kenya and South Africa.ResultsSix themes emerged from these interviews. Overall, LMIC and HIC women shared similar experiences of microaggressions during patients, working along ancillary staff, related to pregnancy, imposter syndrome, difficulties during job search, and unique barriers as consultant.ConclusionsThe findings of this study highlight that gender disparities are present at all levels in Otolaryngology but can present differently depending on context. Laryngoscope, 133:547–551, 2023