Citations

Abstract Context The detection and management of concomitant pheochromocytoma (PHEO) and primary aldosteronism (PA) is not well understood. Objective To investigate varying presentations and outcomes of cases with coexisting PHEO and PA to provide an approach to its diagnosis and management. Methods We conducted a retrospective case series of adult patients with concomitant PHEO and PA at Mayo Clinic from 2000-2020 and an additional review of cases before 2000 and from the medical literature. Clinical, biochemical, radiologic, and histologic parameters were measured. Results Fifteen patients (53% men, median age 53 years) were diagnosed with concomitant PHEO and PA. The majority presented with hypertension (13, 87%) and hypokalemia (13, 87%), and 6 (40%) presented with symptoms suggestive of catecholamine excess. All patients who underwent preoperative workup for catecholamine excess (14, 93%) were found to have biochemical levels above the upper limits of normal. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) was performed in 9 patients (60%), where 5 (56%) were diagnosed with bilateral PA, and 4 (44%) with unilateral PA. Patients underwent either unilateral (12, 80%) or bilateral (3, 20%) adrenalectomy. Biochemical improvement or resolution of catecholamine excess was confirmed in all cases with documented measurements. Recurrence of PHEO was not observed. Six patients (40%) displayed persistent PA postoperatively. Conclusion Concomitant PHEO and PA is a rare but likely underreported condition. Hypertension with or without hypokalemia should prompt evaluation for PA, while any indeterminate adrenal mass should be assessed for PHEO. Coexisting disease warrants consideration of AVS to determine the laterality of PA to ensure appropriate management.

Abstract Background The increasing incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), has fuelled the need for innovative models of care. We aimed to compare effectiveness of e-health interventions (virtual clinics, telephone consultation, remote monitoring or any web-based health platform) with standard care in management of IBD. Our primary outcomes were to assess the difference in disease activity and percentage of patients in clinical remission at the end of follow up. Our secondary outcomes were to investigate differences in quality of life (QoL), IBD-knowledge & rate ratios (RR) for endoscopic procedures, total healthcare encounters, corticosteroid use, and IBD related hospitalisation or surgery. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Clinical trials registry and Cochrane databases for randomised controlled trials (RCT) published in the English language until November 2020, comparing e-health interventions to standard care for patients with IBD. Pooled estimates of dichotomous outcomes were calculated using the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method. For continuous data, the standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI were calculated using the inverse variance statistical method. Event data were analysed and expressed as RR with 95% CI using the inverse variance statistical method. Random effects model was used. Results Nine studies involving 1841 participants (991 e-health group and 850 controls) were identified. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean disease activity scores for UC (SMD 0.22, 95% CI: -0.04–0.48) and CD (SMD 0.02, 95% CI: -0.18–0.22) in the e-health and standard care groups and no statistically significant difference in the percentage of patients in clinical remission at the end of follow up between both groups (OR -1.05, 95% CI: 0.76–1.45). Higher QoL (SMD 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05–0.34) and IBD knowledge (SMD 0.25, 95% CI: 0.12–0.37) scores were noted in the e-health group compared to standard care. There were no statistically significant differences noted in the RR for endoscopic procedures (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.81–1.26), total healthcare encounters (RR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.93–1.15;), IBD related, corticosteroid use (RR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.51–1.92), and IBD related hospitalisation (RR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.53–1.25) or surgery (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.49–1.55) between both groups. Conclusion E-health interventions are comparable with standard care for impact on disease activity, remission, endoscopy utilisation, total healthcare encounters, corticosteroid use, and IBD related hospitalisation or surgery. QoL and IBD related knowledge were higher in the e-health compared to the standard care group.

Abstract Objective: The detection and management of concomitant pheochromocytoma (PHEO) and primary aldosteronism (PA) is not well understood. Our objectives were to investigate varying presentations and outcomes of cases with coexisting PHEO and PA to provide an approach to its diagnosis and management. Design: Retrospective case series from 2000–2020 at a single institution tertiary center; additional review of previously known cases before 2000 and from the medical literature. Patients and Measurements: Adult patients with concomitant PHEO and PA. Clinical, biochemical, radiologic, and histologic parameters were reviewed. Results: Fifteen patients (53% men, median age 53 years) were diagnosed with concomitant PHEO and PA. The majority presented with hypertension (13, 87%) and hypokalemia (13, 87%), but only 6 (40%) presented with symptoms suggestive of catecholamine excess. All patients with preoperative work-up for catecholamine excess (14, 93%) were found to have elevated plasma or urinary metanephrines/catecholamines above the upper limit of normal. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) was performed in 9 (60%) patients, where 5 (56%) were diagnosed with bilateral PA, and 4 (44%) with unilateral PA. All patients underwent either unilateral (12, 80%) or bilateral (3, 20%) adrenalectomy to treat their PHEO and/or PA. Postoperative catecholamines and/or catecholamine breakdown products normalized or improved in 13 (87%) patients and were not measured in 2. Recurrence of PHEO was not observed. Six (40%) displayed persistent PA postoperatively, where 4 required long-term mineralocorticoid blockade. Conclusions: Concomitant PHEO and PA is a rare but likely under-reported condition. Hypertension with or without hypokalemia should prompt evaluation for PA, while any indeterminate adrenal mass should be worked up for PHEO. Coexisting disease warrants consideration of AVS to determine the laterality of PA to ensure appropriate management.

Arginine-rich dipeptide repeats associated with ALS and FTD inhibit machinery for microtubule-based axonal cargo transport.

Abstract The relatively high cost of anti-TNF agents and looming or actual expiry of patents for several biologics have led to the development of “highly similar” versions of the “originator” drugs called “biosimilars.” The approval of biosimilars has been based on “extrapolation,” whereby approval is granted in licensed indications for the reference product without the need for clinical trials. We discuss efficacy and safety data in support of biosimilar use from prospective studies, switching from originator biologic, impact on immunogenicity, pharmaco-economic, and practical considerations for clinicians.

ABSTRACTBackgroundRapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) occurs occasionally in essential tremor (ET), but polysomnographic REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) analyses have been sparse.ObjectiveTo characterize the amount and distribution of polysomnographic RSWA, the electrophysiologic substrate of RBD, in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and ET.MethodsWe analyzed quantitative RSWA in 73 patients: PD (23), ET (23), and age‐sex‐matched controls (27). None had dream‐enactment behavior history or received antidepressants. Phasic, tonic, “any,” and phasic‐burst duration RSWA measures were calculated in the submentalis (SM) and anterior tibialis (AT) muscles. The automated REM atonia index (RAI) was also determined. Statistical analysis was performed by Kruskal‐Wallis rank‐sum and Mann‐Whitney tests.ResultsSM phasic RSWA was significantly greater for PD than ET patients and controls (12.5% ± 12.8% vs. 4.9% ± 6.7%, 3.9% ± 2.6%), as was SM “any” (13.54% ± 14.30% vs. 5.2% ± 7.6%, 4.2% ± 2.6%). RAI was significantly lower in PD than in ET and controls (0.78 ± 0.23 vs. 0.92 ± 0.09 vs. 0.90 ± 0.17, P ≤ 0.005), but no different between ET and controls. AT phasic and “any” RSWA was similar between the 3 groups. ET and control RSWA was similar in all measures. Two ET patients (8.7%) had SM RSWA similar to PD patients.ConclusionsElevated SM RSWA distinguished PD from ET in patients without dream‐enactment symptoms and occurs frequently in PD patients, and in isolated tremor suggests underlying synucleinopathy. Prospective studies will further validate these findings.

AbstractThis international multidisciplinary document intends to provide clinicians with evidence‐based practical patient‐centered recommendations for evaluating patients and decedents with (aborted) sudden cardiac arrest and their families. The document includes a framework for the investigation of the family allowing steps to be taken, should an inherited condition be found, to minimize further events in affected relatives. Integral to the process is counseling of the patients and families, not only because of the emotionally charged subject, but because finding (or not finding) the cause of the arrest may influence management of family members. The formation of multidisciplinary teams is essential to provide a complete service to the patients and their families, and the varied expertise of the writing committee was formulated to reflect this need. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence. The recommendations were opened for public comment and reviewed by the relevant scientific and clinical document committees of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); the document underwent external review and endorsement by the partner and collaborating societies. While the recommendations are for optimal care, it is recognized that not all resources will be available to all clinicians. Nevertheless, this document articulates the evaluation that the clinician should aspire to provide for patients with sudden cardiac arrest, decedents with sudden unexplained death, and their families.

Treatment is complex for patients with head and neck (H&N) cancers with specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guiding treatment decision-making. Treatment planning for H&N cancers involves a multidisciplinary team of experts. This article describes supportive care recommendations in the NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers, as well as the rationale supporting a new section on imaging recommendations for patients with H&N cancers. This article also describes updates to treatment recommendations for patients with very advanced H&N cancers and salivary gland tumors, specifically systemic therapy recommendations.