Gossard, Thomas

Abstract Introduction Most older adults with isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) are men, yet in younger adults there is greater parity between the sexes. Whether the clinical characteristics between women and men with iRBD may differ remains unclear. We aimed to analyze presenting clinical and demographic characteristics of iRBD in men and women. Methods We identified 130 women and 130 men with PSG confirmed iRBD who were matched for time of polysomnographic diagnosis, abstracted their clinical histories, and comparatively analyzed clinical characteristics between the sexes. Results RBD symptom onset average age (50.4 ± 20.0 vs. 55.4 ±16.9 years, p=0.03) and age at diagnosis (56.4 ±16.7 vs. 62.5 ± 13.3 years, p< 0.01) were younger in women than in men. Injury frequency was similar between groups. Antidepressant use prior to diagnosis (80.8% vs 53.0%, p< 0.01), psychiatric comorbidity (79.8% vs. 50.8%, p< 0.01) and chronic pain syndrome (39.2% vs. 17.4%, p< 0.01) diagnoses were more frequent in women than men. Insomnia (31.5% vs. 18.2%, p= 0.01), hypersomnoence (50.8% vs 37.9%, p=0.04) and overlap parasomnia disorder (13.8% vs 9.8%, p=0.06) were more frequent in women than men, while sleep apnea (43.1% vs. 70.5%, p < 0.01.) and vascular co-morbidity (62.3% vs 83.3%, p< 0.01) occurred more frequently in men than women. Autoimmunity was similar between sexes. Conclusion Women were younger when diagnosed, and had more frequent psychiatric diagnoses and antidepressant use, with different comorbid sleep disturbances and comorbidities than men with iRBD. Key sex differences in iRBD could imply different etiologies and aid accurate and timely diagnosis. Support (if any)

Abstract Study Objectives Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) carries a high lifetime risk for phenoconversion to a defined neurodegenerative disease (NDD) including Parkinson disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy. We aimed to examine iRBD patient values and preferences regarding prognostic counseling. Methods One hundred thirteen iRBD patient participants enrolled in the Mayo Clinic iRBD Patient Registry were sent an email survey concerning their values and preferences concerning NDD prognostic counseling and their experiences following diagnosis with iRBD. Results Of 81 respondents (71.7% response rate), the majority were men (74.0%) with an average age of 65.7 (±9.7) years. Responses indicated a strong preference toward receiving prognostic information about possible future NDD development. 92.5% of respondents felt knowledge concerning personal NDD risk was important, while 87.6% indicated prognostic discussions were important to maintaining trust in their physician. 95.7% indicated a desire for more information, while only 4.3% desired less information regarding their NDD prognostic risk. Most respondents strongly agreed that prognostic information was important to discuss with their family and friends and inform future life planning, and most expressed interest in learning more about future neuroprotective therapies and symptomatic treatments for parkinsonism and dementia. Conclusions Most iRBD patients indicated strong preferences for disclosure of NDD prognostic risk and indicated that prognostic information was important for family discussions and future life planning. Future broader surveys and qualitative studies of clinic-based and ultimately community dwelling iRBD patients’ values and preferences are needed to guide appropriately tailored and individualized prognostic counseling approaches following iRBD diagnosis.

Abstract Introduction Accurate, early diagnosis of isolated rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is crucial given its injury potential and neurological prognosis. We aimed to analyze visual and automated REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) diagnostic thresholds in a current cohort of iRBD patients using submentalis (SM) and individual four limb electromyography (EMG) recordings, including bilateral flexor digitorum superificialis (FDS) and anterior tibialis (AT) during polysomnography. Methods We analyzed RSWA in 20 iRBD patients and 20 age-sex-AHI matched controls who underwent polysomnography between 2017-2021 for phasic burst durations, phasic, tonic, and "any" muscle activity, and automated REM atonia index (RAI). Group RSWA metrics were analyzed with non-parametric comparisons, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine optimal diagnostic cutoff thresholds for iRBD. Correlation explored associative relationships between RSWA metrics, and principal components analysis (PCA) defined determinants of RSWA metric variance. Results All mean RSWA metrics were higher in iRBD patients than controls (p<0.05), except for left and bilateral AT phasic density and duration. RSWA(phasic%, AUC; "any"%, AUC) cutoffs were: SM (6.5%, AUC=90.2; 6.5%, AUC=92.5); L FDS (7.3%, AUC=95.8; 7.3%, AUC=95.8%); R FDS (5.4%, AUC=93.5; 5.8%, AUC=93.2%); Bilateral FDS (10.7%, AUC=96; 15.3%, AUC=95.8); L AT (6.7%, AUC=74.5; 6.7%, AUC=74.8%); R AT (4.7%, AUC=76.8; 4.7%, AUC=76.8%); Bilateral AT (7.5%, AUC=77.5; 7.5%, AUC=77.5%), combined SM/FDS (15.0%, AUC=95.5; 15.1%; AUC=95.8), combined SM/AT (16.5%, AUC=85.8; 21.0%; AUC=88.8),tonic (0.5%; AUC=85.9), and RAI (0.90; AUC=91.4). Phasic burst duration cutoffs were: SM=0.7s (AUC=90.2), L FDS=0.5 s (AUC=83.2), R FDS=0.6 (AUC=85.2), L AT=0.3 s (AUC=65.0) and R AT=0.4 s (AUC=77.0). PCA demonstrated that FDS and combined SM/FDS and SM/AT RSWA metrics best explained RSWA variance and differentiated controls from RBD, while SM and AT alone were less explanatory. Conclusion This study provides evidence for quantitative RSWA diagnostic thresholds applicable in current iRBD populations, and confirms the key importance of FDS to assure accurate iRBD diagnosis. Interestingly, these RSWA diagnostic thresholds are lower than previously determined thresholds, suggesting secular trends toward earlier iRBD detection and heterogeneous disease duration relative to polysomnography acquisition, underscoring the necessity of future large scale prospective, multicenter polysomnographic analyses to determine definitive iRBD diagnostic RSWA thresholds. Support (If Any)

AbstractBackgroundTo examine patient preferences regarding prognostic counseling for idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD). Idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) carries an approximate 73‐91% long term risk for phenoconversion to dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson disease (PD). Previous research has shown that most providers counsel their patients concerning this risk, yet patients’ values and preferences regarding counseling are unknown.Methods122 participants with iRBD in the Mayo Clinic iRBD Patient Registry enrolled. Participants were sent a survey concerning prognostic counseling and their experience in being diagnosed with iRBD.ResultsOf 81 respondents (67.2% response rate), 74% were men with an average age of 65.7 ± 9.7 years. Responses indicated a strong preference toward receiving prognostic information; 92.5% felt knowledge concerning neurodegenerative disease risk was important, while 87.6% felt prognostic discussion was important to maintain trust in their physician. Additionally, 95.7% indicated they desired more information, while only 4.3% would have desired less information regarding prognostic risk following iRBD diagnosis. Most respondents agreed strongly that prognostic information was important for discussions with their family and friends and future life planning, and expressed interest in learning more about future neuroprotective therapies and symptomatic treatments for parkinsonism and dementia.ConclusionsiRBD patients indicated a strong preference for disclosure of neurodegenerative prognostic risk information, preferred more rather than less information, and felt prognostic information was important for family discussions and life planning. This data informs prognostic counseling practices regarding iRBD and other neurodegenerative diseases.