Jagielski, Jack

Abstract Introduction Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is characterized by loss of normal REM sleep atonia and dream enactment behavior. iRBD is strongly associated with α-synucleinopathies and risk for developing Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and multiple system atrophy (MSA), yet phenoconversion risk for long-term outcomes of younger women and men remains undefined. We aimed to ascertain longitudinal outcomes and phenoconversion risk in the Mayo Clinic iRBD cohort. Methods Eighty-nine of 165 registry participants with at least one-year follow-up were included. Retrospective chart review attained baseline demographics, age at presentation, baseline Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, and phenoconversion status (iRBD, PD, DLB, mild cognitive impairment [MCI], MSA, or other). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were analyzed with alpha at p < 0.05. Results 68 men and 21 women had a mean age of 63 years at polysomnographic diagnosis. At follow-up, 64 (71.9%) remained iRBD; 7 (7.9%) developed PD, 11 (12.4%) developed DLB, 3 (3.4%) developed MCI, 1 (1.1%) developed MSA, and 3 (3.4%) developed another dementia. Abnormal TUG (>12 seconds) occurred in 5.9% and abnormal MoCA (< 24) in 23.3%. Phenoconversion rates were similar in women and men (p = 0.44). Older age at PSG predicted phenoconversion, corresponding to a two-fold increase in risk with each 10-year increase (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.15–3.52). Neither abnormal TUG nor MoCA predicted conversion. Cumulative phenoconversion was approximately 1% at 1 year, 7% at 3 years, 10% at 5 years, 30% at 10 years, 34% at 12 years, and 49% at 15 years. Mean and median time to phenoconversion was 7 years (range, 1-18 years). Conclusion We found that iRBD phenoconversion rates were lower than historically reported. Only age at presentation predicted phenoconversion, with risk doubling per decade. At 12 years, cumulative phenoconversion rate was approximately 34%. Support (if any)

Abstract Introduction Emerging evidence suggests that positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment for moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in elderly patients does not improve daytime sleepiness, or quality of life outcomes, despite improving apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). While oral appliance therapy (OAT) is known to be an effective treatment for mild-to-moderate OSA, its efficacy in treatment of elderly patients with severe OSA is unknown. Methods Retrospective chart review of patients ≥ 65 years old with diagnosis of OSA, treated with OAT, who underwent subsequent follow-up sleep testing and clinical assessments, including Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), a measure of daytime sleepiness. Results We studied 66 elderly patients with OSA (31 women, 35 men), including 58 with mild-to-moderate OSA (AHI < 30) and 8 with severe OSA (AHI ≥ 30) treated with OAT. At baseline, patients with mild-to-moderate OSA had a median AHI of 11.6 compared to 41.3 in patients with severe OSA (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in ESS score between patients with mild-to-moderate OSA (median ESS = 8; IQR = 4-12) and severe OSA (median ESS = 6; IQR = 3-9). Following their OSA diagnosis, OAT was offered due to PAP intolerance (n = 32), patient preference (n = 28), or as an alternative treatment option (n = 4). After initiation of OAT, 42 patients with mild-to-moderate and 7 with severe OSA underwent follow-up assessment with home sleep testing (n = 32), oximetry (n = 15), or polysomnography (n = 2). At follow-up assessment, ESS was decreased in patients with mild-to-moderate OSA (median ESS = 5; IQR = 3-8) and severe OSA (median ESS = 5; IQR = 3-7), indicating reduction in daytime sleepiness in response to OAT in both groups. Moreover, 50% of patients with mild-to-moderate OSA and 50% of severe OSA patients saw ≥ 50% reduction in AHI. Conclusion Our study findings suggest that treatment with OAT in mild-to-moderate and severe OSA is tolerable and effective in elderly patients who do not have contraindication for this treatment. OAT should be considered as an alternative treatment specifically for elderly adults with severe OSA not tolerating or improving with PAP therapy. Support (if any)

Abstract Introduction Quantitative rapid eye movement (REM) sleep without atonia (RSWA) recorded during polysomnography (PSG) represents loss of normal REM sleep atonia. RSWA is the neurophysiologic signature of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Visually scored RSWA is a candidate biomarker for synucleinopathies. However, visual RSWA scoring requires expert scoring, limiting widespread application. We comparatively analyzed RSWA in DLB and iRBD using the automated Ferri REM Atonia Index (RAI). Methods We quantitatively analyzed the RAI in 17 DLB and 20 iRBD patients, compared to 20 controls using Hypnolab Software for Sleep Analysis (SWS Soft, Colognola ai Colli, Italy). PSG data were converted to European Data Format (.EDF), and the submentalis surface electromyogram (EMG) signal was notch-filtered at 60 Hertz and rectified. Automatically calculated RAI scores were comparatively analyzed across groups (DLB, iRBD, controls) using Kruskal Wallis H tests for group comparisons, and regression analyses determined relationships between diagnosis, age, and sex. Logistic regression ROC determined optimal RAI for distinguishing iRBD from DLB. When interpreting RAI, lower values represent greater amounts of RSWA, and higher values represent more normal REM atonia. Results Median age was no different between DLB (72.6 years), iRBD (69.4 years), and controls (68.0 years). The DLB group consisted of 16 men and one woman, the iRBD group had 18 men and 2 women, and controls were comprised of 16 men and 4 women. Median RAI was lowest in DLB (0.32), intermediate in iRBD (0.84) and highest in controls (0.96), indicating a gradient in RSWA amounts from DLB patients (highest) to controls (lowest). Regression demonstrated diagnosis independently predicted RAI, controlling for age and sex (adjusted R2=0.64, p=0.0001). The RAI that optimally distinguished iRBD from DLB was 0.48 (specificity 85%, sensitivity 76%, AUC=0.88). Conclusion The RAI demonstrated a clear gradient throughout the Lewy body spectrum; highest (indicating lowest RSWA amounts) in controls, intermediate in iRBD, and lowest (indicating greatest RSWA) in DLB. The RAI is a promising, time efficient and broadly applicable candidate biomarker for DLB and iRBD. Automated quantitative RSWA could be a valuable tool for deep phenotyping throughout the Lewy body disease spectrum. Support (if any) This study was supported by: U01NS100620, R34AG056639, U19AG071754, and P30AG62677.

Abstract Introduction Most older adults with isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) are men, yet in younger adults there is greater parity between the sexes. Whether the clinical characteristics between women and men with iRBD may differ remains unclear. We aimed to analyze presenting clinical and demographic characteristics of iRBD in men and women. Methods We identified 130 women and 130 men with PSG confirmed iRBD who were matched for time of polysomnographic diagnosis, abstracted their clinical histories, and comparatively analyzed clinical characteristics between the sexes. Results RBD symptom onset average age (50.4 ± 20.0 vs. 55.4 ±16.9 years, p=0.03) and age at diagnosis (56.4 ±16.7 vs. 62.5 ± 13.3 years, p< 0.01) were younger in women than in men. Injury frequency was similar between groups. Antidepressant use prior to diagnosis (80.8% vs 53.0%, p< 0.01), psychiatric comorbidity (79.8% vs. 50.8%, p< 0.01) and chronic pain syndrome (39.2% vs. 17.4%, p< 0.01) diagnoses were more frequent in women than men. Insomnia (31.5% vs. 18.2%, p= 0.01), hypersomnoence (50.8% vs 37.9%, p=0.04) and overlap parasomnia disorder (13.8% vs 9.8%, p=0.06) were more frequent in women than men, while sleep apnea (43.1% vs. 70.5%, p < 0.01.) and vascular co-morbidity (62.3% vs 83.3%, p< 0.01) occurred more frequently in men than women. Autoimmunity was similar between sexes. Conclusion Women were younger when diagnosed, and had more frequent psychiatric diagnoses and antidepressant use, with different comorbid sleep disturbances and comorbidities than men with iRBD. Key sex differences in iRBD could imply different etiologies and aid accurate and timely diagnosis. Support (if any)

Abstract Introduction Accurate, early diagnosis of isolated rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is crucial given its injury potential and neurological prognosis. We aimed to analyze visual and automated REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) diagnostic thresholds in a current cohort of iRBD patients using submentalis (SM) and individual four limb electromyography (EMG) recordings, including bilateral flexor digitorum superificialis (FDS) and anterior tibialis (AT) during polysomnography. Methods We analyzed RSWA in 20 iRBD patients and 20 age-sex-AHI matched controls who underwent polysomnography between 2017-2021 for phasic burst durations, phasic, tonic, and "any" muscle activity, and automated REM atonia index (RAI). Group RSWA metrics were analyzed with non-parametric comparisons, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine optimal diagnostic cutoff thresholds for iRBD. Correlation explored associative relationships between RSWA metrics, and principal components analysis (PCA) defined determinants of RSWA metric variance. Results All mean RSWA metrics were higher in iRBD patients than controls (p<0.05), except for left and bilateral AT phasic density and duration. RSWA(phasic%, AUC; "any"%, AUC) cutoffs were: SM (6.5%, AUC=90.2; 6.5%, AUC=92.5); L FDS (7.3%, AUC=95.8; 7.3%, AUC=95.8%); R FDS (5.4%, AUC=93.5; 5.8%, AUC=93.2%); Bilateral FDS (10.7%, AUC=96; 15.3%, AUC=95.8); L AT (6.7%, AUC=74.5; 6.7%, AUC=74.8%); R AT (4.7%, AUC=76.8; 4.7%, AUC=76.8%); Bilateral AT (7.5%, AUC=77.5; 7.5%, AUC=77.5%), combined SM/FDS (15.0%, AUC=95.5; 15.1%; AUC=95.8), combined SM/AT (16.5%, AUC=85.8; 21.0%; AUC=88.8),tonic (0.5%; AUC=85.9), and RAI (0.90; AUC=91.4). Phasic burst duration cutoffs were: SM=0.7s (AUC=90.2), L FDS=0.5 s (AUC=83.2), R FDS=0.6 (AUC=85.2), L AT=0.3 s (AUC=65.0) and R AT=0.4 s (AUC=77.0). PCA demonstrated that FDS and combined SM/FDS and SM/AT RSWA metrics best explained RSWA variance and differentiated controls from RBD, while SM and AT alone were less explanatory. Conclusion This study provides evidence for quantitative RSWA diagnostic thresholds applicable in current iRBD populations, and confirms the key importance of FDS to assure accurate iRBD diagnosis. Interestingly, these RSWA diagnostic thresholds are lower than previously determined thresholds, suggesting secular trends toward earlier iRBD detection and heterogeneous disease duration relative to polysomnography acquisition, underscoring the necessity of future large scale prospective, multicenter polysomnographic analyses to determine definitive iRBD diagnostic RSWA thresholds. Support (If Any)

Abstract Introduction REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) is the neurophysiological substrate of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), a form of prodromal parkinsonism in most older adults. Isolated RSWA (without clinical RBD) elevation was demonstrated recently in older adults following SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) infection, but comparison to controls was not reported. We aimed to comparatively analyze RSWA between patients with previous COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 negative controls. Methods 25 patients with previous COVID-19 infection were compared to 25 age-sex matched controls who tested negative for COVID-19 prior to polysomnography. Patients receiving medications known to increase RSWA were excluded. We reviewed medical records to determine clinical features and quantitatively analyzed RSWA in the submentalis (SM) and anterior tibialis (AT) muscles for phasic, tonic, and “any” muscle activity, phasic burst duration, and the automated REM atonia index. Non-parametric analyses compared clinical and polysomnographic features between groups, with combined SM and AT RSWA as the defined primary outcome. The comparative frequency of COVID-19 positive cases and COVID-19 negative controls who met or exceeded proposed isolated RSWA thresholds was also determined. Results COVID-19 patients had significantly greater RSWA than COVID-19 negative controls in the combined SM and AT muscles (p = 0.00076). Most other RSWA metrics were also higher in COVID-19 patients than controls (p<0.03), except tonic muscle activity, phasic burst durations, and RAI. Isolated RSWA occurred more frequently in COVID-19 (9 patients, 36%) than controls (3, 12%; p>0.05). No patients had a clinical history or polysomnographic evidence for parasomnia behavior or a primary neurological condition. Conclusion Quantitative RSWA amounts were comparatively greater in COVID-19 patients than in COVID-19 tested-negative controls, suggesting association of previous COVID-19 infection with central nervous system brainstem dysfunction in the region of the dorsal pons and/or ventromedial medulla. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether RSWA is a predisposing influence to, or consequence of, COVID-19 infection in these patients, and whether COVID-19 survivors might harbor neurodegenerative risk or disease markers. Support (If Any)