Citations

Abstract Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a precursor to multiple myeloma (MM). Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is a precursor to either myeloid or lymphoid malignancy, depending on whether the mutation is in a gene associated with lymphoid (L-CHIP) or myeloid (M-CHIP) outcome. Little is known about the association between CHIP and MGUS and their combined effect on risk of MM. We examined this question within Mayo Clinic Biobank cohort of participants aged 50 years or older with no prior history of hematological malignancies. Using whole blood, individuals were screened for MGUS using a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry assay. M-CHIP and L-CHIP were defined based on mutations in 56 genes associated with myeloid malignancies or mutations in 235 genes associated with lymphoid malignancies, respectively, using whole-exome-sequencing. Incident MM was identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes and confirmed via medical record review. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals for the association of CHIP and MGUS. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR), with time defined as date between blood sample and the first incident MM, date of death, or 12/31/2023. All models were adjusted for age and sex. Of the 16, 479 individuals (median age 65 years, 45% male) screened, 12.3% were positive for MGUS, 9.8% were positive for M-CHIP, and 1.5% were positive for L-CHIP. There was no evidence of an association between M-CHIP and MGUS (OR=0.97, 95% CI:0.83-1.12) nor L-CHIP and MGUS (OR=1.12, 95% CI:0.78-1.57), including with any MGUS isotype (IgA, IgG, or IgM; P-values>0.22). Next, we investigated the association of these precursors on risk of MM. Median follow-up was 11.7 years (range 0.1-15.1), and 46 individuals developed incident MM. Both MGUS (HR=29.7, 95% CI: 14.1-62.4) and L-CHIP (HR=4.1, 95% CI: 1.3-13.2) were significantly associated with incident MM, but not M-CHIP (HR-1.0, 95% CI: 0.4-2.5). Investigating the combined effect of MGUS and L-CHIP, we found those with MGUS alone had a 27.5-fold (95% CI: 13.0-58.2) increased risk of incident MM compared to those with no precursors. No individuals with L-CHIP only developed MM, but those with both L-CHIP and MGUS had a 129.4-fold (95% CI: 34.4-486.4) increased risk of incident MM. In the largest cohort with screened MGUS and CHIP, we found no evidence of an association between either definition of CHIP with MGUS. However, individuals with both L-CHIP and MGUS were at the highest risk of developing MM. Citation Format: Nicholas J. Boddicker, Cristine Allmer, Danelle H. Moonen, Aaron D. Norman, Angelica Macauda, Alyssa Clay-Gilmour, Janet E. Olson, Mrinal S. Patnaik, Vincent Rajkumar, Esteban Braggio, David L. Murray, Shaji Kumar, Susan L. Slager, Celine M. Vachon. The association between MGUS and CHIP and their impact on multiple myeloma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4917.

Abstract Introduction: With over 80, 000 new cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) diagnosed annually, modifiable risk factors remain unclear. Circadian disruption, linked to cancers like breast and prostate, affects immune cells (e.g., natural killer cells and T-helper cells) by altering their trafficking and proliferation. Some studies (PMID: 30566672, 27611440) suggest long sleep may increase overall NHL risk, including a Mendelian randomization (MR) study (PMID: 32895918). However, no research has examined the causal relationship between sleep traits, including long sleep, and NHL risk, by subtypes. We hypothesize that sleep traits are causally associated with NHL subtypes in European populations, testing this using MR with data from the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph). Methods: We conducted two-sample MR using genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data for sleep traits and NHL subtypes. Only independent, genome-wide significant (p < 5×10-8) Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as valid instruments, sourced from the UK Biobank. Sleep traits included chronotype (153 SNPs), insomnia (48 SNPs), sleep duration (78 SNPs), excessive daytime sleepiness (37 SNPs), short sleep (27 SNPs), and long sleep (8 SNPs). NHL subtype data were from InterLymph: follicular lymphoma (6, 508 cases / 64, 183 controls), mantle cell lymphoma (1, 169 cases / 61, 603 controls), Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (WM/LPL: 1, 697 cases / 59, 333 controls), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (8, 522 cases / 67, 653 controls). The primary analysis used inverse-variance weighted (IVW) random-effects, with MR-Egger for pleiotropy adjustment. Results: Using the IVW method, we did not identify any statistically significant causal association between sleep traits and the risk of NHL subtypes, but did yield several intriguing trends. Long sleep (sleep duration >= 9 h per night) showed a marginally increased NHL risk [Odds ratio (OR) range: 1.51 - 247.9] across each subtype. Short sleep (sleep duration < 7 h per night) showed a similar trend [OR range: 1.25 - 1.81], except for WM/LPL, where we noticed a negative trend. The confidence limit for long sleep was imprecise due to the small number of variants. We did not notice any significant directional horizontal pleiotropy or weak instrument bias. Conclusions: We found no conclusive evidence of a relationship between sleep traits and four NHL subtypes. However, we see suggestive trends of long and short sleep associated with higher risk of some NHL subtypes. These findings align with the previous studies, which showed long sleep was associated with higher risk of NHL overall. Future directions include expanding our analysis to additional NHL subtypes, generating polygenic risk scores, and conducting stratified analyses. Citation Format: Pankhil Shah, Brittany Crawford, Anwar Merchant, Brenda Birmann, Angelica Macauda, Michelle A. Hildebrandt, Aaron Norman, Neil E. Caporaso, Meredith Yeager, Michael Dean, Immaculata De Vivo, Lynn Goldin, Nicola J. Camp, Rosalie Griffin, Delphine Casabonne, Federico Canzian, Pelin Unal, Elad Ziv, Catherine R. Marinac, Alexandra Nieters, Stephen J. Chanock, Mitchell J. Machiela, Michael Conry, Charlie Zhong, Hanla A. Park, Simon Cheah, Jonathan N. Hofmann, Elizabeth E. Brown, Celine Vachon, Susan Slager, Sonja Berndt, Sophia S. Wang, Vijai Joseph, James McKay, Henrik Hjalgrim, Lara Sucheston-Campbell, Karl Smith-Byrne, Alyssa Clay-Gilmour. Association between sleep traits and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma subtypes: a mendelian randomization study in the International Lymphoma Epidemiology (InterLymph) Consortium [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 7415.

Objective: Review the current literature for available treatments for acute cholecystitis (AC) in nonsurgical candidates and provide guidelines for the management of these patients. Background: Cholecystectomy is the gold-standard treatment modality for AC. A considerable number of patients who are not eligible for surgery are managed by percutaneous and endoscopic techniques. There is recent data regarding endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage and emerging percutaneous approaches to address cholelithiasis and remove drains. Methods: An expert panel of surgeons, gastroenterologists, and interventional radiologists reviewed the current literature and provided recommendations for AC management in nonsurgical candidates. Recommendations were based on relevant evidence, with quality and strength assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results: Percutaneous cholecystostomy is advised for patients ineligible for lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) or with reversible conditions, aiming to bridge to cholecystectomy. The optimal timing of cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy remains unclear. In cases where surgery is not feasible, potential definitive treatments such as percutaneous cholecystolithotripsy/lithectomy and cholecystoduodenal stenting should be considered. For calculous AC, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with LAMS is recommended as a therapy for never-surgical candidates if they are eligible for monitored anesthesia care or general anesthesia and there is institutional expertise and minimal intervening ascites. Conclusions: The management of AC in nonsurgical candidates remains a challenge, with institutional protocols varying based on physician preferences and expertise. The proposed protocol integrates percutaneous and endoscopic approaches and emphasizes the need for multidisciplinary collaboration. Further research is required to evaluate these evolving management techniques, as the current literature is limited.

Abstract Studies have identified genetic and epidemiologic factors associated with mammographic density (MD) phenotypes. However, MD-associated genetic variants only account for a small proportion of the total estimated heritability. Interrogating interactions between genetic and epidemiologic factors could potentially identify additional MD-associated loci, expand our understanding of the genetic basis of MD phenotypes, and clarify how epidemiologic factors modulate relationships between genetic variants and MD. We conducted six separate genome-wide, gene–environment (GxE) interaction analyses, applying 2 degrees of freedom (df) and 1df interaction tests, for each of three MD phenotypes (percent density, dense area (DA), and nondense area (NDA)). The six epidemiologic factors considered were height, ever parous, parity, ever menopausal hormone therapy, ever breastfeeding, and months of breastfeeding. We included European ancestry participants from multiple studies within the Markers of Density consortium and the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (n = 4895-16 218 depending on specific analyses). We identified 11 loci with genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10−8) interaction tests including two novel common genetic signals interacting with parity (8p21.2) and ever breastfeeding (19p13.2) for NDA. Our results suggest that epidemiologic risk factors might influence relationships between common genetic variants and MD phenotypes at particular genomic loci.

Background: Latinas with mammographic dense breasts are at increased risk of breast cancer. This randomized controlled trial tests the effectiveness of three breast density (BD) educational approaches on adherence to subsequent mammography screening among Latinas receiving care at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). Measure(s): Adherence was ascertained using electronic health record and survey responses. Kaplan–Meier estimates of the time to subsequent mammogram were used to obtain adherence rates at 1- and 2-years post baseline mammogram. Cox modeling assessed whether adherence differed by patient characteristics or group assignment. Results: This analysis was limited to Latinas enrolled between October 27, 2016, and December 21, 2018 ( n = 946; 66.1% <50 years of age, 53.5% with dense breasts). Adherence rates at 1 year was 24.8% increasing to 51.7% by year 2. Latinas randomized to the Promotora + brochure + letter arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09 [95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.87 to 1.36]) or brochure + letter (HR: 1.03 [95% CI 0.82 to 1.29]) arm were not more likely to be adherent to subsequent mammography compared to the letter only arm ( p = 0.76) . Adjusting for age and study group, having more prior mammograms, being “extremely likely” to get an annual mammogram, and having more confidence to get an annual mammogram at baseline were significant drivers of subsequent adherence. Conclusion: Informational interventions targeting BD education alone are unlikely to significantly improve adherence to subsequent mammography among Latinas receiving care in FQHCs.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) were developed as a result of meetings convened by a multidisciplinary panel of pediatric ALL experts, with the goal of providing recommendations on standard treatment approaches based on current evidence. The NCCN Guidelines for pediatric ALL focus on risk assessment and stratification of risk-adapted therapy; treatment strategies for BCR::ABL1 (Philadelphia chromosome [Ph])-negative and BCR::ABL1-positive B-cell lineage, T-cell lineage, and infant ALL; and supportive care considerations. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for pediatric ALL focuses on the diagnosis of and management of pediatric T-ALL.

TPS311 Background: Approximately 45% of dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the immunotherapy arm progressed at 12 mos (KEYNOTE 177). We hypothesize that dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients (pts) may be more effectively treated with the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 (PD-1) pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-L1 therapy (atezo) alone. Preclinical work demonstrated synergistic effects between anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF as well as between oxaliplatin/anti-PD-1 in murine CRC models, and phase II data showed activity of anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF in chemotherapy refractory colon cancer. Within the AtezoTRIBE 8-pt dMMR CRC subgroup treated with FOLFOXIRI+bev+atezo, median PFS was not reached, with the first progression event at ~16 mos. Additionally, in other solid tumor malignancies, anti-PD-1 plus anti-VEGFr (i.e., HCC and RCC) as well as anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy (i.e., gastroesophageal and lung cancers) combinations are standard first-line treatments. Methods: This two-arm prospective phase III open-label trial randomizes (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H to atezo monotherapy v mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Key inclusion criteria have been simplified on recent amendments to better mirror clinical practice for pts receiving mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo: One cycle of FOLFOX or CAPOX, with or without bev (or biosimilar) prior to enrollment allowed, dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; pts with total bilirubin ≤4.0 x ULN; duration of therapy for up to two years for both arms; imaging frequency on post-treatment follow-up has been reduced; as has measurable disease per RECIST. Primary endpoint is PFS. Assuming the atezo monotherapy control arm has a 48% PFS at 24 mos as assessed by site investigator, we have 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.6 (equivalent to 64.4% PFS at 24 mos) with alpha 0.025 one-sided. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, safety profile, disease control rate, and duration of response. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Harmonization of translational analyses is planned between GI004 (COMMIT) and A021502 (ATOMIC). Sample size has been modified with the accrual goal of 120 pts randomized between the two immunotherapy arms needed for study completion. Enrollment actively continues at U.S. sites. Current accrual (as of 9-20-2024): 100/120. Clinical trial information: NCT02997228 .

TPS310 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines v serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively, or with serial monitoring (Cohort B), will be randomized to FP+Ox v more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate v delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox v FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Current accrual (as of 9-20-2024): 500/1,912. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

Abstract US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or AD and related dementias (ADRD) are decades old and aimed at specialists. This evidence‐based guideline was developed to empower all—including primary care—clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. Through a modified‐Delphi approach and guideline‐development process (7374 publications were reviewed; 133 met inclusion criteria) an expert workgroup developed recommendations as steps in a patient‐centered evaluation process. This summary focuses on recommendations, appropriate for any practice setting, forming core elements of a high‐quality, evidence‐supported evaluation process aimed at characterizing, diagnosing, and disclosing the patient's cognitive functional status, cognitive–behavioral syndrome, and likely underlying brain disease so that optimal care plans to maximize patient/care partner dyad quality of life can be developed; a companion article summarizes specialist recommendations. If clinicians use this guideline and health‐care systems provide adequate resources, outcomes should improve in most patients in most practice settings. Highlights US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or AD and related dementias (ADRD) are decades old and aimed at specialists. This evidence‐based guideline was developed to empower all—including primary care—clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. This summary focuses on recommendations, appropriate for any practice setting, forming core elements of a high‐quality, evidence‐supported evaluation process aimed at characterizing, diagnosing, and disclosing the patient's cognitive functional status, cognitive–behavioral syndrome, and likely underlying brain disease so that optimal care plans to maximize patient/care partner dyad quality of life can be developed; a companion article summarizes specialist recommendations. If clinicians use this guideline and health‐care systems provide adequate resources, outcomes should improve in most patients in most practice settings.

Abstract US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or a related dementia (ADRD) are two decades old. This evidence‐based guideline was developed to empower all clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. An expert workgroup conducted a review of 7374 publications (133 met inclusion criteria) and developed recommendations as steps in an evaluation process. This summary briefly reviews core recommendations and details specialist recommendations of a high‐quality, evidence‐supported evaluation process aimed at characterizing, diagnosing, and disclosing the patient's cognitive functional status, cognitive–behavioral syndrome, and likely underlying brain disease so that optimal care plans to maximize patient/care partner dyad quality of life can be developed; a companion article summarizes primary care recommendations. If clinicians use the recommendations in this guideline and health‐care systems provide adequate resources, outcomes should improve in most patients in most practice settings. Highlights US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or related dementias (ADRD) are decades old and aimed at specialists. This evidence‐based guideline was developed to empower all—including primary care—clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. This summary focuses on recommendations appropriate for specialty practice settings, forming key elements of a high‐quality, evidence‐supported evaluation process aimed at characterizing, diagnosing, and disclosing the patient's cognitive functional status, cognitive–behavioral syndrome, and likely underlying brain disease so that optimal care plans to maximize patient/care partner dyad quality of life can be developed; a companion article summarizes primary care recommendations. If clinicians use this guideline and health‐care systems provide adequate resources, outcomes should improve in most patients in most practice settings.