Citations

BackgroundThe outcomes for patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with adverse clinical prognostic factors such as a high age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) are not optimal. In the current study, the authors performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the totality of evidence pertaining to the efficacy of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto‐HCT) consolidation for patients with DLBCL in first remission.MethodsThe authors searched the Cochrane and MEDLINE/PubMed databases through December 1, 2018, for studies comparing conventional chemotherapy with rituximab (R‐chemo) versus R‐chemo and auto‐HCT. Two authors independently reviewed all references for study inclusion and extracted data related to benefits (overall survival, progression‐free survival, and response rates) and harms (treatment‐related mortality and adverse events).ResultsFour studies (1173 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the current analysis. The median duration of follow‐up ranged from 42 to 76 months. There was no difference noted with regard to the overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.74‐1.37), progression‐free survival (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58‐1.04), or response rates (risk ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92‐1.04) between patients who received R‐chemo and auto‐HCT and those who received R‐chemo alone. The risk of mortality and therapy failure was not found to be different when the analysis was limited to high aaIPI between the 2 groups. Although there was no difference noted with regard to the risk of treatment‐related mortality, there was a significantly higher incidence of CTCAE grade 3 or 4 adverse events in patients who received R‐chemo and auto‐HCT compared with patients treated with R‐chemo alone.ConclusionsThe findings from what to the authors' knowledge is the first meta‐analysis performed in the rituximab era demonstrated no beneficial effect of upfront auto‐HCT consolidation in patients with aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma, including high‐risk clinical groups (high aaIPI).

Abstract The present project was undertaken to determine whether the activation of the EGFR family (EGFR/ErbB2/ErbB3/ErbB4) and its downstream signaling effector ERK1/2 plays a role in enzalutamide resistance and whether treatment with ErbB or ERK inhibitors overcome this resistance. C4-2B (enzalutamide sensitive) and 22Rv1 (partially enzalutamide resistant) cell lines cultured for prolonged periods in enzalutamide, developed resistance to this drug (C4-2B/MDVR and 22Rv1/MDVR, respectively). Whole genome comparison of enza-resistant to parental lines demonstrated that the ErbB signaling network was significantly upregulated in the enza-resistant lines. Comparison of various enza-sensitive and resistant lines demonstrated a strong correlation between phosphorylation at EGFR(Y1068) and enza resistance. Inhibition of EGFR, but not that of ErbB2 or ErbB3 prevented cell viability. The EGFR inhibitors erlotinib and dacomitinib, but not the ErbB2 inhibitor lapatinib, suppressed viability in combination with enzalutamide. We hypothesized that enza-resistant tumors expressing higher levels of EGFR would be more responsive to erlotinib. To test this hypothesis, we compared the effects of erlotinib and enzalutamide, individually or in combination, in organelles from PDX tumors expressing high or low EGFR levels. Significantly, tumors expressing high EGFR, but not those expressing low EGFR, were responsive to the combination. Finally, we investigated the cause for greater efficacy with erlotinib compared to lapatinib in PCa. Comparison of the effects of different ligands revealed that while both lapatinib and erlotinib inhibited EGFR phosphorylation, only erlotinib but not lapatinib was able to inhibit EGF-induced ERK phosphorylation. This indicated an important role for ERK in the mediation of EGFR ligand induced enzalutamide resistance. Continuous culture of enza-sensitive C4 cells in enzalutamide resulted in the development of ERK phosphorylation in these PTEN-null cells that normally do not express phosphorylated ERK, and the newly ERK phosphorylated cells also were more susceptible to erlotinib as well. In support of a role for ERK in mediating the effects of EGFR activation in enza-resistant cells, inhibition of EGFR but not ErbB2 or ErbB3 inhibited ERK phosphorylation, and the ERK inhibitor ulitertinib inhibited viability of enza-resistant lines. We conclude that enzalutamide treatment causes an increase in EGFR ligands that result in the phosphorylation of EGFR at Y1068, which further resulted in phosphorylation of ERK. EGFR inhibitors that prevent ERK phosphorylation were effective in suppressing viability of enza-resistant CRPC cells, whereas ErbB2 inhibitors that did not affect ERK phosphorylation were unable to affect cell viability. These results demonstrate why certain ErbB inhibitors failed to affect enza-resistant CRPC tumors but provide encouragement for others. Citation Format: Thomas M. Steele, Maitreyee K. Jathal, Salma Siddiqui, Sisi Qin, Clifford G. Tepper, Ralph W. deVere White, Manish Kohli, Liewei Wang, Allen C. Gao, Paramita M. Ghosh. Overcoming EGFR and ERK-mediated resistance to enzalutamide in castration-resistant prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4842.

Abstract Background and Aims: Progastrin is a tumor promoting peptide which is detectable in the blood of patients with different cancers. Progastrin gene is a direct target of the WNT/ß-catenin oncogenic pathway involved in tumorigenesis and possibly tumor progression/ treatment efficacy. Since WNT/ß-catenin oncogenic pathway is dysregulated in advanced prostate cancer we evaluated plasma progastrin in metastatic prostate cancer as a predictive and prognostic biomarker. Methods: Metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) states were enrolled in a cohort study of blood sample collection and follow-up for outcomes between 9/2009 and 11/2013. Patients were enrolled in mHSPC unique sub-cohorts before initiating androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); during ADT; at the time of failure of ADT and before starting chemotherapy. Plasma progastrin was measured using the ELISA cancerREAD®. Progastrin concentrations in the cancer patients (test set) was assessed against 213 samples from asymptomatic volunteers from the French blood establishment (control set) and prograstin levels were also compared for each of the above four mHSPC and mCRPC cohorts as well as for association with time to failure on AA for the mHSPC cohort and overall survival for both mHSPC and mCRPC subcohorts. We also determined progastrin levels in patients with two serial samples to evaluate if changes were predictive for overall survival. Results: Of the 523 mHSPC+mCRPC patients 96 were in mHSPC state enrolled before starting ADT; 101 mHSPC patients were enrolled while receiving ADT; 143 mHSPC patients were enrolled at the time of ADT failure and 143 were clinically progressive mCRPC. All cohorts were unique and 246/523 patients had two serial samples collected and analyzed across all subcohorts. The median time of follow up of the whole cohort was 8.34 years (IQR: 4.53-12.97) and 371/523 had died at the time of the analysis. Plasma progastrin levels was detected in 87.6% of all the patients (cut-off value 1 pM, range 0 to 311 pM, median value of 4.7 pM) compared to the control set (median value=0.61 pM; IQR 0.00-1.58). The Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis indicated an area under the curve of 0.84 (p<0.0001; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.87). Of these, 106 patients had a decrease and 140 patients an increase of progastrin levels. Patients with a serial increase of progastrin had a worst overall survival compare to the other group (p=0.019). Conclusion: Progastrin is a blood based biomarker elevated in advanced prostate cancer patients serial increases in progastrin levels during treatment are predictive of poor survival. Progastrin assay might be useful for monitoring therapeutic interventions like androgen deprivation therapy effects as well for advanced prostate cancer patients. Citation Format: Manish Kohli, Winston Tan, Lea Payen, Carole Langlois-Jacques, Pierre Liaud, Delphine Maucort-Boulch, Dominique Joubert, Alexandre Prieur. Plasma progastrin level as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in advanced prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2294.

Abstract Heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in the GRN gene lead to progranulin (PGRN) haploinsufficiency and cause frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 pathology type A (FTLD-TDP type A). PGRN is a highly conserved, secreted glycoprotein and functions in the central nervous system as a key modulator of microglial function. Hence, altered microglial function caused by PGRN deficiency may be tied to the pathogenesis of FTLD-TDP. Our previous studies showed that haploinsufficiency of GRN mutations extends to microglial PGRN expression in the hippocampal CA1 region. In this study, we found that the CA1 sector was associated with less neuronal loss and more frequent TDP-43 inclusions in FTLD-TDP type A cases with GRN mutations than in sporadic cases. In addition, the CA1 region in GRN mutation cases contained more rod-like microglia, which also had reduced PGRN expression. These findings suggest that the profile of TDP-43 inclusions, neuronal number, and microgliosis in the CA1 sector of FTLD-TDP type A cases may be influenced by GRN gene expression status.

The morphologic similarities of the microfilariae and their infrequency in clinical specimens in settings of endemicity present challenges to clinical laboratories in maintaining competence for accurate identification and differentiation.

Background: Considerable craniofacial features of Crouzon syndrome are attributed to the dysmorphology of the cranial base. As cephalometric studies have focused mainly on the facial deformity, rather than the cranial base, the underlying cause of deformity is not as well understood. Therefore, the authors compared the cranial base development of Crouzon syndrome to controls to trace the timing of deformity in the cranial base and face, to analyze their temporal correlation. Methods: Ninety computed tomographic scans were included (Crouzon, n = 36; controls, n = 54) and divided into five age subgroups. Craniofacial cephalometric measurements were analyzed by Materialise software. Results: The overall cranial base length in Crouzon syndrome compared with controls decreased 8 percent (p = 0.014) on average. The posterior cranial fossa shortening accounted for most of this reduction. The cranial base displaced with the distances from basion, sella, and ethmosphenoid to posterior nasal spine shortened by 21%, 18%, and 16%, respectively (all p < 0.01) during life. Although the cranial base angle on intracranial surface remains normal, the angles on facial surface narrowed were reduced. Conclusions: The cranial base deformity of Crouzon syndrome consists of the whole skull base and particularly anterior skull base shortening early, leading to a compensatory widened anterior skull base. However, when this widening did not compensate fully for the rapid enlargement of the brain, the posterior skull base displaced inferiorly and became kyphotic. The cranial base deformity develops sequentially anterior to posterior in a probable cascade of influence pattern. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Interindividual differences in DNA repair systems may play a role in modulating the individual risk of developing colorectal cancer. To better ascertain the role of DNA repair gene polymorphisms on colon and rectal cancer risk individually, we evaluated 15,419 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 185 DNA repair genes using GWAS data from the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) and the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO), which included 8,178 colon cancer, 2,936 rectum cancer cases and 14,659 controls. Rs1800734 (in MLH1 gene) was associated with colon cancer risk (p‐value = 3.5 × 10−6) and rs2189517 (in RAD51B) with rectal cancer risk (p‐value = 5.7 × 10−6). The results had statistical significance close to the Bonferroni corrected p‐value of 5.8 × 10−6. Ninety‐four SNPs were significantly associated with colorectal cancer risk after Binomial Sequential Goodness of Fit (BSGoF) procedure and confirmed the relevance of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and homologous recombination pathways for colon and rectum cancer, respectively. Defects in MMR genes are known to be crucial for familial form of colorectal cancer but our findings suggest that specific genetic variations in MLH1 are important also in the individual predisposition to sporadic colon cancer. Other SNPs associated with the risk of colon cancer (e.g., rs16906252 in MGMT) were found to affect mRNA expression levels in colon transverse and therefore working as possible cis‐eQTL suggesting possible mechanisms of carcinogenesis.