Persing, John A.

Background: Oculoorbital disproportion in patients with craniosynostosis has similarities and dissimilarities between syndromic and nonsyndromic cases. The authors hypothesized that these two conditions have specific individual influences as they relate to development of the orbital and periorbital skeletons. Methods: A total of 133 preoperative computed tomography scans (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 38; Apert syndrome bicoronal synostosis subtype, n = 33; Crouzon syndrome bicoronal synostosis subtype, n = 10; controls, n = 52) were included. Craniometric and volumetric analyses related to the orbit and periorbital anatomy were performed. Results: Orbital cavity volume was mildly restricted in nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis (7 percent, p = 0.147), but more so in Apert and Crouzon syndromes [17 percent (p = 0.002) and 21 percent (p = 0.005), respectively]. The sphenoid side angle in Apert syndrome was wider than when compared to Crouzon syndrome (p = 0.043). The ethmoid side angle in Apert patients, however, was narrower (p = 0.066) than that in Crouzon patients. Maxilla anteroposterior length was more restricted in Apert syndrome than Crouzon syndrome (21 percent, p = 0.003) and nonsyndromic cases (26 percent, p < 0.001). The posterior nasal spine position was retruded in Crouzon syndrome (39 percent, p < 0.001), yet the anterior nasal spine position was similar in Apert and Crouzon syndromes. Conclusions: Orbit and periorbital malformation in syndromic craniosynostosis is likely the combined influence of syndromic influences and premature suture fusion. Apert syndrome expanded the anteriorly contoured lateral orbital wall associated with bicoronal synostosis, whereas Crouzon syndrome had more infraorbital rim retrusion, resulting in more severe exorbitism. Apert syndrome developed maxillary hypoplasia, in addition to the maxillary retrusion, observed in Crouzon syndrome and nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis patients. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Background: Tracheotomy in infancy helps patients with Pfeiffer syndrome survive by preventing respiratory crisis, however, difficulty in decannulation consequently may be a challenge. This study attempts to investigate the regional abnormalities of the nasopharyngeal airway in Pfeiffer syndrome, to provide an anatomic basis for the upper airway surgical treatment and decannulation. Method: Seventy-two preoperative CT scans (Pfeiffer syndrome, n=30; control, n=42) were included in this study. The airway volume, cross-sectional area, and cephalometrics, were measured using Materialise software. Results: Patients with Pfeiffer syndrome developed a 50% (p<0.001) reduction of nasal airway volume, and a 44% (p=0.003) restriction in pharyngeal airway volume. The cross-sectional area of Pfeiffer patients at the choana, was only half that of normals’ (p<0.001). The posterior width of nasal airway in Pfeiffer syndrome was shortened by 13% (p=0.003), and the height was reduced by 21% (p<0.001). The cross-sectional areas at condylion and gonion levels, indicating the caliber of pharyngeal airway at entrance and midsection, were reduced by 67% (p<0.001) and 47% (p<0.001), respectively, when compared with normals. Conclusion: Nasal airway volume in Pfeiffer syndrome is significantly restricted, in length, height and width, along with the choanal stenosis in all cases in this cohort. The reduced anteroposterior length of nasal airway contributes to the shortened maxilla, more than the anteroposterior position. The limited nasal pathway height and width results from the hypoplastic sphenoid. Mediolateral and anteroposterior restricted dimensions are evident across the entire course of pharyngeal airway. Therefore, mediolateral maxillary expansion likely benefits Pfeiffer syndrome patients, in addition to maxillomandibular advancement.

Background Oculo-orbital disproportion in patients with craniosynostosis have similarities and dissimilarities between syndromic and nonsyndromic cases. We hypothesize these two conditions have specific individual influences as it relates to development of the orbital and periorbital skeletons. Method A total of 133 preoperative CT scans (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n=38; Apert syndrome bicoronal synostosis subtype, n=33; Crouzon syndrome bicoronal synostosis subtype, n=10; controls, n=52) were included. Craniometric and volumetric analyses related to the orbit and periorbital anatomy were performed. Results The orbital cavity volume is mildly restricted in nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis (7%, p=0.147), but more so in Apert and Crouzon syndromes, 17% (p=0.002) and 21% (p=0.005), respectively. The sphenoid side angle in Apert syndrome is wider than when compared to Crouzon syndrome (p=0.043). The ethmoid side angle in Apert patients however is narrower (p=0.066) than that in Crouzon patients. Maxilla anteroposterior length is more restricted in Apert syndrome than Crouzon syndrome (21%, p=0.003) and nonsyndromic cases (26%, p<0.001). The posterior nasal spine position is retruded in Crouzon syndrome (39%, p<0.001), yet the anterior nasal spine position is similar in Apert and Crouzon syndromes. Conclusion Orbit and periorbital malformation in syndromic craniosynostosis is likely the combined influence of syndromic influences and premature suture fusion. Apert syndrome expands the anteriorly contoured lateral orbital wall associated with bicoronal synostosis, while Crouzon syndrome has more infraorbital rim retrusion, resulting in more severe exorbitism. Apert syndrome develops maxillary hypoplasia, in addition to the maxillary retrusion, observed in Crouzon syndrome and nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis patients.

Background: We propose a landmark-based, virtual coordinate system, specifically designed for assessment of asymmetrical craniofacial anatomy associated with unicoronal synostosis. Method: CT scans of 33 patients with nonsyndromic unicoronal synostosis were included. Proposed mid-sagittal plane was compared with commonly used sagittal planes: (1) nasion, sella, and basion (N-S-BA); (2) midplane of bilateral frontozygomatic sutures (midFZ); and (3) the skull gravity center plane, to evaluate reliability and validity in the assessments of the anterior and posterior skull base. Results: The proposed midplane is similar to the midFZ plane in describing the direction of the anterior skull base. However, it has less bias than the N-S-BA (P < 0.001), and the gravity center planes (P < 0.001). The proposed midplane measures the direction of the posterior skull base plane, similar to the midFZ and gravity center planes, but it has less measurement deviation than the N-S-BA plane (P < 0.001). The most protrusive point on the frontal bone in unicoronal patients is contralateral to the fused suture and distant from the mid-sagittal plane by 13.93 ± 4.01 mm. In addition, it is more anteriorly positioned, by 5.32 mm (P < 0.001), when compared with the corresponding point on the synostotic side. The uppermost point of the supraorbital rim on the synostotic side is cephalic to that of the contralateral side by 4.09 mm (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Prioritized orientation of an averaged Frankfort horizontal plane, followed by the location of the mid-sagittal and coronal planes, can generate a reliable and valid coordinate framework for the assessment of asymmetric skull shape in unicoronal synostosis.

Purpose: Classic features of Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (SCS) described in the literature include a prominent nasal bridge, eyelid ptosis, telorbitism, maxillary hypoplasia, and mandibular prognathism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate objectively the bony features of SCS. Methods: Preoperative computer tomography scans of 15 SCS patients, 23 normal controls, 13 bicoronal nonsyndromic, and 7 unicoronal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients were included for analysis. Unaffected controls and nonsyndromic patients were age- and sex-matched to SCS patients. Morphometric cephalometrics were analyzed using three-dimensional computer tomography reconstructions. Mann–Whitney U were used to compare facial measurements between SCS and normal and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis controls. Results: Telorbitism was present in bicoronal SCS patients only (P = 0.04) but absent in the unicoronal and bicoronal/metopic cohorts. The angle of the nasal bone relative to the sella was not different between SCS and controls (P = 0.536), although the angle of the nasal bone relative to the forehead was decreased in SCS by 15.5° (P < 0.001). Saethre-Chotzen syndrome had a 2.6° maxillary retrusion relative to controls (P = 0.03). In addition, SCS patients aged 4 to 7 months had a wider (39.34 versus 35.04, P = 0.017) and anteroposteriorly foreshortened (32.12 versus 35.06, P = 0.039) maxilla. There was no difference in mandibular prognathism among SCS patients as measured by the sella-nasion-B point angle compared to controls (P = 0.705). Conclusions: Despite classic descriptions, on morphometric analysis SCS patients did not demonstrate consistency across all suture subtypes in terms of telorbitism, a broad nasal bridge, or mandibular prognathism. Rather, SCS subtypes of SCS based on suture pathology more closely resemble nonsyndromic patients.

Background: Little is known about the detailed growth of the cranial fossae, even though they provide an important structural connection between the cranial vault and the facial skeleton. This study details the morphologic development of isolated cranial vault synostosis and associated syndromes on cranial fossa development. Methods: A total of 125 computed tomographic scans were included (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 36; Apert syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 24; Crouzon syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 11; and controls, n = 54). Three-dimensional analyses were produced using Materialise software. Results: The regional anterior and middle cranial fossae volumes of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis are characterized by significant increases of 43 percent (p < 0.001) and 60 percent (p < 0.001), respectively, and normal posterior cranial fossa volume. The cranial fossae depths of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis were increased, by 37, 42, and 21 percent (all p < 0.001) for anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossae, respectively, accompanying the shortened cranial fossae lengths. The volume and morphology of all cranial fossae in Apert syndrome nearly paralleled nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. However, Crouzon syndrome had reduced depths of cranial fossae, and more restricted fossa volumes than both Apert syndrome and nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. Conclusions: Cranial vault suture synostosis is likely to be more influential on cranial fossae development than other associated influences (genetic, morphologic) in Apert and Crouzon syndromes. Isolated Apert syndrome pathogenesis is associated with an elongation of the anterior cranial fossa length in infants, whereas in Crouzon syndrome, there is a tendency to reduce cranial fossa depth, suggesting individual adaptability in cranial fossae development related to vault synostosis.

Background: Pfeiffer syndrome is a rare syndromic craniosynostosis disorder, with a wide range of clinical manifestations. This study aims to investigate the structural abnormalities of cranial fossa and skull base development in Pfeiffer patients, to provide an anatomic basis for surgical interventions. Method: Thirty preoperative CT scans of Pfeiffer syndrome patients were compared to 35 normal controls. Subgroup comparisons, related to differing suture synostosis, were performed. Results: Overall, the volume of anterior and middle cranial fossae in Pfeiffer patients were increased by 31% (P < 0.001) and 19% (P = 0.004), versus controls. Volume of the posterior fossa in Pfeiffer patients was reduced by 14% (P = 0.026). When only associated with bicoronal synostosis, Pfeiffer syndrome patients developed enlarged anterior (68%, P = 0.001) and middle (40%, P = 0.031) fossae. However, sagittal synostosis cases only developed an enlarged anterior fossa (47%, P < 0.001). The patients with solely bilateral squamosal synostosis, developed simultaneous reduced anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossae volume (all P ≤ 0.002). The overall skull base angulation, measured on both intracranial and subcranial surfaces, grew normally. Conclusion: Enlarged anterior cranial fossae in Pfeiffer syndrome children is evident, except for the squamosal synostosis cases which developed reduced volume in all fossae. Volume of the middle cranial fossa is influenced by associated cranial vault suture synostosis, specifically, sagittal synostosis cases develop normal middle fossa volume, while the bicoronal cases develop increased middle fossa volume. Posterior cranial fossa development is restricted by shortened posterior cranial base length. Surgical intervention in Pfeiffer syndrome patients optimally should be indexed to different suture synostosis.

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea is common in patients with Crouzon syndrome, yet it may be caused by multiple factors. This study aims to investigate the natural history of airway development in preoperative Crouzon patients, from infants to adults. Methods: Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans (Crouzon syndrome, n = 73; control, n = 87) were divided into five age subgroups. CT scans were measured using Materialise software. Results: Before 6 months of age, nasal airway volume in patients with Crouzon syndrome was smaller than normal by 37% ( p = 0.002), and the cross-sectional area at the choana reduced by 45% ( p < 0.001). The reduction of nasal airway volume and cross-sectional area reached their nadir at 2 years of age, with shortening of 44% and 63% (both p < 0.001), respectively. They gradually caught up to normal dimensions after 6 years of age. Between 2 and 6 years, the pharyngeal airway in patients with Crouzon syndrome reduced 44% ( p = 0.011) compared with controls. However, the airway cross-sectional area at condylion and gonion levels was less than normal, before 6 months (35%, p = 0.024) and (44%, p = 0.006) after 2 years of age, respectively. This reduction remains into adulthood. Conclusion: Nasal airway volume is more limited in children with Crouzon syndrome who are younger than 2 years of age. Whereas after 2 years of age, the pharyngeal airway develops significant volume restriction, leading to timing and specific treatment area foci based on the site of temporal maximal constriction.

Objective Previous studies have explored the restricted nasopharyngeal airway in Apert syndrome patients. This study aims to investigate the segmented airway volume changes with age and directly analyze their correlations with subcranial dimensions and angulations. Methods Ninety-seven preoperative computed tomography scans (Apert, n = 44; control, n = 53) were included in this study, and divided into 5 age-related subgroups. Computed tomography scans were measured using Mimics and 3-matics software. Results Before 6 months of age, the nasal cavity in Apert syndrome is reduced by 47% (P = 0.002), which gradually approximates normal thereafter; however, there remained a 30% reduction, compared with controls. It is highly correlated with the anteroposterior length of subcranial space, and the position of maxilla and palate. The pharyngeal airway volume in Apert syndrome patients, younger than 6 months, was larger than normal by 129% (P = 0.013). However, between 2 and 6 years of age, the pharyngeal airway becomes smaller than normal, with a 57% (P = 0.010) reduction in childhood and 52% (P = 0.005) in adolescence. It is closely correlated with the intercondylar and intergonial widths. Conclusions Airway compromise in Apert syndrome patients is attributable more to the nasal cavity in infants, but in the older child, it is the pharyngeal region. The restricted nasal airway in Apert syndrome is correlated with the subcranial space length and width, but independent of cranial base flexion. The pharyngeal airway volume in Apert syndrome is not as highly correlated with craniofacial morphology. Rather, it is impacted by the growth of mandible, which often requires surgical intervention later in childhood.

Introduction: Based on an established classification system of Apert syndrome subtypes, we aim to directly analyze the correlation between segmented airway volume changes and different skull suture synostosis, so as to provide individualized surgical planning for each subgroup of Apert patients. Methods: CT scans of 44 unoperated Apert syndrome and 53 controls were included and subgrouped as: type I. Bilateral coronal synostosis; type II. Pansynostosis; type III. Perpendicular combinations of cranial vault synostosis. CT scans were measured using Mimics and 3-matics software. Results: Type I developed a 41% ( P = .116) reduction in the nasal cavity, yet a normal sized pharyngeal airway. The reduced nasal airway was linked to the decreased cross sectional area ( r = 0.598, P = .001), vertical dimension ( r = 0.719, P < .001), and narrower width ( r = 0.727, P < .001). Type II developed proportionally reduced nasal airway and pharyngeal airway volumes (both 47%, P = .113 and P = .041), along with the proportionally restricted cross sectional areas at choana and condylion levels by 62 to 65%. This reduction is related to the cranial base length ( r = 0.712, P = .048), and also cranial base angulation ( r = 0.780, P = .023). Nasal and pharyngeal airway developed normal volume in type III. However, the cross sectional areas at the gonion level diminished by 74% ( P < .001). Conclusion: Airway development is influenced by subtype of Apert suture synostosis. Type II pansynostosis Apert patients developed synchronous reduced nasal and pharyngeal airways, which is correlated with the slightly flattened cranial base. Type I bicoronal patients have a smaller nasal cavity, but normally sized hypopharynx. Yet, type III patients developed normal nasopharyngeal airway volume overall.