Mozaffari, Mohammad Ali

Purpose: Classic features of Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (SCS) described in the literature include a prominent nasal bridge, eyelid ptosis, telorbitism, maxillary hypoplasia, and mandibular prognathism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate objectively the bony features of SCS. Methods: Preoperative computer tomography scans of 15 SCS patients, 23 normal controls, 13 bicoronal nonsyndromic, and 7 unicoronal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients were included for analysis. Unaffected controls and nonsyndromic patients were age- and sex-matched to SCS patients. Morphometric cephalometrics were analyzed using three-dimensional computer tomography reconstructions. Mann–Whitney U were used to compare facial measurements between SCS and normal and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis controls. Results: Telorbitism was present in bicoronal SCS patients only (P = 0.04) but absent in the unicoronal and bicoronal/metopic cohorts. The angle of the nasal bone relative to the sella was not different between SCS and controls (P = 0.536), although the angle of the nasal bone relative to the forehead was decreased in SCS by 15.5° (P < 0.001). Saethre-Chotzen syndrome had a 2.6° maxillary retrusion relative to controls (P = 0.03). In addition, SCS patients aged 4 to 7 months had a wider (39.34 versus 35.04, P = 0.017) and anteroposteriorly foreshortened (32.12 versus 35.06, P = 0.039) maxilla. There was no difference in mandibular prognathism among SCS patients as measured by the sella-nasion-B point angle compared to controls (P = 0.705). Conclusions: Despite classic descriptions, on morphometric analysis SCS patients did not demonstrate consistency across all suture subtypes in terms of telorbitism, a broad nasal bridge, or mandibular prognathism. Rather, SCS subtypes of SCS based on suture pathology more closely resemble nonsyndromic patients.

Background: Little is known about the detailed growth of the sphenoidal and temporal bones, even though they contribute significantly to the cranial base and cranial fossa skeletons. They also serve to connect the cranial vault with facial structure. This study details their morphologic development in isolated bicoronal synostosis and associated syndromes. Methods: Eighty-one CT scans were included (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 28; Apert syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 19; Crouzon syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 8; and controls, n = 26), and measured using Materialize software. Results: Sphenoidal and temporal bone volumes in nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis are reduced 23% (P = 0.005) and 24%(P = 0.003) at 6 months of age, compared to controls. Apert and Crouzon syndrome patients developed similar reduced volumes. The greater wing of the sphenoid and pterygoid processes in nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis are initially inferiorly rotated at 2 months of age, by 9.60° (P = 0.002) and 4.33° (P = 0.023), respectively. In Apert syndrome, these rotations were reduced by 4.82° (P = 0.003) and 12.60° (P < 0.001), (like Crouzon syndrome). However, in Apert syndrome, the length of pterygoid processes is shortened by 11% (P = 0.018) compared to nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. Crouzon syndrome skulls did not develop a statistically significant shortening relative to nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. Mediolateral expansion of the sphenoid in nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis was less than normal (P = 0.023), and it was further reduced in syndromic skulls. Conclusion: Isolated bicoronal synostosis tends to reduce the volume of sphenoidal and temporal bones, and inferior and posterior rotation of the entire sphenoid. Syndromic conditions restrict sphenoidal rotation, and limit the expansion of sphenoidal greater wing and pterygoid plate.

Background: The association of isolated craniosynostosis and the influence of syndromic forms confound the understanding of craniofacial morphologic development. This study attempts to clarify the individual influences of isolated bicoronal synostosis, Apert syndrome, and Crouzon syndromes on skull base morphology. Methods:: One hundred seventeen computed tomographic scans were included (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 36; Apert syndrome with bicoronal synostosis, n = 25; Crouzon syndrome with bicoronal synostosis, n = 11; controls, n = 45). Cephalometric measurements were analyzed using Materialise software. Results: Nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis patients developed a shortened cranial base length, with a significantly shortened distance between nasion and sella (p = 0.005). The cranial base angles of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis in both the cranial side (N-S-BA) and facial side (N-SO-BA) increased significantly, by 17.04 degrees (p < 0.001) and 11.75 degrees (p < 0.001), respectively. However, both the N-S-BA and N-SO-BA angles of Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome were narrowed more than that of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis [by 12.11 degrees (p < 0.001) and 12.44 degrees (p < 0.001), respectively, in Apert syndrome; and by 11.66 degrees (p = 0.007) and 13.71 degrees (p = 0.007), respectively, in Crouzon syndrome]. However, there is no statistically significant difference of these two angles between Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome, when they were only associated with bicoronal synostosis. Contrary to the relatively normal subcranial space of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, both Apert and Crouzon syndromes developed a reduced subcranial space. Conclusions: Isolated bicoronal synostosis resulted in a flattened cranial base, whereas Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome developed a normal cranial base angle when only associated with bicoronal synostosis. The syndromic skulls had additional significantly reduced subcranial space.