Citations

Abstract Study Objectives Narcolepsy is a chronic condition affecting the sleep/wake cycle that is challenging to diagnose. Epidemiological data from large US-focused studies remain limited, with no validated claims-based case selection definitions for narcolepsy. We estimated the prevalence/incidence of diagnosed narcolepsy (type 1 [NT1], type 2 [NT2], overall) in an insured US population using validated, claims-based narcolepsy case definitions. Materials and Methods This observational study used HealthVerity administrative claims-linked electronic medical records to develop case definitions identifying individuals with NT1, NT2, and overall narcolepsy from diagnosis, medication, and procedure codes. Claims-based case definition performance (NT1, NT2, overall narcolepsy) was assessed using positive predictive values (PPVs). Prevalence (per 100 000 persons, on December 31, 2023) and annual incidence (per 100 000 person-years [PY], 2020 − 2023) were calculated/adjusted using PPVs for each case definition. Results Unadjusted point prevalence among individuals with ≥12 months of continuous enrollment were 15.5/100 000 (NT1), 51.1/100 000 (NT2), and 67.0/100 000 (overall narcolepsy). Unadjusted incidence rates were stable from 2020 − 2023 for NT1 (range, 2.0 − 2.3/100 000 PY) but declined across years for NT2 (9.1 − 7.6/100 000 PY) and overall narcolepsy (11.3 − 9.6/100 000 PY). PPVs (95% confidence interval) of NT1, NT2, and overall narcolepsy were 0.81 (0.72 − 0.88), 0.84 (0.75 − 0.91), and 0.80 (0.71 − 0.87), contributing to epidemiologic estimates being reduced by ~20% after PPV adjustment. Prevalence and incidence were higher in females than males. Individuals with NT1 were ~ 4 years younger versus NT2. Conclusions Validated definitions for narcolepsy can reduce potential misclassification. Our findings highlight a relatively low NT1 prevalence in the US. In contrast, NT2 prevalence estimates were > 3 times higher than NT1.

COASY-related disorders (CRDs) are a spectrum of autosomal recessive conditions caused by the dysfunction of CoA synthase, an enzyme responsible for the final steps of CoA synthesis. Clinical manifestations of CRDs are highly variable, ranging from perinatal lethal pontocerebellar hypoplasia to childhood-onset neurodegenerative brain iron accumulation, which is often recognized after clinical regression. Recent reports have described a few individuals with CRD who screened positive for carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I deficiency by newborn screening (NBS). However, heterogeneous clinical presentations, conflicting biochemical/molecular sequencing of CPT1A, and a lack of metabolic characterization have led to lengthy, costly diagnostic journeys. To address some of these aspects, this investigation retrospectively evaluated NBS acylcarnitine patterns in five CRD cases using Collaborative Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR). A total of 25 metabolites/ratios were identified to deviate significantly from reference ranges and were primarily composed of elevated free carnitine and reduced long-chain acylcarnitine levels. While low acylcarnitine concentrations are often not reported due to a lack of lower reference cutoffs, ratios involving these metabolites relative to short-chain acylcarnitines could aid in identifying CRD cases via NBS. When comparing this pattern to CPT-Ia cases, we confirmed a nearly identical acylcarnitine pattern between these, and thus support the need to consider CRD in cases with NBS results suggestive of CPT-Ia. This study is the first case series to characterize NBS patterns in patients with CRD and highlights the unique opportunity for early detection, particularly in cases that are neonatally asymptomatic and have unremarkable confirmatory biochemical results.

ABSTRACT Negative pressure wound therapy relies on suction, commonly set to −125 mmHg, to evacuate wound fluid, but dysvascular and pressure injuries often respond unpredictably. Newton's third law indicates that negative pressure applies an equal and opposite contact pressure on the wound surface, and this study quantified this contact pressure across dressing types, wound configurations and suction levels. Using a porcine explant model, central and peripheral contact pressure measurements were obtained beneath black reticulated open cell foam, white foam and a novel thermoplastic elastomer dressing across plexiglass, intact skin, shallow and deep wounds under −50, −75 and −125 mmHg. Contact pressure increased proportionally with negative pressure, and multivariable modelling demonstrated that dressing type, wound type and suction level significantly influenced pressure, with negative pressure explaining most of the variance (0.77 and 0.68). Thermoplastic elastomer at −50 mmHg in deep wounds produced the lowest contact pressure, whereas black reticulated open cell foam and white foam at −125 mmHg generated elevated contact pressures of approximately +125 to +195 mmHg. These findings show that black reticulated open cell foam at conventional −125 mmHg can create hypoperfusion conditions, whereas thermoplastic elastomer consistently produces the lowest pressures and may enhance perfusion at lower suction levels, offering a physiologic explanation for improved clinical outcomes in dysvascular and pressure injuries treated with reduced negative pressure.

Abstract Complete response (CR) is an important treatment goal in follicular lymphoma (FL). In relapsed or refractory (R/R) FL, CR rates decline, and disease progression accelerates with each treatment line, with particularly poor outcomes in patients with high‐risk features. Odronextamab, a CD20 × CD3 bispecific antibody, demonstrated deep, durable responses and generally manageable safety in R/R FL in the Phase 2 ELM‐2 study (NCT03888105); we present an exploratory analysis in patients who attained a CR. Patients received intravenous odronextamab with step‐up dosing in Cycle 1, 80 mg weekly in Cycles 2–4, then 160 mg once every 2 weeks until disease progression or other protocol‐defined reason for discontinuation. Patients with CR lasting ≥9 months switched to dosing once every 4 weeks. Overall, 73.4% (94/128) of patients attained CR, 93.6% (88/94) by first response assessment (~Week 12). Median time to CR was 2.7 months (range 2.3–7.9). Median duration of CR was 25.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 20.5–not evaluable [NE]) overall and 23.7 months (18.2–NE) in patients with high‐risk features. Overall, 79.5% (35/44) of patients who switched to Q4W dosing maintained CR at last assessment. Patients with low/undetectable CD20 expression by immunohistochemistry (<10% CD20 + cells) or RNA sequencing (messenger RNA < 500 transcripts per million) could achieve CR. Median progression‐free survival was 27.8 months (95% CI 23.0–NE) in patients with CR and not reached in those with undetectable circulating tumor DNA at Week 12. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) led to treatment discontinuation in 16.0% of patients with CR; the most common TEAE was cytokine release syndrome (56.4%). This generally manageable safety profile and the sustainability of CRs support odronextamab as a potential long‐term treatment for heavily pretreated R/R FL.

Background/Objectives: While doxorubicin (DOX) and trastuzumab (TRZ) improve overall survival in women with breast cancer, these two anti-cancer drugs increase the risk of developing heart failure. As a novel and largely unexplored approach, our aim was to evaluate whether the prophylactic use of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin (EMPA), with and without the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril (PER), is cardioprotective in preventing DOX + TRZ-mediated cardiotoxicity. Methods: In a chronic in vivo murine model, female mice received prophylactic treatment with PER (3 mg/kg), EMPA (10 mg/kg), or EMPA + PER via oral gavage for a total of 3 weeks as a run-in period prior to weekly administration of DOX + TRZ (8 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg, respectively) intraperitoneally for an additional 3 weeks (total of 6 weeks). Results: In mice treated with DOX + TRZ, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased from 75 ± 2% at baseline to 40 ± 4% at week 6. Prophylactic treatment with either PER, EMPA, or EMPA+PER improved LVEF to 58 ± 3%, 66 ± 3%, and 67 ± 4% at week 6, respectively (p < 0.05). Histological analyses confirmed significant disruption of myofibrils, vacuolization, and loss of sarcomere integrity in the DOX + TRZ-treated mice. Prophylactic administration with PER, EMPA, or EMPA + PER, however, improved myofibril integrity at week 6 in mice receiving DOX + TRZ. Finally, although the Bax/Bcl-xL ratio was significantly elevated by 1.5-fold in mice treated with DOX + TRZ, this marker of apoptosis was attenuated by prophylactic treatment with either PER, EMPA, or EMPA + PER. Conclusions: Prophylactic administration of EMPA mitigated adverse cardiovascular remodeling in a chronic in vivo model of DOX + TRZ-mediated cardiotoxicity.

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in tumor progression and therapeutic response. Monocytes and macrophages, depending on their phenotype, can either enhance anti-tumor immunity or promote tumor growth by regulating cytokines such as IL-6. Multiple myeloma (MM), a hematologic malignancy, expresses the IL-6 receptor CD126 on its surface. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells targeting CD126 have been developed and shown to effectively eliminate CD126-positive tumor cells. However, interactions between macrophages, myeloma cells, and CAR-T cells require further investigation to optimize treatment strategies and minimize adverse effects. In this study, THP-1-derived macrophages, CD126 CAR-T cells, and MM cells, especially RPMI 8226 cells, were used to explore these interactions. A reduced cell population and an increased apoptosis of RPMI 8226 cells were observed in the presence of M1 macrophages. Metformin, known to influence IL-6 production, reduced the viability of RPMI 8226 cells with decreased CD126 expression. However, the killing activity of CD126 CAR-T cells against RPMI 8226 cells decreased after co-culture with macrophages, likely due to interactions between the CAR-T cells and the macrophages. These findings highlight the significant role of macrophages and inflammatory responses in MM progression and in modulating the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy, providing valuable insights for the optimization of immunotherapeutic strategies.

Abstract In both type 1 and type 2 diabetes (T1D and T2D), insulin-producing β cells undergo progressive dysfunction due to inflammation, leading to impaired glucose responsiveness, dedifferentiation, and cell loss. While bile acid (BA) dysregulation under diabetic conditions is known to influence metabolic and inflammatory pathways, its mechanistic role in β cell regulation remains incompletely defined 1–3 . Here we show that bile acid sensor Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal motif (BET) signaling cooperatively regulates β cell inflammatory response and β cell identity. We identified the physiological protein-protein interaction between FXR and the bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) as a regulatory axis that protects against β cell dysfunction. We show that FXR activation by Fexaramine (Fex) together with BRD4 inhibition by JQ1 synergistically suppressed IL-1β-induced inflammation while also improving β cell identity and insulin secretion in both db/db model and high-fat diet (HFD) plus multi low-dose streptozotocin (MLD-STZ) model of diabetes. Importantly, this cooperative effect is abolished in β cell–specific FXR knockout (βFXRKO) mice, establishing that FXR is required for the functional synergy between these pathways in vivo . Mechanistically, structure-guided modeling and mutational analyses identified a direct interaction between FXR and the BD2 domain of BRD4, depending on specific lysine acetylation sites. Additionally, inhibition of the BD2 domain of BET combined with FXR activation markedly improved β cell survival in human T1D and T2D models established from human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived islet-like organoids (HILOs). Collectively, these findings establish a BA–bromodomain axis as a transcriptional interface linking metabolic signaling and chromatin regulation, and highlight FXR–BET targeting as a promising strategy to counter progressive β cell failure in diabetes.

PURPOSE GBM AGILE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03970447 ) is a phase II/III Bayesian adaptive platform registration trial testing multiple arms against a common control; the primary end point is overall survival (OS). Regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, showed OS benefit in recurrent (RD) glioblastoma in the phase II REGOMA trial and entered GBM AGILE as the first investigational arm. METHODS Patient subtypes included in the regorafenib arm of GBM AGILE were newly diagnosed unmethylated (NDU) and RD glioblastoma. Prospective defined sets of subtypes, or arm signatures, were NDU, RD, and all (NDU + RD). As the first investigational arm in GBM AGILE, regorafenib was equally randomized to the control arm. Treatment in the control arm is temozolomide + radiotherapy (in newly diagnosed) or lomustine (in RD). Efficacy was assessed by OS hazard ratio (HR), arm/control, and demonstrated when the Bayesian probability of benefit (HR <1.00) was ≥98%. Analysis was performed monthly for limited efficacy, which occurs when the Bayesian predictive power is <25% for all signatures, and determines stopping enrollment. Follow-up continued for 12 months after accrual stopped. RESULTS When the predictive power was <25% in all predefined signatures for regorafenib, accrual stopped for limited efficacy. The final analysis did not demonstrate OS improvement in the regorafenib arm in RD nor NDU glioblastoma. Median HRs were 1.05 (NDU), 1.07 (RD), and 1.07 (all) with final probabilities of benefit (HR <1.00) of 0.421 (NDU), 0.312 (RD), and 0.296 (all). Regorafenib was associated with increased toxicity relative to control. CONCLUSION GBM AGILE did not show superiority of regorafenib over control in RD (lomustine) or NDU (temozolomide + radiotherapy) glioblastoma, yet caused increased toxicities. Regorafenib has been removed from National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines as a treatment option for RD.

Background In low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) is practically used to define low flow and prompt dobutamine stress echocardiography to discern pseudo-severe AS. In patients with preserved LVEF, stroke volume index (SVI) <35 mL/m² is typically used. However, both are volume-based surrogates. Transaortic flow rate (TAFR), calculated as stroke volume divided by left ventricular ejection time, may better reflect true flow. Nonetheless, comparative data between TAFR and established metrics remain limited. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of TAFR in symptomatic low-gradient severe AS. Methods We retrospectively identified patients with low-gradient severe AS (AVA ≤1 cm 2 and peak velocity (Vmax) <4 m/s or mean gradient (MG) <40 mm Hg) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement at Mayo Clinic sites (2017–2023). The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results Among 475 patients included (mean age 85±8 years; 49% women), 242 (51%) had TAFR <220 mL/s, 165 (35%) had EF <50%, and 221 (47%) had SVI <35 mL/m 2 . Low TAFR was significantly associated with higher 1-year mortality even after stratifying by EF or SVI. In multivariate analysis, TAFR was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 2.38; 95% CI 1.19 to 4.76, p=0.014) after adjusting for reduced LVEF, low SVI, gender, chronic kidney disease and mitral and tricuspid regurgitation. Conclusions In patients with symptomatic low-gradient severe AS, low TAFR, not SVI or LVEF, is independently associated with mortality and may offer more accurate measure of flow state for clinical staging.

Abstract A short diagnosis-to-treatment interval independently predicts inferior outcomes in follicular lymphoma. Using international discovery and validation cohorts, we demonstrate its prognostic value beyond established prognostic indices, with implications for risk stratification, clinical trial design, and interpretation.