Connelly, Jennifer

PURPOSE GBM AGILE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03970447 ) is a phase II/III Bayesian adaptive platform registration trial testing multiple arms against a common control; the primary end point is overall survival (OS). Regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, showed OS benefit in recurrent (RD) glioblastoma in the phase II REGOMA trial and entered GBM AGILE as the first investigational arm. METHODS Patient subtypes included in the regorafenib arm of GBM AGILE were newly diagnosed unmethylated (NDU) and RD glioblastoma. Prospective defined sets of subtypes, or arm signatures, were NDU, RD, and all (NDU + RD). As the first investigational arm in GBM AGILE, regorafenib was equally randomized to the control arm. Treatment in the control arm is temozolomide + radiotherapy (in newly diagnosed) or lomustine (in RD). Efficacy was assessed by OS hazard ratio (HR), arm/control, and demonstrated when the Bayesian probability of benefit (HR <1.00) was ≥98%. Analysis was performed monthly for limited efficacy, which occurs when the Bayesian predictive power is <25% for all signatures, and determines stopping enrollment. Follow-up continued for 12 months after accrual stopped. RESULTS When the predictive power was <25% in all predefined signatures for regorafenib, accrual stopped for limited efficacy. The final analysis did not demonstrate OS improvement in the regorafenib arm in RD nor NDU glioblastoma. Median HRs were 1.05 (NDU), 1.07 (RD), and 1.07 (all) with final probabilities of benefit (HR <1.00) of 0.421 (NDU), 0.312 (RD), and 0.296 (all). Regorafenib was associated with increased toxicity relative to control. CONCLUSION GBM AGILE did not show superiority of regorafenib over control in RD (lomustine) or NDU (temozolomide + radiotherapy) glioblastoma, yet caused increased toxicities. Regorafenib has been removed from National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines as a treatment option for RD.

Abstract Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI measures of brain tumor cerebral blood volume (CBV) are able to predict grade, overall survival and response to treatment. Wide-spread acceptance of DSC-MRI has been challenged by the need to balance contrast agent dose and CBV accuracy. The goal of this study was to identify and validate single-dose, BTIP compliant, DSC-MRI protocols. Using a validated, patient-based DRO, we evaluated CBV accuracy across a range of acquisition parameters (field strength, TR, TE, flip angle, multi-echo acquisitions, dosing protocols) and post-processing steps. To validate the optimal protocols, we next collected DSC-MRI data following ASFNR’s recommended “double – dose” approach, where a single-dose preload (to minimize T1 effects) is given prior to a second bolus injection (for DSC-MRI data acquisition). The single-dose DSC-MRI data was collected during the preload bolus injection. Consistency of the derived CBV data, visual agreement and data characteristics (e.g. CNR) was statistically evaluated. When using a single-dose and routine single-echo pulse sequence, the DRO analysis found that a low flip angle (LFA = 30o) and 30ms TE provided the highest CBV accuracy (concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) = 0.92) and precision (coefficient of variation (CV) = 8.2%)). For comparison, the maximum accuracy found with the DRO utilizes a double-dose injection protocol and yielded a CCC of 0.98 and CV of 6.8%. Single-dose, multi-echo acquisitions provided higher accuracy than the LFA data and matched that found with the double-dose approach. In patients (data collection ongoing), the agreement between single-dose LFA (n > 40) or multi-echo (n > 40) based CBV values and the reference double-dose approach was very high (CCC > 0.94) and were statistically equivalent. Optimized single-dose DSC-MRI protocols provide highly accurate CBV data, use lower doses of contrast agent, and simplify scan procedures, indicating their potential for robust use in clinical practice and trials.