Allam, M A

Background In low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) is practically used to define low flow and prompt dobutamine stress echocardiography to discern pseudo-severe AS. In patients with preserved LVEF, stroke volume index (SVI) <35 mL/m² is typically used. However, both are volume-based surrogates. Transaortic flow rate (TAFR), calculated as stroke volume divided by left ventricular ejection time, may better reflect true flow. Nonetheless, comparative data between TAFR and established metrics remain limited. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of TAFR in symptomatic low-gradient severe AS. Methods We retrospectively identified patients with low-gradient severe AS (AVA ≤1 cm 2 and peak velocity (Vmax) <4 m/s or mean gradient (MG) <40 mm Hg) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement at Mayo Clinic sites (2017–2023). The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results Among 475 patients included (mean age 85±8 years; 49% women), 242 (51%) had TAFR <220 mL/s, 165 (35%) had EF <50%, and 221 (47%) had SVI <35 mL/m 2 . Low TAFR was significantly associated with higher 1-year mortality even after stratifying by EF or SVI. In multivariate analysis, TAFR was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 2.38; 95% CI 1.19 to 4.76, p=0.014) after adjusting for reduced LVEF, low SVI, gender, chronic kidney disease and mitral and tricuspid regurgitation. Conclusions In patients with symptomatic low-gradient severe AS, low TAFR, not SVI or LVEF, is independently associated with mortality and may offer more accurate measure of flow state for clinical staging.

Abstract Background/Introduction Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is common among elderly patients and is associated with a high risk of complications. Managing ACS, particularly dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), poses challenges due to the increased risk of recurrent hemorrhagic and ischemic events in this population. Purpose This study evaluated cardiovascular outcomes in patients ≥75 years that were initiated on DAPT with aspirin (ASA) plus either ticagrelor or clopidogrel following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods We used the TriNetX repository to identify adult patients (≥75 years) diagnosed with AMI between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021, who subsequently initiated DAPT and were not on anticoagulation. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: ASA + ticagrelor and ASA + clopidogrel. Outcomes assessed included major bleeding, repeat coronary intervention, all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalizations, stroke, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and pacemaker implantation. Follow-up time was restricted to one year. A 1:1 propensity score matching algorithm was applied using the greedy nearest-neighbor method with a caliper of 0.1 pooled standard deviations to ensure balance (i.e., comorbidities, medications, laboratory values) between the two cohorts. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR), and Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HR). Results Before propensity score matching (PSM), 19,859 patients were in the ASA + ticagrelor cohort, and 47,032 were in the ASA + clopidogrel cohort. Post-PSM, 19,746 patients remained in each cohort, with a mean age of 82.2 years and a mean follow-up duration of 298.77 days for the ASA + ticagrelor cohort and 297.59 days for the ASA + clopidogrel cohort. The ASA + ticagrelor cohort had a higher incidence of major bleeding (aOR 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08–1.31]) and pacemaker implantation (aOR 1.14 [95% CI, 1.02–1.29]) compared to the ASA + clopidogrel cohort. Event-free survival analysis showed lower survival rates for major bleeding (HR 1.18 [95% CI, 1.07–1.30]) and pacemaker implantation (HR 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01–1.28]). No significant differences were observed between cohorts in repeat coronary interventions (aOR 0.95 [95% CI, 0.88–1.03]), atrial fibrillation (aOR 1.03 [95% CI, 0.97–1.08]), all-cause mortality (aOR 1.03 [95% CI, 0.96–1.12]), all-cause hospitalization (aOR 1.01 [95% CI, 0.97–1.05]), or stroke (aOR 0.95 [95% CI, 0.86–1.04]). Conclusions In elderly patients, DAPT with ASA + ticagrelor was associated with higher rates of major bleeding and need for pacemaker compared to ASA + clopidogrel. Given the similar risks of recurrent coronary intervention and mortality between the two regimens, these findings highlight the need for careful consideration when selecting ticagrelor over clopidogrel in this population.