Farina, J F

Abstract Background Treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may be associated with adverse cardiac events. Troponin elevation is part of the diagnostic criteria for ICI related myocarditis (ICIrM) and myocardial infarction (MI), however there is limited data for causes of troponin elevation independent of MI and ICIrM and their clinical outcomes with ICI therapy. Purpose To assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) in patients treated with ICI based on different etiologies and association with cardiac events. Methods All patients treated with ICI who had hs-TnT measured at a multi-center institution from 2011 to 2022 were included. Medical records were reviewed for baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes, including cardiac death and MACE (MI, stroke, heart failure [HF]), and cause of hs-TnT elevation. Risk of cardiac events and mortality were compared for the different etiologies of hs-TnT elevation. Results Of 5,423 patients treated with ICI, 1669 had post-ICI hs-TnT measurement. Mean age was 68.7±11.3 years, 58.3% were male, with follow-up through one year from ICI first administration. Elevated hs-TnT was seen in 1136 patients, with the different causes for elevation depicted in Figure 1, panel A. ICIrM patients exhibited the highest median hs-TnT value of 364 ng/L (IQR 1096), followed by a median of 98 ng/L for MI/Type 2 ischemia, 61 ng/L for infection/sepsis, 51 ng/L for pulmonary embolus, 50 ng/L for HF and 27 ng/L for indeterminate causes, Figure 1, panel B. Additionally, median time from first ICI dose to hs-TnT elevation according to each of the diagnoses are depicted in Figure 1, panel C, with ICIrM showing the shortest median time of 44 days (IQR 74). Hs-TnT elevation in patients with ICIrM had the highest risk for cardiac death (HR 52.7, 95% CI 11.7-238.0, p<0.001), followed by hs-TnT elevation due to HF (HR 15.9, 95% CI 2.9-87.0, p=0.001), MI/type 2 ischemia (HR 11.6, 95% CI 2.4-56.1, p=0.002), and infection/sepsis (HR 5.7, 95% CI 1.0-31.0, p=0.045) compared to those with no hs-TnT elevation, Figure 2, panel A. Similarly, patients with ICIrM had highest risk for MACE (HR 8.2, 95% CI 4.4-15.3, p<0.001), followed by increased hs-TnT due to MI/type 2 ischemia (HR 8.1, 95% CI 5.0-13.1, p<0.001), HF (HR 7.6, 95% CI 4.2-13.7, p<0.001), pulmonary embolism (HR 5.1, 95% CI 2.5-10.8, p<0.001), infection/sepsis (HR 4.1, 95% CI 2.4-7.0, p<0.001), and indeterminate cause (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.8, p<0.001), Figure 2, panel B. Conclusions Hs-TnT measurements have prognostic value for cardiac events in cancer patients receiving ICI therapy, including in those without ICIrM. Patients with ICIrM demonstrated the highest median hs-TnT levels and the poorest outcomes, with a graded response observed; the worst prognosis was seen in patients with hs-TnT elevation due to ICIrM, followed by other causes, and those without hs-TnT elevation had the best prognosis.Figure 1 Figure 2

Abstract Background/Introduction Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is common among elderly patients and is associated with a high risk of complications. Managing ACS, particularly dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), poses challenges due to the increased risk of recurrent hemorrhagic and ischemic events in this population. Purpose This study evaluated cardiovascular outcomes in patients ≥75 years that were initiated on DAPT with aspirin (ASA) plus either ticagrelor or clopidogrel following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods We used the TriNetX repository to identify adult patients (≥75 years) diagnosed with AMI between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021, who subsequently initiated DAPT and were not on anticoagulation. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: ASA + ticagrelor and ASA + clopidogrel. Outcomes assessed included major bleeding, repeat coronary intervention, all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalizations, stroke, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and pacemaker implantation. Follow-up time was restricted to one year. A 1:1 propensity score matching algorithm was applied using the greedy nearest-neighbor method with a caliper of 0.1 pooled standard deviations to ensure balance (i.e., comorbidities, medications, laboratory values) between the two cohorts. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR), and Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HR). Results Before propensity score matching (PSM), 19,859 patients were in the ASA + ticagrelor cohort, and 47,032 were in the ASA + clopidogrel cohort. Post-PSM, 19,746 patients remained in each cohort, with a mean age of 82.2 years and a mean follow-up duration of 298.77 days for the ASA + ticagrelor cohort and 297.59 days for the ASA + clopidogrel cohort. The ASA + ticagrelor cohort had a higher incidence of major bleeding (aOR 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08–1.31]) and pacemaker implantation (aOR 1.14 [95% CI, 1.02–1.29]) compared to the ASA + clopidogrel cohort. Event-free survival analysis showed lower survival rates for major bleeding (HR 1.18 [95% CI, 1.07–1.30]) and pacemaker implantation (HR 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01–1.28]). No significant differences were observed between cohorts in repeat coronary interventions (aOR 0.95 [95% CI, 0.88–1.03]), atrial fibrillation (aOR 1.03 [95% CI, 0.97–1.08]), all-cause mortality (aOR 1.03 [95% CI, 0.96–1.12]), all-cause hospitalization (aOR 1.01 [95% CI, 0.97–1.05]), or stroke (aOR 0.95 [95% CI, 0.86–1.04]). Conclusions In elderly patients, DAPT with ASA + ticagrelor was associated with higher rates of major bleeding and need for pacemaker compared to ASA + clopidogrel. Given the similar risks of recurrent coronary intervention and mortality between the two regimens, these findings highlight the need for careful consideration when selecting ticagrelor over clopidogrel in this population.