Tahsin, Malak

Multimodality imaging plays a pivotal role in ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation by providing critical insights into arrhythmogenic substrates and guiding procedural strategies. This updated review explores the integration of various imaging techniques, including echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), electroanatomical mapping (EAM), and nuclear imaging, to optimize VT ablation outcomes. Echocardiography, particularly transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), is an essential first-line tool for evaluating structural heart disease and left ventricular function. Moreover, echocardiography aids in risk stratification and procedural planning by detecting regional wall motion abnormalities and thrombus formation. Meanwhile, intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) enhances ablation precision by providing real-time catheter visualization, improving procedural success, and reducing complications such as cardiac tamponade. Nonetheless, CMR is the gold standard for myocardial tissue characterization, enabling the identification of scar burden and conduction channels critical for VT pathogenesis. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) facilitates preprocedural planning by localizing arrhythmogenic substrates, predicting VT recurrence risk, and informing ablation strategies. Additionally, T1- and T2-mapping techniques refine the assessment of myocardial fibrosis and inflammation, further improving patient selection and outcomes. MDCT complements CMR by offering high-resolution anatomical visualization and aids in delineating scar distribution, epicardial fat, and vascular structures, informing safe and effective ablation approaches. The integration of these imaging modalities significantly enhances VT ablation precision, reduces recurrence rates, and improves patient outcomes.

Abstract Background/Introduction Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is common among elderly patients and is associated with a high risk of complications. Managing ACS, particularly dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), poses challenges due to the increased risk of recurrent hemorrhagic and ischemic events in this population. Purpose This study evaluated cardiovascular outcomes in patients ≥75 years that were initiated on DAPT with aspirin (ASA) plus either ticagrelor or clopidogrel following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods We used the TriNetX repository to identify adult patients (≥75 years) diagnosed with AMI between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021, who subsequently initiated DAPT and were not on anticoagulation. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: ASA + ticagrelor and ASA + clopidogrel. Outcomes assessed included major bleeding, repeat coronary intervention, all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalizations, stroke, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and pacemaker implantation. Follow-up time was restricted to one year. A 1:1 propensity score matching algorithm was applied using the greedy nearest-neighbor method with a caliper of 0.1 pooled standard deviations to ensure balance (i.e., comorbidities, medications, laboratory values) between the two cohorts. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR), and Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HR). Results Before propensity score matching (PSM), 19,859 patients were in the ASA + ticagrelor cohort, and 47,032 were in the ASA + clopidogrel cohort. Post-PSM, 19,746 patients remained in each cohort, with a mean age of 82.2 years and a mean follow-up duration of 298.77 days for the ASA + ticagrelor cohort and 297.59 days for the ASA + clopidogrel cohort. The ASA + ticagrelor cohort had a higher incidence of major bleeding (aOR 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08–1.31]) and pacemaker implantation (aOR 1.14 [95% CI, 1.02–1.29]) compared to the ASA + clopidogrel cohort. Event-free survival analysis showed lower survival rates for major bleeding (HR 1.18 [95% CI, 1.07–1.30]) and pacemaker implantation (HR 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01–1.28]). No significant differences were observed between cohorts in repeat coronary interventions (aOR 0.95 [95% CI, 0.88–1.03]), atrial fibrillation (aOR 1.03 [95% CI, 0.97–1.08]), all-cause mortality (aOR 1.03 [95% CI, 0.96–1.12]), all-cause hospitalization (aOR 1.01 [95% CI, 0.97–1.05]), or stroke (aOR 0.95 [95% CI, 0.86–1.04]). Conclusions In elderly patients, DAPT with ASA + ticagrelor was associated with higher rates of major bleeding and need for pacemaker compared to ASA + clopidogrel. Given the similar risks of recurrent coronary intervention and mortality between the two regimens, these findings highlight the need for careful consideration when selecting ticagrelor over clopidogrel in this population.

Bladder cancer is a biologically heterogeneous disease with variable clinical presentations, outcomes and responses to therapy. Thus, the clinical utility of single biomarkers for the detection and prediction of biological behavior of bladder cancer is limited. We have previously identified and validated a bladder cancer diagnostic signature composed of 10 biomarkers, which has been incorporated into a multiplex immunoassay bladder cancer test, Oncuria™. In this study, we evaluate whether these 10 biomarkers can assist in the prediction of bladder cancer clinical outcomes. Tumor gene expression and patient survival data from bladder cancer cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed. Alignment between the mRNA expression of 10 biomarkers and the TCGA 2017 subtype classification was assessed. Kaplan–Meier analysis of multiple gene expression datasets indicated that high expression of the combined 10 biomarkers correlated with a significant reduction in overall survival. The analysis of three independent, publicly available gene expression datasets confirmed that multiplex prognostic models outperformed single biomarkers. In total, 8 of the 10 biomarkers from the Oncuria™ test were significantly associated with either luminal or basal molecular subtypes, and thus, the test has the potential to assist in the prediction of clinical outcome.