Kanaan, Christopher

Multimodality imaging plays a pivotal role in ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation by providing critical insights into arrhythmogenic substrates and guiding procedural strategies. This updated review explores the integration of various imaging techniques, including echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), electroanatomical mapping (EAM), and nuclear imaging, to optimize VT ablation outcomes. Echocardiography, particularly transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), is an essential first-line tool for evaluating structural heart disease and left ventricular function. Moreover, echocardiography aids in risk stratification and procedural planning by detecting regional wall motion abnormalities and thrombus formation. Meanwhile, intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) enhances ablation precision by providing real-time catheter visualization, improving procedural success, and reducing complications such as cardiac tamponade. Nonetheless, CMR is the gold standard for myocardial tissue characterization, enabling the identification of scar burden and conduction channels critical for VT pathogenesis. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) facilitates preprocedural planning by localizing arrhythmogenic substrates, predicting VT recurrence risk, and informing ablation strategies. Additionally, T1- and T2-mapping techniques refine the assessment of myocardial fibrosis and inflammation, further improving patient selection and outcomes. MDCT complements CMR by offering high-resolution anatomical visualization and aids in delineating scar distribution, epicardial fat, and vascular structures, informing safe and effective ablation approaches. The integration of these imaging modalities significantly enhances VT ablation precision, reduces recurrence rates, and improves patient outcomes.

Background Marfan syndrome (MFS) is associated with progressive aortic and valvular disease requiring cardiac surgery, but contemporary data on repeat cardiac operations in adults remain limited. Methods We performed a retrospective multicentre cohort study of 783 adults with MFS evaluated across three Mayo Clinic sites. Cardiac operations, postoperative complications, echocardiographic findings and redo sternotomy events were identified by chart review. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with redo sternotomy. Results Overall, 454 patients (58.0%) underwent at least one cardiac operation, and 185 patients (23.6% of the total cohort; 41.0% of operated patients) required redo sternotomy. The most common procedures were aortic root intervention (53.4%), aortic valve intervention (39.6%), mitral valve intervention (16.1%) and tricuspid valve intervention (2.6%). Valvular abnormalities were frequent, including mitral regurgitation (51.5%), mitral valve prolapse (41.1%), tricuspid regurgitation (44.6%) and aortic regurgitation (28.5%). Major postoperative complications occurred in 15.3% of patients. On multivariate analysis, hypertension (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.54 to 3.72), emergent initial operation (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.97 to 5.80) and postoperative complications (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.27) were independently associated with redo sternotomy, whereas repair extending beyond the aortic root was associated with lower odds (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.53). Conclusion In this large multicentre cohort of adults with MFS, cardiac surgery was common, and redo sternotomy occurred frequently among operated patients. These findings provide a contemporary description of the long-term need for cardiac surgery in adults with MFS managed at tertiary referral centres.

Background The prevalence and clinical correlates of extra-aortic vascular disease in Marfan syndrome remain incompletely defined, and current surveillance strategies primarily target the thoracic aorta. Methods We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study of 783 patients with Marfan syndrome across three tertiary centres, with systematic chart and imaging adjudication to define aneurysm and dissection distribution. Results Extra-aortic aneurysms were identified in 32% of patients, most commonly involving the iliac, carotid and subclavian arteries. Extra-aortic dissections occurred in 5.2%. Extra-aortic aneurysms clustered strongly with markers of advanced aortic disease, including abdominal aortic aneurysm (adjusted OR 3.48), prior aortic dissection (OR 3.39) and extra-aortic dissection (OR 4.44), as well as age >40 years and male sex. Genetic confirmation status was not associated with extra-aortic aneurysm presence. Conclusions Extra-aortic vascular involvement is common in Marfan syndrome and closely linked to advanced aortic pathology. These findings support risk-stratified vascular imaging beyond the thoracic aorta in higher-risk patients.

Abstract Background/Introduction Access to timely healthcare in disadvantaged areas remains essential to achieving equitable health outcomes, especially in regions facing structural and social vulnerabilities. Purpose To assess wait times for cardiovascular disease consultations in US-Mexico border regions compared to non-border regions among US Veterans. Methods This cross-sectional analysis included all veteran cardiovascular consultations referred through the Veterans Choice Program to community healthcare centers from 2014 to 2020. We obtained the average wait times in days for consultation approval, scheduling, completion, and total wait time from approval to consultation completion. All consultations were classified by county of residence as either within a US-Mexico border region or a non-border region, as per the La Paz Agreement. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of border status on average wait times. ARIMA modeling was completed to estimate forecasted wait times during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results A total of 485,158 consultations related to outpatient cardiovascular disease were retrieved from the VA Healthcare System. Amongst these, 461,696 of the consultations were placed in non-border regions whereas 23,462 consultations were placed in US-Mexico border regions. The most common consultation requests were made for general cardiology clinic (n=365,227), echocardiography (n=32,017), cardio-pulmonary rehabilitation (n=40,699), and cardiac stress testing (n=16,258). Wait times for cardiovascular disease consultations were not higher in US-Mexico border counties than in non-border regions. For electrophysiology consultations specifically, border counties exhibited significantly shorter total wait times (coeff = -10.81, p=0.008). Additionally, while the COVID-19 pandemic led to increased total wait times in non-border areas (Figure 1), total wait times in border regions remained stable during this period (Figure 2). Conclusions Our findings suggest that US-Mexico border region status does not result in longer wait times for cardiovascular disease consultations, with the exception of shorter wait times for electrophysiology services. This study provides important insights into the unique dynamics of healthcare access in structurally disadvantaged regions, highlighting that wait times are not a significant barrier to cardiovascular care in border areas, and emphasizes the need to consider regional differences in healthcare delivery policies.