Citations

Abstract Introduction: DRd is the standard of care for frontline (FL) treatment (tx) of transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). This is supported by its superior efficacy and tolerable safety profile vs lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) and vs bortezomib plus Rd (VRd) per the phase 3 MAIA clinical trial and real-world data. However, based on recent phase 3 CEPHEUS and IMROZ trial data, the tx paradigm is shifting toward the use of quadruplets for suitable TIE patients with NDMM. CEPHEUS demonstrated the superior efficacy of DVRd vs VRd in TIE and transplant-deferred patients with NDMM. DVRd-treated patients achieved significantly higher rates of minimal residual disease negativity and significantly improved progression-free survival vs VRd-treated patients. DVRd is listed as a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Category 1 preferred regimen in this setting and is therefore used in US real-world clinical practice. The objective of this study was to evaluate real-world usage patterns of FL DVRd and FL DRd in nontransplanted patients with NDMM and to assess the characteristics of patients treated with these regimens. Methods:Data from the Flatiron Health Research database were used for this retrospective observational study. Patients were included in this analysis if they received FL tx with DVRd or DRd for NDMM between Jan 1, 2019, and Dec 31, 2024. The index date was defined as the initiation date of FL DVRd or FL DRd. As the Flatiron database does not capture transplant eligibility status, the analysis excluded all patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at any time during the study period. Patients were also excluded if they were <18 years of age, enrolled in a clinical trial, had presence of other cancers, received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or were diagnosed with amyloid light-chain amyloidosis before the index date. High cytogenetic risk was defined as the presence of abnormalities including del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16). Descriptive statistics were used to report demographic and clinical characteristics. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate duration of therapy. Results: Among the nontransplanted NDMM cohort, 704 FL DVRd-treated patients and 396 FL DRd-treated patients were identified. At index, FL DVRd patients were generally younger than FL DRd patients (median age, 68 vs 78 years, respectively), more likely to be male (55.3% vs 49.5%), and less likely to have Medicare coverage (8.4% vs 17.2%). The 2 cohorts had similar proportions of Black/African American patients (18.9% and 18.7%). Among patients with available data, high cytogenetic risk was more frequently observed in FL DVRd (29.2%) vs FL DRd (17.5%) patients; a lower proportion of FL DVRd patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage III disease (27.1%) than ISS stage I disease (39.9%), whereas a higher proportion of FL DRd patients had ISS stage III disease (32.9%) than ISS stage I disease (25.5%). FL DVRd patients were more likely to be nonfrail (Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome simplified frailty score <2) vs FL DRd patients (64.6% vs 28.2%). Use of both DVRd and DRd increased during the study period; however, the increase was greater for DVRd, particularly in the later years. Notably, FL DVRd was started in 10 patients in 2019, increasing to 146 in 2022 and 222 in 2024. By comparison, FL DRd was initiated in 17 patients in 2019, increasing to 85 in 2022 and 97 in 2024. Median follow-up was 15.6 mo in the DVRd cohort and 20.3 mo in the DRd cohort. Median duration of DVRd therapy was 18.5 mo (95% CI, 14.8–22.7) and was 23.5 mo (95% CI, 19.0–31.7) for DRd therapy. Bortezomib as part of the DVRd regimen was given once weekly or less frequently in the majority (65.6%) of patients. Conclusions: These real-world data show the increasing FL use of the daratumumab-based quadruplet regimen DVRd among nontransplanted patients with NDMM. FL DVRd patients were generally younger and less frail but more likely to have high cytogenetic risk than those treated with DRd. These data also show that daratumumab-based regimens, either as a triplet (DRd) or a quadruplet (DVRd), are increasingly adopted over time in real-world clinical practice. These data further suggest that DRd and DVRd may be considered foundational for the tx of nontransplanted patients with NDMM regardless of patient characteristics, including age, frailty, cytogenetic risk, and ISS stage.

Abstract Background Despite CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy achieving remarkable remission rates in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL), long-term survival remains constrained by T-cell exhaustion and immunosuppressive microenvironments. Dasatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been shown to alleviate T cell exhaustion and enhance CAR-T cell persistence, demonstrating therapeutic synergy in newly diagnosed ALL. However, it may also suppress CAR-T cytotoxicity and is ineffective against BCR-ABLT315I mutations. Third-generation TKIs, including ponatinib and olverembatinib, effectively overcome T315I-mediated resistance, yet their impact on CAR-T cell function and immune modulation remains insufficiently defined. Methods and Results: We first established in vitro co-culture models of CD19 CAR-T cells with the B-ALL cell line NALM6 to evaluate the effects of dasatinib, ponatinib and olverembatinib on resting and tumor antigen-activated CAR-T cells. At clinically relevant concentrations, none of the TKIs affected resting CAR-T viability. In contrast, upon activation, all three TKIs significantly inhibited CAR-T activation, cytotoxicity, and cytokine secretion (IL-2, TNF-α, IFN-γ), while reducing activation-induced CAR-T cell apoptosis. TKIs treatment also downregulated exhaustion markers (eg. PD-1, TIM3, LAG3) and promoted differentiation toward naïve (TN) and central memory (TCM) subsets, while reducing terminal effector T cells. After the drug elution, CAR-T cells regained their cytolytic function in response to tumor targets. Notably, ponatinib-treated CAR-T cells exhibited higher levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 post-washout compared to other groups. Importantly, the TN/TCM phenotype and low exhaustion marker expression were preserved after washout in all TKI-treated groups. Transcriptomic profiling of CAR-T cells in vitro revealed that all three TKIs downregulated key exhaustion-associated genes, including PDCD1, HAVCR2, CTLA4 and NR4A1, along with upregulation of stemness- and memory-associated genes (eg. CCR7, TCF7, LEF1, IL7R). Gene set enrichment analysis showed inhibition of T-cell activation, apoptosis, glycolysis, and TGF-β signaling by all TKIs. Remarkably, ponatinib uniquely activated the IFN-γ pathway, suggesting superior immunostimulatory effects. Mechanistically, all three TKIs suppressed the phosphorylation of AKT, p38 MAPK, and NF-κB p65, indicating shared inhibition of downstream TCR signaling. Based on these findings, we evaluated ponatinib in a clinical setting. A prospective study (No. ChiCTR2000036350) enrolled three R/R B-ALL patients with the BCR-ABLT315I mutation. All the patients received CD19 CAR-T cell therapy followed by ponatinib maintenance, initiated two months post-infusion. All three patients remained progression-free during ponatinib maintenance. Notably, the DNA copies of CAR-T cells remained detectable at months 5 and 9 after ponatinib treatment in two patients, respectively. To further explore the in vivo effects of ponatinib on T cells and other immune cells,peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from these patients before and one month after ponatinib initiation for single-cell RNA sequencing. Ponatinib exposure led to an increased proportion of CD8+T cells and a decreased abundance of myeloid cells subsets. Within T cells, effector cells expanded while Tregs and exhausted T cells decreased. Differential gene analysis showed suppression of activation, adhesion, apoptosis, and PD-1/PD-L1 signaling, aligning with in vitro results. Functional scoring revealed enhanced cytotoxicity, IFN-γ responses, and reduced glycolysis, exhaustion, TGF-β, and Treg signatures. Furthermore, analysis of NK cell subsets showed enhanced cytolytic scores and enrichment of proliferation and immune activation pathways, suggesting that ponatinib preserves innate immune responses in vivo. Conclusions: This study provides preclinical and preliminary clinical evidence that third-generation TKIs, particularly ponatinib, can effectively alleviate CAR-T cell exhaustion, promote memory phenotypes, and remodel the immune microenvironment. Compared to dasatinib and olverembatinib, ponatinib uniquely enhances effector cytokine production and activates the IFN-γ pathway. These findings support ponatinib as a promising combinatorial agent with CAR-T therapy, offering a rational strategy for improving outcomes in patients with T315I-mutated R/R B-ALL.

Abstract Introduction: Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare histiocytic neoplasm, with approximately 90% of patients exhibiting alterations in the MAPK pathway. BRAF and MEK inhibitors have shown promising results in treating MAPK pathway-altered LCH. However, treatment interruptions due to adverse effects are common, and limited access to targeted therapies complicates care globally. While chemotherapy remains a common treatment for LCH, the outcomes for patients with MAPK pathway-altered LCH specifically receiving chemotherapy are still unclear. Methods: This multi-institutional international retrospective cohort study analyzed adult patients with BRAF or MAP2K (gain-of-function, GOF) altered LCH that were consecutively seen at Mayo Clinic, MN, AZ, and FL, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Peking Union Medical College Hospital in China between 2007 and 2024. All patients who were included in this study were treated with chemotherapy, and those who have received targeted therapies or other modalities of frontline treatment were excluded. All time-to-event analyses were performed from the frontline therapy initiation, using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression-free survival (PFS) included death and progression as events and was measured from the time of treatment initiation. The response assessment was based on radiographic evaluation in accordance with the most recent Histiocyte Society consensus guideline. Risk organ involvement was defined as disease involving the liver, spleen, bone marrow or central nervous system. Results: A total of 63 patients with LCH were included. The median age of the population was 34 years (range: 27-43), and males were 59%. Risk organ involvement was seen in 44 (70%) of patients and multisystemic LCH was observed in 48 (76%) patients. Among the 63 patients, BRAF gain-of-function alterations were observed in 79%, MAP2K mutations in 19%, and BRAF fusions in 2%. Of the BRAF gain-of-function alterations, BRAFV600E mutation was seen in 64% patients and [p.N486_P490del] deletion in 36%. There was no significant difference in organ involvement (single-system versus multisystem) or risk organ involvement between patients with BRAF and MAP2K alterations. All 63 patients received systemic therapy with chemotherapy and the regimens included Cytarabine (n=43), Cladribine (n=5), Etoposide (n=1), Methotrexate (n=1), and combined Methotrexate and Cytarabine (n=13). The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 3.8 years (range 3.2–5.0 years), with similar durations observed in patients with single-system vs. multisystem involvement and those with risk-organ involvement vs. no risk-organ involvement. The overall response rate among patients who received chemotherapy was 89%, with complete responses in 15 patients (26%) and partial responses in 40 patients (64.5%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 2.61 years (95% CI: 2.06–NA). The 3-year PFS did not significantly differ based on risk organ involvement: 50.6% (95% CI: 36–71) for patients with risk organ involvement versus 47.4% (95% CI: 28–81) for those without, p=0.52. Patients with single-system disease experienced longer PFS compared to those with multisystem disease; the 3-year PFS was 80.2% (95% CI: 58.7–100) versus 42.2% (95% CI: 29–61.5), respectively, p=0.04. Conclusions: Our results indicate that LCH patients with a GOF alteration in the MAPK pathway derive significant clinical benefit from chemotherapy, achieving deep and durable responses. Therefore, patients should not be excluded from treatment due to the absence of targeted therapies, as they can still attain substantial responses and clinical improvement with chemotherapy, even in the context of MAPK pathway-driven disease.

Abstract Background: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted T cell engagers (TCEs) have emerged as a highly potent immunotherapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, both primary and acquired resistance significantly limit the durability of responses. Antigen escape and development of dysfunctional T cell responses are a significant driver of relapse post-therapy. Here, we preclinically interrogate if continual versus intermittent/response-adapted dosing differently affects development of resistance, the translatability to clinical resistance mechanisms, and how tumor-intrinsic or microenvironmental factors shape the development of resistance to BCMA-TCEs. Methods: We utilized a syngeneic transplantable Vk*MYC MM model which permits clonal tracking through unique immunoglobulin rearrangements. Two cohorts of tumor-bearing mice were treated with a murine surrogate BCMA-TCE using distinct strategies: (1) continuous weekly dosing until disease progression, and (2) an “ intermittent/response-adapted” strategy, where treatment was paused after initial response and resumed upon detection of M-spike. At time of relapse on therapy, RNA-seq was performed on isolated tumor cells to investigate mutations in- or loss of Tnfrsf17/BCMA. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was also performed on 189,025 cells isolated from bone marrow and extramedullary sites. Results: Both continuous and intermittent treatment regimens resulted in similar overall survival. BCMA-TCE treatment induced a distinctive pattern of disease progression, with para- and extra-medullary dissemination observed in 31% (17/54) of treated mice—regardless of treatment schedule. Given this treatment-induced dissemination hasn't been historically observed in our model, we further profiled BCMA expression and infiltrating immune cells to understand relapse mechanisms at these sites. Furthermore, we noted lower BCMA expression in tumors from continuously treated mice compared to untreated or stop-and-go cohorts. Importantly, reduced BCMA expression occurred without loss of plasma cell identity indicating that lineage switching may not be occurring as observed in other hematological malignancies treated similarly (Ruella, 2023, Nat Rev Drug Discov); malignant cells retained high expression of canonical plasma cell markers Irf4, Prdm1, Xbp1, Sdc1. We identified three mechanisms of acquired resistance:Genomic BCMA loss: Complete and irreversible loss of BCMA due to retrotransposition of IAP particles into the first intron of Tnfrsf17, disrupting transcription of downstream exons. This represented a genomic mechanism of antigen escape occurring with continual and prolonged TCE dosing, disrupting transcription and eliminating surface BCMA.Transient BCMA downregulation: Transient downregulation of BCMA expression associated with rapid disease relapse under continuous treatment. Tumors exhibited low BCMA levels and widespread dissemination in paramedullary sites. However, re-transplantation into naïve hosts led to restoration of BCMA expression and re-sensitization to TCE, indicating antigen loss was not permanent.Resistance without antigen loss: In the intermittent dosing regimen, several cases achieved complete remission after two doses, relapsed after treatment pause, and were not controlled after subsequent retreatment. Despite preserved BCMA expression and absence of BCMA mutations or deletions, tumors were refractory to retreatment, suggesting a tumor extrinsic mechanism of resistance. scRNA-seq analysis of the tumor microenvironment is ongoing and the role of uniquely identified immune infiltrates, like NK-like lymphocytes and distinct macrophages, in shaping the cell responses is under consideration. Conclusion: Resistance to BCMA-TCE therapy in the Vk*MYC model of MM arises through multiple mechanisms including genomic antigen loss and transient antigen downregulation. Continuous therapy drives selective pressure leading to target loss via genomic or epigenetic routes, while intermittent dosing preserves antigen but permits resistance to TCE, potentially through immune escape mediated by microenvironmental changes. These insights underscore the translatability of the Vk*MYC model for evaluating rational combination therapies to mitigate these resistance mechanisms. All procedures performed on animals were in accordance with regulations and established guidelines and were reviewed and approved by an IACUC or through an ethical review process.

Abstract Background: For patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), extramedullary relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) carries an extremely unfavorable prognosis. As a new immunotherapy, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has shown remarkable effects in refractory or relapsed B-ALL (r/r B-ALL). However, there is still a lack of evidence for its efficacy and safety in patients with extramedullary relapse after allo-HSCT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of allogeneic CAR-T in such high-risk populations. Method: We conducted a prospective clinical study, during which 7 patients with B-ALL who experienced extramedullary relapse after allo-HSCT were enrolled between October 2019 and January 2025. These patients all received allogeneic CD19 CAR-T cell therapy. We prospectively evaluated the safety, efficacy, and survival outcomes following CAR-T treatment. This study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (No. ChiCTR2000036350). Results: This study included 7 patients with extramedullary relapse after allo-HSCT. Median age was 21 years (range: 15 - 46 years), and the median follow-up time was 415 days (range: 130 - 1320 days). The last follow-up was conducted until July 5, 2025. All the patients were classified as high-risk patients before transplantation. Four of them were Philadelphia chromosome/BCR-ABL positive (Ph+). The sites of extramedullary relapse included: 5 cases of central nervous system (among which 2 cases were accompanied by BCR-ABL molecular relapse in the bone marrow), 1 case of testicular relapse, and 1 case of extensive extramedullary relapse. The median interval from transplantation to extramedullary relapse was 628 days (44 - 1225 days). All patients received chemotherapy, radiotherapy or targeted therapy to reduce tumor burden before infusion. The infusion dose of CAR-T cells was 4 - 10 × 10⁶/kg. After infusion, one patient developed grade 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and grade 4 immune effector cell-related neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), while the remaining patients did not experience grade 2 or higher CRS or ICANS. No patients developed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and all adverse events were resolved. In terms of therapeutic efficacy, one patient was considered unresponsive at the first assessment after infusion (54 days after infusion). The remaining 6 patients all achieved complete remission (CR) efficacy. The median duration of CR was 275 days (range: 120 - 1305 days). During the follow-up period, one patient suffered from central nervous system relapse again at 275 days post-infusion, while the other 5 maintained a continuous CR. The expansion of CAR-T cells in peripheral blood peaked between days 8 to 15 post-infusion, with a median peak of 1.90E+05 copies/μg DNA (range: 1.78E+04 – 3.18E+05 copies/μg DNA), and the longest duration of detectable expansion was 1320 days. Furthermore, CAR-T cells were detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of three patients, indicating their capability for targeted migration and central nervous system infiltration. Conclusion: Overall, allogeneic CAR-T therapy has demonstrated excellent safety and durable anti-leukemia effects in high-risk ALL patients with extramedullary relapse after transplantation.

Abstract Introduction: Despite remarkable advances in treatment, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) continue to suffer relapse. Therefore, the development of novel therapeutic strategies is required. The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, especially its core ATPase subunits SMARCA2/4, is essential for super-enhancer function and MM cell survival. Furthermore, NSD2, which is overexpressed in t(4;14)-positive MM, has been reported to interact with SMARCA2/4, suggesting differential sensitivity to SMARCA2/4 inhibition. While ATPase inhibitors and PROTAC degraders targeting SMARCA2/4 have demonstrated promising preclinical efficacy in MM and other malignancies, their broader therapeutic relevance remains to be clarified. Methods: To support the clinical development of mSWI/SNF antagonists for MM, we first performed PRISM-based profiling of the anti-proliferative effects of both an mSWI/SNF ATPase PROTAC degrader and a catalytic inhibitor across a panel of 888 cancer cell lines from diverse lineages. Lineage enrichment analysis identified plasma cell myeloma as one of the most sensitive malignancies, with the PROTAC degrader demonstrating particularly potent effects. These were followed by in-depth studies in 35 human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs) using FHD-286 (SMARCA2/4 ATPase inhibitor), AU-24118 (CRBN-based degrader), and AU-15330 (VHL-based degrader). Cell viability was assessed after 5-day treatment by flow cytometry with Annexin V and Live/Dead staining. Additional assays were performed in hCRBN-engineered murine plasmacytoma cell lines and Vk*MYChCRBN MM mouse models. Chromatin profiling employed CUT&Tag with SMARCA2/4 and IKZF1/3 antibodies. Results: FHD-286 and AU-24118 showed potent anti-myeloma activity across most cell lines (median IC₅₀: 4.5 nM and 5.9 nM, respectively). HMCLs with t(4;14), as compared to those without, were more sensitive to FHD-286 (p= 0.0064), with a similar trend for AU-24118 (p=0.09). AU-24118 log2 IC₅₀ values correlated with those of FHD-286 (r=0.62, p=0.0002) and with pomalidomide (r=0.61, p=0.0002), suggesting a shared biology. Indeed, CUT&Tag analysis for SMARCA2/4 and the pomalidomide targets IKZF1/3 showed these factors co-localized at most sites throughout the genome in MM.1S cells, including at DUSP22/IRF4, POU2AF1, and IgH super-enhancers. Treatment with AU-15330, depleted SMARCA2/4 off chromatin at >80% of sites within 8 hours (FDR <0.01), and somewhat surprisingly also depleted IKZF1/3 off chromatin at 70% of bound regions, indicating IKZF1/3 function is dependent upon SWI/SNF. Resultantly, combination studies of SWI/SNF targeting agents and pomalidomide showed a lack of synergy and in some cases antagonism, highlighting the importance of careful evaluation when considering combination with pomalidomide. We and others have demonstrated that murine cells are IMiDs resistant due to species-specific differences in CRBN. Using three distinct mouse plasmacytoma cell lines (+/-hCRBN), hCRBN-expressing cells showed a 100-fold greater sensitivity to AU-24118 compared hCRBN- cell lines. In vivo safety testing of AU-24118 using hCRBN transgenic mice exhibited early mortality within 7 days at doses ≥1.875 mpk and within 3 days at doses ≥7.5 mpk, accompanied by rapid body weight loss. In contrast, a preliminary efficacy study using de novo Vk*MYChCRBN mice, AU-24118 administered at 1 mpk three times per week was well tolerated and led to approximately 40% reduction in serum M-protein within 2 weeks (p<0.05), with no notable weight loss, demonstrating a therapeutic window. Conclusions: Broad PRISM profiling confirms lineage-specific vulnerability of MM to SWI/SNF inhibition, with in vitro and in vivo validation supporting selective efficacy in high-risk t(4;14)-positive subtypes. FHD-286, AU-15330, and AU-24118 demonstrated strong in vitro activity, particularly in t(4;14)-positive HMCLs. This activity was due, in part, to chromatin compaction and decommissioning of lineage and oncogenic enhancers as well as eviction of IKZF1/3 off chromatin. AU-24118 showed high selectivity, with picomolar range IC₅₀ in sensitive HMCLs. Due to species-specific CRBN differences, accurate toxicity evaluation of AU-24118 requires hCRBN-expressing models, and preliminary data indicate in vivo efficacy in the highly predictive Vk*MYChCRBN model. These findings support the potential of SMARCA2/4 targeting agents, especially AU-24118, as promising therapies for MM, particularly in high-risk t(4;14)-positive cases.

Abstract Introduction High disease burden has been associated with reduced efficacy and resistance to BCMA CAR-T therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (van de Donk, Blood Cancer Discov, 2021; Martin, J Clin Oncol, 2023). While CAR-T cells can still induce remissions in these patients, outcomes are often worse compared to those with a lower tumor load. In addition to tumor debulking, novel strategies are needed to improve responses and durability of CAR-T cells in these patients. We previously demonstrated that immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) improve in vivo responses to T cell engagers (TCE) in high tumor burden setting by boosting T cell activation (Meermeier, Blood Cancer Discov, 2021; Meermeier, Blood, in press). IMiDs have also been shown to promote CAR-T cell antitumor activity in moderate to low tumor burden conditions (E:T ratios ≥1:1) (Yan, J Transl Med, 2024; Wang, Clin Cancer Res, 2018). We hypothesized that combining CAR-T with an IMiD may improve CAR-T function in high tumor burden setting. Methods We generated murine anti-BCMA.CD28 CAR-T cells by transducing Con-A stimulated T lymphocytes extracted from hCRBN+ mice, expanded with IL-7 and IL-15 to express a memory phenotype. We then tested CAR-T, or untransduced T cells, ability to kill in vitro IMiD resistant, hCRBN-, Vk*MYC myeloma cells in low (E:T 1:1) and high (E:T 1:≥5) tumor burden, with and without pomalidomide (POM) and IL-2. Tumor killing and T cell phenotype were assessed by flow cytometry at 24-72 hours. This controlled system allowed us to focus on putative CAR-T cell intrinsic impact of IMiDs. Results In low tumor burden setting, CAR-T effectively killed tumor at all timepoints, with or without POM; addition of POM increased T cell number, confirming that IMiDs support CAR-T expansion. Unexpectedly, in high tumor burden (E:T 1:≥5), adding POM diminished CAR-T mediated killing over time and hindered CAR-T expansion. Moreover, combination with POM decreased granzyme B, while increased expression of exhaustion marker TOX, ultimately leading to CAR-T apoptosis. This phenotype was further intensified by increasing concentrations of IL-2 in the co-culture, resulting in increased expression of CAR-T expressing LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT, suggesting that CAR-T cells may be overactivated by POM and IL-2. Our manufacturing protocol preferentially expands memory CAR-T cells, favored for their durability, proliferative capacity, and considered to rapidly expand upon encounter with antigen. We reasoned that CAR-T are already sufficiently activated by CAR/CD3z stimulation, especially with a CD28 co-stimulatory domain (versus 4-1BB), known promote rapid, effector memory expansion upon activation (Kawalekar, Immunity, 2016). Activation is intensified by high tumor burden where antigen is highly abundant. We hypothesize under intense, sustained antigen exposure in high tumor burden, the addition of POM paradoxically triggers activation induced cell death (AICD). Conclusion Although it is well accepted that POM can boost T cell function and proliferation, we demonstrate that in high tumor burden, POM drives memory CAR-T to increase exhaustion markers and apoptotic cell death by overactivation, further exacerbated by exogenous IL-2. Interestingly, we have shown opposite effects of preclinically combining POM with TCE therapy in high tumor burden, based on dosing schedule. Concomitant administration transiently boosted T cell activation improving response rates but rapidly led to T cell exhaustion (Meermeier, Blood Cancer Discov, 2021). In contrast, IMiD pretreatment in the context of step-up dosing TCE administration improved T cell fitness and longevity (Meermeier, Blood, in press).The effect of IMiDs on T cells transcriptional program is likely to differ depending on differentiation stage and mode of T cell activation. Memory cells have more sensitive TCR signaling (Kumar, Immunity, 2011) and can be hyperactivated, leading to AICD. Thus, timing of IMiD administration, when tumor burden is low, may be a critical consideration as different T cell subsets require different levels of activation. Conversely, TCE provide only initial activation via TCR signaling, therefore POM may help in providing necessary co-stimulation in this setting. Future studies will evaluate different co-stimulatory domains and test in vivo effects of POM on CAR-T expansion and persistence, particularly as CAR-T cells diminish over time as tumor burden increases.

Abstract Introduction Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents (VEN/HMA) is an approved frontline induction therapy for older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, data comparing its efficacy and safety to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in intermediate-risk AML—characterized by molecular and cytogenetic heterogeneity—remain limited. Methods This multicenter, real-world retrospective study analyzed newly diagnosed intermediate-risk AML patients who received either VEN/HMA or IC. We evaluated composite complete remission (CRc) rates, transfusion and infection rates, long-term outcomes including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and performed subgroup analyses to identify mutation-specific predictors of treatment response. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Results A total of 229 intermediate-risk AML patients were included. VEN/HMA achieved a comparable CRc rate to IC (75.3% vs. 63.4%) with lower transfusion needs and fewer infections. Patients harboring FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A, or TET2 mutations showed greater benefit from VEN/HMA, while KIT-mutated patients responded more favorably to IC. Among patients who did not undergo allo-HSCT, VEN/HMA significantly improved 3-year OS (P = 0.001) and PFS (P = 0.008). No significant OS or PFS difference was observed in the allo-HSCT subgroup. In MRD-negative patients without transplant, those treated with VEN/HMA had superior OS compared to IC. Multivariable analysis identified VEN/HMA (HR = 0.613, P = 0.038) and allo-HSCT (HR = 0.11, P = 0.001) as independent predictors of better survival. Conclusions VEN/HMA is a safe and effective induction strategy for intermediate-risk AML, particularly in patients with BCL-2 inhibitor–sensitive mutations (FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A, TET2). These findings support a genotype-guided treatment approach in AML, complementing current risk stratification frameworks and informing individualized induction therapy decisions.

Abstract Overview: The emergence of effective immune therapies for multiple myeloma has highlighted the importance of understanding the roles of less abundant components within the tumor microenvironment. Single-cell analyses provide snapshots of the functional relationships of individual cells at precise moments in time, as well as insight into the overall cellular composition. By integrating single-cell datasets from multiple studies, we improve our ability to identify trends within rare cell populations, such as macrophages, and explore their clinical implications. We investigate human data here because our prior research of murine models indicated that macrophages expressing C1q, particularly those co-expressing Fcgr4, tend to correlate positively with increased tumor burden. Methods: We combined 56 human bone marrow samples – primarily collected at baseline, post-induction, or post-ASCT – with three publicly available data sets: GSE210079 (post CAR-T bone marrow microenvironment); GSE223060 (single-cell analysis of the MMRF cohort); and GSE271107 (disease progression from healthy donors and MGUS to SMM and NDMM). These data sets were integrated using Seurat to generate robust cellular clusters from over 300,000 cells across 117 samples. We validated our single-cell findings with bulk Affymetrix, whole bone marrow gene expression data (collected at baseline and post-baseline) from the Total Therapy clinical trials (GSE136324). Results: A distinct cluster of C1QA/B/C-expressing macrophages was consistently identified in all single-cell cohorts. These cells co-express FCER1G, CSF1R, and CD68 (markers also expressed in murine C1Q macrophages) and typically cluster adjacent to FCGR3A-expressing monocytes. Within the disease progression cohort, C1Q macrophages were found in all phases of progression: healthy donors, MGUS, SMM, and NDMM. However, C1Q macrophages in progressive disease (SMM and NDMM) have distinct expression features including lower levels of MRC1 and higher levels of APOBEC3A and ISG15 – genes linked to inflammatory responses. Among 11 post-induction samples submitted to lenalidomide maintenance, five with shorter responses displayed elevated expression of APOBEC3A and ISG15 in C1Q-expressing macrophages compared to six samples with longer responses. In a cohort of 22 samples 100 days post-ASCT, seven poor responders showed both an increased frequency of C1Q macrophages and elevated APOBEC3A expression compared to good responders. The MMRF cohort indicated that higher baseline frequencies of C1Q macrophages often preceded rapid disease progression (e.g. MMRF_1720, MMRF_1641). Anecdotal evidence from the CAR-T therapy cohort suggests that expansion of C1Q macrophages could serve as an early warning for tumor recurrence; sample 16 showed retention and expansion of C1Q macrophages 28 days post-CAR-T, that was subsequently followed by increased tumor cell counts at 3 months post-therapy. Analysis of bulk, whole bone marrow gene expression revealed that elevated levels of C1Q genes correlated with poorer outcomes, particularly in post-baseline samples. Multivariate Cox survival analysis revealed that high C1Q expression independently predicted inferior overall survival in post-baseline samples after adjusting for age, ISS stage, high levels of tumor-associated markers (SDC1, JCHAIN, DERL3), and high-risk UAMS7 subtypes (MF, MS, PR). Moreover, post-baseline GEP70 risk scores (from matched bone marrow aspirates) positively correlated with elevated C1Q expression in whole bone marrow samples. Conclusion: Both single-cell and bulk analyses indicate that the persistence of immunosuppressive C1Q macrophages following therapy is associated with inferior clinical outcomes. Although the precise mechanisms are yet to be fully understood, the close proximity of similar macrophages to tumor cells–as observed in other cancers–likely also occurs in myeloma and reflects the crucial relationship between tumor cells and macrophages within the bone marrow. While C1Q macrophages are typically rare in individual samples, analysis of combined cohorts is building evidence of their crucial role in immune cross-talk and therapeutic resistance mechanisms.