Zhang, Jian

Abstract Introduction Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents (VEN/HMA) is an approved frontline induction therapy for older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, data comparing its efficacy and safety to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in intermediate-risk AML—characterized by molecular and cytogenetic heterogeneity—remain limited. Methods This multicenter, real-world retrospective study analyzed newly diagnosed intermediate-risk AML patients who received either VEN/HMA or IC. We evaluated composite complete remission (CRc) rates, transfusion and infection rates, long-term outcomes including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and performed subgroup analyses to identify mutation-specific predictors of treatment response. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Results A total of 229 intermediate-risk AML patients were included. VEN/HMA achieved a comparable CRc rate to IC (75.3% vs. 63.4%) with lower transfusion needs and fewer infections. Patients harboring FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A, or TET2 mutations showed greater benefit from VEN/HMA, while KIT-mutated patients responded more favorably to IC. Among patients who did not undergo allo-HSCT, VEN/HMA significantly improved 3-year OS (P = 0.001) and PFS (P = 0.008). No significant OS or PFS difference was observed in the allo-HSCT subgroup. In MRD-negative patients without transplant, those treated with VEN/HMA had superior OS compared to IC. Multivariable analysis identified VEN/HMA (HR = 0.613, P = 0.038) and allo-HSCT (HR = 0.11, P = 0.001) as independent predictors of better survival. Conclusions VEN/HMA is a safe and effective induction strategy for intermediate-risk AML, particularly in patients with BCL-2 inhibitor–sensitive mutations (FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A, TET2). These findings support a genotype-guided treatment approach in AML, complementing current risk stratification frameworks and informing individualized induction therapy decisions.

Background : Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD20 and can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Nonetheless, a significant number of patients experience disease progression or relapse post-rituximab therapy. CD19-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in B-NHL treatment. However, few studies have focused on the efficacy and safety of CD20 CAR-T cells in rituximab-refractory/relapsed (R/R) B-NHL patients, particularly those treated with rituximab for a short time. Here, we conducted a prospective study, aimed to assess the long-term remission and survival in patients with rituximab-R/R B-NHL after treatment with U16 (CD20 CAR-T cells). Methods : This first-in-human study is an open-label, single center investigator-initiated trial (IIT) to determine the safety and efficacy of CD20 CAR-T in R/R B-NHL after previous rituximab treatment failure (no. ChiCTR2000036350). CD20 CAR-T was administered at a target dose of 1.0×107 CAR-T cells/kg after a 3-day conditioning chemotherapy with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of CD20 CAR-T. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded according to ASTCT 2019 criteria. The secondary objectives were to evaluate efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK). Response was assessed per Lugano 2014 criteria. Results:A total of 16 patients with R/R B-NHL were enrolled.The median age was 49 years (range, 28-66). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 2-5). All patients had received rituximab therapy; of these, 9 had done so within the 3 months before CAR-T infusion. CRS occurred in all patients, with 11 patients (68.75%) experiencing grade 1 or 2 CRS and 5 patients (31.25%) experiencing grade 3 CRS. No patient developed grade 4 CRS , and only one patient had ICANS.The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events observed after infusion included leukopenia (93.3%), anemia (40%) and thrombocytopenia (60%). An overall response rate of 100% was observed among enrolled patients, with 11 patients (68.75%) achieving complete remission(CR) and 5 patients (32.25%) achieving partial remission(PR) within 3 months. The median follow-up time was 11.7 months(range 0.69-47.47). The median overall survival was not reached, and the median progression-free survival was 14.5 months. 9 patients remained CR or PR for 12 months, with 7 of them continuing in CR for up to 24 months. The pharmacokinetics of CD20 CAR-T cells were assessed using quantitative PCR to determine the expansion and persistence ability. Peak CAR amplification were detected 7-14 days after infusin. Patients 1, 2 and 4 achieved long-term remission, and persistent positive CAR-T cell copy numbers were detected for 15 months, 30 months and 26 months, respectively. However, patients 7, 8 and 12 relapsed within 3 months, and the CAR-T cell copies of all three patients were reduced to fewer than 1×103 copies/μg of DNA within 3 months. The qPCR results indicated that the maintenance of efficacy was closely related to the persistence of CAR-T cells. Notably, patients who received rituximab less than 3 months before CAR-T infusion had a poorer prognosis, with higher relapse rates (77.8% vs. 28.6%) and shorter progression-free survival, regardless of the degree of response. Conclusion : Long-term follow-up demonstrated that CD20 CAR-T therapy can produce a deep and durable response with a favorable safety profile in patients with rituximab-refractory/relapsed B-NHL. Notably, patients who had received rituximab within 3 months had a poorer prognosis.