Citations

ABSTRACT Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare and aggressive plasma cell disorder with inferior outcomes compared with multiple myeloma (MM). However, studies describing outcomes after first progression and subsequent lines of therapy remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed 104 patients with pPCL who progressed after first‐line therapy treated at one comprehensive cancer center between 2006 and 2024. Clinical characteristics, treatments, time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier methods. All pPCL patients received novel agent–based induction. At the time of analysis, 63% had died; median OS was 39 months. High‐risk cytogenetics were present in 71%. The median TTNT after first‐line therapy was 10 months. Symptomatic progression occurred in 29% of patients and was associated with significantly inferior subsequent OS (13 vs. 34 months) compared with those experiencing asymptomatic biochemical progression. The TTNT progressively shortened with subsequent lines of therapy (3rd line: 6 months; 4th line: 4 months; 5th line: 3 months). Notable exceptions included pPCL patients with t (11;14) treated with anti‐BCL‐2‐based regimens, who achieved a median TTNT of 13 months. Additionally, 24 patients received anti‐BCMA CAR T‐cell therapy. With a median follow‐up of 21 months, their median TTNT was 32 months. pPCL is characterized by frequent disease progression and diminishing response duration with successive therapeutic lines. Symptomatic progression portends particularly poor outcomes. Anti‐BCL‐2‐based therapy in t (11;14) disease and anti‐BCMA CAR T‐cell therapy appear to provide more durable disease control and represent important advances for the management of progressed pPCL.

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Occult intra‐abdominal metastases are identified in approximately 20% of patients with radiographically localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) through staging laparoscopy, as peritoneal cytology is limited in sensitivity. Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for PDAC in tumor tissue, blood, and pancreatic secretions. This study assesses the feasibility and diagnostic performance of MDMs in peritoneal lavage fluid collected during staging laparoscopy, comparing their performance to mutant KRAS (m KRAS ) detection. Methods DNA from peritoneal lavage fluid of PDAC patients was analyzed for m KRAS mutations (codons 12, 13, and 61) using droplet‐digital PCR and for 13 MDMs and a reference gene (B3GALT6) using quantitative methylation‐specific PCR. An MDM score was generated from the average signal of the 13 MDMs and evaluated for its ability to detect intra‐abdominal metastases via receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results Among 48 patients, 15 (31%) had intra‐abdominal metastases. The MDM score showed 87% sensitivity and 90% specificity (AUC = 0.98), outperforming m KRAS , which showed 40% sensitivity and 85% specificity (AUC = 0.62; p < 0.0001). Conclusions MDMs in peritoneal lavage fluid may enable highly accurate molecular staging of PDAC and warrant validation in larger studies.

8001 Background: The ALCHEMIST clinical trial platform, launched by the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) in 2014, screened patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for molecular markers and tailored post-operative adjuvant therapy trials. A081105 evaluated whether adjuvant erlotinib improved overall survival (OS) following complete resection in patients with early stage EGFR mutated lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: A081105 was a randomized phase III trial enrolling patients with completely resected stage IB (≥4 cm), II, or IIIA non-squamous NSCLC (per the 7 th TNM staging classification) harboring EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutations. Patients were randomized 1:1 to erlotinib 150 mg daily for up to 2 years or placebo/observation, stratified by stage, prior chemotherapy, EGFR mutation subtype, and ECOG performance status. The primary endpoint was OS in the per-protocol (PP) population with centrally confirmed EGFR mutations, designed to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 in favor of erlotinib with a power of 86% and one sided type I error rate of 5%. Secondary endpoints included OS and disease free survival (DFS) in a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population with local or centrally confirmed EGFR mutations, and safety. A prespecified backstop analysis was conducted after a minimum of 5 years of follow-up on all patients. Results: Trial enrollment was discontinued when 390 of the intended 450 patients had been enrolled due to the proven benefit of adjuvant osimertinib. Among 390 enrolled patients, the arms were balanced for age (median: 67.0 years), sex (70% female), race (70% white), stage (II: 51%, IIIA: 37%), prior chemotherapy (82%), ECOG PS 0 (60%), and exon 19 deletion (57%). Adjuvant erlotinib did not significantly improve OS compared with placebo/observation in the overall PP population (364 patients, 108 events, HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.59–1.34; 1-sided P = 0.29) or within exon 19 deletion (HR: 0.94) or L858R mutation (HR: 0.82) subgroups. Five-year OS rates were 78.6% versus 77.9%, respectively. Results were consistent in the mITT analysis (379 patients, 113 events, HR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58–1.28). Erlotinib improved DFS (mITT: 181 events, median: 68 vs 50 months, HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55–1.01). Across both arms, 11% of patients started non-protocol treatment (Osimertinib: 9%) prior to disease progression, and 9% withdrew consent for all follow-up prior to recurrence. In the erlotinib arm, 3 deaths on study were reported; grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported on 39% of patients. Median duration of treatment on Erlotinib arm was 16 months; only 37% of patients completed the planned treatment. Conclusions: In resected EGFR -mutant NSCLC, adjuvant erlotinib did not improve overall survival but improved DFS. Additional studies are exploring efficacy in selected subsets of patients using genomics and proteomic analyses. Clinical trial information: NCT02193282 .

639 Background: Large cohort studies have shown a survival benefit with the use of GLP1 receptor agonists (GLP1 RA) in cancer patients. The impact of GLP1 RA usage in breast cancer (BC) and the different subtypes is unknown. To investigate the potential influence of GLP1 RA usage on BC survival, a study was conducted on a large institutional database. Methods: A de-identified institutional database identified newly diagnosed Stage I, II, and III BC patients from 2005 to present and use of GLP1 RA. The study compared survival rates for BC patients with and without GLP1 RA and further stratified by BC subtype [ER+HER2-, HER2+, ER-PR-HER2-(triple negative BC (TNBC))], BMI, and age. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate overall survival. This study analyzed de-identified data accessed through Mayo Clinic Platform Discover. Per 45 CFR 46.102, this activity did not require IRB review. Data was extracted using an established privacy-preserving protocol and de-identified via expert determination under the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Raw EHR data and other unreported data cannot be shared due to de-identification parameters. Results: 88015 BC patients were identified, of which 3919 (4.5%) received GLP1 RA. The 5-year survival rate was 98.5% with vs 85.5% without GLP1 RA (p-value <0.0001). The survival benefit persisted for different BMI’s and ages: BMI >30 (98.4% vs 85.1%), >25 (98.4% vs 85.4%), and age <50 (99.5% vs 89.3%) and >50 (98.1% vs 84.8%) [all p<0.0001]. 21770 patients with ER+ disease were identified, of which 1412 (6.5%) received GLP1 RA. The 5-year survival rate was 99.0% vs 87.7% (p-value <0.0001). The survival benefit persisted by BMI and age: BMI >30 (99.0% vs 86.2%), >25 (98.9% vs 87.1%) and age <50 (99.6% vs 90.5%) and >50 (98.7% vs 87.2%) [all p<0.0001]. 3599 patients with HER2+ disease were identified, of which 202 (5.6%) received GLP1 RA. The 5-year survival rate was 99.3% vs 80.1% (p-value <0.0001). The survival benefit persisted by stratification: BMI >30 (100.0% vs 80.0%, p-value <0.0004), and <25 (97.7% vs 76.2%, p-value <0.019), and age <50 (100% vs 87.0%, p-value <0.043) and > 50 (99.0% vs 77.2%, p-value <0.0002). 8389 patients with TNBC disease were identified, of which 360 (4.3%) received GLP1 RA. The 5-year survival rate was 91.0% vs 71.9% (p-value <0.0001). The survival benefit persisted by stratification: BMI >30 (96.4% vs 72.9%, p-value <0.0001), >25 (93.2% vs 71.8%, p-value <0.0001), and age <50 (96.0% vs 73.0%, p-value <0.0028) and >50 (88.9% vs 71.8%, p-value <0.0001). For those TNBC patients who received GLP1 RA, having a BMI >30 conferred a protective effect with a 5-year survival rate was 97.9 vs 89.8% (p-value <0.0014). Conclusions: The study suggests that GLP1-RA improves 5-year survival rates of patients with BC and this applies to all subtypes of BC. These results suggest that further study of the impact of GLP1-RA on BC patients is warranted.

1564 Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) females with early-stage ER-negative and/or HER2-positive breast cancer commonly receive chemotherapy to reduce risk of recurrence. Fertility concerns, counseling, and preservation may influence chemotherapy decisions and time to chemotherapy (TTC) initiation. Methods: We surveyed AYA survivors of stage I–III premenopausal ER-negative and/or HER2-positive breast cancer treated at Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California (2013-2022). Fertility concerns were defined as not having completed desired family size or being unsure about having completed desired family size at diagnosis. We summarized receipt of fertility counseling, receipt of chemotherapy, and use of oocyte/embryo cryopreservation for fertility preservation (FP). Among fertility-concerned patients who received chemotherapy, TTC (days from diagnosis) was assessed separately for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) vs for adjuvant chemotherapy (AdjC). Time to NAC was natural log–transformed and modeled with multivariable log-linear regression to estimate relative differences in TTC, adjusting for stage, study site, ER, HER2, age, and diagnosis year. Results: Of 363 respondents, 197 (54%) had fertility concerns at diagnosis; 183/197 (93%) received chemotherapy, similar to 153/166 (92%) among those without concerns (p=0.7). Of the concerned chemotherapy recipients, 45 (25%) saw a fertility specialist but did not pursue FP while 55 (30%) underwent FP. For the 112 fertility-concerned NAC recipients, FP was associated with longer TTC than no fertility specialist counseling (mean=41 vs. 30 days; adjusted ratio=1.39; 95% CI 1.15–1.69), whereas fertility specialist counseling without FP was not (mean= 31 vs. 30 days, adjusted ratio=1.04; 95% CI 0.86–1.25). For the 71 fertility-concerned AdjC recipients, TTC was similar for patients who did not see a fertility specialist (mean=63 days), those who froze oocytes/embryos (mean=65 days), and those who saw a fertility specialist but did not pursue FP (mean=69 days). Conclusions: In this AYA breast cancer cohort, there was no evidence that fertility concerns led patients to decline chemotherapy. FP was associated with a modest delay in NAC initiation (<2 weeks on average). Time to chemotherapy (TTC) among 183 AYA patients with ER− and/or HER2+ breast cancer and fertility concerns. Fertility-focused care N (n=183) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=112) Mean TTC, days Relative difference in TTC, adjusted ratio (95%CI) Adjuvant chemotherapy (n=71) Mean TTC, days No fertility counseling from a specialist 83 (45%) 55 (49%) 29.6 Reference 28 (39%) 62.6 Received fertility counseling from a specialist No fertility preservation 45 (25%) 28 (25%) 30.7 1.04 (0.86,1.25) 17 (24%) 68.6 Fertility preservation 55 (30%) 29 (26%) 41.2 1.39 (1.15,1.69) 26 (37%) 64.6

Introduction Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary cancer syndrome that increases risk for colorectal and other cancers. We hypothesize that vaccines against tumor-associated antigens CEA, MUC1, and brachyury, simultaneously delivered in an adenovirus serotype-5 vector (Tri-Ad5) combined with the immune-enhancing IL-15 receptor superagonist nogapendekin-alfa-inbakicept (NAI) will reduce the incidence of colorectal neoplasms in LS carriers. Methods In this ongoing phase IIB double-blind placebo-controlled trial, two open-label safety phases (SPs) assessed safety of Tri-Ad5 alone (SP1, n=10) and with added NAI (SP2, n=10). A randomized controlled trial (RCT) follows the SPs. After baseline colonoscopy, vaccine dosing occurs at weeks 0, 4 and 8; Tri-Ad5 alone in SP1 and Tri-Ad5 plus NAI in SP2, with identical boosters at Week 52. The RCT phase participants (n=138) were randomized to receive Tri-Ad5 plus NAI or placebo. All participants complete colonoscopy at Weeks 52 and 104 for assessment of the primary endpoint: cumulative colorectal neoplasm incidence. Secondary endpoints include safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity. Results All 20 SP participants (median age 57.5 (range 42–75), 70% female, 15% minority) received all prime and booster series. SP1 participants reported 139 adverse events (AEs) and SP2 participants reported 178. AEs were predominantly grade 1; no treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred. The most common treatment-related AEs were reactogenic events including grade 3 rash (without skin necrosis or breakdown) at NAI injection site (100% of SP2 participants). The RCT phase (n=138) recently completed accrual. Discussion In LS carriers without active cancer, the combination of Tri-Ad5 + NAI was well-tolerated; the RCT phase is ongoing. Clinical Trial Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/ , identifier NCT05419011.