Delgado, Adriana

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Occult intra‐abdominal metastases are identified in approximately 20% of patients with radiographically localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) through staging laparoscopy, as peritoneal cytology is limited in sensitivity. Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for PDAC in tumor tissue, blood, and pancreatic secretions. This study assesses the feasibility and diagnostic performance of MDMs in peritoneal lavage fluid collected during staging laparoscopy, comparing their performance to mutant KRAS (m KRAS ) detection. Methods DNA from peritoneal lavage fluid of PDAC patients was analyzed for m KRAS mutations (codons 12, 13, and 61) using droplet‐digital PCR and for 13 MDMs and a reference gene (B3GALT6) using quantitative methylation‐specific PCR. An MDM score was generated from the average signal of the 13 MDMs and evaluated for its ability to detect intra‐abdominal metastases via receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results Among 48 patients, 15 (31%) had intra‐abdominal metastases. The MDM score showed 87% sensitivity and 90% specificity (AUC = 0.98), outperforming m KRAS , which showed 40% sensitivity and 85% specificity (AUC = 0.62; p < 0.0001). Conclusions MDMs in peritoneal lavage fluid may enable highly accurate molecular staging of PDAC and warrant validation in larger studies.

Abstract Introduction: Laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage enhances staging accuracy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Occult intra-abdominal metastases are identified by staging laparoscopy in approximately 20% of patients with radiologically localized PDAC. Peritoneal fluid cytology has limited sensitivity in detecting occult intra-abdominal metastasis. Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) can accurately detect PDAC from tumor tissue, blood, and pancreatic secretions. This study aims to assess the feasibility of assaying MDMs in peritoneal lavage fluid obtained at the time of staging laparoscopy for patients with PDAC. Methods: Peritoneal lavage fluid (25-60 mL) obtained from patients with PDAC at the time of staging laparoscopy was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1200 × g. The pellet was resuspended and aliquoted into 200µL tubes and frozen at -80°C. DNA extracted from one aliquot was assayed for mutant KRAS (G12A and G13D) and then bisulfite converted to measure 13 MDMs (GRIN2D, CD1D, ZNF781, FER1L4, RYR2, CLEC11A, AK055957, LRRC4, MAX.CHR5.4295, HOXA1, PRKCB, SHISA9, NTRK3) and a normalizing reference gene (B3GALT6) using quantitative methylation specific PCR. The association of KRAS and the average signal from the 13 MDMs (MDMscore) with intra-abdominal metastasis (Y/N) was assessed with the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Among 48 PDAC patients, staging laparoscopy revealed intra-abdominal metastasis in 15 (31%). Of the 15 intra-abdominal metastases, 6 were found to have biopsy-confirmed intra-abdominal metastasis and positive peritoneal cytology, 4 were positive on peritoneal cytology alone, and 5 had biopsy-confirmed intra-abdominal metastasis alone. The sensitivity of the MDMscore for intra-abdominal metastasis was 87% (CI: 60-98%) at 90% (CI: 76-98%) specificity whereas the sensitivity for KRAS was 40% (CI: 16-68%) at 85% (CI: 68-95) specificity. The AUC for the MDMscore was 0.98 (CI: 0.94-1.00) compared to 0.62 (CI: 0.48-0.77) for that of KRAS (p&lt;0.0001). Conclusion: MDMs assayed from peritoneal lavage fluid collected during staging laparoscopy is a novel tool for accurate molecular staging of PDAC. These early results warrant further study in a larger cohort to assess impact on peritoneal staging and its clinical utility in the neoadjuvant treatment paradigm of PDAC. Citation Format: Kalika Maheshwari, Calise K. Berger, William R. Taylor, Douglas W. Mahoney, Kelli N. Burger, Adriana M. Delgado, Karen A. Doering, Heather M. Streich, Patrick H. Foote, Sean P. Cleary, Travis E. Grotz, Micheal L. Kendrick, Rory L. Smoot, Patrick P. Starlinger, Cornelius A. Thiels, Mark J. Truty, Susanne G. Warner, John B. Kisiel, Shounak Majumder. Methylated DNA markers for detection of peritoneal metastasis in pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3784.

ImportanceIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are pancreatic cysts that can give rise to pancreatic cancer (PC). Limited population data exist on their prevalence, natural history, or risk of malignant transformation (IPMN-PC).ObjectiveTo fill knowledge gaps in epidemiology of IPMNs and associated PC risk by estimating population prevalence of IPMNs, associated PC risk, and proportion of IPMN-PC.Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP), patients aged 50 years and older with abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans between 2000 and 2015 were randomly selected (CT cohort). All patients from the REP with PC between 2000 and 2019 were also selected (PC cohort). Data were analyzed from November 2021 through August 2023.Main outcomes and MeasuresCIs for PC incidence estimates were calculated using exact methods with the Poisson distribution. Cox models were used to estimate age, sex, and stage–adjusted hazard ratios for time-to-event end points.ResultsThe CT cohort included 2114 patients (1140 females [53.9%]; mean [SD] age, 68.6 [12.1] years). IPMNs were identified in 231 patients (10.9%; 95% CI, 9.7%-12.3%), most of which were branch duct (210 branch-duct [90.9%], 16 main-duct [6.9%], and 5 mixed [2.2%] IPMNs). There were 5 Fukuoka high-risk (F-HR) IPMNs (2.2%), 39 worrisome (F-W) IPMNs (16.9%), and 187 negative (F-N) IPMNs (81.0%). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 12.0 (8.1-15.3) years, 4 patients developed PC (2 patients in F-HR and 2 patients in F-N groups). The PC incidence rate per 100 person years for F-HR IPMNs was 34.06 incidents (95% CI, 4.12-123.02 incidents) and not significantly different for patients with F-N IPMNs compared with patients without IPMNs (0.16 patients; 95% CI, 0.02-0.57 patients vs 0.11 patients; 95% CI, 0.06-0.17 patients; P = .62). The PC cohort included 320 patients (155 females [48.4%]; mean [SD] age, 72.0 [12.3] years), and 9.8% (95% CI, 7.0%-13.7%) had IPMN-PC. Compared with 284 patients with non-IPMN PC, 31 patients with IPMN-PC were older (mean [SD] age, 76.9 [9.2] vs 71.3 [12.5] years; P = .02) and more likely to undergo surgical resection (14 patients [45.2%] vs 60 patients [21.1%]; P = .003) and more-frequently had nonmetastatic PC at diagnosis (20 patients [64.5%] vs 130 patients [46.8%]; P = .047). Patients with IPMN-PC had better survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.94; P = .03) than patients with non-IPMN PC.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, CTs identified IPMNs in approximately 10% of patients aged 50 years or older. PC risk in patients with F-N IPMNs was low and not different compared with patients without IPMNs; approximately 10% of patients with PC had IPMN-PC, and they had better survival compared with patients with non-IPMN PC.

Improving early detection and treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is critical because untreated AF is a major contributor to stroke and heart failure. We sought to generate knowledge about the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial to test the effect of the Alert for AFib intervention on knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about treatment-seeking for signs and symptoms of AF. Adults ≥65 years old (96% White) at risk for developing AF were randomized to receive the Alert for AFib intervention ( n = 40) or an attention control session ( n = 40). Feasibility goals for recruitment, participant retention, adherence, perceived satisfaction and burden, and intervention fidelity were met. From baseline to study completion, knowledge ( p = .005) and attitudes ( p < .001) about treatment-seeking improved more in the intervention group compared with the control group. Results support testing the effectiveness of the Alert for AFib intervention in a large trial.