Citations

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive form of brain tumor in adults. Despite maximal surgical resection, irradiation, and chemotherapy, median overall survival (OS) for recurrent GBM (rGBM) remains at only 30 weeks. GBM tumors have an immune-suppressive microenvironment with low numbers of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Interleukin 7 (IL-7) plays a key role in T cell homeostasis and survival, with IL-7 inducing T cell expansion in lymphopenic conditions. Efineptakin alfa (NT-I7), a long-acting IL-7, has been shown to increase effector CD8 T cells and reduce suppressor T-regulatory cells in murine GBM models, with subsequently improved OS. We recently completed a Phase I study in newly diagnosed GBM patients which showed that NT-I7 is safe, well-tolerated, and increased absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs), and determined maximum tolerated dose for Phase II. We hypothesized that NT-I7 may not only mitigate GBM treatment-associated immune suppression, but also potentiate the effect of immune checkpoint blockade, leading to an increase in TILs and improved survival. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining NT-I7 and pembrolizumab in rGBM patients. This is an open-label, single arm one-stage Phase II study of NT-I7 and pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy with surgery for adult patients with rGBM. We plan to enroll 30 evaluable patients, including a 6-patient safety run-in. The primary endpoint is the 9-month OS rate. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, objective response rate, changes in ALC, and adverse events profile. The correlative endpoints include studies to assess the anti-glioma immune response, changes in T cell subsets and functionality, peripheral cytokine quantification, and immunohistochemical analysis of GBM tissue. Longitudinal cerebrospinal fluid proteomics is optional. This study opened in Jan 2023. Six (6) of the planned thirty (30) patients had been enrolled by time of submission.

Abstract WSD0922-Fu is an oral, CNS-penetrant, small molecule EGFR inhibitor which potently inhibits EGFR aberrations specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high-grade astrocytoma (HGA). MC1914 (NCT04197934) is a first-in-human phase 1 trial in patients with EGFR aberrant recurrent HGA and NSCLC. Adult patients with either recurrent EGFR mutant NSCLC with CNS metastases or recurrent EGFR aberrant HGA were enrolled and treated across six cohorts (40 mg once daily to 320 mg twice daily, 28-day cycles) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). 25 patients (17 HGA, 8 NSCLC) were enrolled (median age = 57 years; 24% female; 36% ECOG 0). All patients with HGA received prior radiation and temozolomide. All patients with NSCLC had previous disease progression on EGFR inhibitor therapy (prior osimertinib 88%). The median duration of WSD0922-Fu exposure among all patients was 55 days (range 3 to >279 days) [NSCLC median = 131 days; HGA median = 51 days]. Common treatment-related adverse events are comparable to other EGFR inhibitors (fatigue, acneiform rash, diarrhea, nausea, pruritis). At Cycle 1 Day 15 for patients treated at MTD (160 mg twice daily), the mean terminal elimination half-life (%CV) in the plasma was 31.6 h (102%) (median 14.5 h). The mean Cmax, Tmax, oral clearance at steady state, and AUC (0-12 h) (%CV) were 4513 ng/mL (50%), 2.0 hr (69%), 6.9 L/hr/m2 (42%), and 28084 h*ng/mL (52%), respectively. Among patients with NSCLC treated at MTD or higher dose levels and with available response data, 100% (5/5) of patients demonstrated clinical benefit (SD + PR) while 60% of patients had partial responses. Intracranial and extracranial efficacy was concordant. Furthermore, prolonged stable disease (9 cycles) was observed in a patient with EGFRvIII mutant GBM. Expansion cohorts are in progress to optimize WSD0922-Fu dose and schedule for future phase 2 development.

Abstract BACKGROUND Leveraging external data has the potential to increase efficiency and precision of drug development in glioblastoma by complementing or replacing data from in-trial controls. We used an external control arm (ECA) to re-analyze data of the abemaciclib, neratinib and CC-115 arms of the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial. METHODS INSIGhT (NCT02977780) is an ongoing phase 2 adaptive platform trial in newly diagnosed MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma with a shared control arm of patients receiving radiation therapy with concurrent and maintenance temozolomide. The initial experimental arms (abemaciclib, neratinib, CC-115) have not shown a survival benefit relative to the shared control arm. We re-analyzed the experimental arm data and replaced the shared control arm with an ECA. The ECA was developed from a collection of trial datasets and real-world data available through the Glioblastoma External (GBM-X) Data Platform (). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for possible differences between pretreatment covariates (age, sex, resection, KPS) in the ECA and shared control arm. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate treatment effects. RESULTS On INSIGhT, patients were randomized to abemaciclib (n = 74), neratinib (n = 80), and CC-115 (n = 12). There were 687 unmethylated MGMT patients in the GBM-X ECA. After propensity score matching, there was no significant treatment effect associated with abemaciclib (HR 1.091, 95%CI:0.834-1.433, p = 0.536), neratinib (HR = 1.043, 95%CI:0.787-1.383, p = 0.770), or CC-115 (HR 1.088, 95%CI:0.834-1.433, p = 0.794) compared to the ECA. CONCLUSION In comparison to an ECA, there was no significant survival benefit with abemaciclib, neratinib and CC-115. Treatment effects estimates were similar to the primary analyses based on the original shared control arm of INSIGhT. The use of external control arms in early phase testing of new therapies is supported by our findings and could significantly reduce costs and time to conduct trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Prior to 2021, (classic) glioblastoma (GBM) required absence of IDH mutation and histologic features of hypercellularity, nuclear atypia, microvascular proliferation (MVP), and necrosis. Absence of histologic features can be a result of undersampling, with molecular, radiologic, and clinical features consistent with GBM. Accordingly, WHO 2021 defined molecular glioblastoma as diffuse glioma IDHwt, H3wt, with one or more of MVP, necrosis, TERT promoter mutation, EGFR gene amplification (EGFRamp), and/or +7/−10. We hypothesized that there is clinical and radiographic heterogeneity among tumors defined as molecular GBM. METHODS We identified 121 patients that met the criteria for molecular GBM. 121 Classic GBM, defined as IDHwt with hypercellularity, MVP or necrosis, were matched to molecular GBM cases by age, sex, and diagnosis date. All cases were reviewed for relevant histologic features and molecular features. Examined clinical variables included: first symptom, time from first symptom to date of pathological diagnosis, date of first MRI, tumor location, radiographic features of enhancement, diffusion or mass effect, time to progression and overall survival. Clinical, radiologic, and molecular features were compared between classic and molecular GBM. RESULTS Currently,160 cases have been reviewed. Preliminary results show that there is a longer time from first symptom to diagnosis for molecular GBM. Molecular GBM is significantly more likely to be discovered coincidentally, and without enhancement or radiographic necrosis. Classic GBM is significantly more likely to present with focal neurologic deficit as first symptom, regional mass effect on index imaging and have monosomy 10. CONCLUSION While pathologic undersampling accounts for a significant proportion of molecular GBM, our data suggest that there are significant clinical, radiographic, and outcome differences between classical and molecular GBM. Final analysis of the entire cohort will help better define this clinical spectrum.

Abstract BACKGROUND Craniopharyngiomas, primary brain tumors of the pituitary-hypothalamic axis, can cause significant clinical sequelae. Treatment using surgery, radiation, or both often entails significant morbidity. In prior work, we demonstrated that ninety-five percent of papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCP) harbor BRAF V600E mutations (Brastianos et al. Nature Genetics 2014). In this multicenter National Cancer Institute cooperative group trial (Alliance A071601), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of BRAF/MEK inhibition in patients with PCP without prior irradiation. METHODS Eligible patients, with measurable disease and whose PCP screened positively for BRAF mutations, without prior radiation, received the BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination vemurafenib/cobimetinib in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint of objective response rate at 4 months based on centrally determined volumetric data was evaluated in 16 patients on this single arm phase 2 trial. RESULTS Based on volumetric response criteria by central radiology review, 15 of 16 patients (94%; 95% CI: 70% to 100%) had a durable objective partial response to therapy. Thus, this study met primary endpoint for overall response rate. The median tumor reduction was 91% (range of 68% to 99%). Median follow-up was 22 months (95% CI: 19 to 30 months) and median number of treatment cycles was 8. Median progression-free survival and duration of response were not yet reached. Three patients progressed during follow-up after therapy was discontinued; none have died. The sole non-responder stopped treatment after eight days due to toxicity. Grade 3 toxicities at least possibly related to treatment occurred in 12 patients (rash in 6 patients). Grade 4 toxicities were observed in two patients: hyperglycemia (n=1) and increased creatine phosphokinase (n=1). Three patients discontinued treatment for adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Our study indicates that BRAF/MEK inhibitors are a safe and effective treatment for PCP without prior irradiation. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; U24CA196171, U10CA180868 (NRG); Genentech; . ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03224767.

Abstract BACKGROUND New therapies are needed for meningioma since treatment options are limited once patients have exhausted surgery and radiation. FAK, CDK4/6 and RAF/MEK represent potential targets because of synthetic lethality with NF2, loss of CDKN2A, and activation of MAPK signaling pathway in meningioma, respectively. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of targeting FAK, CDK4/6 and RAF/MEK as monotherapies and combination therapies in traditional and patient-derived cell lines and xenografts. METHODS In vitro, cell viability and proliferation assays were used to test abemaciclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor), defactinib (FAK inhibitor) and VS-6766 (RAF/MEK inhibitor) as monotherapy and in combination. To better recapitulate the meningioma microenvironment, targeted agents were evaluated with Matrigel, an artificial extracellular matrix. The efficacy of VS-4718 (in vivo formulation of defactinib) and abemaciclib were evaluated in a subcutaneous IOMM-lee meningioma model (having CDKN2A loss) in nude mice. Furthermore, we are establishing cell cultures and patient-derived cell and xenograft (PDX) models using freshly-resected tissue from patients with recurrent or high-grade (WHO grade 2-3) meningiomas. RESULTS In vitro evaluation identified the combination of defactinib with abemaciclib resulted in a synergistic decrease in cell viability relative to each monotherapy alone, while the combination of defactinib+VS-6766 was not beneficial. The presence of Matrigel enhanced the sensitivity of all three agents. In vivo, we observed improved survival in mice treated with abemaciclib vs control (45 days vs 26 days; p=0.03), as well as combination of VS-4718 + abemaciclib vs control (44 days vs 26 days; p=0.04, Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test). We did not observe survival extension with VS-4718 monotherapy. Lastly, we successfully established an orthotopic meningioma PDX using a WHO Grade 3 tumor for evaluation of novel therapies in meningioma. CONCLUSION Abemaciclib showed promising efficacy in preclinical meningioma xenografts with CDKN2A loss. Studies to evaluate these therapies in other orthotopic models are underway.

AbstractBackgroundIdentifying patient‐ and disease‐specific characteristics associated with clinical trial enrollment of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer may target efforts to improve accrual.MethodsAlliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance) trials opened from January 1, 2000, and closed before January 1, 2018, for common AYA cancers were identified. Proportions of AYAs (aged 18–39 years old) versus non‐AYAs (aged ≥40 years old) enrolled by cancer type were summarized by descriptive statistics. Among studies with ≥20 AYAs enrolled, demographic and disease characteristics of AYAs versus non‐AYAs were compared with χ2 and Kruskal–Wallis tests. A qualitative review was also conducted of therapeutic trials included in analysis in PubMed through December 31, 2021, that reported AYA‐specific survival.ResultsAmong 188 trials enrolling 40,396 patients, AYAs represented 11% (4468 of 40,396) of accrual. AYA accrual varied by cancer type (leukemia, 23.6%; breast, 9.9%; lymphoma, 14.8%; colorectal, 6.2%; central nervous system, 8.1%; melanoma, 11.8%; sarcoma, 12%). Across ages, the proportion of Black and Hispanic patients enrolled was 1%–10%. Compared to non‐AYAs, AYAs in breast and colorectal cancer trials were less likely to be White and more likely to be Hispanic. Disease characteristics differed by age for selected trials. Two trials reported AYA‐specific survival, with no significant differences observed by age.ConclusionsAYA accrual to Alliance trials was comparable to or exceeded population‐based, age‐specific prevalence estimates for most cancer types. Greater proportional representation of Hispanic and non‐White patients among AYAs reflects US demographic trends. The small number of minority patients enrolled across ages underscores the persistent challenge of ensuring equitable access to trials, including for AYAs.

PURPOSE The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time, some limitations of these criteria were identified, and challenges emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. METHODS Informed by data from studies evaluating the different criteria, updates to the RANO criteria are proposed (RANO 2.0). RESULTS We recommend a standard set of criteria for both high- and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the postradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), rather than the postsurgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for comparison with subsequent scans. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks after radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, are required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for the evaluation of treatment for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is highly recommended. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (two-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH wild-type glioblastoma, the nonenhancing disease will no longer be evaluated except when assessing response to antiangiogenic agents. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant nonenhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and nonenhancing tumor components for response assessment. CONCLUSION The revised RANO 2.0 criteria refine response assessment in gliomas.