Citations

AbstractBackgroundRepetitive head impacts from American football have been associated with long‐term cognitive symptoms. The late neuropsychological profiles of this population is not well‐characterized. Research has relied on retrospective informant reports and/or has been small samples of former professional players. We describe objective neuropsychological test performance in former college and professional American football players.MethodsMale (45‐74 years) former National Football League (n=107) and college football players (n=59) from the DIAGNOSE‐CTE Research Project completed a neuropsychological test battery, Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) and Quick Dementia Rating Scale (QDRS). Neuropsychological test scores were converted to T‐scores using age, sex, and/or education‐adjusted normative data. T‐scores<35 defined impairment. Participants were enrolled across the spectrum of symptom severity (asymptomatic to dementia). Individuals without decisional capacity were excluded. Participants with missing data (n=4) and who scored <45 on Test of Memory Malingering Trial 2 (n=10) were excluded.Results108 (65.1%) identified as White and 53 (31.9%) as Black. Mean education years was 16.76 (SD=1.48). Fourteen (8.4%) and 6 (3.6%) reported diagnostic history of ADHD and learning disability, respectively. Average Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 24.96 (SD=3.17); 85 (51.2%) scored <26. Impairment rates were highest for learning and episodic memory. On Neuropsychological Assessment Battery List Learning, 29.5% were impaired on Immediate recall, 36.1% on Short Delay, and 44.0% on Long Delay Recall. Impairment rates for Craft Story Immediate and Delayed Recall (Paraphrase) were 15.7% and 18.7%, respectively. 19.9% and 15.7% were impaired on learning and delayed recall of the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test‐Revised. Impairments were frequent on the Multilingual Naming Test (20.5%), Trail Making Test Parts B (19.3%) and A (18.1%), Animal Fluency (15.7%), and Number Span Backward (15.1%). Impairments were less common (<10%) for phonemic fluency, planning, basic attention, and visual‐perceptual abilities, Mean FAQ was 3.11 (SD=5.14); 23 (13.9%) had an FAQ >9. Based on QDRS scores, 66 (39.8%) had mild cognitive impairment, 44 (26.5%) mild dementia, and 6 (3.6%) moderate dementia.ConclusionsIn these former American football players, neuropsychological impairments were most frequent in episodic memory, followed by confrontation naming and executive function. Further research is needed to delineate this population’s unique neuropsychological profile.

Background: Psychotic symptoms are common in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related neurodegenerative disorders and are associated with more rapid disease progression and increased mortality. It is unclear to what degree existing criteria are utilized in clinical research and practice. Objective: To establish research criteria for the diagnosis of psychosis in AD. Methods: The International Society to Advance Alzheimer’s Research and Treatment (ISTAART) Neuropsychiatric Symptoms (NPS) Professional Interest Area (PIA) psychosis subgroup reviewed existing criteria for psychosis in AD and related dementias. Through a series of in person and on-line meetings, a priority checklist was devised to capture features necessary for current research and clinical needs. PubMed, Medline and other relevant databases were searched for relevant criteria. Results: Consensus identified three sets of criteria suitable for review including those of Jeste and Finkel, Lyketsos, and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, 5th edition. It was concluded that existing criteria could be augmented by including a more specific differentiation between delusions and hallucinations, address overlap with related conditions (agitation in particular), adding the possibility of symptoms emerging in the preclinical and prodromal phases, and building on developing research in disease biomarkers. Conclusion: We propose criteria, developed to improve phenotypic classification of psychosis in AD, and advance the research agenda in the field to improve epidemiological, biomarker, and genetics research in the field. These criteria serve as a complement to the International Psychogeriatric Association criteria for psychosis in neurocognitive disorders.

Abstract During the past decade, a conceptual shift occurred in the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD) considering the disease as a continuum. Thanks to evolving biomarker research and substantial discoveries, it is now possible to identify the disease even at the preclinical stage before the occurrence of the first clinical symptoms. This preclinical stage of AD has become a major research focus as the field postulates that early intervention may offer the best chance of therapeutic success. To date, very little evidence is established on this “silent” stage of the disease. A clarification is needed about the definitions and lexicon, the limits, the natural history, the markers of progression, and the ethical consequence of detecting the disease at this asymptomatic stage. This article is aimed at addressing all the different issues by providing for each of them an updated review of the literature and evidence, with practical recommendations.

Frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) encompasses a spectrum of related neurodegenerative disorders with behavioral, language, and motor phenotypes for which there are currently no effective therapies. This is the second of two articles that summarize the presentations and discussions that occurred at two symposia in 2011 sponsored by the Frontotemporal Degeneration Treatment Study Group, a collaborative group of academic and industry researchers that is devoted to developing treatments for FTD. This article discusses the current status of FTD clinical research that is relevant to the conduct of clinical trials, and why FTD research may be an attractive pathway for developing therapies for neurodegenerative disorders. The clinical and molecular features of FTD, including rapid disease progression and relatively pure molecular pathology, suggest that there are advantages to developing drugs for FTD as compared with other dementias. FTD qualifies as orphan indication, providing additional advantages for drug development. Two recent sets of consensus diagnostic criteria will facilitate the identification of patients with FTD, and a variety of neuropsychological, functional, and behavioral scales have been shown to be sensitive to disease progression. Moreover, quantitative neuroimaging measurements demonstrate progressive brain atrophy in FTD at rates that may surpass Alzheimer's disease. Finally, the similarities between FTD and other neurodegenerative diseases with drug development efforts already underway suggest that FTD researchers will be able to draw on this experience to create a road map for FTD drug development. We conclude that FTD research has reached sufficient maturity to pursue clinical development of specific FTD therapies.