Mitic, Laura L.

Abstract Objectives Neurofilament light (NfL) is an established biofluid marker of neuroaxonal injury for neurological diseases. Several high-throughput and sensitive immunoassays have been developed to quantify NfL in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), facilitating the use of NfL as a biomarker in research and clinical practice. However, because of the lack of rigorous comparisons of assays, it has been difficult to determine whether data are comparable and whether assay performance differs. Here, we compared the performance of five NfL immunoassays. Methods To assess the five NfL immunoassays (Fujirebio, ProteinSimple, Quanterix, Roche and Siemens), we used pooled plasma or pooled CSF, as well as unique samples from 20 healthy controls and 20 individuals with El Escorial defined probable or definite amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), to evaluate precision, parallelism and/or bias. We also examined correlations between plasma and CSF NfL concentrations within and across assays and evaluated their ability to differentiate healthy controls from individuals with ALS. Results Four of the five assays demonstrated exemplary performance based on our analyses of precision and parallelism. Across the five assays, NfL concentrations were lower in plasma than in CSF, although they displayed a high degree of correlation. We noted bias across assays; plasma NfL concentrations were lowest for the Roche assay and highest for the ProteinSimple assay. In addition, all assays reliably distinguished healthy controls from individuals with ALS using plasma or CSF NfL. Conclusions Four NfL assays demonstrated similar analytic performance. Alongside performance, other factors such as costs, accessibility, usability, footprint, and intended use, should be considered.

AbstractBackgroundIn familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration (f‐FTLD), plasma levels of neurofilament light (NfL) are elevated at least two years prior to symptom onset and predict future clinical status. The Neurofilament Surveillance Project (NSP), an actively recruiting observational study, seeks to obtain higher resolution data of temporal changes in plasma NfL to better understand its clinical utility in f‐FTLD interventional trials. The NSP is a pre‐competitive collaboration sponsored by the Bluefield Project to Cure FTD and funded by biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies and nonprofit organizations.MethodParticipants must be members of families with disease‐causing mutations in C9orf72, MAPT or GRN and enrolled in the ALLFTD natural history study. Up to 335 participants, with roughly equal representation across mutation type, provide plasma quarterly for 3 years (4355 samples total) to enable the observation of peripheral NfL levels longitudinally during disease onset and progression. Plasma is collected by certified mobile research nurses during remote visits, and NfL is measured in batch at least every 6 months. NfL measurements from one plasma aliquot per draw will be correlated with annual assessments obtained in the ALLFTD study, including measures of disease severity (CDRÒ+NACC‐FTLD, CGI, etc.), cognitive function from the UDS Neuropsychology Battery, and volumetric MRI data. Additional plasma aliquots are reserved for future analyses of other biomarkers during the course of the study; another subset of aliquots is reserved to share with interested investigators after the study ends.ResultAs of 1/19/22, the NSP had enrolled 161 participants, including 62 from C9orf72 kindreds, 60 from MAPT kindreds, and 28 from GRN kindreds. One‐hundred forty‐five participants had completed their initial visit, and 109 had completed more than 3, and up to 5, quarterly blood draws. Enrollment and study visits are ongoing despite COVID‐related limitations.ConclusionThe quarterly blood sampling from this study, combined with annual comprehensive clinical assessments through the ALLFTD natural history study, will enable a more detailed understanding of when and how NfL levels change during phenoconversion and/or disease progression in f‐FTLD mutation carriers. These data will be especially informative in the context of the targeted investigational therapeutics for f‐FTLD now entering clinical trials.

Abstract Genetic frontotemporal lobar degeneration caused by autosomal dominant gene mutations provides an opportunity for targeted drug development in a highly complex and clinically heterogeneous dementia. These neurodegenerative disorders can affect adults in their middle years, progress quickly relative to other dementias, are uniformly fatal and have no approved disease-modifying treatments. Frontotemporal dementia, caused by mutations in the GRN gene which encodes the protein progranulin, is an active area of interventional drug trials that are testing multiple strategies to restore progranulin protein deficiency. These and other trials are also examining neurofilament light as a potential biomarker of disease activity and disease progression and as a therapeutic endpoint based on the assumption that cerebrospinal fluid and blood neurofilament light levels are a surrogate for neuroaxonal damage. Reports from genetic frontotemporal dementia longitudinal studies indicate that elevated concentrations of blood neurofilament light reflect disease severity and are associated with faster brain atrophy. To better inform patient stratification and treatment response in current and upcoming clinical trials, a more nuanced interpretation of neurofilament light as a biomarker of neurodegeneration is now required, one that takes into account its relationship to other pathophysiological and topographic biomarkers of disease progression from early presymptomatic to later clinically symptomatic stages.

Frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) encompasses a spectrum of related neurodegenerative disorders with behavioral, language, and motor phenotypes for which there are currently no effective therapies. This is the second of two articles that summarize the presentations and discussions that occurred at two symposia in 2011 sponsored by the Frontotemporal Degeneration Treatment Study Group, a collaborative group of academic and industry researchers that is devoted to developing treatments for FTD. This article discusses the current status of FTD clinical research that is relevant to the conduct of clinical trials, and why FTD research may be an attractive pathway for developing therapies for neurodegenerative disorders. The clinical and molecular features of FTD, including rapid disease progression and relatively pure molecular pathology, suggest that there are advantages to developing drugs for FTD as compared with other dementias. FTD qualifies as orphan indication, providing additional advantages for drug development. Two recent sets of consensus diagnostic criteria will facilitate the identification of patients with FTD, and a variety of neuropsychological, functional, and behavioral scales have been shown to be sensitive to disease progression. Moreover, quantitative neuroimaging measurements demonstrate progressive brain atrophy in FTD at rates that may surpass Alzheimer's disease. Finally, the similarities between FTD and other neurodegenerative diseases with drug development efforts already underway suggest that FTD researchers will be able to draw on this experience to create a road map for FTD drug development. We conclude that FTD research has reached sufficient maturity to pursue clinical development of specific FTD therapies.

Frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) is a common cause of dementia for which there are currently no approved therapies. Over the past decade, there has been an explosion of knowledge about the biology and clinical features of FTD that has identified a number of promising therapeutic targets as well as animal models in which to develop drugs. The close association of some forms of FTD with neuropathological accumulation of tau protein or increased neuroinflammation due to progranulin protein deficiency suggests that a drug's success in treating FTD may predict efficacy in more common diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. A variety of regulatory incentives, clinical features of FTD such as rapid disease progression, and relatively pure molecular pathology suggest that there are advantages to developing drugs for FTD as compared with other more common neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. In March 2011, the Frontotemporal Degeneration Treatment Study Group sponsored a conference entitled “FTD, the Next Therapeutic Frontier,” which focused on preclinical aspects of FTD drug development. The goal of the meeting was to promote collaborations between academic researchers and biotechnology and pharmaceutical researchers to accelerate the development of new treatments for FTD. Here we report the key findings from the conference, including the rationale for FTD drug development; epidemiological, genetic, and neuropathological features of FTD; FTD animal models and how best to use them; and examples of successful drug development collaborations in other neurodegenerative diseases.