Abstract Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) differ in their clinical features and genetic etiologies but share progressive cognitive decline. Emerging evidence implicates lipid dysregulation in neurodegeneration, but its extent across FTLD subtypes and how it compares to AD are unclear. Here, we performed integrated lipidomic and proteomic analyses of matched frontal (disease-vulnerable) and occipital (relatively spared) post-mortem cortices from individuals with genetic and sporadic FTLD-TDP, FTLD-tau (Pick’s disease, PiD), AD, and controls. FTLD and AD exhibited convergent lipid alterations, including reduced levels of cardiolipins and phosphatidylethanolamines, alongside increased gangliosides, diacylglycerols, cholesterol esters, acylcarnitines, and coenzyme Q, with generally greater changes in FTLD frontal cortex. FTLD displayed additional alterations, including reductions in bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphate, ceramides, phosphatidylserines, phosphatidylinositols, and sulfatides. These lipid changes were accompanied by proteomic alterations involving lysosomal proteins, phospholipases, phospholipid remodeling enzymes, and fatty acid oxidation pathways. Although lipidomic and proteomic signatures were broadly shared across FTLD subtypes, GRN associated FTLD-TDP and PiD showed the most extensive alterations. Triglycerides were selectively reduced in PiD in association with decreased DGAT1 expression, whereas cholesterol esters were elevated across all subtypes except C9orf72 associated FTLD-TDP. These findings identify shared disruptions in lipid homeostasis and lysosomal lipid metabolism across FTLD and AD, highlighting convergent metabolic pathways underlying neurodegeneration.
Shared lipidome and proteome signatures of frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease
Abstract Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) differ in their clinical features and genetic etiologies but share progressive cognitive decline. Emerging evidence implicates lipid dysregulation in neurodegeneration, but its extent across FTLD subtypes and how it compares to AD are unclear. Here, we performed integrated lipidomic and proteomic analyses of matched frontal (disease-vulnerable) and occipital (relatively spared) post-mortem cortices from individuals with genetic and sporadic FTLD-TDP, FTLD-tau (Pick’s disease, PiD), AD, and controls. FTLD and AD exhibited convergent lipid alterations, including reduced levels of cardiolipins and phosphatidylethanolamines, alongside increased gangliosides, diacylglycerols, cholesterol esters, acylcarnitines, and coenzyme Q, with generally greater changes in FTLD frontal cortex. FTLD displayed additional alterations, including reductions in bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphate, ceramides, phosphatidylserines, phosphatidylinositols, and sulfatides. These lipid changes were accompanied by proteomic alterations involving lysosomal proteins, phospholipases, phospholipid remodeling enzymes, and fatty acid oxidation pathways. Although lipidomic and proteomic signatures were broadly shared across FTLD subtypes, GRN associated FTLD-TDP and PiD showed the most extensive alterations. Triglycerides were selectively reduced in PiD in association with decreased DGAT1 expression, whereas cholesterol esters were elevated across all subtypes except C9orf72 associated FTLD-TDP. These findings identify shared disruptions in lipid homeostasis and lysosomal lipid metabolism across FTLD and AD, highlighting convergent metabolic pathways underlying neurodegeneration.
The advantages of frontotemporal degeneration drug development (part 2 of frontotemporal degeneration: The next therapeutic frontier)
Frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) encompasses a spectrum of related neurodegenerative disorders with behavioral, language, and motor phenotypes for which there are currently no effective therapies. This is the second of two articles that summarize the presentations and discussions that occurred at two symposia in 2011 sponsored by the Frontotemporal Degeneration Treatment Study Group, a collaborative group of academic and industry researchers that is devoted to developing treatments for FTD. This article discusses the current status of FTD clinical research that is relevant to the conduct of clinical trials, and why FTD research may be an attractive pathway for developing therapies for neurodegenerative disorders. The clinical and molecular features of FTD, including rapid disease progression and relatively pure molecular pathology, suggest that there are advantages to developing drugs for FTD as compared with other dementias. FTD qualifies as orphan indication, providing additional advantages for drug development. Two recent sets of consensus diagnostic criteria will facilitate the identification of patients with FTD, and a variety of neuropsychological, functional, and behavioral scales have been shown to be sensitive to disease progression. Moreover, quantitative neuroimaging measurements demonstrate progressive brain atrophy in FTD at rates that may surpass Alzheimer's disease. Finally, the similarities between FTD and other neurodegenerative diseases with drug development efforts already underway suggest that FTD researchers will be able to draw on this experience to create a road map for FTD drug development. We conclude that FTD research has reached sufficient maturity to pursue clinical development of specific FTD therapies.
Frontotemporal degeneration, the next therapeutic frontier: Molecules and animal models for frontotemporal degeneration drug development
Frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) is a common cause of dementia for which there are currently no approved therapies. Over the past decade, there has been an explosion of knowledge about the biology and clinical features of FTD that has identified a number of promising therapeutic targets as well as animal models in which to develop drugs. The close association of some forms of FTD with neuropathological accumulation of tau protein or increased neuroinflammation due to progranulin protein deficiency suggests that a drug's success in treating FTD may predict efficacy in more common diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. A variety of regulatory incentives, clinical features of FTD such as rapid disease progression, and relatively pure molecular pathology suggest that there are advantages to developing drugs for FTD as compared with other more common neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. In March 2011, the Frontotemporal Degeneration Treatment Study Group sponsored a conference entitled “FTD, the Next Therapeutic Frontier,” which focused on preclinical aspects of FTD drug development. The goal of the meeting was to promote collaborations between academic researchers and biotechnology and pharmaceutical researchers to accelerate the development of new treatments for FTD. Here we report the key findings from the conference, including the rationale for FTD drug development; epidemiological, genetic, and neuropathological features of FTD; FTD animal models and how best to use them; and examples of successful drug development collaborations in other neurodegenerative diseases.