Citations

ABSTRACTBackgroundGlenohumeral arthrodesis is a demanding surgical procedure. However, it is an option for reconstruction an oncologic resection, especially for patients in whom the axillary nerve is compromised.MethodsWe reviewed 26 (12 male:14 female) glenohumeral arthrodeses (14 primary:12 revision) following an oncologic resection. The most common method of reconstruction was a free vascularized fibula autograft with a bulk allograft (n = 18). The median follow‐up was 22 years (IQR 19 years).ResultsMedian Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scores and Toronto Extremity Salvage Scores at final follow‐up were 86% and 80%. MSTS scores were similar in patients receiving arthrodesis for primary versus secondary reconstruction. Fifteen (58%) patients had postoperative complications requiring reoperation. Most reoperations occurred with‐in the first 5 years postoperative, with two procedures occurring after 10‐years. Three patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease, one of which also had a local recurrence.ConclusionGlenohumeral arthrodesis provides satisfactory long‐term outcomes for primary and secondary management of shoulder girdle tumors. While early complication rates were high, long‐term complications were rare.

Abstract Excessively restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical trials are one of many barriers to clinical trial enrollment for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDSs). Many organizations are developing efforts to increase clinical trial eligibility; yet, several recent publications focused on patients with MDS suggest that many patients with this disease may be excluded from clinical trials unnecessarily. Clinical trial eligibility should reflect the phase of the study and risks of the agent being studied. Phase 3 trials should be less restrictive than early-phase trials to represent the real-world population as closely as possible. We hypothesize that many clinical trials, particularly phase 3 trials, have unnecessarily restrictive eligibility criteria. This study aims to evaluate the most common eligibility criteria according to phase of trial and to determine whether criteria correspond with drug safety signals. We identified MDS clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 1 January 2000 to 1 September 2023 and analyzed the eligibility criteria of 191 therapeutic MDS trials. We found that categorical inclusion and exclusion criteria are remarkably similar in representation across trial phases. Additionally, only 13% of trials are concordant with drug safety signals, suggesting that the eligibility criteria are often arbitrary. On behalf of the icMDS (International Consortium for Myelodysplastic Syndromes), an association of international MDS experts, we provide a position statement on restrictive eligibility criteria for MDS clinical trials that should be avoided with the aim of removing barriers to clinical trial enrollment.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with cervical artery dissection (CAD) are at risk for subsequent ischemic events. We aimed to identify characteristics that are associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke after initial presentation of CAD and to evaluate the differential impact of anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these high-risk individuals. METHODS: This was a preplanned secondary analysis of the STOP-CAD study (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection), a multicenter international retrospective observational study (63 sites from 16 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa) that included patients with CAD predominantly between January 2015 and June 2022. The primary outcome was subsequent ischemic stroke by day 180 after diagnosis. Clinical and imaging variables were compared between those with versus without subsequent ischemic stroke. Significant factors associated with subsequent stroke risk were identified using stepwise Cox regression. Associations between subsequent ischemic stroke risk and antithrombotic therapy type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets) among patients with identified risk factors were explored using adjusted Cox regression. RESULTS: In all, 4023 patients (mean age was 47.4 years; 44.5% were women) were included. By day 180, subsequent ischemic stroke occurred in 5.3% of the cohort. In adjusted Cox regression, factors associated with increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke were prior history of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 7.31 [95% CI, 1.61–33.13]; P =0.010), presentation within 7 days from first symptoms (aHR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.04–8.91]; P =0.043), infarct on baseline imaging (aHR, 9.85 [95% CI, 3.65–26.58]; P <0.001), and occlusive dissection (aHR, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.03–5.34]; P =0.043). Only patients with occlusive dissection demonstrated a reduced risk of subsequent ischemic stroke when treated with anticoagulation versus antiplatelets (aHR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.16–0.80]; P =0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of the STOP-CAD study, several factors associated with subsequent ischemic stroke were identified among patients with CAD. Furthermore, we identified a potential benefit of anticoagulation in patients with CAD with occlusive dissection. These findings require validation by meta-analyses of prior studies to formulate optimal treatment strategies for specific high-risk CAD subgroups.

Objective: To characterize the relationship between surgeon-staff familiarity and the time required to perform an operation. Summary Background Data: The clinical and operational efficiency of operating rooms is a driver of hospital finances and patient outcomes. Surgeon-staff familiarity is an important focus for quality improvement and process optimization. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed analyzing operations performed at 4 academic hospitals between July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2023. Exclusion criteria (urgent operations, 2-specialty cases, low surgeon/specialty volume in data set, scheduled length > 8 hours) were applied to limit heterogeneity. The exposure of interest was familiarity between the surgeon and the allied health staff (scrub technicians and circulating nurses) present during an operation (represented as the median staff experience with the index surgeon in the previous 180 d). The primary outcome was whether the actual case length was (vs. was not) 10% shorter than the scheduled case length (“shorter case length”). A secondary outcome was the quantification of the difference between the observed and expected case length and whether the surgical time (cut-close) was shorter. Results: A total of 257,645 operations performed by 25 different specialties comprised the analyzed cohort. Higher levels of surgeon-staff familiarity were associated with a higher likelihood of a shorter case length (observed:expected ratio = 1.16 [1.14–1.18] for high/high levels of familiarity, compared with 0.90 [0.88–0.91] for low/low levels of familiarity). Greater familiarity was also associated with case lengths that were shorter relative to scheduled case length (high/high levels of familiarity 8.7% shorter than low/low levels, P < 0.001). Within the 4 most common types of cases, those operations performed by teams with higher levels of familiarity had shorter surgical times (cut-to-close). Conclusions: This study found that operations were more efficiently performed when the scrub technician and circulating nurse staff had a greater recent experience with the primary surgeon. Surgical team familiarity should be considered a focus of operational and clinical excellence.

Objective: Multicancer Detection (MCD) tests, such as the GRAIL Galleri, offer a novel approach to cancer screening by detecting cancer-specific methylation patterns in cell-free DNA through a single blood sample. This study evaluated an 18-month implementation of MCD testing in a tertiary ambulatory internal medicine clinic. Patients and Methods: Between June 2022 and November 2023, 2244 asymptomatic (without symptoms attributed to cancer) patients underwent MCD testing. The study focused on operational workflows, patient and physician education, and diagnostic follow-up of positive results. Standardized materials, including electronic health record (EHR) workflows, FAQs, and diagnostic pathways, were developed to facilitate implementation. Challenges included managing false positives, patient anxiety, costs, and ethical considerations. Results: Of the 2244 patients tested, 17 (0.76%) had positive results, and 15 underwent further diagnostic evaluation. Cancer was confirmed in 11 (73.3%) patients, including cases of breast, colon, esophageal, lymphoma, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers. Four patients had no identifiable malignancy despite comprehensive work-up. Conclusions: MCD testing is feasible in routine clinical workflows, with 73% of positive cases yielding cancer diagnoses. While promising, further research is required to assess long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and optimal implementation strategies of cancer interception in broader healthcare settings.

Objectives/Goals: Manual skin assessment in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) can be time consuming and inconsistent (>20% affected area) even for experts. Building on previous work we explore methods to use unmarked photos to train artificial intelligence (AI) models, aiming to improve performance by expanding and diversifying the training data without additional burden on experts. Methods/Study Population: Common to many medical imaging projects, we have a small number of expert-marked patient photos (N = 36, n = 360), and many unmarked photos (N = 337, n = 25,842). Dark skin (Fitzpatrick type 4+) is underrepresented in both sets; 11% of patients in the marked set and 9% in the unmarked set. In addition, a set of 20 expert-marked photos from 20 patients were withheld from training to assess model performance, with 20% dark skin type. Our gold standard markings were manual contours around affected skin by a trained expert. Three AI training methods were tested. Our established baseline uses only the small number of marked photos (supervised method). The semi-supervised method uses a mix of marked and unmarked photos with human feedback. The self-supervised method uses only unmarked photos without any human feedback. Results/Anticipated Results: We evaluated performance by comparing predicted skin areas with expert markings. The error was given by the absolute difference between the percentage areas marked by the AI model and expert, where lower is better. Across all test patients, the median error was 19% (interquartile range 6 – 34) for the supervised method and 10% (5 – 23) for the semi-supervised method, which incorporated unmarked photos from 83 patients. On dark skin types, the median error was 36% (18 – 62) for supervised and 28% (14 – 52) for semi-supervised, compared to a median error on light skin of 18% (5 – 26) for supervised and 7% (4 – 17) for semi-supervised. Self-supervised, using all 337 unmarked patients, is expected to further improve performance and consistency due to increased data diversity. Full results will be presented at the meeting. Discussion/Significance of Impact: By automating skin assessment for cGVHD, AI could improve accuracy and consistency compared to manual methods. If translated to clinical use, this would ease clinical burden and scale to large patient cohorts. Future work will focus on ensuring equitable performance across all skin types, providing fair and accurate assessments for every patient.

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) and is estimated to be present in >70% of AF patients. This Frontiers Review was prepared by 29 expert members of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration to summarize existing evidence and knowledge gaps on links between hypertension, AF, and their cardiovascular sequelae; simultaneous screening for hypertension and AF; and the prevention of AF through antihypertensive therapy. Hypertension and AF are inextricably connected. Both are easily diagnosed, often silent, and frequently treated inadequately. Together, they additively increase the risk of ischemic stroke, heart failure, and many types of dementia, resulting in greater all-cause mortality, considerable disease burden, and increased health care expenditures. Automated upper arm cuff blood pressure devices with implemented technology can be used to simultaneously detect both hypertension and AF. However, positive screening for AF with an oscillometric blood pressure monitor still requires ECG confirmation. The current evidence suggests that high-risk individuals aged ≥65 years or with treatment-resistant hypertension could benefit from AF screening. Since antihypertensive therapy effectively lowers AF risk, particularly in individuals with left ventricular dysfunction, hypertension should be the key target for AF prediction and prevention rather than merely a comorbidity of AF. Nevertheless, several important gaps in knowledge need to be filled over the next years, including the ideal method and selection of patients for simultaneous screening of hypertension and AF and the optimal antihypertensive drug class and blood pressure targets for AF prevention.

Abstract Background Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) is a deadly central nervous system embryonal tumor caused by loss of SMARCB1, a core subunit of SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complexes. SMARCB1-deficient cancers are defined by loss of cell differentiation-associated enhancers, but how SWI/SNF interacts with other arbiters of cell differentiation (specifically lineage-specific transcription factors [TFs]) remains poorly understood. Methods We leveraged a multi-omics approach, patient-derived ATRT cells, and patient-derived orthotopic xenografts to investigate the interplay of SWI/SNF with lineage-specific TFs in a clinically relevant setting. Results We observe that an activating protein 1 (AP-1)-dependent transcriptional regulatory network is lost in ATRT, and AP-1 and lineage-specific TFs TEAD1 and ZIC2 require SMARCB1 for enhancer binding. SMARCB1-dependent SWI/SNF integrates transcriptional functions of lineage-specific TFs into a core regulatory circuit that depends on the AP-1 subunit c-JUN, whose expression is determined by a SMARCB1-dependent super-enhancer that is lost in ATRT-MYC. In the absence of SMARCB1, lineage-specific TFs are sequestered to promoters, where they maintain core transcriptional programs necessary for cell survival. Targeting residual, promoter-proximal TF activity by a protein degrader of the SWI/SNF ATPase SMARCA4 or small-molecule inhibitors that indirectly inhibit AP-1 and TEAD activity abrogates expression of these networks, reducing cell viability in vitro and prolonging survival in an orthotopic patient-derived xenograft model. Conclusions These results demonstrate SWI/SNF complexes are critical for lineage-specific TF binding and activity at both promoters and enhancers. In the context of ATRT, these findings reveal a previously underappreciated therapeutic vulnerability in targeting residual promoter-proximal TF function in ATRT.

OBJECTIVE Previous research suggests elective surgical procedures performed later in the week have worse outcomes. This study investigated whether the day of the week on which elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery was performed impacts clinical outcomes. METHODS Using data from the Quality Outcomes Database, a nationwide, multicenter prospective registry, this study included patients undergoing elective ACDF for cervical spondylosis. Patients were categorized into groups based on the surgery day (early week, Monday and Tuesday; late week, Thursday and Friday). Analyzed outcomes included postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations, and patient-reported outcomes. Statistical methods included the independent t-test, Pearson’s chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS The study analyzed 19,818 patients, with 41.7% undergoing surgery early in the week and 36.9% later. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality, readmissions, or reoperations between the two groups. Early-week surgical procedures were associated with a higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia requiring nasogastric tubes (0.6% vs 0.3%, p = 0.02) and a higher incidence of vocal cord paralysis (0.5% vs 0.3%, p = 0.01). The data indicate a surgical selection bias with more complex surgical procedures and higher risk patients typically scheduled earlier in the week, which likely contributed to the increased rates of dysphagia. Conversely, patients who underwent operations on Fridays were more likely to be discharged on the same day compared to those earlier in the week (p = 0.02), without a significant difference in length of stay overall. Surgical procedures performed later in the week were more likely to be performed at ambulatory surgical centers rather than inpatient facilities (p < 0.01), indicating a strategic selection of healthier patients for end-of-week procedures. CONCLUSIONS The day of elective ACDF surgery does not affect mortality, readmissions, or reoperation rates. However, early-week surgical procedures may see slightly higher rates of postoperative dysphagia and vocal cord paralysis, likely due to the scheduling of more complex cases or higher risk patients during these days. Overall, the authors’ data confirm that day of surgery does not influence overall patient recovery significantly. This information is useful for surgical planning and for providing patient reassurance that the day of the week does not significantly impact surgical outcomes.