Citations

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), such as exosomes and microvesicles, are released by different cell types and participate in physiological and pathophysiological processes. EVs mediate intercellular communication as cell‐derived extracellular signalling organelles that transmit specific information from their cell of origin to their target cells. As a result of these properties, EVs of defined cell types may serve as novel tools for various therapeutic approaches, including (a) anti‐tumour therapy, (b) pathogen vaccination, (c) immune‐modulatory and regenerative therapies and (d) drug delivery. The translation of EVs into clinical therapies requires the categorization of EV‐based therapeutics in compliance with existing regulatory frameworks. As the classification defines subsequent requirements for manufacturing, quality control and clinical investigation, it is of major importance to define whether EVs are considered the active drug components or primarily serve as drug delivery vehicles. For an effective and particularly safe translation of EV‐based therapies into clinical practice, a high level of cooperation between researchers, clinicians and competent authorities is essential. In this position statement, basic and clinical scientists, as members of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) and of the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) program of the European Union, namely European Network on Microvesicles and Exosomes in Health and Disease (ME‐HaD), summarize recent developments and the current knowledge of EV‐based therapies. Aspects of safety and regulatory requirements that must be considered for pharmaceutical manufacturing and clinical application are highlighted. Production and quality control processes are discussed. Strategies to promote the therapeutic application of EVs in future clinical studies are addressed.

Background: Many women have heavy menstrual bleeding during perimenopause that may interfere with overall quality of life and contribute to sexual dysfunction. We aimed to determine whether sexual function in women improves after endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual periods. Methods: Validated surveys (Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI], Female Sexual Distress Scale [FSDS], and Short-Form Health Survey [SF–12]) were administered to 136 women before and after endometrial ablation from August 2008 through June 2013. Scores at baseline and 6 months after surgery were compared using the paired t test. Results: A total of 97 women completed the FSFI and FSDS surveys at baseline and 6 months after ablation. Mean full-scale FSFI score increased from 26.5 to 28.8 ( p < .001), with improvement in 5 of 6 FSFI domains. Mean FSDS score decreased from 13.6 to 9.7 ( p < .001), showing decreased personal distress regarding sexual function. In assessing quality of life, SF–12 scores improved for global physical function ( p < .001) and mental function ( p = .002). Conclusions: Female sexual function improved and personal distress associated with sexual function decreased after endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual cycles.

Abstract Background: SGI-110 (guadecitabine) is a novel HMA that prolongs in vivo exposure of the active moiety decitabine following subcutaneous (SC) administration. We previously reported guadecitabine clinical activity in previously untreated elderly AML with Overall Complete Response (CR+CRi+CRp) of 55% using a standard 5-day regimen (Yee et al, 2014). Here we report the first results of a more intensive 10-day regimen in the same patient population. Methods: Elderly AML patients (≥ 65y) with at least one of the following characteristics were enrolled: age ≥ 75y; poor Performance Status (PS) ≥ 2; significant comorbidities particularly cardiopulmonary dysfunction; poor risk cytogenetics; or secondary AML. Guadecitabine 60 mg/m2/d SC was administered for 10 days (Days 1-5; and 8-12) for the first 1-2 cycles followed by the 5-day regimen (Days 1-5) for subsequent cycles. Cycles were scheduled every 28 days. Primary endpoint was Overall Complete Response (Overall CR). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival, Safety including all-cause 30-day and 60-day early mortality, and global maximum DNA demethylation from baseline by LINE-1 assay. Results: Fifty two patients were treated with median age 77 (range 66-92) including 40 (77%) ≥75y; 34 (65%) male; 21 (40%) PS ≥ 2; 19 (36%) poor risk cytogenetics; and 13 (25%) secondary AML. The median bone marrow blasts percentage was 49% (range 16-98%). All patients had a minimum follow up of 3 months; 26 (50%) patients remain on treatment at the time of the analysis. Overall CR was observed in 24 patients (46%):14 CR (27%), 8 CRi (15%), and 2 CRp (4%). There was no significant difference between median DNA demethylation in responders (- 27%) and non-responders (-28%). Early all-cause 30-day and 60-day mortality occurred in 2 (4%) and 10 (19%) patients respectively. The most common Grade ≥3 Adverse Events considered by investigators to be drug-related were febrile neutropenia (33%), thrombocytopenia (27%), neutropenia (21%), anemia (15%), bacteremia (10%), and pneumonia (6%). Conclusions: Administration of guadecitabine as a more intense 10-day regimen for the first 1-2 cycles was active with acceptable toxicity. However, and although it was not a randomized comparison, the 10-day regimen did not result in higher rate of Overall CR in previously untreated AML than what was previously reported for the 5-day regimen. A Phase III randomized clinical trial in previously untreated AML patients not considered candidates for intensive chemotherapy has been initiated with the 5-day regimen of guadecitabine. Reference: Yee K, Daver N, Kropf P, et al: European Hematology Association Meeting, June 12-15, 2104; Milan, Italy. Abstract S647. Citation Format: Gail Roboz, Hagop Kantarjian, Patricia Kropf, Ellen Richie, Nitin Jain, Elizabeth Griffiths, Nikola A. Podoltsev, Katherine Walsh, Casey O'Connell, Wendy Stock, David Rizzieri, Raoul Tibes, Todd Rosenblat, Woonbok Chung, Pietro Taverna, Xiang Yao Su, Sue Naim, Mohammad Azab, Jean-Pierre Issa. First results of a 10-day regimen of SGI-110 (guadecitabine), a second generation hypomethylating agent (HMA) in previously untreated elderly AML who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT321. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT321

Abstract Telomeres are complex structures that cap chromosome ends, protecting them from degradation, double strand breaks and end-to-end fusions. Telomeres are maintained by the enzyme telomerase, which is made up of a reverse transcriptase encoded by TERT, and an RNA template encoded by TERC. The telomere structure itself is composed of proteins encoded by ACD, ACYP2, BICD1, DKC1, DCLRE1B, MPHOSPH6, NAF1, NOLA1, NOLA2, NOLA3, OBFC1, PIK3C3, POT1, RTEL1, TEP1, TERF1, TERF2, TERF21P, TINF2, TNKS/PINX1, TPP1 and ZNF208. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TERT and adjoining CLPTM1L gene region are associated with multiple cancer types, and some are associated with both increased and decreased risks across different cancer types. We systematically characterized the patterns of association between variants in these 25 telomere structure and maintenance genes and risk across five cancer types in the Genetic Association and Mechanisms in Oncology (GAME-ON) consortium. We performed a subset-based meta-analysis (ASSET) of 209,367 directly measured and imputed SNPs, one megabase up- and downstream of these genes, across genome-wide association studies of colorectal (5,100 cases, 4,831 controls), lung (12,160 cases, 16,838 controls), breast (15,748 cases, 18,084 controls), ovarian (4,369 cases, 9,123 controls) and prostate (14,160 cases, 12,724 controls) cancers. Correlations (r2) between SNPs were examined in Haploview using the 1000 Genomes Project CEU population. A total of 87 TERT, 123 TERC and 26 DCLRE1B SNPs were associated with cancer risk at gene-level Bonferroni-corrected p-values of 4.2-7.8×10−6. Patterns of association were similar for prostate and colorectal cancers in DCLRE1B. Much stronger associations were observed in TERT and TERC, with 63 and 24 SNPs reaching genome-wide significance (p&lt;5.0×10−8), respectively. Of these, 9 TERT and 9 TERC SNPs were correlated at r2&lt;0.75. The most strongly associated SNPs in TERT (rs37004, p = 2.6×10−11) and TERC (rs76925190, p = 1.5×10−15) are in regions containing documented risk loci for lung and prostate cancers, respectively. TERT rs37004 (p = 1.2×10−13) and 6 of the other 9 SNPs in TERT were associated only with lung cancer risk. For the other 2 SNPs, there was a suggestion that patterns of risk were opposite for lung and prostate cancers. While TERC rs76925190 was strongly associated with prostate cancer risk (p = 5.4 x10−17), it was also suggestively associated with colorectal cancer risk (p&lt;0.005). This pattern was similar for another 2 of the 9 SNPs, while for the rest, associations were limited to prostate cancer. The complex patterns of association in telomere structure and maintenance genes observed across cancer types may provide insight about the mechanisms through which telomere dysfunction in different tissues influences cancer risk. Citation Format: Sara Karami, Younghun Han, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Sara Lindstrom, John S. Witte, Iona Cheng, Shenying Fang, Jiali Han, Peter Kraft, Fengju Song, Rayjean J. Hung, James McKay, Stephen J. Chanock, Mala Pande, Angela Risch, Hongbing Shen, Christopher A. Haiman, Lisa Boardman, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Graham Casey, Ulrike Peters, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Brandon Pierce, Wei Zheng, Christopher I. Amos, Jennifer A. Doherty. Risk loci in telomere structure and maintenance genes across five cancer types: GAME-ON Consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4609. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4609

Background: Care of the gynecologic cancer survivor extends beyond cancer treatment to encompass promotion of sexual, cardiovascular, bone, and brain health; management of fertility, contraception, and vasomotor symptoms; and genetic counseling. Methods: This is a narrative review of the data and guidelines regarding care and surveillance of the gynecologic cancer survivor. We searched databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus using the search terms gynecologic cancer, cancer surveillance, and cancer survivor and reached a consensus for articles chosen for inclusion in the review based on availability in the English language and publication since 2001, as well as key older articles, consensus statements, and practice guidelines from professional societies. However, we did not undertake an extensive systematic search of the literature to identify all potentially relevant studies, nor did we utilize statistical methods to summarize data. We offer clinical recommendations for the management of gynecologic cancer survivors based on review of evidence and our collective clinical experience. Results: Key messages include the limitations of laboratory studies, including CA-125, and imaging in the setting of gynecologic cancer surveillance, hormonal and non-hormonal management of treatment-related vasomotor symptoms and genitourinary syndrome of menopause, as well as recommendations for general health screening, fertility preservation, and contraception. Conclusions: A holistic approach to care extending beyond cancer treatment alone benefits gynecologic cancer survivors. In addition to surveillance for cancer recurrence and late treatment side effects, survivors benefit from guidance on hormonal, contraceptive, and fertility management and promotion of cardiovascular, bone, brain, and sexual health.

Abstract Objective Clinicians’ ability to use and interpret genetic information depends upon how those data are displayed in electronic health records (EHRs). There is a critical need to develop systems to effectively display genetic information in EHRs and augment clinical decision support (CDS). Materials and Methods The National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research and Electronic Medical Records & Genomics EHR Working Groups conducted a multiphase, iterative process involving working group discussions and 2 surveys in order to determine how genetic and genomic information are currently displayed in EHRs, envision optimal uses for different types of genetic or genomic information, and prioritize areas for EHR improvement. Results There is substantial heterogeneity in how genetic information enters and is documented in EHR systems. Most institutions indicated that genetic information was displayed in multiple locations in their EHRs. Among surveyed institutions, genetic information enters the EHR through multiple laboratory sources and through clinician notes. For laboratory-based data, the source laboratory was the main determinant of the location of genetic information in the EHR. The highest priority recommendation was to address the need to implement CDS mechanisms and content for decision support for medically actionable genetic information. Conclusion Heterogeneity of genetic information flow and importance of source laboratory, rather than clinical content, as a determinant of information representation are major barriers to using genetic information optimally in patient care. Greater effort to develop interoperable systems to receive and consistently display genetic and/or genomic information and alert clinicians to genomic-dependent improvements to clinical care is recommended.

Abstract Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) and BRAF mutation status are associated with colorectal cancer survival, whereas the role of body mass index (BMI) is less clear. We evaluated the association between BMI and colorectal cancer survival, overall and by strata of MSI, BRAF mutation, sex, and other factors. Methods: This study included 5,615 men and women diagnosed with invasive colorectal cancer who were followed for mortality (maximum: 14.7 years; mean: 5.9 years). Prediagnosis BMI was derived from self-reported weight approximately one year before diagnosis and height. Tumor MSI and BRAF mutation status were available for 4,131 and 4,414 persons, respectively. Multivariable hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from delayed-entry Cox proportional hazards models. Results: In multivariable models, high prediagnosis BMI was associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality in both sexes (per 5-kg/m2; HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06–1.15), with similar associations stratified by sex (Pinteraction: 0.41), colon versus rectum (Pinteraction: 0.86), MSI status (Pinteraction: 0.84), and BRAF mutation status (Pinteraction: 0.28). In joint models, with MS-stable/MSI-low and normal BMI as the reference group, risk of death was higher for MS-stable/MSI-low and obese BMI (HR, 1.32; P value: 0.0002), not statistically significantly lower for MSI-high and normal BMI (HR, 0.86; P value: 0.29), and approximately the same for MSI-high and obese BMI (HR, 1.00; P value: 0.98). Conclusions: High prediagnosis BMI was associated with increased mortality; this association was consistent across participant subgroups, including strata of tumor molecular phenotype. Impact: High BMI may attenuate the survival benefit otherwise observed with MSI-high tumors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(8); 1229–38. ©2015 AACR.