Citations

SummaryThe hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemic was forecasted through 2030 for 17 countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East, and interventions for achieving the Global Health Sector Strategy on viral hepatitis targets—“WHO Targets” (65% reduction in HCV‐related deaths, 90% reduction in new infections and 90% of infections diagnosed by 2030) were considered. Scaling up treatment and diagnosis rates over time would be required to achieve these targets in all but one country, even with the introduction of high SVR therapies. The scenarios developed to achieve the WHO Targets in all countries studied assumed the implementation of national policies to prevent new infections and to diagnose current infections through screening.

AbstractBackground & AimsAlthough hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections remain major risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), non‐viral causes of HCC, particularly non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), are becoming increasingly prevalent. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and survival of cryptogenic and viral HCC.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 3878 consecutive HCC patients seen at two tertiary centres in the United States and one in Taiwan from 2004 to 2014. We compared the clinical characteristics, treatment and survival of patients by underlying aetiology: cryptogenic (n = 696), HBV (n = 1304) or HCV (n = 1878).ResultsCirrhosis was present in 66.8% of the cryptogenic HCC patients, compared with 74.7% of HBV‐related HCC (HBV‐HCC) (P = .001) and 85.9% of HCV‐HCC (P < .001). Compared to viral HCC, cryptogenic HCC patients presented with larger tumours and at later stages of disease. Five‐year overall survival was 16.3% among cryptogenic HCC patients compared with 31.9% among HBV‐HCC patients and 27.7% among HCV‐HCC patients (P < .001 for both by the log‐rank test). HCC aetiology was not an independent predictor of survival, though ethnicity, cirrhosis status, meeting Milan criteria and treatment allocation were.ConclusionsCompared with viral HCC patients, those with cryptogenic HCC had lower prevalence of cirrhosis, were diagnosed with larger tumours at more advanced stages of disease, and had poorer overall survival. Additional efforts are needed to identify patients at risk of cryptogenic HCC and to identify cryptogenic HCC at earlier stages of disease.

Abstract Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, including talazoparib, potentiate temozolomide efficacy in multiple tumor types; however, talazoparib-mediated sensitization has not been evaluated in orthotopic glioblastoma (GBM) models. This study evaluates talazoparib ± temozolomide in clinically relevant GBM models. Talazoparib at 1–3 nmol/L sensitized T98G, U251, and GBM12 cells to temozolomide, and enhanced DNA damage signaling and G2–M arrest in vitro. In vivo cyclical therapy with talazoparib (0.15 mg/kg twice daily) combined with low-dose temozolomide (5 mg/kg daily) was well tolerated. This talazoparib/temozolomide regimen prolonged tumor stasis more than temozolomide alone in heterotopic GBM12 xenografts [median time to endpoint: 76 days versus 50 days temozolomide (P = 0.005), 11 days placebo (P &lt; 0.001)]. However, talazoparib/temozolomide did not accentuate survival beyond that of temozolomide alone in corresponding orthotopic xenografts [median survival 37 vs. 30 days with temozolomide (P = 0.93), 14 days with placebo, P &lt; 0.001]. Average brain and plasma talazoparib concentrations at 2 hours after a single dose (0.15 mg/kg) were 0.49 ± 0.07 ng/g and 25.5±4.1 ng/mL, respectively. The brain/plasma distribution of talazoparib in Bcrp−/− versus wild-type (WT) mice did not differ, whereas the brain/plasma ratio in Mdr1a/b−/− mice was higher than WT mice (0.23 vs. 0.02, P &lt; 0.001). Consistent with the in vivo brain distribution, overexpression of MDR1 decreased talazoparib accumulation in MDCKII cells. These results indicate that talazoparib has significant MDR1 efflux liability that may restrict delivery across the blood–brain barrier, and this may explain the loss of talazoparib-mediated temozolomide sensitization in orthotopic versus heterotopic GBM xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(12); 2735–46. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is a key driver of prostate cancer, and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is a standard treatment for patients with advanced and metastatic disease. However, patients receiving ADT eventually develop incurable castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Here, we report that the chromatin modifier LSD1, an important regulator of AR transcriptional activity, undergoes epigenetic reprogramming in CRPC. LSD1 reprogramming in this setting activated a subset of cell-cycle genes, including CENPE, a centromere binding protein and mitotic kinesin. CENPE was regulated by the co-binding of LSD1 and AR to its promoter, which was associated with loss of RB1 in CRPC. Notably, genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of CENPE significantly decreases tumor growth. Our findings show how LSD1-mediated epigenetic reprogramming drives CRPC, and they offer a mechanistic rationale for its therapeutic targeting in this disease. Cancer Res; 77(20); 5479–90. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Current clinical parameters do not stratify indolent from aggressive prostate cancer. Aggressive prostate cancer, defined by the progression from localized disease to metastasis, is responsible for the majority of prostate cancer–associated mortality. Recent gene expression profiling has proven successful in predicting the outcome of prostate cancer patients; however, they have yet to provide targeted therapy approaches that could inhibit a patient's progression to metastatic disease. Experimental Design: We have interrogated a total of seven primary prostate cancer cohorts (n = 1,900), two metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer datasets (n = 293), and one prospective cohort (n = 1,385) to assess the impact of TOP2A and EZH2 expression on prostate cancer cellular program and patient outcomes. We also performed IHC staining for TOP2A and EZH2 in a cohort of primary prostate cancer patients (n = 89) with known outcome. Finally, we explored the therapeutic potential of a combination therapy targeting both TOP2A and EZH2 using novel prostate cancer–derived murine cell lines. Results: We demonstrate by genome-wide analysis of independent primary and metastatic prostate cancer datasets that concurrent TOP2A and EZH2 mRNA and protein upregulation selected for a subgroup of primary and metastatic patients with more aggressive disease and notable overlap of genes involved in mitotic regulation. Importantly, TOP2A and EZH2 in prostate cancer cells act as key driving oncogenes, a fact highlighted by sensitivity to combination-targeted therapy. Conclusions: Overall, our data support further assessment of TOP2A and EZH2 as biomarkers for early identification of patients with increased metastatic potential that may benefit from adjuvant or neoadjuvant targeted therapy approaches. Clin Cancer Res; 23(22); 7072–83. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Hyperactivation of AKT is common and associated with endocrine resistance in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer. The allosteric pan-AKT inhibitor MK-2206 induced apoptosis in PIK3CA-mutant ER+ breast cancer under estrogen-deprived condition in preclinical studies. This neoadjuvant phase II trial was therefore conducted to test the hypothesis that adding MK-2206 to anastrozole induces pathologic complete response (pCR) in PIK3CA mutant ER+ breast cancer. Experimental Design: Potential eligible patients with clinical stage II/III ER+/HER2− breast cancer were preregistered and received anastrozole (goserelin if premenopausal) for 28 days in cycle 0 pending tumor PIK3CA sequencing. Patients positive for PIK3CA mutation in the tumor were eligible to start MK-2206 (150 mg orally weekly, with prophylactic prednisone) on cycle 1 day 2 (C1D2) and to receive a maximum of four 28-day cycles of combination therapy before surgery. Serial biopsies were collected at preregistration, C1D1 and C1D17. Results: Fifty-one patients preregistered and 16 of 22 with PIK3CA-mutant tumors received study drug. Three patients went off study due to C1D17 Ki67 &gt;10% (n = 2) and toxicity (n = 1). Thirteen patients completed neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. No pCRs were observed. Rash was common. MK-2206 did not further suppress cell proliferation and did not induce apoptosis on C1D17 biopsies. Although AKT phosphorylation was reduced, PRAS40 phosphorylation at C1D17 after MK-2206 persisted. One patient acquired an ESR1 mutation at surgery. Conclusions: MK-2206 is unlikely to add to the efficacy of anastrozole alone in PIK3CA-mutant ER+ breast cancer and should not be studied further in the target patient population. Clin Cancer Res; 23(22); 6823–32. ©2017 AACR.

Key Points SCHOLAR-1 is the first patient-level analysis of outcomes of refractory DLBCL from 2 large randomized trials and 2 academic databases. SCHOLAR-1 demonstrated poor outcomes in patients with refractory DLBCL, supporting a need for more effective therapies for these patients.

Abstract Introduction: MutHER is a phase II trial that demonstrated the anti-tumor activity of the pan-HER inhibitor neratinib in HER2mut, non-amplified MBC. The major challenges to accrue to this trial were the large number of pts to screen for the 2-3% HER2mut population and the high rate (24%) of poor quality tumor DNA for sequencing. The goals of this ctDNA study were: 1) the concordance of HER2mut detected by ctDNA versus tumor testing; 2) the incidence of ctDNA HER2mut in HER2 non-amplified MBC; 3) changes in HER2mut variant allele frequency (VAF) on neratinib therapy. Methods: A sample size of 30 negative (neg) controls was needed to ensure 90% confidence if ctDNA testing has &gt;90% specificity in detecting HER2mut. Thus, plasma from MBC pts obtained at screening for MutHER trial (Neg control: 40 pts without HER2mut on tumor testing; Positive (pos) control: 14 pts with known HER2mut who received neratinib) were subjected to Guardant360 ctDNA 70-gene panel sequencing (all exons of HER2 included). ctDNA from the 14 neratinib treated pts were also analyzed at week (wk) 4 and upon progression. ctDNA data from MBC pts clinically tested at Guardant Health were interrogated for HER2mut incidence. Results: Among the 14 pts with tumor pos for HER2mut, ctDNA sequencing identified the same HER2mut in 11, discrepant HER2mut in 1, and neg in 2. The 2 pts with ctDNA neg for HER2mut had progressive disease (PD) and stable disease (SD &gt; 6 months) on neratinib, respectively. Among the 40 neg controls, 8 were not evaluable (no detectable ctDNA or assay unsuccessful) and all 32 successfully sequenced cases were neg for HER2mut. The sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA for HER2mut detection was 11/14 (79%, 90% CI: 53-94%) and 32/32 (100%, 90% CI: 91-100%), respectively. Among the 11 paired baseline and wk 4 samples, 9 (82%) had lower HER2mut VAFs at wk 4 than at baseline, with 1 complete response (CR), 1 partial response (PR), 5 SD, and 4 PD at wk 8 as best tumor response. Two pts had higher wk 4 ctDNA HER2mut VAFs and both had radiographic PD at wk 8. The absolute HER2mut VAF levels at wk 4 were significantly associated with TTP (Spearman rho=-0.69, p=0.02) and tumor size change (rho=0.67, p=0.05). The HER2mut VAFs were significantly higher at progression than wk 4 in all pts (p&lt;0.01). One pt acquired a new HER2mut T798I, which is analogous to the gate-keeper mutation EGFR T790M. The incidence of HER2mut without amplification in unselected consecutive MBC clinically tested by Guardant360 was 3% (48/1,584), with mutation pattern similar to published tumor testing data. Conclusions: ctDNA sequencing is sensitive and highly specific in detecting HER2mut, offering a non-invasive method to identify pts for trials of HER2mut-targeted therapy. Decreased HER2mut VAFs at wk 4 was observed in 82% of cases, consistent with the on-target effect of neratinib. Increased HER2mut VAFs at wk 4 is a potential early marker of progression. Citation Format: Cynthia Ma, Ron Bose, Feng Gao, Rachel Freedman, Melinda Telli, Gretchen Kimmick, Eric Winer, Michael Naughton, Matthew Goetz, Christy Russell, Debu Tripathy, Melody Cobleigh, Andres Forero, Timothy Pluard, Carey Anders, Shana Thomas, Jill Anderson, Caroline Bumb, Kimberly Banks, Richard Lanman, Richard Bryce, Alshad Lalani, John Pfeifer, Daniel Hays, Mark Pegram, Kimberly Blackwell, Philippe Bedard, Hussam Al-Kateb, Matthew Ellis. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing for HER2 mutation (HER2mut) screening and response monitoring to neratinib in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT011. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT011

Abstract Lung cancer is the most lethal malignancy around the world. In Hong Kong, chronic tobacco use is prevalent in male but &lt;20% of female patients smoke. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations affect 30% and 67% of male and female lung adenocarcinomas, respectively. Treatment responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are not uniform and all patients eventually develop drug resistance. Mutation screening of immediate pre-treatment tumors is the most ideal for assessing drug targets but in practice, excision specimens of primary or metastatic sites are more efficient in terms of tumor quantity, timeliness and patient acceptance. However, information on the applicability of this approach and correlation with the clinical outcome is limited. For this purpose, we compared the whole exome mutation profiles of 39 excised EGFR mutant cancers treated with first line TKI with the clinical response type, including 15 stage I/II and 24 stage III/IV tumors. They included 16 non-responders (NR) defined clinically as those with stable or progressive disease, and 23 responders (R) defined by partial or complete tumor shrinkage. Considering only the non-synonymous SNV and INDEL mutations of coding regions of known actionable targets and genes listed in both the CGC and COSMIC cancer databases, the tumors harbored 54 mutated genes including 26 recurrently mutated and 28 genes involving only 1 tumor. Excluding EGFR, TP53 was the most commonly mutated gene occurring in 25/39 (64.1%) cases. Most known resistant genes involved in the EGFR and bypass signaling network showed mutations only in the NR group including recurrent mutations of PTEN (3/16), PIK3CA (2/16) and NF1 (2/16), and single case mutations of AKT1, ALK, RAF1 and KDR. Two EGFR network candidates showed mutations in both the NR and R groups, including HGF (2/16 NR, 1/23 R) and ROS1 (1 case in either group). Four post-treatment (post-TKI) tumors of acquired resistance were also analyzed, all of which showed EGFR T790M while no pre-treatment NR or R tumor harbored this mutation. Notably, mutations in the β-catenin pathway were prominent in the NR and post-TKI tumors, including APC (2/16 NR), CTNNB1 (1/16 NR, 1/4 post-TKI) and c-MYC (1/16 NR, 1/4 post-TKI) while they were not detected in the R tumors. Also, nonsense mutations of ARID1A was observed in 2/16 NR but none of the R tumors. In summary, our findings revealed candidate TKI resistant mutations involving the EGFR and bypass signaling networks in pre-treatment excision specimens particularly in non-responding patients. The EGFR T790M was not detectable in pre-treatment samples but was prevalent in post-TKI treated cancers. While this study is limited by its small cohort size, the findings indicate deep sequencing analysis of pre-treatment excision specimens of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas is warranted for detection of resistant mutations and predicting treatment response. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Xu-yuan Gao, Hang Xu, James CM Ho, Oscar SH Chan, Feng Xu, Junwen Wang, Victor HF Lee, Vicky PC Tin, Zhijie Xiao, Siqi Wang, Judy WP Yam, Maria P. Wong. Whole-exome sequencing reveals tyrosine kinase-resistant mutations in pretreatment EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-274. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-274