Chen, Pei‐Jer

4033 Background: HCC is a major health problem across the world. The global HCC BRIDGE study is the first global, large-scale, observational study to document the real-world experience of HCC patients from diagnosis to death. Methods: This longitudinal cohort study (started March 2009) includes HCC patients newly diagnosed between January 2005 and June 2011 and treated at major medical centers, with data collected retrospectively and prospectively as recorded in patient charts. Full patient enrollment is expected at the end of January 2012. Results: At the time of the first interim analysis (July 2011), 12,442 treated HCC patients were enrolled at 42 sites in Asia (n=8909, 72% [China: n=6295, 71%; Japan: n=295, 3%]), Europe (n=2040, 16%) and North America 1493 (n=1493, 12%). Mean age was 57 years; 82% were male. The predominant risk factor was HBV in Asia (76%) and HCV in Europe (48%), North America (45%) and Japan (69%). Most patients were diagnosed without surveillance (Asia, 82%; Europe, 73%; North America, 69%; Japan, 64%). In Asia, Europe and North America, the predominant BCLC stage at diagnosis was C (48%, 46%, 46%) followed by A (34%, 28%, 26%). First recorded treatments in Asia, Europe and North America were resection (31%, 15%, 21%), transplantation (1%, 3%, 1%), TACE (49%, 30%, 36%), other locoregional therapy (12%, 35%, 23%) and systemic therapy (3%, 10%, 8%). Treatments ever used (2005–2011) in Asia, Europe and North America were resection (33%, 17%, 24%), transplantation (2%, 6%, 12%), TACE (57%, 35%, 48%), other locoregional therapy (20%, 42%, 37%) and systemic therapy (9%, 20%, 21%). These results will be updated with data from the full study population (approx. 19,000 patients), and preliminary survival data will be presented. Conclusions: As the largest study of its type, in 19,000 patients worldwide, the HCC BRIDGE study provides valuable insights into global HCC disease characteristics and patient management. Based on prior analyses, differences in risk factors among regions confirm well-known trends, while other observed differences (e.g., treatment variations) may be related to country- and site-specific practices and patient characteristics.

SummaryDue to the introduction of newer, more efficacious treatment options, there is a pressing need for policy makers and public health officials to develop or adapt national hepatitis C virus (HCV) control strategies to the changing epidemiological landscape. To do so, detailed, country‐specific data are needed to characterize the burden of chronic HCV infection. In this study of 17 countries, a literature review of published and unpublished data on HCV prevalence, viraemia, genotype, age and gender distribution, liver transplants and diagnosis and treatment rates was conducted, and inputs were validated by expert consensus in each country. Viraemic prevalence in this study ranged from 0.2% in Hong Kong to 2.4% in Taiwan, while the largest viraemic populations were in Nigeria (2 597 000 cases) and Taiwan (569 000 cases). Diagnosis, treatment and liver transplant rates varied widely across the countries included in this analysis, as did the availability of reliable data. Addressing data gaps will be critical for the development of future strategies to manage and minimize the disease burden of hepatitis C.

SummaryFactors influencing the morbidity and mortality associated with viremic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection change over time and place, making it difficult to compare reported estimates. Models were developed for 17 countries (Bahrain, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Colombia, Croatia, Dominican Republic, Ethiopia, Ghana, Hong Kong, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Morocco, Nigeria, Qatar and Taiwan) to quantify and characterize the viremic population as well as forecast the changes in the infected population and the corresponding disease burden from 2015 to 2030. Model inputs were agreed upon through expert consensus, and a standardized methodology was followed to allow for comparison across countries. The viremic prevalence is expected to remain constant or decline in all but four countries (Ethiopia, Ghana, Jordan and Oman); however, HCV‐related morbidity and mortality will increase in all countries except Qatar and Taiwan. In Qatar, the high‐treatment rate will contribute to a reduction in total cases and HCV‐related morbidity by 2030. In the remaining countries, however, the current treatment paradigm will be insufficient to achieve large reductions in HCV‐related morbidity and mortality.

SummaryThe hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemic was forecasted through 2030 for 17 countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East, and interventions for achieving the Global Health Sector Strategy on viral hepatitis targets—“WHO Targets” (65% reduction in HCV‐related deaths, 90% reduction in new infections and 90% of infections diagnosed by 2030) were considered. Scaling up treatment and diagnosis rates over time would be required to achieve these targets in all but one country, even with the introduction of high SVR therapies. The scenarios developed to achieve the WHO Targets in all countries studied assumed the implementation of national policies to prevent new infections and to diagnose current infections through screening.

Abstract Background & Aims Hepatocellular carcinoma ( HCC ) is the second most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The global HCC BRIDGE study was a multiregional, large‐scale, longitudinal cohort study undertaken to improve understanding of real‐life management of patients with HCC , from diagnosis to death. Methods Data were collected retrospectively from January 2005 to September 2012 by chart reviews of eligible patients newly diagnosed with HCC at participating institutions. Results Forty‐two sites in 14 countries contributed final data for 18 031 patients. Asia accounted for 67% of patients, Europe for 20% and North America for 13%. As expected, the most common risk factor was hepatitis C virus in North America, Europe and Japan, and hepatitis B virus in China, South Korea and Taiwan. The most common Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage at diagnosis was C in North America, Europe, China and South Korea, and A in Taiwan and Japan. Across all stages, first HCC treatment was most frequently transarterial chemoembolization in North America, Europe, China and South Korea, percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation in Japan and resection in Taiwan. Survival from first HCC treatment varied significantly by region, with median overall survival not reached for Taiwan and 60, 33, 31, 24 and 23 months for Japan, North America, South Korea, Europe and China respectively ( P < 0.0001). Conclusions Initial results from the BRIDGE study confirm previously reported regional trends in patient demographic characteristics and HCC risk factors, document the heterogeneity of treatment approaches across regions/countries and underscore the need for earlier HCC diagnosis worldwide.

Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype B and C seem not to affect the therapeutic response to lamivudine (3TC). Whether a given genotype has an earlier emergence of 3TC resistance remains unclear. We thus conducted this study to elucidate the association of HBV genotype with the emergence of 3TC-resistant strains in Taiwanese patients. Methods Forty chronic hepatitis B patients who developed resistance after 3TC therapy were retrospectively enrolled. HBV genotype, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV DNA levels were determined at baseline. The presence of 3TC-resistant mutations was confirmed by direct sequencing whenever biochemical breakthrough developed. Results The distribution of HBV genotype B and C in 40 patients receiving 3TC therapy were 60% and 40%, respectively. The mean interval to detect 3TC- resistant strain was 19.6 ±1.7 months. By using multivariate analysis, HBV genotype B and higher pre-treatment HBV DNA level were independently associated with earlier detection of 3TC-resistant strains. In addition, genotype B was significantly associated with development of 3TC resistance within the first 12 months of 3TC therapy compared with genotype C (odds ratio 8.27; P=0.004). Conclusions Compared with HBV genotype C, genotype B appears to have an earlier biochemical resistance to 3TC than genotype C. Therefore, more frequent monitoring of viral load or genotypical resistance might be needed for patients with HBV genotype B infection receiving 3TC therapy, especially during the first year.