Johnson, Philip J.

4033 Background: HCC is a major health problem across the world. The global HCC BRIDGE study is the first global, large-scale, observational study to document the real-world experience of HCC patients from diagnosis to death. Methods: This longitudinal cohort study (started March 2009) includes HCC patients newly diagnosed between January 2005 and June 2011 and treated at major medical centers, with data collected retrospectively and prospectively as recorded in patient charts. Full patient enrollment is expected at the end of January 2012. Results: At the time of the first interim analysis (July 2011), 12,442 treated HCC patients were enrolled at 42 sites in Asia (n=8909, 72% [China: n=6295, 71%; Japan: n=295, 3%]), Europe (n=2040, 16%) and North America 1493 (n=1493, 12%). Mean age was 57 years; 82% were male. The predominant risk factor was HBV in Asia (76%) and HCV in Europe (48%), North America (45%) and Japan (69%). Most patients were diagnosed without surveillance (Asia, 82%; Europe, 73%; North America, 69%; Japan, 64%). In Asia, Europe and North America, the predominant BCLC stage at diagnosis was C (48%, 46%, 46%) followed by A (34%, 28%, 26%). First recorded treatments in Asia, Europe and North America were resection (31%, 15%, 21%), transplantation (1%, 3%, 1%), TACE (49%, 30%, 36%), other locoregional therapy (12%, 35%, 23%) and systemic therapy (3%, 10%, 8%). Treatments ever used (2005–2011) in Asia, Europe and North America were resection (33%, 17%, 24%), transplantation (2%, 6%, 12%), TACE (57%, 35%, 48%), other locoregional therapy (20%, 42%, 37%) and systemic therapy (9%, 20%, 21%). These results will be updated with data from the full study population (approx. 19,000 patients), and preliminary survival data will be presented. Conclusions: As the largest study of its type, in 19,000 patients worldwide, the HCC BRIDGE study provides valuable insights into global HCC disease characteristics and patient management. Based on prior analyses, differences in risk factors among regions confirm well-known trends, while other observed differences (e.g., treatment variations) may be related to country- and site-specific practices and patient characteristics.

Abstract Background & Aims Hepatocellular carcinoma ( HCC ) is the second most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The global HCC BRIDGE study was a multiregional, large‐scale, longitudinal cohort study undertaken to improve understanding of real‐life management of patients with HCC , from diagnosis to death. Methods Data were collected retrospectively from January 2005 to September 2012 by chart reviews of eligible patients newly diagnosed with HCC at participating institutions. Results Forty‐two sites in 14 countries contributed final data for 18 031 patients. Asia accounted for 67% of patients, Europe for 20% and North America for 13%. As expected, the most common risk factor was hepatitis C virus in North America, Europe and Japan, and hepatitis B virus in China, South Korea and Taiwan. The most common Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage at diagnosis was C in North America, Europe, China and South Korea, and A in Taiwan and Japan. Across all stages, first HCC treatment was most frequently transarterial chemoembolization in North America, Europe, China and South Korea, percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation in Japan and resection in Taiwan. Survival from first HCC treatment varied significantly by region, with median overall survival not reached for Taiwan and 60, 33, 31, 24 and 23 months for Japan, North America, South Korea, Europe and China respectively ( P < 0.0001). Conclusions Initial results from the BRIDGE study confirm previously reported regional trends in patient demographic characteristics and HCC risk factors, document the heterogeneity of treatment approaches across regions/countries and underscore the need for earlier HCC diagnosis worldwide.

Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from them impacted survival. BRIDGE is a multiregional cohort study including HCC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2011. A total of 8,656 patients from 20 sites were classified into four groups: (A) 718 ideal resection candidates who were resected; (B) 144 ideal resection candidates who were not resected; (C) 1,624 nonideal resection candidates who were resected; and (D) 6,170 nonideal resection candidates who were not resected. Median follow‐up was 27 months. Log‐rank and Cox's regression analyses were conducted to determine differences between groups and variables associated with survival. Multivariate analysis of all ideal candidates for resection (A+B) revealed a higher risk of mortality with treatments other than resection. For all resected patients (A+C), portal hypertension and bilirubin >1 mg/dL were not associated with mortality. For all patients who were not ideal candidates for resection (C+D), resection was associated with better survival, compared to embolization and “other” treatments, but was inferior to ablation and transplantation. Conclusions : The majority of patients undergoing resection would not be considered ideal candidates based on current guidelines. Not resecting ideal candidates was associated with higher mortality. The study suggests that selection criteria for resection may be modestly expanded without compromising outcomes, and that some nonideal candidates may still potentially benefit from resection over other treatment modalities. (H epatology 2015;62:440–451

Purpose: To study the efficacy and safety of percutaneous cisplatin-epinephrine (CDDP-EPI) injectable gel in patients with localized unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had histologically proven HCC, no prior treatment except for surgery, and no more than three tumors (each measured ≤ 7 cm, total tumor volume ≤ 200 cm3). They were treated percutaneously under ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) guidance, with up to 10 mL of CDDP-EPI gel (1 mL contains 4 mg of CDDP and 0.1 mg of EPI) per treatment and four treatments in 6 weeks to a maximum of eight treatments. The primary end points were tumor response, defined by change of percentage of tumor necrosis according to CT criteria, and safety. Survival parameters were secondary end points. Results: From June 1997 to April 2000, 58 patients (median age, 65 years) entered the study. All patients were assessable for safety, and 51 were assessable for efficacy. The median number of treatments was four (range, one to eight treatments). Objective response rate was 53% (27 of 51 patients), including 16 complete and 11 partial responses. Of the 27 responders, 14 (52%) subsequently developed progressive disease, but in most of them (93%), a new tumor arose at untreated liver sites. Median survival was 27 months (range, 18.4 to 35.7 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 79%, 56%, and 14% respectively. The procedure was well tolerated with only minor side effects. Conclusion: Percutaneous local ablation with CDDP-EPI injectable gel can induce significant tumor necrosis and local control for localized unresectable HCC, and the treatment is well tolerated.