Back to Authors

Lenz, Robert

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0078-6598

Mayo Clinic

Amgen (United States)

Citations 8

Efficacy of Erenumab for the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Migraine With and Without Aura (S32.006)
Kudrow, David, Tepper, Stewart J. , Cheng, Sunfa , Leonardi, Dean, Lenz, Robert , Mikol, Daniel D., Ashina, Messoud , Dodick, David W. , Goadsby, Peter J. , Reuter, Uwe

Neurology | December 7, 2023 | Volume: 90 | Issue: 15_supplement | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.90.15_supplement.s32.006 Get It

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Erenumab on Exercise Time During a Treadmill Test in Patients with Stable Angina (S32.004)
Depré, Christophe, Antalik, Lubomir, Starling, Amaal J. , Koren, Michael J. , Eisele, Osa , Kubo, Yumi , Lenz, Robert , Mikol, Daniel D.

Neurology | December 7, 2023 | Volume: 90 | Issue: 15_supplement | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.90.15_supplement.s32.004 Get It

Prevention of Episodic Migraine with AMG 334, a Human Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Monoclonal Antibody: Phase 2 Study Results and 52-Week Analysis of Open-Label Extension (S26.002)
Lenz, Robert , Silberstein, Stephen D., Saper, Joel R., Cady, Roger , Trotman, Marie‐Louise, Dietrich, Julie , Sun, Hong , Dodick, David W. , Goadsby, Peter J. , Reuter, Uwe , Ashina, Messoud , Zhang, Feng

Neurology | December 7, 2023 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 16_supplement | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.86.16_supplement.s26.002 Get It

Prevention of Episodic Migraine with AMG 334, a Human Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Monoclonal Antibody: Phase 2 Study Results and 52-Week Analysis of Open-Label Extension (I3.001)
Lenz, Robert , Silberstein, Stephen D., Saper, Joel R., Cady, Roger , Trotman, Marie‐Louise, Dietrich, Julie , Sun, Hong , Dodick, David W. , Goadsby, Peter J. , Reuter, Uwe , Ashina, Messoud , Zhang, Feng

Neurology | December 7, 2023 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 16_supplement | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.86.16_supplement.i3.001 Get It

The Spectrum of Response to Erenumab in Patients With Episodic Migraine and Subgroup Analysis of Patients Achieving ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% Response
Broessner, Gregor, Reuter, Uwe , Bonner, Jo, Hallström, Yngve, Picard, Hernàn , Lenz, Robert , Klatt, Jan , Mikol, Daniel D., Reuter, Uwe , Dodick, David W. , Zhang, Feng

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | September 2, 2020 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2026-2040

10.1111/head.13929 Get It

Objective To assess the efficacy of erenumab at the ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) response thresholds, using data from the 6‐month double‐blind treatment phase (DBTP) of the Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Migraine Prevention (STRIVE) pivotal clinical trial. Methods Enrolled patients with episodic migraine (EM; ≥4 MMD and <15 monthly headache days) were randomized (1:1:1) to erenumab 70 mg (n = 312), erenumab 140 mg (n = 318), or placebo (n = 316) once monthly. We determined the proportions of patients with ≥50%, ≥75% and 100% reduction in MMD over the last 3 months of the STRIVE DBTP (months 4 through 6) and conducted post hoc analyses to contextualize the treatment benefit in patient subgroups achieving, and not achieving, these response thresholds. Outcome measures included changes in MMD, acute migraine‐specific medication days (MSMD), and patient‐reported outcomes. Results The proportions of patients with a reduction in MMD from baseline were greater for erenumab than for placebo at all response thresholds. As previously reported for the ≥50% response threshold, 135/312 (43.3%) of patients on erenumab 70 mg and 159/318 (50.0%) on erenumab 140 mg responded, vs 84/316 (26.6%) for placebo. At months 4 through 6, 65/312 (20.8%) and 70/318 (22.0%) of those on erenumab 70 mg and erenumab 140 mg, respectively, achieved ≥75% reductions vs 25/316 (7.9%) on placebo. A reduction of 100% response, which required no migraine days over 3 consecutive months based on observed data, was achieved by 10/312 (3.2%) of patients treated with erenumab 70 mg and 16/318 (5.0%) for erenumab 140 mg, vs 9/316 (2.8%) for placebo. At all response thresholds, responders achieved numerically greater reductions in mean MMD and MSMD, and greater improvements in disability than did the overall population; importantly, these remarkable responses were noted early. Meanwhile, 60/312 (19.2%) and 53/318 (16.7%) patients on erenumab 70 and 140 mg, respectively, had no reduction in MMD from baseline in months 4 through 6, compared with 104/316 (32.9%) patients on placebo. Conclusions The responses at the ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% thresholds provide context for establishing realistic patient and physician expectations regarding the magnitude of treatment benefit that may be achieved by patients with EM responding to erenumab (STRIVE, NCT02456740).
A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Erenumab on Exercise Time During a Treadmill Test in Patients With Stable Angina
Depré, Christophe, Antalik, Lubomir, Starling, Amaal J. , Koren, Michael J. , Eisele, Osa , Lenz, Robert , Mikol, Daniel D., Starling, Amaal

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | May 31, 2018 | Volume: 58 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 715-723

10.1111/head.13316 Get It

Objective To determine the potential impact of erenumab, a human anti‐calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) receptor monoclonal antibody, on total exercise time (TET), time to exercise‐induced angina, and ST depression in a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study in patients with stable angina due to documented coronary artery disease. Background The relative importance of the CGRP receptor pathway during myocardial ischemia has not been established. Methods An exercise treadmill test was conducted following a single IV infusion of erenumab 140 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in exercise duration as measured by TET with a noninferiority margin of −90 seconds. Safety follow‐up visits occurred through week 12. Eighty‐eight participants were included in the analysis. Results LS mean (SE) change in TET was −2.9 [14.8] seconds in the erenumab group and 8.1 [14.4] seconds in placebo; adjusted mean (90% CI) treatment difference was −11.0 (–44.9, 22.9) seconds. The CI lower bound (–44.9 sec) did not reach pre‐defined non‐inferiority margin of −90 seconds, demonstrating that TET change from baseline in the erenumab group was non‐inferior to placebo. There was no difference in time to exercise‐induced angina in erenumab and placebo groups (median [90% CI] time of 500 [420, 540] vs 508 [405, 572] seconds; hazard ratio [90% CI]: 1.11 [0.73, 1.69], P = .69) or time to onset of ≥1 mm ST‐segment depression (median [90% CI] time of 407 [380, 443] vs 420 [409,480] seconds; hazard ratio [95% CI]: 1.14 [0.76, 1.69], P = .59). Adverse events were reported by 27% and 32% of patients in erenumab and placebo groups. Conclusions Erenumab did not adversely affect exercise time in a high cardiovascular risk population of patients, supporting that inhibition of the canonical CGRP receptor does not worsen myocardial ischemia.
ARISE: A Phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine
Dodick, David W. , Ashina, Messoud , Brandes, Jan Lewis, Kudrow, David, Lantéri‐Minet, Michel , Osipova, V. В. , Palmer, Kerry, Picard, Hernàn , Mikol, Daniel D., Lenz, Robert , Dodick, David W , Ashina, Messoud

Cephalalgia | February 23, 2018 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1026-1037

10.1177/0333102418759786 Get It

Background Calcitonin gene-related peptide plays an important role in migraine pathophysiology. Erenumab, a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, is being evaluated for migraine prevention. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, 577 adults with episodic migraine were randomized to placebo or 70 mg erenumab; 570 patients were included in efficacy analyses. Primary endpoint was change in monthly migraine days. Secondary endpoints were ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days, change in acute migraine-specific medication treatment days, and ≥5-point reduction in Physical Impairment and Impact on Everyday Activities domain scores measured by the Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary. All endpoints assessed change from baseline at month 3. Results Patients receiving erenumab experienced −2.9 days change in monthly migraine days, compared with −1.8 days for placebo, least-squares mean (95% CI) treatment difference of −1.0 (−1.6, −0.5) ( p < 0.001). A ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days was achieved by 39.7% (erenumab) and 29.5% (placebo) of patients (OR:1.59 (95% CI: 1.12, 2.27) ( p = 0.010). Migraine-specific medication treatment days were reduced by −1.2 (erenumab) and −0.6 (placebo) days, a treatment difference of −0.6 (−1.0, −0.2) ( p = 0.002). The ≥5-point reduction rates in Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary – Physical Impairment were 33.0% and 27.1% (OR:1.33 (0.92, 1.90) ( p = 0.13) and in Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary – Everyday Activities were 40.4% and 35.8% (OR:1.22 (0.87, 1.71) ( p = 0.26). Safety and adverse event profiles of erenumab were similar to placebo. Most frequent adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection, injection site pain, and nasopharyngitis. Conclusions As a preventive treatment of episodic migraine, erenumab at a dosage of 70 mg monthly significantly reduced migraine frequency and acute migraine-specific medication use. (Funded by Amgen). Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02483585.