Citations

AbstractBackgroundEvent‐related‐potentials (ERPs) during cognitive tasks are sensitive measures of cognitive decline [1]‐[2] and could quantitatively measure the trajectory of disease progression or response to clinical interventions. In this longitudinal study, we aimed to compare ERPs between individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and controls, and to demonstrate the test‐retest reliability of ERP measures to assess their potential utility for future observational studies and treatment trials.MethodsParticipants included individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n=31) and healthy controls stratified by age: HC2 (n=46, 40‐60 yrs.), HC3 (n=56, 60‐90 yrs.). ERPs during attention, image recognition, and verbal memory tasks were recorded using a wireless EEG to determine amplitudes and latencies of the P200 and late positive potential (LPP) ERP components in response to target (memorized) and non‐target (novel) stimuli. Differences between MCI and HC3 groups were characterized at the initial visit, and longitudinal changes in ERP components were determined at 1‐year follow‐up for both groups. Reliability of ERP measures was demonstrated by computing intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) measures of test‐retest variability in all healthy controls (HC2 and HC3) from initial visit to 1‐year follow‐up.ResultsAt the initial visit, the MCI group demonstrated reduced LPP amplitude (Hedges‐g=0.8, p=10‐3) and delayed P200‐latency (Hedges‐g=0.89, p=10‐4) when compared to HC3. Reliability in healthy controls was high for LPP (0.85 and 0.75 for target and non‐target stimuli, respectively) and moderate for P200‐latency (0.67 and 0.53 for target and non‐target stimuli, respectively), without longitudinal changes after 1‐year follow‐up. Individuals with MCI demonstrated increased P200‐latency (Hedges‐g= 1.05, p=0.02, df=8).ConclusionsIndividuals with MCI demonstrated quantifiable memory ERP deficits at baseline with detectable change in the P200 component at 1‐year follow‐up, demonstrating that ERPs are sensitive measures for quantifying mild cognitive impairment. Test‐retest reliability of these measures was good or moderate after 1‐year, supporting their feasibility for longitudinal monitoring of patients during disease progression or quantifying the cognitive impact of potential interventions.

Abstract Background We have previously reported on a US based national surveillance study from 6 geographically dispersed medical centers for the susceptibility and epidemiology of C. difficile isolates. This current survey was conducted with isolates collected in 2020-21 with specific attention to the susceptibility to ridinilazole as well as nine comparators. A summary of the susceptibilities of 300 isolates of C. difficile tested against 10 antimicrobial agents Methods in 2020-21 C. difficile isolates or stools from patients with C. difficile toxin positive antibiotic associated diarrhea were collected in 6 US medical centers and referred to a central lab. After confirmation of 300 isolates antibiotic susceptibilities were determined by agar dilution method (CLSI M11-A9) against 10 agents listed in Table below. Ribotyping was performed by PCR capillary gel electrophoresis on all isolates. Results A summary of the susceptibilities of the 300 isolates against 10 antimicrobial agents are shown in the Table. The most common ribotype was 014-020 (14.4% compared to 11.8% in 2016), followed by 106 (10%, compared to 15% in 2016), 027 (10% compared to 13.1% in 2016), 002 (8% compared to 8.5% in 2016, 078-126 (4.3% compared to 1.3% in 2016). Ridinilazole was very potent against all isolates collected in the US with an MIC 90 of 0.25 mcg/ml, including against all the hypervirulent ribotypes as well as those isolates with antibiotic resistances to other antibiotics in the test panel. Conclusion Ridinilazole showed excellent in-vitro activity against C. difficile isolates in the US, independent of ribotype. There has been a striking change in ribotype distribution compared to 2016, accompanied by a reduction in C. difficile resistance to moxifloxacin and imipenem. Disclosures Cheleste M. Thorpe, MD, Actelion: Grant/Research Support|Deinove: Advisor/Consultant|General Mills: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Summit: Advisor/Consultant|Summit: Grant/Research Support Stuart Johnson, M.D., Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Membership on Ferring Publication Steering Committee|Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Summit Plc: Advisor/Consultant Dale N. Gerding, MD, Destiny Pharma plc.: Advisor/Consultant Karen C. Carroll, MD, Abbott Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|BD Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|BD Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support|BioRad, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Meridian Biosciences: Grant/Research Support|Roche Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|Scanogen, Inc: Advisor/Consultant|Scanogen, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Thermo Fisher, Inc: Advisor/Consultant Kevin W. Garey, PharmD, MS, Acurx: Grant/Research Support|cidara: Advisor/Consultant|cidara: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Seres Health: Grant/Research Support|Summit: Grant/Research Support Esther Duperchy, PhD, Summit Plc: Employee David R. Snydman, MD, Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck and Company: Grant/Research Support|Prolacta: Advisor/Consultant|Prolacta: Grant/Research Support|Seres: Advisor/Consultant|Seres Health: Grant/Research Support|Summit Plc: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Grant/Research Support|Visterra: Advisor/Consultant.

Abstract Objective To determine COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) in the seven-day post-vaccination period in patients with SLE vs autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs), non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs), and healthy controls (HC). Methods Data were captured through the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) questionnaire (March–December 2021). Multivariable regression models accounted for age, gender, ethnicity, vaccine type and background treatment. Results Among 9462 complete respondents, 583 (6.2%) were SLE patients (mean age: 40.1 years; 94.5% females; 40.5% Asian; 42.9% Pfizer-recipients). Minor AEs were reported by 83.0% of SLE patients, major by 2.6%, hospitalization by 0.2%. AE and hospitalization frequencies were similar between patients with active and inactive SLE. Rashes were more frequent in SLE patients vs HC (OR; 95% CI: 1.2; 1.0, 1.5), chills less frequent in SLE vs AIRDs (0.6; 0.4, 0.8) and nrAIDs (0.5; 0.3, 0.8), and fatigue less frequent in SLE vs nrAIDs (0.6; 0.4, 0.9). Pfizer-recipients reported higher overall AE (2.2; 1.1, 4.2) and injection site pain (2.9; 1.6, 5.0) frequencies than recipients of other vaccines, Oxford/AstraZeneca-recipients more body ache, fever, chills (OR: 2.5, 3.0), Moderna-recipients more body ache, fever, chills, rashes (OR: 2.6, 4.3). Hospitalization frequencies were similar across vaccine types. AE frequencies were similar across treatment groups, although chills were less frequent in antimalarial users vs non-users (0.5; 0.3, 0.9). Conclusion While COVID-19 vaccination-related AEs were reported by four-fifths of SLE patients, those were mostly minor and comparable to AEs reported by healthy individuals, providing reassurance regarding COVID-19 vaccination safety in SLE.

Abstract Characterizing intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity of glioblastoma has historically relied on discrete classifications of malignant cell populations leaving immune and other cell populations, known to exist admixed with the malignant tumor cells, relatively neglected. Manifold learning algorithms can manage deconvolving multiple cell populations and are often used to track cell state transitions in single cell transcriptomics. We applied a manifold learning approach to TCGA microarray data (Nf525) and bulk transcriptomics of 134 image localized biopsies across 30 patients with primary and 9 with recurrent glioblastoma to further elucidate how to organize biopsies across a spectrum of possible tissue states. The algorithm revealed a low-dimensional manifold graph for which each biopsy lives across 3 polarizing tissue states - one that is associated with diffusely invaded brain, one that is enriched in mesenchymal genes, and one that is enriched in classical proliferative tumor signatures. We deconvolved the bulk transcriptomics of the image-localized biopsies to reveal the relative abundance of 18 malignant, immune, and other cell subpopulations in each biopsy. Overlaying the cellular decomposition onto the manifold graph visualizing the tissue state distributions revealed that transitions between states correlate with changes in cellular cohabitation composition. The tumor cellular cohabitation ecologies have the lowest diversity, as inferred by ecological measures such as Shannon entropy and evenness, at the distal poles of the graph when compared to the transitional arms. Further, we found that the relationship between imaging appearance of contrast enhancement on T1-weighted MRI and the biopsy cellular composition varies with sex and primary vs recurrent biopsy status. The limited spectrum of possible tissue states revealed by the manifold learning is suggestive of a limited continuum along which tumor and non-tumoral cell populations can cohabitate. Such a limited low-dimensional biological space may constrain the dynamics of tumor biology in a predictable manner.

ImportanceCytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation.ObjectiveTo determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings.ExposuresImmunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm.ResultsThe median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79).Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701

Abstract Objectives The COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune diseases (COVAD) study aimed to assess short-term COVID-19 vaccination-related adverse events (AEs) in RA patients. Methods An online self-reported questionnaire (March–December 2021) was used to capture data related to COVID-19 vaccination-related AEs in RA, other autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) (excluding RA and inflammatory myositis), non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs) and healthy controls (HCs). Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were performed. Results Of the 9462 complete respondents, 14.2% (n = 1347) had been diagnosed with RA; they had a mean (s.d.) age of 50.7 (13.7) years, 74.2% were women and 49.3% were Caucasian. In total, 76.9% and 4.2% of patients with RA reported minor and major AEs, respectively. Patients with active and inactive RA had similar AE and hospitalization frequencies. Overall, AEs were reported more frequently by BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 recipients and less frequently by BBV152 recipients compared with the rest. Major AE and hospitalization frequencies were similar across recipients of different vaccines. Patients receiving methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine reported fewer minor AEs than those patients not on them. Compared with HCs and patients with other AIRDs, patients with RA reported similar total AEs, overall minor AEs, and hospitalizations. Compared with nrAIDs, patients with RA reported lower frequencies of overall AEs, minor AEs (both odds ratio [OR] = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5, 0.9), and injection site pain (OR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.5, 0.8) with similar major AE and hospitalization frequencies. Conclusion Despite the differences in AE frequency across different COVID-19 vaccines, all were well tolerated in patients with RA and were comparable to HCs, providing reassurance as to the safety of COVID-19 vaccination.