Thorpe, Cheleste M.

ABSTRACT We have previously reported on the susceptibility and epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile isolates from six geographically dispersed medical centers in the United States. This current survey was conducted with isolates collected in 2020–2021 from six geographically dispersed medical centers in the United States, with specific attention to susceptibility to ridinilazole as well as nine comparators. C. difficile isolates or stools from patients with C. difficile antibiotic-associated diarrhea were collected and referred to a central laboratory. After species confirmation of 300 isolates at the central laboratory, antibiotic susceptibilities were determined by the agar dilution method [M11-A9, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)] against the 10 agents. Ribotyping was performed by PCR capillary gel electrophoresis on all isolates. Ridinilazole had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 90 of 0.25 mcg/mL, and no isolate had an MIC greater than 0.5 mcg/mL. In comparison, fidaxomicin had an MIC 90 of 0.5 mcg/mL. The vancomycin MIC 90 was 2 mcg/mL with a 0.7% resistance rate [both CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria]. The metronidazole MIC 90 was 1 mcg/mL, with none resistant by CLSI criteria, and a 0.3% resistance rate by EUCAST criteria. Among the 50 different ribotypes isolated in the survey, the most common ribotype was 014–020 (14.0%) followed by 106 (10.3%), 027 (10%), 002 (8%), and 078–126 (4.3%). Ridinilazole maintained activity against all ribotypes and all strains resistant to any other agent tested. Ridinilazole showed excellent in vitro activity against C. difficile isolates collected between 2020 and 2021 in the United States, independent of ribotype.

Abstract Background We have previously reported on a US based national surveillance study from 6 geographically dispersed medical centers for the susceptibility and epidemiology of C. difficile isolates. This current survey was conducted with isolates collected in 2020-21 with specific attention to the susceptibility to ridinilazole as well as nine comparators. A summary of the susceptibilities of 300 isolates of C. difficile tested against 10 antimicrobial agents Methods in 2020-21 C. difficile isolates or stools from patients with C. difficile toxin positive antibiotic associated diarrhea were collected in 6 US medical centers and referred to a central lab. After confirmation of 300 isolates antibiotic susceptibilities were determined by agar dilution method (CLSI M11-A9) against 10 agents listed in Table below. Ribotyping was performed by PCR capillary gel electrophoresis on all isolates. Results A summary of the susceptibilities of the 300 isolates against 10 antimicrobial agents are shown in the Table. The most common ribotype was 014-020 (14.4% compared to 11.8% in 2016), followed by 106 (10%, compared to 15% in 2016), 027 (10% compared to 13.1% in 2016), 002 (8% compared to 8.5% in 2016, 078-126 (4.3% compared to 1.3% in 2016). Ridinilazole was very potent against all isolates collected in the US with an MIC 90 of 0.25 mcg/ml, including against all the hypervirulent ribotypes as well as those isolates with antibiotic resistances to other antibiotics in the test panel. Conclusion Ridinilazole showed excellent in-vitro activity against C. difficile isolates in the US, independent of ribotype. There has been a striking change in ribotype distribution compared to 2016, accompanied by a reduction in C. difficile resistance to moxifloxacin and imipenem. Disclosures Cheleste M. Thorpe, MD, Actelion: Grant/Research Support|Deinove: Advisor/Consultant|General Mills: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Summit: Advisor/Consultant|Summit: Grant/Research Support Stuart Johnson, M.D., Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Membership on Ferring Publication Steering Committee|Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Summit Plc: Advisor/Consultant Dale N. Gerding, MD, Destiny Pharma plc.: Advisor/Consultant Karen C. Carroll, MD, Abbott Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|BD Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|BD Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support|BioRad, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Meridian Biosciences: Grant/Research Support|Roche Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|Scanogen, Inc: Advisor/Consultant|Scanogen, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Thermo Fisher, Inc: Advisor/Consultant Kevin W. Garey, PharmD, MS, Acurx: Grant/Research Support|cidara: Advisor/Consultant|cidara: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Seres Health: Grant/Research Support|Summit: Grant/Research Support Esther Duperchy, PhD, Summit Plc: Employee David R. Snydman, MD, Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck and Company: Grant/Research Support|Prolacta: Advisor/Consultant|Prolacta: Grant/Research Support|Seres: Advisor/Consultant|Seres Health: Grant/Research Support|Summit Plc: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Grant/Research Support|Visterra: Advisor/Consultant.

In 2011, we initiated a sentinel surveillance network to assess changes in Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium ) difficile antimicrobial susceptibility to fidaxomicin from 6 geographically dispersed medical centers in the United States. This report summarizes data from 2013 to 2016. C. difficile isolates or toxin-positive stools from patients were referred to a central laboratory. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by agar dilution. CLSI, EUCAST, or FDA breakpoints were used, where applicable.

Abstract Background Trends in the distribution of ribotypes for C. difficile associated diarrheal isolates obtained over time in the United States are lacking. As part of surveillance program for C. difficile susceptibility, we analyzed stool isolates for ribotype distribution from a phase 2 trial of surotomycin (2010–2011) (North America sites) as well as a national surveillance study from 2011–2014. Isolates for the surveillance study were referred from 6 geographically distinct medical centers. Methods C. difficile isolates or C. difficile toxin + stools from patients with C. difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) were submitted for testing to Tufts Medical Center. Following isolation and confirmation as C. difficile, a random sample of isolates were ribotyped by PCR capillary gel electrophoresis. Results 673 isolates over the 5 years of the analysis have been ribotyped to date. There were 49 unique ribotype designations, and 16 ribotypes had more than 10 isolates. The ribotype distribution by year is shown in the table. Conclusion There has been a change in the frequency of ribotypes over time in the US. Of the most common ribotypes seen, 027 has decreased by over 50% while there has been an increase of 014-020, 002, and 106. 014-020 is now the most common ribotype seen in the US. These data suggest that there is a changing epidemiology of C. difficile in the US and continuous monitoring of the ribotype distributions and clinical implications is warranted. Disclosures D. R. Snydman, Merck: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee and Research grant; Shire: Consultant, Consulting fee; Summit PLC: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee and Research grant; BioK+: Consultant, Consulting fee; Actelion: Grant Investigator, Research grant; S. G. Jenkins, Cormedix: Consultant, Consulting fee; Bayer: Consultant, Consulting fee; Merck: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Research grant; E. J. C. Goldstein, Merck: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee and Grant recipient; Cubist: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee; Actelion: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient; Summit PLC: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Grant recipient; R. Patel, Curetis: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee and Research grant; Pocared: Grant Investigator, Research grant; nanoMR: Grant Investigator, Research grant; BioFire: Grant Investigator, Research grant; Check-Points: Grant Investigator, Research grant; 3M: Grant Investigator, Research grant; Cubist: Grant Investigator, Research grant; Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant; S. Johnson, Bio-K+: Consultant, Consulting fee; D. N. Gerding, Merck, Shire, Cubist, Rebiotix, sanofi pasteur, Summit, DaVoltera, Actelion: Consultant, Consulting fee; CDC, US Dept of Veterans Affairs Research Service: Grant Investigator, Research grant

ABSTRACT In 2011 a surveillance study for the susceptibility to fidaxomicin and epidemiology of Clostridium difficile isolates in the United States was undertaken in seven geographically dispersed medical centers. This report encompasses baseline surveillance in 2011 and 2012 on 925 isolates. A convenience sample of C. difficile isolates or toxin positive stools from patients were referred to a central laboratory. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by agar dilution (CLSI M11-A8). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Food and Drug Administration, or European Union of Clinical Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints were applied where applicable. Toxin gene profiles were characterized by multiplex PCR on each isolate. A random sample of 322 strains, stratified by institution, underwent restriction endonuclease analysis (REA). The fidaxomicin MIC 90 was 0.5 μg/ml for all isolates regardless of REA type or toxin gene profile, and all isolates were inhibited at ≤1.0 μg/ml. By REA typing, BI strains represented 25.5% of the isolates. The toxin gene profile of tcdA , tcdB , and cdtA/B positive with a tcdC 18-bp deletion correlated with BI REA group. Moxifloxacin and clindamycin resistance was increased among either BI or binary toxin-positive isolates. Metronidazole and vancomycin showed reduced susceptibility (EUCAST criteria) in these isolates. Geographic variations in susceptibility, REA group and binary toxin gene presence were observed. Fidaxomicin activity against C. difficile isolated in a national surveillance study did not change more than 1 year after licensure. This analysis provides baseline results for future comparisons.