Citations

PURPOSE The outcomes of anti–PD-1 agents plus fluoropyrimidine/platinum in frontline advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (aGEAs) remain poor. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and activity of fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin and tislelizumab with the DKK1-neutralizing antibody DKN-01 in aGEAs in a phase IIa open-label study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients had untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative aGEAs, RECIST v1.1 measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1, and adequate organ function. Patients received intravenous DKN-01 300 mg once every 2 weeks, tislelizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 once every 3 weeks, and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 twice daily on days 1-15 of each 21-day cycle. The primary end point was safety and tolerability. Key secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) by RECISTv1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Between September 18, 2020, and April 8, 2021, 25 patients were enrolled. All patients who received at least one dose of DKN-01 were included in the safety analysis. Most patients had gastroesophageal junction tumors, median age was 61 years, 76% were male, and 55% were ECOG of 0. All patients reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. The ORR was 73% (95% CI, 49.8 to 89.3), with a disease control rate of 95%. The ORR was 90% (95% CI, 55.5 to 99.7) in the DKK1-high tumor patients and 67% (95% CI, 29.9 to 92.5) in the DKK1-low tumor patients. The median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 12.0) and the 12-month PFS rate was 33%. The median OS was 19.5 months (95% CI, 15.2 to 24.4) with a 12-month OS rate of 76% and an 18-month OS rate of 55%. CONCLUSION DKN-01 can be safely combined with frontline fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin and tislelizumab and demonstrates encouraging activity independent of PD-L1 expression levels. A randomized phase II trial is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04363801 ).

Abstract Background Most breast biopsies are diagnosed as benign breast disease, with 1.5- to 4-fold increased breast cancer risk. Apart from pathologic diagnoses of atypical hyperplasia, few factors aid in breast cancer risk assessment of these patients. We assessed whether a 313–single nucleotide variation (formerly single-nucleotide polymorphism) polygenic risk score stratifies risk of benign breast disease patients. Methods We pooled data from 5 Breast Cancer Association Consortium case-control studies (mean age = 59.9 years), including 6706 participants with breast cancer and 8488 participants without breast cancer. Using logistic regression, we estimated breast cancer risk associations by self-reported benign breast disease history and strata of polygenic risk score, with median polygenic risk score category among women without benign breast disease as the referent. We assessed interactions and mediation of benign breast disease and polygenic risk score with breast cancer risk. Results Benign breast disease history was associated with increased breast cancer risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37 to 1.60; P < .001). Polygenic risk score increased breast cancer risk, irrespective of benign breast disease history (Pinteraction = .48), with minimal evidence of mediation of either factor by the other. Women with benign breast disease and polygenic risk score in the highest tertile had more than twofold increased odds of breast cancer (OR = 2.73, 95% CI = 2.41 to 3.09), and those with benign breast disease and polygenic risk score in the lowest tertile experienced reduced breast cancer risk (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.91) compared with the referent group. Women with benign breast disease and polygenic risk score in the highest decile had a 3.7-fold increase (95% CI = 3.00 to 4.61) compared with those with median polygenic risk score without benign breast disease. Conclusion Breast cancer risks are elevated among women with benign breast disease and increase progressively with polygenic risk score, suggesting that optimal combinations of these factors may improve risk stratification.

The NCCN Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer/Fallopian Tube Cancer/Primary Peritoneal Cancer provide multidisciplinary diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment recommendations for this disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights detail how the evolution of the use of PARP inhibitors as maintenance and single-agent regimens for the treatment of ovarian cancer informed panel recommendations in the guidelines.

Objectives Mayo Clinic’s hospital-at-home program, Advanced Care at Home (ACH), launched in 2020. While hospital-at-home literature reported safe and effective care for the general patient population and those with COVID, comparative outcomes between these two groups were unknown. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the outcomes of COVID and non-COVID patients enrolled in ACH and evaluate if COVID patients can be safely treated in this setting. Methods Demographics, clinical characteristics, and safety outcomes were retrospectively analyzed to compare COVID and non-COVID patients discharged from ACH between November 2020 and May 2022. Patient characteristics analyzed included severity of illness (SOI) and risk of mortality (ROM), calculated using All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG). Hospitalization-specific variables included length of stay (LOS), escalation of care, and 30-day readmission rates. Results Of 1051 patients, 173 (16%) had COVID, and 878 (84%) were non-COVID patients. The average age in the COVID cohort was 66.6 (15.3) years, compared with 72.2 (14.0) in the non-COVID cohort. Extreme SOI was higher in the COVID group (43.3% versus 17.4%), as was extreme ROM (46.2% versus 16.2%), but LOS was shorter (5.7 versus 7 days). Escalation of care (7.5% in COVID cohort versus 8.4%) and 30-day readmission outcomes (9.2% for COVID patients versus 12.9%) were not statistically different between the groups. Conclusions Despite higher SOI and ROM, COVID patients had shorter LOS with outcomes that were not statistically different from non-COVID patients. COVID patients can be safely and efficiently cared for in ACH.

OBJECTIVE The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device was approved to treat wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. The device is designed as an intrasaccular flow disruptor covering aneurysm widths up to 10 mm. Although prior studies combined all aneurysm sizes, it is known that aneurysms behave differently in response to endovascular treatment based on their size. Therefore, the authors’ objective was to identify ideal middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm width and neck sizes most suitable for WEB treatment. METHODS The WorldWideWEB consortium is a large multicenter retrospective database that analyzes intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. In this study, all unruptured MCA bifurcation aneurysms with available measurements were included. Cutoff values based on aneurysm width and neck in relation to aneurysm occlusion status were measured using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Propensity score matching (PSM) was then used to compare treatment outcomes between aneurysms smaller and larger than the cutoff value for both width and neck size. RESULTS The ideal cutoff values for MCA bifurcation aneurysm width and neck were 6.1 mm and 4.6 mm, respectively. On PSM, 87 matched pairs were compared based on width size (≤ 6.1 mm and > 6.1 mm), and 77 matched pairs were compared based on neck size (≤ 4.6 mm and > 4.6 mm). There was a significant difference in adequate aneurysm occlusion between aneurysms smaller and larger than those cutoff values for both widths (93% vs 76%, p = 0.0017) and neck sizes (90% vs 70%, p = 0.0026). The retreatment rate was also significantly higher for larger aneurysms in both parameters. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that MCA bifurcation aneurysms ≤ 6.1 mm in width and ≤ 4.6 mm in neck size are significantly better candidates for WEB treatment, leading to improved occlusion status and reduced retreatment rate, which are important considerations when using WEB devices.

Abstract Background Fibrinogen plays a critical role in hemostasis and is essential to clot formation. Changes in the quantity or activity of fibrinogen can lead to disorders affecting coagulation. Thus, it is essential to precisely quantify fibrinogen levels to differentiate between hyperfibrinogenemia in hypercoagulable disorders and dysfibrinogenemia, hypo/afibrinogenemia, and irregular bleeding. Current diagnostic tests that use antibodies to detect fibrinogen or activity-based measures are susceptible to interference from heparin contamination, hemolysis, and hyperbilirubinemia. Here, we evaluated the use of targeted proteomics for developing a quantitative assay for fibrinogen in plasma samples. Methods Four peptides each for alpha and gamma chains of fibrinogen were synthesized using FMOC chemistry on a Liberty Blue (CEM Corp) peptide synthesizer. A targeted multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) assay was developed and optimized using Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC connected to a TSQ Altis triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Evaluations were conducted using a range of standards, such as pure protein, WHO plasma and commercially available plasma with known fibrinogen amounts for the accurate quantitation of fibrinogen. Calibration curves were generated using different dilutions in various matrices. The repeatability and precision of the assay were evaluated across five different days. The plasma samples were processed and digested in a 96-well plate and subjected to C18 clean-up using a Bravo automated liquid handler (Agilent). All samples were spiked-in with corresponding heavy-labeled peptides prior to digestion with trypsin. Multiple reaction monitoring assays were performed on tryptic digests of plasma samples. Results Calibration curves using commercial plasma for all peptides showed linearity from 20 mg/dl to 1,308 mg/dl. This covers the entire clinical range including normal (200-350 mg/dl), deficient states (<100 mg/dl) and excess production (>350 mg/dl) that can be used for evaluation of bleeding disorders including consumption coagulopathy and hyperfibrinogenemia. Based on the overall performance in terms of linearity, limit of detection/quantitation, carryover and coefficient of variation (CV) across five different days, two peptides per chain were finally selected for developing the quantitative assay. The intra-assay variability was <5% and intra-day CV was ∼20%. This assay is currently being tested on a variety of clinical samples representing a range of fibrinogen levels. Conclusions Our study focused on assessing whether multiplexed MRM assay could be implemented to measure fibrinogen levels in plasma. Our data indicate the feasibility of MRM-based assays for determining fibrinogen levels as an alternative to existing non-mass spectrometry-based activity or antigen assays.

Abstract Background Laboratory identification of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) is critical for diagnosing antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, a common cause of unprovoked thromboembolic events and pregnancy morbidity. Commonly used clot-based assays for LAC include the dilute Russell’s viper venom time (DRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), but these are susceptible to anticoagulant interferences. Despite standardization efforts, LAC interpretation remains challenging due to pre- and post-analytical complexity and limited expertise. This study explored the use of deep neural networks (DNN) to facilitate LAC diagnosis. Methods Retrospective data for LAC profiling with 13 features performed at Mayo Clinic between 2021 and 2022 was collected. The profiles of 7,202 patients were randomly divided into training (n=4608), validation (n=1153), and test cohorts (n=1441). Diagnostic outputs including LAC positivity (determined by DRVVT or APTT) and the presence of warfarin (WAR) and heparin (HEP), were confirmed by expert assessment. Three DNN architectures were developed and evaluated (Figure 1): (1) four single output DNN models with a domain knowledge driven selection of input features, (2) four single output DNN models using the same 13 inputs across all models, and (3) a multi-output DNN model. Model performance was evaluated using the F1 score and the index of balanced accuracy (IBA) for each output label. Results Architecture 1 achieved high diagnostic accuracy with IBA values of 0.989-1.000 for all four outputs and F1 scores of 0.945-0.991. Architecture 2 exhibited F1 scores of 0.902-0.973 and IBA values of 0.935-0.992. Architecture 3 achieved F1 scores of 0.933-0.967 and IBA values of 0.941-0.983. Conclusions All three architectures accurately classify LAC and common anticoagulation effects. The comparable performance of architectures 1 and 2 suggests that manual feature extraction is unnecessary. Given its relative simplicity and versatility, architecture 3 is the preferred choice for implementation in a clinical laboratory to standardize LAC diagnosis.

160 Background: In the United States, racial/ethnic disparities in adoption of breast cancer evidence-based practices (EBPs) persist along the cancer care continuum. This scoping review applied an implementation science lens to describe the current evidence base for interventions to reduce disparities, synthesizing evidence on effective interventions while highlighting gaps in the literature. Methods: A formalized search strategy identified USA-based interventional studies aiming to improve adoption of an EBP along the breast cancer care continuum among racially/ethnically minoritized patients. Relevant articles from 1/2010 - 8/2022 (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus) were included. For each article, two reviewers screened and extracted data, with a third resolving discrepancies. The PRISMA-ScR checklist and JBO Manual for Evidence Synthesis framework were followed. Results: Our search strategy yielded 45,215 articles. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 59 articles were retained, targeting screening (85%, 50 of 59), treatment (12%, 7 of 59), and survivorship (5%, 3 of 59) (2 targeted multiple areas). No articles targeted end-of-life care. Of these, 49% (29 of 59) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Among 24 screening RCTs, the most common interventions—and fraction with statistically significant improved screening uptake—were patient navigation (100%, 11 of 11) and patient education (80%, 4 of 5). Among 4 treatment RCTs, 3 targeted adjuvant chemotherapy uptake. Of these, 1 had significant improvements and used patient navigation. The 2 studies without significant improvements used a patient tracking tool/alert system or patient education. Among 2 survivorship RCTs, one used email interventions, resulting in significantly improved physical activity and dietary health. A second used a nurse-facilitated internet support group, resulting in significantly improved physical/psychological symptoms. Early to mid-stage implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, or fidelity) were commonly measured (81%, 48 of 59). No study measured later stage implementation outcomes (sustainability or costs). Conclusions: In multiple studies, patient navigation and education improved breast cancer screening among racially/ethnically minoritized populations. In one study, patient navigation improved completion of adjuvant treatment. Despite these studies, patient navigation is not reimbursed for cancer screening, and adoption has not been widespread. Future studies should focus on evaluating and improving later stage implementation outcomes (sustainability and costs). Based on these results, insurance reimbursement mechanisms for screening-related navigation may be warranted. Future breast cancer care delivery disparities research should also be expanded to include treatment, survivorship, and end-of-life care.

AbstractThe Psychiatric Pediatric Issues Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) aimed to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with epilepsy. The Task Force conducted a systematic review and identified two studies that assessed the accuracy of four screening measures for depression and anxiety symptoms compared with a psychiatric interview. Nine studies met the eligibility criteria for treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders or symptoms. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed. The evidence generated by this review followed by consensus where evidence was missing generated 47 recommendations. Those with a high level of agreement (≥80%) are summarized. Diagnosis: (1) Universal screening for anxiety and depression is recommended. Closer surveillance is recommended for children after 12 years, at higher risk (e.g., suicide‐related behavior), with subthreshold symptoms, and experiencing seizure worsening or therapeutic modifications. (2) Multiple sources of ascertainment and a formal screening are recommended. Clinical interviews are recommended whenever possible. The healthcare provider must always explain that symptom recognition is essential to optimize treatment outcomes and reduce morbidity. (3) Questioning about the relationship between symptoms of anxiety or depression with seizure worsening/control and behavioral adverse effects of antiseizure medications is recommended. Treatment: (1) An individualized treatment plan is recommended. (2) For mild depression, active monitoring must be considered. (3) Referral to a mental health care provider must be considered for moderate to severe depression and anxiety. (4) Clinical care pathways must be developed. (5) Psychosocial interventions must be tailored and age‐appropriate. (6) Healthcare providers must monitor children with epilepsy who are prescribed antidepressants, considering symptoms and functioning that may not improve simultaneously. (7) Caregiver education is essential to ensure treatment adherence. (8) A shared‐care model involving all healthcare providers is recommended for children and adolescents with epilepsy and mental health disorders. We identified clinical decisions in the management of depression and anxiety that lack solid evidence and provide consensus‐based guidance to address the care of children and adolescents with epilepsy.