Citations

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a prevalent condition affecting one in four patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has proven benefits in PAD. We are conducting a trial testing the utility of IPC in the ESRD population by assessing the improvement in quality of life (QOL), functional limitation and walking performance from PAD-related symptoms. We aim to present our pilot results. Methods: Prospective single cohort study undergoing recruitment of outpatients at the hemodialysis (HD) unit of John H. Stroger Hospital. The calculated sample size is 78. PAD is confirmed by ankle-brachial index (ABI) and demographics obtained from interview and chart review. At baseline and post intervention, a Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT), Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ) and Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) are administered. The IPC device (Bio Arterial Plus) is used for intervention during HD. We present continuous variables as median (IQR) and categorical variables as percentage. Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed for comparison of results. Results: So far, 9 patients have completed intervention for the pilot study, 44% are men, the majority hispanic (66%), with age 48 (41-63) years. At baseline 66% of ABI were abnormal, all due to non-compressible PAD 1.46 (1.20-1.62). All patients have HTN, 44% diabetes, 33% hyperlipidemia and 33% heart failure. The median time of intervention is 70 (60-83) days. There was a significant difference in QOL measured by the WIQ (Fig.1), PAQ physical limitation (p=0.011), and PAQ social limitation (p=0.018). Although there was a trend towards benefit, no statistical difference was found on rest of objective and subjective measured parameters (p>0.05) Conclusions: Preliminary, IPC shows to improve many subsets of QOL in patients with ESRD and PAD. Given the small sample, improvement of walking distance remains elusive but with trends towards benefit.

Introduction: The incidence and etiologies underlying sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in the young are derived from population- and referral-based cohorts of young SCA survivors. The extent to which the use of these cohorts contributes to discrepancies in our understanding of SCA in the young is unknown. As such, we sought to determine and compare the spectrum of SCA etiologies observed in young SCA survivors evaluated at a single tertiary center on both a primary and referral basis. Methods: Retrospective review of 940 young SCA survivors evaluated between 1990 and 2017 was used to identify all individuals ≤ 50 years of age that experienced a SCA. SCA root cause was determined by review of the medical records and diagnoses classified as ischemic, primary electrical, structural, or unexplained. SCA survivors that initially presented to our institution were classified as primary, while those who presented for secondary evaluation received a referral classification. Results: Overall, 566 SCA survivors were identified (age at event 33 ± 14 years; 39% females). In comparison to primary SCA survivors, referral SCA survivors were younger at the time of SCA (39 ± 12 vs. 30 ± 14 years; p<0.0001) and less likely to experience pre-SCA symptoms (45% vs. 27%; p<0.0001). Among all SCA survivors, the most common etiologies were idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (27%), acute coronary syndrome (21%), long QT syndrome (10%), and hypertrophic (7%) and dilated (6%) cardiomyopathies. Ischemic etiologies were less common (45% vs. 25%; p<0.0001) and primary electrical disorders more common (6% vs. 23%; p<0.0001) in referral SCA survivors. Conversely, genetic heart diseases (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, long QT syndrome, etc.) were over-represented in referral cases (8% vs. 29%; p<0.0001), whereas no difference was observed in the number of primary and referral SCAs that remained unexplained. Conclusion: This study demonstrates, for the first time, that differences in SCA root cause exist between young SCA survivors evaluated at the same tertiary medical center on a primary vs. referral basis. Ongoing comparison of SCA etiologies between primary and referral SCA survivors may help resolve discrepancies regarding the contribution of specific disorders to SCA in the young.

Background: Non-cardiac surgery (NCS) in patients with severe aortic stenosis has traditionally been associated with high perioperative mortality. Aortic valve replacement is recommended prior to elective NCS, but the impact of this strategy has not been systematically assessed. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing major NCS at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2013. Patients undergoing aortic valve intervention (AVI) prior to NCS were compared to those undergoing surgery without prior AVI (control). Patients undergoing emergency surgery were excluded. Primary endpoint was occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; combination of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, new/worsening heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia) within 30 days of NCS; secondary endpoints were mortality at 30 days and 1 year after NCS. Results: 180 patients (age 74.5 ± 10.5 years, 64% male) who underwent NCS within 12 months after AVI, were compared to 232 patients (age 76.6 ± 10.7 years, 56% male) in the control group. Patients undergoing AVI were more often symptomatic than controls (41% vs 26%, p = 0.002). MACE was significantly higher in the control group (21.6% vs 5.6%, p < 0.001), mainly due to the increased risk of heart failure in the postoperative period in this group (18.5% vs 2.2%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the rate of myocardial infarction (1.7% vs 0.6%, p = 0.39), ventricular arrhythmia (0.9 % vs 0 %, p = 0.51) or stroke (0.9 % vs 0 %, p = 0.51). Kaplan-Meier assessment demonstrated no significant difference at 30 days but a reduction in 1 year mortality in the AVI group compared to the control group (Figure). Conclusions: Pre-operative AVI for severe aortic stenosis results in reduced heart failure and improved 1 year survival. However, other MACE and 30 day mortality appears unchanged. Pre-operative AVI should be considered in symptomatic patients, where the benefit of AVI is demonstrated to be greatest.

Abstract Introduction To further characterize the many struggles and unmet needs of people with narcolepsy (PWN), passive social listening was used to explore how PWN describe the condition using their own words. Methods MyNarcolepsyTeam is a social network where members can organically share their experiences living with narcolepsy with one another. Following an online survey, organic posts, comments, questions, and answers posted from January 2022 to present were analyzed. Results Of 110 survey respondents, 31% reported that the time from symptom onset to diagnosis was ≥10 years. Social listening highlighted both misdiagnoses (eg, depression) and “missed” diagnoses (eg, sleep apnea but not narcolepsy). Almost half (43%) of respondents reported pain as a comorbidity. Social listening revealed the burden of painful comorbidities (eg, fibromyalgia, migraines, neuropathy), which often lead to additional medications and further sleep disruption. While 90% of respondents reported excessive daytime sleepiness, 81% also reported sleep disturbances. Nighttime disruptions experienced by PWN included poor sleep quality, vivid dreams, frequent awakenings, sleep paralysis, and abnormal REM cycles. Structured routines helped improve sleep for some PWN. Additionally, 33% of respondents reporting cataplexy always experienced full body cataplexy; 21% always experienced localized cataplexy; 43% experienced a mix of both, with the remaining answering ‘not sure.’ Social listening highlighted the dangers of cataplexy, including falls/fractures. Organic conversations also brought to bear the full range of emotions that can trigger an attack – from laughter, to being startled, to feeling stressed. In total, 65% of respondents were taking ≥2 medications to treat daytime and/or nighttime narcolepsy symptoms. Organic conversations highlighted the challenges PWN experience managing complex treatment regimens in an attempt to cope with the full spectrum of narcolepsy symptoms. Conclusion Insight into how narcolepsy is experienced in patients’ own words and how patients try to mitigate their symptoms will help sleep specialists better understand the challenges and needs of PWN, which can lead to both faster diagnosis and more effective, individualized treatment. Support (if any) Avadel Pharmaceuticals

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a well-established treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). While PD is primarily characterized by motor symptoms such as tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia, it also involves a range of non-motor symptoms, and anxiety is one of the most common. The relationship between PD and anxiety is complex and can be a result of both pathological neural changes and the psychological and emotional impacts of living with a chronic progressive condition. Managing anxiety in PD is critical for improving the patients’ quality of life. However, patients undergoing STN DBS can occasionally experience increased anxiety. Methods: This study investigates changes in risk-avoidant behavior following STN DBS in a pre-motor animal model of PD under chronic and acute unilateral high frequency stimulation. Results: No significant changes in risk-avoidant behaviors were observed in rats who underwent STN DBS compared with sham stimulation controls. Chronic stimulation prevented sensitization in the elevated zero maze. Conclusions: These results suggest that unilateral stimulation of the STN may have minimal effects on risk-avoidant behaviors in PD. However, additional research is required to fully understand the mechanisms responsible for changes in anxiety during STN DBS for PD.

OBJECTIVE Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) can cause significant difficulty with driving and a subsequent reduction in an individual’s quality of life due to neurological deterioration. The positive impact of surgery on postoperative patient-reported driving capabilities has been seldom explored. METHODS The CSM module of the Quality Outcomes Database was utilized. Patient-reported driving ability was assessed via the driving section of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire. This is an ordinal scale in which 0 represents the absence of symptoms while driving and 5 represents a complete inability to drive due to symptoms. Patients were considered to have an impairment in their driving ability if they reported an NDI driving score of 3 or higher (signifying impairment in driving duration due to symptoms). Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate mediators of baseline impairment and improvement at 24 months after surgery, which was defined as an NDI driving score < 3. RESULTS A total of 1128 patients who underwent surgical intervention for CSM were included, of whom 354 (31.4%) had baseline driving impairment due to CSM. Moderate (OR 2.3) and severe (OR 6.3) neck pain, severe arm pain (OR 1.6), mild-moderate (OR 2.1) and severe (OR 2.5) impairment in hand/arm dexterity, severe impairment in leg use/walking (OR 1.9), and severe impairment of urinary function (OR 1.8) were associated with impaired driving ability at baseline. Of the 291 patients with baseline impairment and available 24-month follow-up data, 209 (71.8%) reported postoperative improvement in their driving ability. This improvement seemed to be mediated particularly through the achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in neck pain and improvement in leg function/walking. Patients with improved driving at 24 months noted higher postoperative satisfaction (88.5% vs 62.2%, p < 0.01) and were more likely to achieve a clinically significant improvement in their quality of life (50.7% vs 37.8%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Nearly one-third of patients with CSM report impaired driving ability at presentation. Seventy-two percent of these patients reported improvements in their driving ability within 24 months of surgery. Surgical management of CSM can significantly improve patients’ driving abilities at 24 months and hence patients’ quality of life.

ABSTRACT Background and hypothesis The MENTOR trial (MEmbranous Nephropathy Trial Of Rituximab) showed that rituximab was noninferior to cyclosporine in inducing complete or partial remission of proteinuria and was superior in maintaining proteinuria remission. However, the cost of rituximab may prohibit first-line use for some patients and health-care payers. Methods A Markov model was used to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of rituximab compared with cyclosporine for the treatment membranous nephropathy from the perspective of a health-care payer with a lifetime time horizon. The model was informed by data from the MENTOR trial where possible; additional parameters including cost and utility inputs were obtained from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of reduced-cost biosimilar rituximab. Results Rituximab for the treatment of membranous nephropathy was cost effective (assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained; in $US 2021) compared with cyclosporine, with an ICER of $8373/QALY over a lifetime time horizon. The incremental cost of rituximab therapy was $28 007 with an additional 3.34 QALYs compared with cyclosporine. Lower cost of rituximab biosimilars resulted in a more favorable ICER, and in some cases resulted in rituximab being dominant (lower cost and great benefit) compared to cyclosporine. Conclusions Despite the greater cost of rituximab, it may be a cost-effective option for the treatment of membranous nephropathy when compared with cyclosporine. The cost-effectiveness of rituximab is further improved with the use of less expensive biosimilars.

Background and Aims: Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) poses significant short-term mortality. Existing prognostic models lack precision for 90-day mortality. Utilizing artificial intelligence in a global cohort, we sought to derive and validate an enhanced prognostic model. Approach and Results: The Global AlcHep initiative, a retrospective study across 23 centers in 12 countries, enrolled patients with AH per National Institute for Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism criteria. Centers were partitioned into derivation (11 centers, 860 patients) and validation cohorts (12 centers, 859 patients). Focusing on 30 and 90-day postadmission mortality, 3 artificial intelligence algorithms (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Machines, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting) informed an ensemble model, subsequently refined through Bayesian updating, integrating the derivation cohort’s average 90-day mortality with each center’s approximate mortality rate to produce posttest probabilities. The ALCoholic Hepatitis Artificial INtelligence Ensemble score integrated age, gender, cirrhosis, and 9 laboratory values, with center-specific mortality rates. Mortality was 18.7% (30 d) and 27.9% (90 d) in the derivation cohort versus 21.7% and 32.5% in the validation cohort. Validation cohort 30 and 90-day AUCs were 0.811 (0.779–0.844) and 0.799 (0.769–0.830), significantly surpassing legacy models like Maddrey’s Discriminant Function, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease variations, age-serum bilirubin-international normalized ratio-serum Creatinine score, Glasgow, and modified Glasgow Scores (p < 0.001). ALCoholic Hepatitis Artificial INtelligence Ensemble score also showcased superior calibration against MELD and its variants. Steroid use improved 30-day survival for those with an ALCoholic Hepatitis Artificial INtelligence Ensemble score > 0.20 in both derivation and validation cohorts. Conclusions: Harnessing artificial intelligence within a global consortium, we pioneered a scoring system excelling over traditional models for 30 and 90-day AH mortality predictions. Beneficial for clinical trials, steroid therapy, and transplant indications, it’s accessible at: https://aihepatology.shinyapps.io/ALCHAIN/.

AbstractIntroductionVentricular tachycardia storm or electrical storm (ES) is a common complication following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The factors contributing to ES and outcomes are less studied. The study aimed to determine the factors associated with ES and the probability of survival in patients undergoing LVAD in three tertiary centers over a span of 15 years.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study on all patients who underwent LVAD implantation at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Phoenix, and Jacksonville) from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2020. ES was defined as ≥3 episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia over a period of 24 h with no identifiable reversible cause. Detailed chart reviews of the electronic health records within the Mayo Clinic and outside medical records were performed.ResultsA total of 883 patients who underwent LVAD implantation were included in our study. ES occurred in 7% (n = 61) of patients with a median of 13 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 5–297 days) following surgery. We found 57% of patients (n = 35) developed ES within 30 days, while 43% (n = 26) patients developed ES at a median of 545 (IQR 152–1032) days after surgery. Following ES, 26% of patients died within 1 year. Patients with ES had a significant association with a history of ventricular arrhythmias and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks before the procedure. ES was significantly associated with reduced survival compared to patients without ES (hazards ratio [HR]: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.39–2.64, p < .001).ConclusionFollowing LVAD implantation, the rate of ES was 7% with majority of ES occurring within 30 days of LVAD. Risk factors for ES included pre‐implant history of ventricular arrhythmias and ICD shock. ES was significantly associated with reduced survival compared to patients without ES.