Antezana, Luis A.

Background: Residency programs have developed monetary initiatives for students underrepresented in medicine (URiM). Our team sought to provide a centralized resource for URiM students seeking plastic surgery subinternships with funded opportunities. Methods: A cross sectional analysis of URiM scholarships offered by US integrated plastic surgery programs (n = 91) between July and September 2023. The study used residency program web domains. Investigators collected information on the monetary value of scholarship, eligibility criteria, and required application documents. Inferential analyses were conducted to investigate whether programs’ geographic region or Doximity ranking played a role in likelihood of scholarship existence. Results: The study found that approximately 52.7% (n = 48) of programs have in place monetary support for underrepresented visiting medical students (eg, stipend or reimbursement). The average monetary support was $1670. A univariate test demonstrated that programs with lower rankings in both reputation and research were less likely to have a scholarship available than higher ranking programs (P = 0.002; P = 0.02, respectively). Programs located in the Midwest regions were 3.5 times more likely to have a diversity scholarship available (P = 0.034). In our multivariate analysis, reputation ranking and geographic region remained significant. A Pearson chi square test showed the greatest proportions of scholarships among geographically similar programs to be in the Midwest (70%), however, not statistically significant. Conclusions: This study provides a centralized resource for URiM students interested in completing away rotations. Further investigation into development of these scholarship opportunities would be of much benefit and could guide other programs in the funding their own diversity scholarships.

Objective To examine the utility of telemedicine in a tertiary otologic practice. Study Design Retrospective case series. Setting Tertiary neurotology clinic. Patients Consecutive adult patients presenting via video visit between January 2020 and January 2021. Intervention(s) Televideo modality to conduct visits with patients seeking evaluation for new concerns, second opinions, or routine follow-up for established conditions. Main Outcome Measure(s) Success of the televideo visit defined by the televideo visit being sufficient for determining a definitive plan and not requiring deferment of recommendations for a subsequent in-person visit. Results A total of 102 televideo visits were performed among 100 unique patients. Of those, 92 (90.2%) visits were for second opinions or evaluation of new concerns, most commonly for vestibular schwannoma (n = 32, 31.4%), followed by sensorineural hearing loss (n = 20, 19.6%). Other visits were conducted for early postoperative follow-up and established general follow-up. In 91.2% of cases (n = 93), patients were successfully evaluated and provided recommendations from the initial video visit. All visits with patients having a diagnosis of meningioma (n = 7), and nearly all with vestibular Schwannoma (97%, n = 31) and sensorineural hearing loss (95%, n = 19) were successful. Of the 79 patients offered surgery as one potential treatment option, 31 patients underwent surgery at our institution by time of review. Patients with unsuccessful visits (n = 9, 8.8%) were advised to schedule additional in-person diagnostic imaging, vestibular testing, or cochlear implant candidacy evaluation to establish a more definitive care plan. Conclusion Virtual televideo visits were successful for a high percentage of selected patients seen at a tertiary neurotology practice, particularly those seeking evaluation of vestibular schwannoma or sensorineural hearing loss.

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to produce a bibliometric review of the 30 most cited articles related to 6 major domains of body contouring—abdominoplasty, thighplasty, brachioplasty, gluteoplasty, body lift, and liposuction—for resident and fellow education. Methods: The authors utilized the Web of Science Citation Index to identify the 30 most cited articles related to surgery for body contouring published from 1975 to 2020. Articles were classified according to their level of evidence, type of study, and country of publication. Results: A total of 336 articles were reviewed to compile our list. The mean number of citations across the articles was 114.7 ± SD 86.1. The highest prevalence of the papers was published between 2000 and 2009 (n = 15, 50%). The country with the highest number of contributions was the United States (n = 22, 73%). Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery served as the main journal of publication for these papers (n = 22, 73.3%). The majority of articles were designated for clinical-type studies (n = 26, 86.7%). No basic science or prevalence study design papers were listed. In terms of level of evidence (LoE), most papers were assigned IV (n = 11, 36.7%) and III (n = 7, 23.3%). Conclusions: Our study reveals that the most cited papers in body contouring are of LoE III and IV. Although the LoE of plastic surgery research, in general, has improved, in the past decade, a call for higher quality papers remains. Overall, this analysis provides an easy, electronic starting point for residents and fellows interested in understanding the field's evolution.

Background: Specialty exposure is most influential in a medical student’s decision to pursue plastic surgery training. We aimed to understand what opportunities exist for students through national plastic surgery organizations. Methods: The American Board of Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and The Aesthetic Society provide online lists of related organizations. Cross-referencing lists yielded 47 unique organizations. Screening for presence of annual meeting and relevance to student and resident education yielded 14 organizations. Bylaws/web-domains were reviewed for information related to the annual meeting, leadership opportunities, membership, grants, and travel scholarships. If available, previrtual/in-person and virtual meeting prices were collected. Lastly, discrepancies between webpage information and phone/email correspondence were noted. Results: All (100%) organizations welcomed students at annual meetings. Eleven promoted student presentation/submission. Average student registration fee was $109.3 ± SD$136.5 compared with $181.20 ± SD$157.20 for residents. Of organizations providing previrtual and virtual pricing (n = 10, 71.4%), there was an average price reduction in student registration of $92 (range: $0–375). Average student membership was $31.70/year ± SD $45.50 compared with $38.80 per year ± SD $65.90 for residents. The percentages of organizations offering student research grants, travel scholarships, and national student leadership were 21.4% (n = 3), 35.8% (n = 5), and 28.6% (n = 4) respectively. No organizations had student chapters/committees. All organizations (100%) contained at least one discrepancy between webpage/bylaw and email/phone. Conclusions: Our results suggest that although national opportunities seem to be limited, a role exists for further engagement, with interested students eager to take the initiative. Virtual conferences present a lower-cost alternative for students and residents.

Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 accelerated the use of virtual visits within health care. We examined the utility of telemedicine for conducting visits in a tertiary head and neck practice. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on patients presenting via video to a tertiary-level head and neck clinic between January 2020 and December 2020. Patient demographics were collected in addition to visit indication, diagnostic imaging/tests at the time of visit, and post-visit plan. Visits were deemed successful if evaluation by video was sufficient in determining a clinical plan and did not require deferment of recommendations for subsequent in-person consult visits and/or work-up (labs, imaging). Logistic regression was performed to identify variables that served as significant predictors of successful video visits. Results A total of 124 video visits were reviewed. Video visits were successful for the initial evaluation 88.7% of the time ( n = 110). Computerized tomographic scans were the most available diagnostic test, available for 54% of patients ( n = 67), followed by biopsy report 30.6% ( n = 38). Visit indication had a statistically significant effect on whether a treatment plan could be made ( p = 0.024). For new patients with parotid masses ( n = 42), definitive treatment plans could be made 97.6% of the time ( n = 41). Patients presenting with an indication of thyroid mass (odds ratio: 0.19 (confidence interval: 0.00072–0.50), p = 0.018) and other neck mass (odds ratio: 0.035 (confidence interval: 0.0014, 0.90), p = 0.043) were at significantly lesser odds than parotid patients to have a successful video visit. Discussion In this study, virtual visits were successful for a high percentage of head and neck visits, particularly among patients seeking evaluation for parotid-related concerns.