Chen, Austin

Abstract Goals/Purpose Patients with adjuvant radiotherapy are significantly more likely to have complications such as infections and wound dehiscence following breast surgery.1 Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (cINPT) holds incision edges together, prevents external contamination and removes exudate, promoting tensile strength and increased collagen recruitment at the incision site compared to the standard of care dressings.2 cINPT is helpful in surgical closures on high-risk patients.3 We evaluated the complication rates following the use of cINPT in implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods/Technique A cohort was collected retrospectively from a single institution, from January 1, 2018 to October 31 2022. The complication rates were then compared between cINPT dressing and standard-of-care dressings on radiated patients following breast surgery. Results/Complications The data collected consist of a total of 83 radiated breasts that underwent implant based reconstruction. cINPT was used in 41 breasts and standard-of-care dressings were used in 42 breasts. Of the cINPT cohort, 2 patients developed seromas that required bedside aspirations (4.8%) and one patient developed an infection (2.4%) with none of the patients requiring re operations. Of the standard of care dressings cohort, 9 patients developed seromas (21.4%), and 3 patients developed infections (7.1%), of which 3 patients required reoperations (7.1%). Conclusion Patients with prior radiation who received cINPT had lower risk of developing complications compared to patients with prior radiation who received standard-of-care dressings.

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to produce a bibliometric review of the 30 most cited articles related to 6 major domains of body contouring—abdominoplasty, thighplasty, brachioplasty, gluteoplasty, body lift, and liposuction—for resident and fellow education. Methods: The authors utilized the Web of Science Citation Index to identify the 30 most cited articles related to surgery for body contouring published from 1975 to 2020. Articles were classified according to their level of evidence, type of study, and country of publication. Results: A total of 336 articles were reviewed to compile our list. The mean number of citations across the articles was 114.7 ± SD 86.1. The highest prevalence of the papers was published between 2000 and 2009 (n = 15, 50%). The country with the highest number of contributions was the United States (n = 22, 73%). Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery served as the main journal of publication for these papers (n = 22, 73.3%). The majority of articles were designated for clinical-type studies (n = 26, 86.7%). No basic science or prevalence study design papers were listed. In terms of level of evidence (LoE), most papers were assigned IV (n = 11, 36.7%) and III (n = 7, 23.3%). Conclusions: Our study reveals that the most cited papers in body contouring are of LoE III and IV. Although the LoE of plastic surgery research, in general, has improved, in the past decade, a call for higher quality papers remains. Overall, this analysis provides an easy, electronic starting point for residents and fellows interested in understanding the field's evolution.