Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

4308 citation(s) found for "Ma, Jeffrey H".

Pediatric sphenoidal Rathke’s cleft cyst
Rykken, Jeffrey , Kalina, Peter

Journal of Pediatric Neuroradiology | August 17, 2016 | Volume: 01 | Issue: 04 | Pages: 313-316

10.3233/pnr-2012-040 Get It

Pediatric spinal adrenocortical carcinoma
Rykken, Jeffrey , Kalina, Peter

Journal of Pediatric Neuroradiology | August 17, 2016 | Volume: 02 | Issue: 02 | Pages: 149-151

10.3233/pnr-13057 Get It

Progressive Brain Atrophy in Super-refractory Status Epilepticus
Hocker, Sara E. , Nagarajan, Elanagan , Hocker, Sara, Hanson, Dennis, Rabinstein, Alejandro A. , Hanson, Dennis P. , Britton, Jeffrey W.

JAMA Neurology | August 17, 2016 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1201

10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.1572 | PMID 27533350 Get It

Red cell exchange for a case of babesiosis
Lehrke, Heidi D., Winters, Jeffrey L. , Winters, Jeffrey L

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | August 17, 2016 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 271-272

10.1002/jca.21495 | PMID 27531166 Get It

Gut Microbiota: Modulation of Host Physiology in Obesity
Nehra, Vandana, Allen, Jacob M. , Mailing, Lucy J., Kashyap, Purna , Woods, Jeffrey A.

Physiology | August 10, 2016 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 327-335

10.1152/physiol.00005.2016 | PMID 27511459 Get It

Many factors are involved in weight gain and metabolic disturbances associated with obesity. The gut microbiota has been of particular interest in recent years, since both human and animal studies have increased our understanding of the delicate symbiosis between the trillions of microbes that reside in the GI tract and the host. It has been suggested that disruption of this mutual tolerance may play a significant role in modulating host physiology during obesity. Environmental influences such as diet, exercise, and early life exposures can significantly impact the composition of the microbiota, and this dysbiosis can in turn lead to increased host adiposity via a number of different mechanisms. The ability of the microbiota to regulate host fat deposition, metabolism, and immune function makes it an attractive target for achieving sustained weight loss.
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cystic Vestibular Schwannomas
Frisch, Christopher D., Jacob, Jeffrey T. , Carlson, Matthew L. , Foote, Robert L. , Driscoll, Colin L. W., Neff, Brian A., Pollock, Bruce E. , Link, Michael J.

Neurosurgery | August 10, 2016 | Volume: 80 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 112-118

10.1227/neu.0000000000001376 | PMID 27509069 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND: The optimum treatment for cystic vestibular schwannoma (VS) remains controversial. Anecdotally, many treating physicians feel that cystic VSs do not respond to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as well as noncystic tumors. OBJECTIVE: To present outcomes after treatment of predominantly cystic VS with SRS. METHODS: A prospectively maintained clinical database of patients undergoing Gamma Knife (Elekta Instruments, Stockholm, Sweden) radiosurgery (GKRS) for VS at a single tertiary academic referral center was retrospectively reviewed. Patients diagnosed with cystic VS who were treated with GKRS between 1997 and 2014 were analyzed. Size-matched solid tumors treated with GKRS during this period were selected as controls. RESULTS: Twenty patients (12 women; median age at treatment, 56 years; range, 36-85 years) with cystic VS met inclusion criteria. The median radiologic follow-up within the cystic group was 63 months (range, 17-201 months), and the median change in tumor size was −4.9 mm (range, −10.4 to 9.3 mm). Sixteen tumors (80%) shrank, 2 (10%) remained stable, and 2 (10%) enlarged, accounting for a tumor control rate of 90%. The median radiologic follow-up in the noncystic control group was 67 months (range, 6-141 months), and the median change in size was −2.0 mm (range, −10.4 to 2.5 mm). Tumor control in the solid group was 90%. Comparing only those tumors that decreased in size showed that there was a trend toward a greater reduction within the cystic group ( P = .05). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that tumor control after SRS for cystic VS may not differ from that of noncystic VS in selected cases.
Defining Glioblastoma Resectability Through the Wisdom of the Crowd: A Proof-of-Principle Study
Zacharia, Brad E. , Cloney, Michael , Sonabend, Aarón , Showers, Christopher R. , Ebiana, Victoria, Nazarian, Matthew , Swanson, Kristin R. , Baldock, Anne, Brem, Henry , Bruce, Jeffrey N. , Butler, William E. , Orringer, Daniel A. , Roberts, David W. , Sagher, Oren , Sanai, Nader , Schwartz, Theodore H. , Silbergeld, Daniel L. , Sisti, Michael B. , Thompson, Reid C., Waziri, Allen, Sonabend, Adam M , Swanson, Kristin R , Cahill, Daniel P. , Carter, Bob S. , Ghogawala, Zoher , McKhann, Guy M. , Zacharia, Brad E

Neurosurgery | August 10, 2016 | Volume: 80 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 590-601

10.1227/neu.0000000000001374 | PMID 27509070 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND Extent of resection (EOR) correlates with glioblastoma outcomes. Resectability and EOR depend on anatomical, clinical, and surgeon factors. Resectability likely influences outcome in and of itself, but an accurate measurement of resectability remains elusive. An understanding of resectability and the factors that influence it may provide a means to control a confounder in clinical trials and provide reference for decision making. OBJECTIVE To provide proof of concept of the use of the collective wisdom of experienced brain tumor surgeons in assessing glioblastoma resectability. METHODS We surveyed 13 academic tumor neurosurgeons nationwide to assess the resectability of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Participants reviewed 20 cases, including digital imaging and communications in medicine-formatted pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance images and clinical vignettes. The selected cases involved a variety of anatomical locations and a range of EOR. Participants were asked about surgical goal, eg, gross total resection, subtotal resection (STR), or biopsy, and rationale for their decision. We calculated a “resectability index” for each lesion by pooling responses from all 13 surgeons. RESULTS Neurosurgeons’ individual surgical goals varied significantly ( P = .015), but the resectability index calculated from the surgeons’ pooled responses was strongly correlated with the percentage of contrast-enhancing residual tumor ( R = 0.817, P < .001). The collective STR goal predicted intraoperative decision of intentional STR documented on operative notes ( P < .01) and nonresectable residual ( P < .01), but not resectable residual. CONCLUSION In this pilot study, we demonstrate the feasibility of measuring the resectability of glioblastoma through crowdsourcing. This tool could be used to quantify resectability, a potential confounder in neuro-oncology clinical trials.
Contemporary analysis of the intraoperative and perioperative complications of neurosurgical procedures performed in the sitting position
Mallory, Grant W., Abcejo, Arnoley S., Pasternak, Jeffrey J., Atkinson, John L. D., Meyer, Fredric B. , Marsh, W. Richard , Link, Michael J. , Perkins, William J., Pasternak, Jeffrey, Perkins, William, Himes, Benjamin , Clarke, Michelle J. , Gompel, Jamie J. Van

Journal of Neurosurgery | August 5, 2016 | Volume: 127 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 182-188

10.3171/2016.5.jns152328 | PMID 27494821 Get It

OBJECTIVE Historically, performing neurosurgery with the patient in the sitting position offered advantages such as improved visualization and gravity-assisted retraction. However, this position fell out of favor at many centers due to the perceived risk of venous air embolism (VAE) and other position-related complications. Some neurosurgical centers continue to perform sitting-position cases in select patients, often using modern monitoring techniques that may improve procedural safety. Therefore, this paper reports the risks associated with neurosurgical procedures performed in the sitting position in a modern series. METHODS The authors reviewed the anesthesia records for instances of clinically significant VAE and other complications for all neurosurgical procedures performed in the sitting position between January 1, 2000, and October 8, 2013. In addition, a prospectively maintained morbidity and mortality log of these procedures was reviewed for instances of subdural or intracerebral hemorrhage, tension pneumocephalus, and quadriplegia. Both overall and specific complication rates were calculated in relation to the specific type of procedure. RESULTS In a series of 1792 procedures, the overall complication rate related to the sitting position was 1.45%, which included clinically significant VAE, tension pneumocephalus, and subdural hemorrhage. The rate of any detected VAE was 4.7%, but the rate of VAE requiring clinical intervention was 1.06%. The risk of clinically significant VAE was highest in patients undergoing suboccipital craniotomy/craniectomy with a rate of 2.7% and an odds ratio (OR) of 2.8 relative to deep brain stimulator cases (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–70, p = 0.04). Sitting cervical spine cases had a comparatively lower complication rate of 0.7% and an OR of 0.28 as compared with all cranial procedures (95% CI 0.12–0.67, p < 0.01). Sitting cervical cases were further subdivided into extradural and intradural procedures. The rate of complications in intradural cases was significantly higher (OR 7.3, 95% CI 1.4–39, p = 0.02) than for extradural cases. The risk of VAE in intradural spine procedures did not differ significantly from sitting suboccipital craniotomy/craniectomy cases (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.09–5.4, p = 0.7). Two cases (0.1%) had to be aborted intraoperatively due to complications. There were no instances of intraoperative deaths, although there was a single death within 30 days of surgery. CONCLUSIONS In this large, modern series of cases performed in the sitting position, the complication rate was low. Suboccipital craniotomy/craniectomy was associated with the highest risk of complications. When appropriately used with modern anesthesia techniques, the sitting position provides a safe means of surgical access.
Osteochondral Autograft Transfer Versus Microfracture in the Knee: A Meta‐analysis of Prospective Comparative Studies at Midterm
Pareek, Ayoosh , Reardon, Patrick J., Macalena, Jeffrey A. , Levy, Bruce A. , Krych, Aaron J. , Stuart, Michael J. , Williams, Riley J. , Krych, Aaron J , Macalena, Jeffrey A

Arthroscopy | July 31, 2016 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2118-2130

10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.038 | PMID 27487736 Get It

Purpose To compare microfracture (MFX) and osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) surgical techniques to determine (1) postoperative activity level, (2) subjective patient outcomes, (3) failure rates, and (4) assess if any lesion characteristics favored one technique over the other. Methods A comprehensive review of literature was performed of all studies comparing MFX and OAT. Studies included were all prospective studies that reported on activity‐based outcome measures such as Tegner activity scores and subjective outcomes such as the International Knee Documentation Committee score. Failure rates, as determined by the publishing authors, were recorded for each study. Meta‐analyses were conducted using a random‐effects model. Paired standardized mean differences (Hedges's g to account for small sample bias) were used for continuous outcome measures, and risk ratios (Mantel‐Haenszel method for small sample bias) for dichotomous outcome measures. Results Six prospective studies satisfied the eligibility criteria and included 249 patients (186 male, 120 female) with an average age of 26.4 years and follow‐up of 67.2 months. Tegner scores were superior in patients treated with OAT compared with MFX (ΔOAT‐MFX for pre‐post scores = 0.94 Tegner points, standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.469, P = .005). Failure rates of MFX were higher than OAT (OAT = 11%, MFX = 32%, risk ratio = 2.42, P < .036). OAT was superior to MFX at 3 years in relation to subjective outcome scores (SMD = 0.404, P = .008). When assessing OAT lesions larger than 3 cm 2 , OAT was superior to MFX with respect to activity level (SMD = 0.506, P = .001). Conclusions OAT may achieve higher activity levels and lower risk of failure when compared with MFX for cartilage lesions greater than 3 cm 2 in the knee, although there was no significant difference for lesions less than 3 cm 2 at midterm. However, because of variability in patient‐specific factors such as age, preinjury activity level, lesion location and size, the superiority of OAT over MFX cannot be generalized to all patient populations and therefore requires individualized patient care. Level of Evidence Level II, meta‐analysis of Level I and II studies.