Citations

4004 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) studies have shown an association between the occurrence of imAEs and outcomes. In the Phase 3 HIMALAYA study (NCT03298451) in uHCC, STRIDE (Single T Regular Interval D) significantly improved overall survival (OS) vs sorafenib (S), and D monotherapy was noninferior to S. STRIDE and D had manageable safety (Abou-Alfa et al. NEJM Evid 2022). STRIDE is approved for uHCC in the United States and Japan and recommended for approval by the European Medicines Agency; D is approved in Japan. This exploratory analysis assessed the association between imAEs and outcomes in HIMALAYA. Methods: Safety was assessed in participants (pts) who received ≥1 dose of STRIDE (T 300 mg [one dose] plus D 1500 mg once every 4 weeks [Q4W]) or D (1500 mg Q4W). imAEs were AEs of special interest associated with drug exposure and consistent with an immune-mediated mechanism of action with no found alternate etiology. Median OS (mOS) and OS rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. OS hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated using Cox modeling, with imAEs as a time-varying covariate and stratified by etiology (HBV/HCV/others), ECOG (0/1), and macro-vascular invasion (yes/no) for pts with vs without imAEs of any grade. Pts with >1 imAE were counted once. Results: In total, 388 pts (STRIDE) and 388 pts (D) were included in the analysis. Any grade imAEs, Grade 3 or 4 imAEs, and imAEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 139 (35.8%), 49 (12.6%), and 22 (5.7%) pts, respectively for STRIDE and 64 (16.5%), 25 (6.4%), and 10 (2.6%) pts, respectively for D. imAEs requiring high-dose steroids (≥40 mg prednisone or equivalent daily) occurred in 78 (20.1%) pts for STRIDE and 37 (9.5%) pts for D. An improvement in OS was seen with STRIDE in pts with imAEs vs pts without (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56–0.95). OS rates at 6, 12, and 24 months (mo) were higher for STRIDE in pts with imAEs vs pts without. The association between imAEs and OS was less clear for D and may be limited by small pt number. In a landmark analysis of pts with vs without imAEs within 6 mo of STRIDE (n=307) or D (n=287), OS HRs (95% CIs) were 0.65 (0.47–0.90) and 1.39 (0.95–2.04), respectively. Conclusions: In HIMALAYA, imAEs with STRIDE or D were manageable and generally low grade. In this exploratory analysis, the occurrence of imAEs was associated with improved OS for STRIDE, generally consistent with findings for other ICIs. Clinical trial information: NCT03298451 . [Table: see text]

e15626 Background: Studies have shown the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in patients with tumors demonstrating microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and an associated defect in DNA mismatch repair (dMMR). In particular, KEYNOTE-177 demonstrated significant survival benefit for patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer with MSI-H or dMMR. Recently published case reports and series have demonstrated similar outcomes for patients with locally advanced and resectable rectal cancer. We report on the experience of patients with locally advanced, resectable rectal adenocarcinoma treated across the Mayo Clinic Health System. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated at Mayo Clinic since 2015 A search of the Mayo Clinic database was done to include parameters for confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma, dMMR in pathology reports. Patients receiving ICI treatment including pembrolizumab, nivolumab/ipilimumab and durvalumab in any combination with chemotherapy and/or radiation were included. Patients with metastatic disease at the time of surgical intervention or ICI were excluded. Clinical data was assimilated. Results: Twenty-one patients met criteria for inclusion in our analysis. Fifteen patients had de novo disease. Six patients had local recurrence and had been treated previously with chemotherapy, radiation (RT) and surgery. None of the patients included had prior ICI therapy. Fifteen patients had Lynch syndrome. The median age of diagnosis was 41.5 years. Seven patients underwent surgical intervention. of the seven patients received surgery upfront followed by immunotherapy. The remaining six had neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiation. Prior to surgery, all patients demonstrated radiographic partial response (rPR). 67% of these demonstrated a pathologic complete response (pCR) while 33% had residual disease. The patient who received surgery upfront and adjuvant ICI continues to have radiographic stable disease after 1 year of treatment. For patients who did not have surgery, 50% had radiographic “complete or near complete” response (rCR), 43% had rPR and 7% had radiographic stable disease. Ten patients received RT and ICI with 70% demonstrating rCR and 30% rPR. Overall, the objective response rate was 90 Response to treatment was observed upwards of 75 months. Only 1 person in the study had progression of disease that occurred after 14 months of therapy. Conclusions: Similar to KEYNOTE-177, patients with locally advanced MSI-H/dMMR rectal cancer have significant and durable response to immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. Further large prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and determine a standardized approach.

e14576 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of many solid malignancies. ICI appears particularly effective when tumors exhibit high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and/or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) status. Although the response is typically quite good in this setting, there are scenarios where benefit is less than anticipated. In this study, we aimed to explore the efficacy of ICIs in patients with MSI-H/dMMR cancers with peritoneal metastasis (PM). Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify patients (pts) with PM from primary MSI-H/dMMR cancers treated with immunotherapy between 2010 and 2022 at Mayo Clinic. Data was collected to include pt demographics, tumor characteristics, pathology, tumor markers, imaging, mutational profile, and previous and subsequent treatments. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR), defined as objective response rate (RECIST v1.1 criteria) or stable disease. Results: Forty-six pts with MSI-H/dMMR and PM treated with ICIs. Most of our cohort were female (61%) with a median age at diagnosis of 61 years. Colorectal cancer was the most common primary site (69.6%), followed by endometrial (6.5%). Most pts received treatment with PD-1 antibodies as second-line therapy following systemic chemotherapy. DCR of the PM was 71.6 % (n= 13 PR, 9 CR, and 9 SD), with a median duration of response of 12.6 months. Thirteen pts (28.4%) had progressive peritoneal disease on ICI with a median PFS of 2.2 months. Ascites was a poor prognosticator and predicted a lack of benefit from ICI (HR 6.6, 95% CI=2.24-19.9, p= 0.006). Mucinous and signet ring histology were common in pts with peritoneal progression (61.5%); however, this was not statistically significant (HR=1.6; 95%CI= 0.4383 to 3.899, p 0.5). Multivariate analysis for the presence or absence of BRAF and/or RAS mutations was not statistically significant in predicting response. Neither was the specific MMR gene mutation(i.e., MLH1 or PMS2). Interestingly, discordant responses between the peritoneum and other sites of metastasis to immunotherapy were seen in 13 pts (28.4%), primarily as primary peritoneal progression compared to other tumor sites. Conclusions: In our cohort, the DCR of metastatic peritoneal disease in MSI-H/dMMR tumors was approximately 71%. The presence of ascites was identified as a poor prognosticator in this setting and was associated with a lack of response/benefit from ICIs. Histologic subtype (i.e., mucinous/signet ring) did not show statistical significance in predicting ICI response. The subpopulation with discordant response to ICI suggests that peritoneal immunobiology may differ from other sites. Further research on immunotherapy response in the peritoneum is needed for this special subset of pts.

2001 Background: Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression remains one of the most commonly encountered and clinically challenging scenarios after radiation therapy (RT) for brain metastases (BM). PURSUE (NCT04410367) evaluated the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine, an amino acid PET radiopharmaceutical, based on various lesion metrics, to establish image interpretation criteria (IIC) for suspected recurrent BM after RT. Methods: Patients with solid tumor BM were enrolled across 7 US sites if they had a previously irradiated ‘reference’ lesion equivocal on MRI for recurrence and were planned for craniotomy. 18F-Fluciclovine PET (185 MBq) took place <42 days post-MRI and 1-21 days pre-craniotomy. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive-, and negative-predictive value [PPV/NPV]) of different thresholds of lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake on qualitative, visual reads vs central histopathological analysis. Lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake was assessed qualitatively by 3 independent blinded readers who visually rated the uptake as ‘mild’ (up to blood pool), ‘moderate’ (above blood pool to parotid), or ‘marked’ (above parotid). Secondary endpoints included the diagnostic performance based on different thresholds of quantitative (e.g., lesion SUV) and dynamic measures of uptake. A committee, including 2 expert imaging physicians independent to PURSUE, reviewed all data in round-table meetings to establish the IIC, which were subsequently used to assess diagnostic performance. Results: All 23 reference lesions in 23 subjects underwent histopathological analysis, with 10 (43%) confirmed as recurrent tumor. The highest performing qualitative measure was ‘marked’, rendering a sensitivity of 92-100%, with variable specificity of 40-80% across readers. SUVmax was a reader-independent, high-performing quantitative metric on ROC analysis (AUC 0.87, SUVmax threshold 4.8 conferring a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 85%). Dynamic measures did not provide added diagnostic value. After analyzing these metrics, the committee established IIC as: Lesions with 18F-fluciclovine uptake of a SUVmax equal to or greater than 4.8, or visually greater than the parotid gland, should be considered suspicious for recurrence. Otherwise, recurrence should be considered unlikely. Application of the IIC resulted in a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 77-85%, PPV of 73-80%, and NPV of 83-85% across the readers. Conclusions: This is the first prospective multicenter trial to evaluate PET characteristics of suspected recurrent BM after RT, verified by histopathology. Qualitative and quantitative IIC show 18F-fluciclovine to be a high-performing diagnostic tool. These IIC will help evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET in future trials. Clinical trial information: NCT04410367 .

1509 Background: Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act has been shown to increase insurance coverage and early-stage cancer diagnoses for young adults (YAs), the age group with the highest uninsured rate. We examined whether Medicaid expansion was associated with increased receipt of timely, guideline-concordant treatment and survival among YA women newly diagnosed with breast cancer, the most common YA cancer diagnosis. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 51,675 women aged 18-39 years who were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2011-2018. We applied the difference-in-differences (DD) method to estimate outcome changes pre vs. post Medicaid expansion, in expansion- vs. non-expansion states. Linear probability models estimated associations of Medicaid expansion with receipt of guideline-concordant treatment – including any endocrine therapy among women with ER-positive or PR-positive breast cancer, and any chemotherapy or targeted therapy among women with ER-negative and PR-negative breast cancer – and initiation of guideline-concordant treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, or targeted therapy for stage I-III diagnoses, and systemic therapy for stage IV diagnoses) <60 days after diagnosis. Flexible parametric survival models were used to estimate 2-year overall survival. DD models also adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, rurality, zip code-level income, comorbidity, and diagnosis year, with standard errors clustered at the state level. Analyses were stratified by stage at diagnosis (stage I-III vs. IV). Results: Of the subset of women with stage I-III ER-positive or PR-positive breast cancer, the percentage receiving endocrine therapy increased in expansion states (85.20% pre-expansion to 86.46% post-expansion), but decreased in non-expansion states (84.32% to 82.79%), resulting in a net increase of 2.42 percentage points (ppt; 95% CI = 0.56 to 4.28) associated with Medicaid expansion in the adjusted DD model. Among all women with stage I-III breast cancer, the percentage with treatment initiation <60 days after diagnosis decreased less in expansion states (84.10% pre-expansion to 82.36% post-expansion) than in non-expansion states (86.95% to 83.98%), resulting in a net reduction of 1.61 ppt (95% CI = 0.05 to 3.18) in treatment delays associated with Medicaid expansion. Notably, the 2-year overall survival increased in expansion states (96.84% pre-expansion to 96.99% post-expansion), but decreased in non-expansion states (97.24% to 96.30%), resulting in a net survival increase of 1.00 ppt (95% CI = 0.21 to 1.79) associated with Medicaid expansion. Conclusions: Among YA women with stage I-III breast cancer, Medicaid expansion was associated with increased receipt of guideline-concordant treatment, reduced delays in treatment initiation, and improved 2-year survival.

11536 Background: Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) who received prior treatment with ≥3 kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Exploratory baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis from INTRIGUE showed pts with second-line advanced GIST with primary KIT exon 11 mutations and secondary resistance mutations exclusively in KIT exons 17/18 derived clinical benefit from ripretinib but not sunitinib (Bauer S et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023; Abs 397784). Outcomes in pts with advanced GIST with ctDNA not detected (ctDNA-ND) had not been evaluated. Here, we present exploratory data from INTRIGUE in pts who had baseline ctDNA-ND vs ctDNA detected (ctDNA-D). Methods: INTRIGUE is an open-label, phase 3 study that enrolled pts with advanced GIST who had disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib (NCT03673501). Pts were randomized 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 wks on/2 wks off) and stratified by mutation according to local pathology report. Baseline peripheral whole blood was analyzed by Guardant360, a 74-gene ctDNA NGS-based assay. Pts with ctDNA-D had ≥1 somatic alteration in the 74 genes analyzed. Results: Pts with ctDNA-ND (82/362, 22.7%) were younger (median: 55.5 vs 62.0 years) and had smaller sums of longest diameters of target lesions (median [range]: 57.6 [11–459] vs 108.8 [15–418] mm) vs ctDNA-D (280/362, 77.3%). Progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in pts with ctDNA-ND vs ctDNA-D and numerically higher with ripretinib vs sunitinib in pts with ctDNA-ND (Table). Pts with ctDNA-ND categorized as not having a KIT exon 9 mutation at randomization ( KIT exon 11, other KIT/PDGFRA, or KIT/PDGFRA wild-type; n = 71) had longer PFS with ripretinib vs sunitinib (median not estimable [NE] vs 11 months; HR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.28 to 1.12). Objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) were higher with ctDNA-ND vs ctDNA-D. Safety was similar between groups and consistent with the primary analysis. Conclusions: Pts with ctDNA-ND had better efficacy outcomes vs pts with ctDNA-D in both treatment arms; PFS was numerically higher with ripretinib vs sunitinib in pts with ctDNA-ND. Although little is known about the biology driving ctDNA in GIST, these data suggest pts may have improved outcomes and different treatment sensitivity based on ctDNA detectability. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501 . [Table: see text]

11535 Background: Twenty-five percent of patients with Ewing Sarcoma (EWS) have metastatic disease at diagnosis, most commonly in the lungs. Our objectives were to compare overall (OS) and pulmonary disease-free survival (PDFS) between patients with metastatic EWS at diagnosis who achieve rapid complete response (RCR), defined as radiographic resolution of all pulmonary nodules at the end of induction chemotherapy, and those with residual pulmonary nodules after induction chemotherapy (non-RCR). Methods: This multi-center, retrospective cohort study included children under 20 years of age with metastatic EWS treated from 2007-2020 at 19 institutions participating in the Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative. Chi-square tests were conducted for differences among groups, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for OS and PDFS. Cox regression was performed for OS, controlling for whole lung irradiation (WLI), extrapulmonary metastases, and age. Results: Among 153 patients with metastatic EWS at diagnosis, 61 (40%) achieved RCR, and 87 (57%) did not (5 unknown). The median number of pulmonary nodules was 3.5 in the RCR vs 5 in the non-RCR groups (p = 0.02), while bilateral disease was present in 44 (72%) RCR vs 75 (86%) non-RCR patients (p = 0.03). Pulmonary relapse occurred in 58 (38%) patients, including 18 (29%) in the RCR and 36 (41%) in the non-RCR groups (p = 0.14). Factors associated with pulmonary relapse in the univariate analysis include median age [15 years (IQR: 12-17) with pulmonary relapse vs 12 years (IQR: 9-16) without (p = 0.03)] and extrapulmonary metastases at diagnosis [24 (41%) patients with pulmonary relapse vs 26 (27%) patients without pulmonary relapse (p = 0.05)]. WLI was performed in 100 patients and was not associated with a reduction in pulmonary relapse (p = 0.93). Complete surgical clearance of pulmonary disease was attempted in 29 (19%) patients, including 17 of the patients who met the criteria for RCR. On Kaplan-Meier analyses, 5-year PDFS did not significantly differ based on RCR (67%) vs. non-RCR (53%, p = 0.13), or WLI (61%) vs. no WLI (54%, p = 0.32). However, 5-year OS did vary significantly between patients with RCR and WLI (85%), RCR without WLI (55%), non-RCR with WLI (60%), and non-RCR without WLI (25%; p < 0.01). In Cox regression analysis, RCR was associated with improved OS after controlling for WLI, extrapulmonary metastases, and patient age (HR 0.51, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients with EWS who had pulmonary metastases at diagnosis had improved OS if they achieved RCR and received WLI, despite having no significant differences in rates of pulmonary relapse. Further research is needed to determine whether clearance of pulmonary disease achieved through surgical metastasectomy provides a comparable survival benefit and if any subsets of patients have a reduced risk of pulmonary relapse after resection.

11524 Background: Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) who received prior treatment with ≥3 kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Sunitinib is approved for advanced GIST after imatinib failure. In the first interim analysis (IA) for overall survival (OS) in the INTRIGUE trial, data were immature (OS event rate, 22.3%), and median OS was not reached in either arm for the KIT exon 11 intent-to-treat (ITT) and all-patient (AP) ITT populations (S Bauer, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022). Additionally, ripretinib had a more favorable safety profile with fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) than sunitinib. Here, we present the second IA of OS and updated safety from INTRIGUE. Methods: INTRIGUE is a global, open-label, phase 3 study that enrolled adult pts with advanced GIST who had disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib (NCT03673501). Randomization was 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 wks on/2 wks off) and was stratified by KIT mutational status and imatinib intolerance. OS was a key secondary endpoint; data cutoff for the second IA was Sept 1, 2022. Results: Of 453 pts in the AP ITT population, 444 received treatment; 51 remain on treatment (33/223 [14.8%] with ripretinib and 18/221 [8.1%] with sunitinib). Common reasons for treatment discontinuation were progressive disease (PD) assessed by independent radiologic review (55.4%), PD assessed by investigator (10.6%), clinical PD (5.9%), withdrawal of consent (5.4%), and adverse event (AE; 4.5%); fewer pts discontinued due to an AE for ripretinib vs sunitinib (2.7% vs 6.3%). Following study treatment discontinuation, 58 pts (25.6%) from the sunitinib arm received ripretinib; 139 pts (61.5%) from the ripretinib arm later received sunitinib. There were 185 OS events (40.8%) in the AP ITT population; median duration of follow-up was 28.7 and 28.5 months for ripretinib and sunitinib, respectively. OS was similar with ripretinib vs sunitinib in the AP ITT (median 35.5 vs 30.9 months; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.18; nominal P = 0.39) and KIT exon 11 ITT populations (median 34.0 vs 31.5 months; HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.48; nominal P = 0.77). The updated safety profile was consistent with the primary analysis; fewer pts had grade 3/4 TEAEs with ripretinib vs sunitinib (95 [42.6%] vs 149 [67.4%]). Dose interruptions and reductions were lower with ripretinib vs sunitinib. The median (range) treatment duration was 7.9 (0.2–38.2) months for ripretinib and 6.5 (0.2–38.3) months for sunitinib. Conclusions: In the second IA from INTRIGUE, OS was similar between treatment arms. The safety profile remained consistent with additional data, and results demonstrate favorable safety with ripretinib in pts with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501 .

4009 Background: Oncogenic FGFR2 alterations (fusions/rearrangements (f/r), amplifications, mutations) represent a broad therapeutic opportunity as they drive multiple solid tumors, particularly cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). However, off-isoform toxicity and on-target resistance limit the benefit of approved pan-FGFR inhibitors (FGFRi). RLY-4008 is the first potent, highly selective, oral FGFR2 inhibitor designed to overcome these limitations by targeting FGFR2 driver alterations and resistance mutations. Here, we present updated dose escalation results from ReFocus (NCT04526106), a seamless Phase I/II, open label study evaluating the safety and preliminary efficacy of RLY-4008 in patients (pts) with advanced, FGFR2-altered solid tumors. Methods: Adult pts received RLY-4008 BID, QD, QD discontinuous on a 4-week (wk) cycle following a Bayesian Optimal Interval design. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), PK, ctDNA and anti-tumor activity (RECIST v1.1) were assessed. Results: As of 30 Jan 23, 116 pts (82 f/r, 27 mutation, 6 amplification) received RLY-4008 at doses of 20-200 mg/day, including 91 with CCA. 50% had prior FGFRi, and median lines of prior therapies was 3 (1-15). 28/46 ct-DNA-evaluable pts with CCA with prior FGFRi had ≥1 baseline resistance mutation, most commonly at FGFR2 N549X (23/46) or V564X (17/46). RLY-4008 had favorable PK with doses ≥40 mg QD providing FGFR2 occupancy ≥90%. 70 mg QD was the RP2D based on PK, safety, anti-tumor activity and exposure-dependent tumor regressions in FGFRi-naïve CCA f/r pts. Anti-tumor activity was observed in CCA and solid tumors across doses and FGFR2 alterations with radiographic tumor reductions in 74 (64%), SD/PR in 83 (72%), including 4/4 (100%) FGFRi-naïve CCA f/r pts at RP2D achieving confirmed PR. Clinically meaningful disease control and durable responses were observed in pts with FGFR2 f/r CCA. Overall, median treatment duration was 24 wks (range <1-108 wks). 105 pts discontinued (PD (81%), AE (3%), other (7%)). Across doses, most common TRAEs were low-grade PPE (57%), stomatitis (56%), dry mouth (38%), alopecia (28%), and dry eye (22%). No grade 4/5 TRAEs were observed. Conclusions: These encouraging dose escalation data confirm the broad therapeutic potential of highly selective FGFR2 targeting with RLY-4008 by demonstrating encouraging initial efficacy across FGFR2-altered solid tumors and genomic alterations, with a differentiated safety profile that avoids FGFR1- and FGFR4-related toxicity. Phase 2 of ReFocus continues across solid tumors and with registrational intent in FGFRi-naïve, FGFR2 f/r CCA. Clinical trial information: NCT04526106 . [Table: see text]

Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe management and outcomes from a contemporary cohort of children with Wilms tumor complicated by inferior vena caval thrombus. Background: The largest series of these patients was published almost 2 decades ago. Since then, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been commonly used to manage these patients, and outcomes have not been reported. Methods: Retrospective review of 19 North American centers between 2009 and 2019. Patient and disease characteristics, management, and outcomes were investigated and analyzed. Results: Of 124 patients, 81% had favorable histology (FH), and 52% were stage IV. IVC thrombus level was infrahepatic in 53 (43%), intrahepatic in 32 (26%), suprahepatic in 14 (11%), and cardiac in 24 (19%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy using a 3-drug regimen was administered in 82% and postresection radiation in 90%. Thrombus level regression was 45% overall, with suprahepatic level showing the best response (62%). Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was potentially avoided in 67%. The perioperative complication rate was significantly lower after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [(25%) vs upfront surgery (55%); P=0.005]. CPB was not associated with higher complications [CPB (50%) vs no CPB (27%); P=0.08]. Two-year event-free survival was 93% and overall survival was 96%, higher in FH cases (FH 98% vs unfavorable histology/anaplastic 82%; P=0.73). Neither incomplete resection nor viable thrombus cells affected event-free survival or overall survival. Conclusions: Multimodal therapy resulted in excellent outcomes, even with advanced-stage disease and cardiac extension. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy decreased the need for CPB to facilitate resection. Complete thrombectomy may not always be necessary.