Yabroff, K. Robin

PURPOSE Cancer survivors endure costly and time-intensive care throughout treatment and survivorship. Paid sick leave provides employment and financial stability while supporting time off for medical needs. We investigated whether paid sick leave is associated with financial hardship and overall and cancer-specific mortality risk in working adult cancer survivors. METHODS Working adults age 18-64 years with a cancer history were identified from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) between 2011 and 2023. Associations of paid sick leave and financial hardship (medical care delays, problems paying medical bills, worry about paying medical bills, and cost-related medication underuse) were examined with 2011-2018 and 2019-2023 data using separate multivariable logistic regressions because of survey redesign in 2019. Linked mortality files from the National Death Index were available for 2011-2018 respondents. The association of paid sick leave and mortality risk was examined with multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS A total of 8,091 and 3,919 working cancer survivors were identified from the 2011-2018 and 2019-2023 NHIS, respectively. Paid sick leave was associated with decreased medical care delays because of cost (2011-2018 odds ratio [OR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.93]; P = .008; 2019-2023 OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.74]; P < .001) but not consistently with other forms of financial hardship. In adjusted analyses, paid sick leave was associated with significant reductions in risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.9]; P = .003) and cancer mortality (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.91]; P = .003). CONCLUSION In working cancer survivors, paid sick leave is associated with decreased care delays and lower overall and cancer-specific mortality risk, which may be due to maintained employment, household income, and health insurance coverage leading to improvements in treatment access, affordability, and overall survivorship care.

11064 Background: Local and state paid sick leave (PSL) mandates have been associated with increased use of preventive services, including cancer screening, and reduced emergency care utilization. Little research has examined PSL policies and cancer after diagnosis. This study evaluates associations of PSL policies and timely treatment initiation among women with early-stage breast cancer. Methods: We identified patients aged 18-64 years newly diagnosed with stages 0-II breast cancer from the National Cancer Database in 2004-2023 and linked then to area-level policy implementation, measured as the month and year the state, county, or city required PSL. Primary outcomes were receipt of definitive surgery or neoadjuvant therapy within 30, 60, and 90 days of diagnosis. We compared changes in treatment initiation between patients residing in areas with and without PSL policies during and after the month and year of diagnosis. We used a staggered difference-in-differences design to account for differential timing of implementation, adjusting for patient demographics, clinical, and area-level characteristics. Random errors were clustered at the state level. Supplemental analyses stratified by county-level unemployment rates and individual insurance coverage. Results: The study included 1,891,411 patients, of whom 249,313 (13.2%) resided in an area with PSL policies at diagnosis. Patients in areas with PSL policies were more likely to have Medicaid, reside in higher-income and metropolitan areas. PSL policy implementation was significantly associated with a 3.4 percentage point (PPT) increase in the probability of treatment ≤30 days (95% CI: 1.1-5.7), 3.0 PPT increase ≤60 days (95% CI: 1.6-4.3), 1.3 PPT increase ≤90 days (95% CI: 0.5-2.1) (Table). Improvements in timely treatment were concentrated in low-unemployment areas; no significant improvements were observed in high-unemployment areas. The magnitude of associations between PSL policies and treatment initiation was stronger among patients without private insurance than with private insurance. Conclusions: Local and state PSL mandates were associated with earlier treatment initiation among working-age patients with early-stage breast cancer, especially in areas with low female unemployment rate. Findings suggest that PSL policies play an important role in timely cancer treatment for employed women who may not have PSL through their jobs. Association of paid sick leave policies and breast cancer treatment initiation. Time from diagnosis to surgery/neoadjuvant therapy (days) DID PPT Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI P-value Overall ≤30 3.4 1.1 5.7 0.004 ≤60 3.0 1.6 4.3 0.000 ≤90 1.3 0.5 2.1 0.001 Low female unemployment ≤30 2.2 -0.7 5.0 0.136 ≤60 3.8 1.8 5.8 0.000 ≤90 1.2 0.3 2.2 0.012 High female unemployment ≤30 1.8 -0.6 4.2 0.145 ≤60 -1.2 -4.5 2.0 0.459 ≤90 -1.4 -3.7 0.9 0.232

PURPOSE Since 2012, several states have implemented mandatory paid sick leave (PSL) policies. PSL can provide patients time and income continuity to undergo screening and/or timely diagnostic workup for new cancer-related symptoms and complete lengthy and expensive cancer treatment courses. This study aimed to examine the association between mandatory PSL policies and cancer stage at diagnosis and overall survival (OS). METHODS Adults age 18-64 years diagnosed with cancer were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program registries between 2010 and 2019. Difference-in-differences (DID) analyses were used to compare absolute changes in stage I and stage IV diagnoses and 1-year OS before and after policy implementation in states that enacted mandatory PSL relative to states that did not enact such policies. RESULTS A total of 1,052,307 patients with cancer were included. In adjusted DID analyses, there were a 0.83 (95% CI = –1.49 to –0.16, P = .014) PP decrease in stage IV diagnoses and a 0.63 (95% CI = 0.10 to 1.17, P = .021) PP increase in 1-year OS associated with implementation of mandatory PSL policies. In exploratory analyses, males and individuals with lung cancer experienced the greatest shifts in policy-associated changes in stage at diagnosis and OS. CONCLUSION PSL policy implementation is associated with decreased late-stage diagnoses and improved OS in patients with cancer. Policies that improve opportunities to receive medical care may facilitate earlier cancer detection and ultimately contribute to better patient outcomes.

Background: Hormone receptor (HR)–negative, HER2-positive (also called HER2-enriched) breast cancer has no worse prognosis than other breast cancers if it is treated with HER2-targeted therapy. Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been shown to be associated with improved access to care and outcomes for many cancers, but its association with receipt of care for HR-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer is unknown. We examined the association of Medicaid expansion with receipt of guideline-concordant treatment, time to treatment initiation, and survival among nonelderly women newly diagnosed with HR-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Women aged 18 to 62 years newly diagnosed with HR-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Outcomes included receipt of stage-based guideline-concordant treatment, timely initiation of treatment (<30 days, <60 days, <90 days from diagnosis), and stage-specific 2-year overall survival. A difference-in-differences (DID) analytic approach compared outcome changes following Medicaid expansion in expansion versus nonexpansion states. Multivariable linear probability models were used to estimate treatment outcomes, and flexible parametric survival models were used to evaluate survival, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical confounders. Results: A total of 31,401 patients were included. Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase of 0.58 percentage points (ppt; 95% CI, 0.01–1.16) in receipt of guideline-concordant treatment overall, a 2.43-ppt (95% CI, 0.68–4.18) increase in initiating guideline-concordant treatment <60 days after diagnosis, and a 1.17-ppt (95% CI, 0.02–2.32) increase in 2-year survival rate. The increase in 2-year survival associated with Medicaid expansion was most prominent for patients with stage III disease (DID, 3.81; 95% CI, 0.82–6.80). Conclusions: Medicaid expansion was associated with improved care and survival for patients with HR-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer, an aggressive cancer type for which prognosis largely depends on access to effective treatment.

Abstract Background This study examines patients’ understanding of health insurance terms and concepts and quantifies health insurance literacy (HIL) levels by key sociodemographic factors. Methods This study included 393 adult patients with cancer (>18 years old) receiving treatment in two ambulatory infusion centers: Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, Arizona and the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson, Mississippi. Respondents’ perceptions of their HIL were assessed using the Health Insurance Literacy Measure (HILM), a validated 21‐item measure of a consumer's ability to select and use health insurance (HIL self‐efficacy). Respondents’ knowledge of health insurance concepts (HIL knowledge) was measured using 10 items created by the Kaiser Family Foundation. The number of correct answers was categorized into three levels: 0–4 (low knowledge), 5–6 (moderate knowledge), and 7–10 (high knowledge). Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare correct answers to HIL knowledge questions by HIL self‐efficacy. Results Nearly three‐quarters of patients had high HIL self‐efficacy and high HIL knowledge (70.5%), understanding basic insurance terms, such as premiums and deductibles. Relatively low percentages of patients correctly answered questions about the meaning of provider networks, health insurance formularies, and calculating out‐of‐pocket spending in scenarios when insurers pay a portion of allowed charges. Lower HIL knowledge was more common among patients with less educational attainment (<college: 15.2%; ≥college: 4.7%), lower household income (<$4999: 11.8%; ≥$5000: 6.1%), and low HIL self‐efficacy scores (low: 24.8%; high: 5.2) (all p values <.05). Conclusions Efforts to improve HIL and navigation of health insurance plan features are required, especially for socioeconomically vulnerable patients.

339 Background: Limited health insurance literacy (HIL) has been linked to problems paying medical bills or delaying care among patients with cancer. In this study, we describe the prevalence and correlates of HIL in a cohort of cancer patients measured using a ten-question HIL quiz developed by the Kaiser Family Foundation. Methods: We examined HIL in 393 adult patients (aged >18 years) receiving cancer treatment in two ambulatory infusion centers, Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, Arizona (12/2019 to 2/2020 and 8/2020 to 10/2020) and University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson, Mississippi (9/2020 to 1/2021). HIL was categorized as low, moderate, or high based on the total number of correct answers: 0-4 (low), 5-6 (moderate), and 7-10 (high). Descriptive statistics characterized the sample and chi-square statistics compared HIL by sociodemographic factors. Results: Most patients understood basic insurance terms, such as premiums and deductibles (Table). However, fewer patients answered questions correctly about provider networks (46.1%), formularies (48.6%), and calculating out-of-pocket (OOP) spending (16.8%). 53 (13.5%), 69 (17.6%), and 271 (69.0%) patients had low, moderate, and high HIL scores, respectively. Lower HIL was more common among patients of younger age (<65 years: 17.8%, 65+ years: 8.7%), lower educational attainment (less than college: 23.2%; college or higher: 4.4%), and lower household income (<$4999: 21.1%, $5000+: 6.1%) (all p-values<0.05). Conclusions: Although HIL in our cohort of cancer patients was relatively high - 69% answered at least 7 questions correctly - there were gaps in understanding of provider networks, formularies, and calculation of OOP spending. Efforts to improve HIL and help with navigation of health insurance plans may be required, especially for socioeconomically vulnerable patients.[Table: see text]

Abstract Female breast cancer is a common cancer in young adults, an age group with the highest uninsured rate. Among 51 675 young adult women (ages 18-39 years) diagnosed with breast cancer between 2011 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database, we estimated changes in guideline-concordant treatment receipt, treatment timeliness, and survival associated with the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion. Of young adults with stage I-III estrogen receptor–positive or progesterone receptor–positive breast cancer, Medicaid expansion was associated with a net increase of 2.42 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.56 to 4.28 percentage points) in the percentage receiving endocrine therapy. Among all young adults with stage I-III breast cancer, Medicaid expansion was associated with a net reduction of 1.65 percentage points (95% CI = 0.08 to 3.22 percentage points) in treatment delays defined as treatment initiation of at least 60 days after diagnosis and a net increase of 1.00 percentage points (95% CI = 0.21 to 1.79 percentage points) in 2-year overall survival. Our study provides evidence of benefit in cancer care and outcomes from Medicaid expansion among the young adult population.

6539 Background: HER2-enriched breast cancer (estrogen and progesterone receptors negative and HER2-positive) has no worse prognosis than other breast cancers if it is treated with HER2-targeted therapy. Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been shown to be associated with improved access to care and outcomes for many cancers, but its impact on care for HER2-enriched breast cancer is unknown. To fill this gap, we examined the association of Medicaid expansion with receipt of guideline-concordant treatment, time to treatment, and survival among newly diagnosed nonelderly women with HER2-enriched breast cancer. Methods: Women aged 18-62 years newly diagnosed with HER2-enriched breast cancer between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Our primary outcomes included receipt of stage-based guideline-concordant treatment, initiation of treatment <60 days, and stage-specific 2-year overall survival. A difference-in-differences (DD) approach compared outcome changes following the expansion in Medicaid expansion vs. non-expansion states. A linear probability model estimated treatment outcome, and a flexible parametric survival model evaluated survival. All models were clustered at the state level and adjusted for age group, race/ethnicity, rurality of residence, zip code-level income, comorbidity, and diagnosis year. Results: A total of 31,354 patients with HER2-enriched breast cancer were included, including 19,255 in expansion states and 12,099 in non-expansion states. Compared to patients in expansion states, patients in non-expansion states were more likely to be racial/ethnic minorities, uninsured, and diagnosed at late-stage. Medicaid expansion was not significantly associated with changes in receipt of surgery for stage I-III disease but was associated with an increase of 4.42 percentage points (ppt, 95% CI: 0.09, 8.74) in receipt of chemotherapy/targeted therapy for stage IV disease, with an increase from 90.4% pre-expansion to 92.8% post-expansion in expansion states and a decrease from 93.7% to 91.9% in non-expansion states. Medicaid expansion was also significantly associated with a 2.41 ppt increase in initiating guideline-concordant treatment within 60 days (95% CI: 0.66, 4.17; 83.5% to 82.5% in expansion states vs. 86.6% to 83.7% in non-expansion states), and a 1.18 ppt increase in two-year survival rate (95% CI: 0.03, 2.33; 94.0% to 94.9% in expansion states vs. 94.3% to 94.1% in non-expansion states). The increase in two-year survival associated with Medicaid expansion was most prominent for stage III patients (DD=3.63 ppt; 95% CI: 0.64, 6.62). Conclusions: Medicaid expansion was associated with increased receipt of timely treatment and improved 2-year survival among nonelderly women newly diagnosed with HER2-enriched breast cancer.