Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

4796 citation(s) found for "Wu, Jennifer".

Overview of 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Group A Streptococcal (GAS) Pharyngitis: Risk Assessment Using Clinical Scoring Systems in Children and Adults
Barshak, Miriam B. , Linder, Jeffrey A., Watson, Michael E, Wessels, Michael R. , Carter, Danielle M, Cohen, Adam L, Bard, Jennifer Dien , Erdem, Güliz , Gregory, Christopher J. , Mochon, A Brian, Stevens, Ryan W, Kaur, Dipleen, Martin, Judith M. , Linder, Jeffrey A. , Watson, Michael E. , Martin, J M , Cohen, Adam L. , Kourtis, Athena P. , Martin, Judith M, Mochon, A. Brian, Shapiro, Daniel J. , Stevens, Ryan W.

Clinical Infectious Diseases | February 12, 2026 | Volume: 82 | Issue: Supplement_3 | Pages: i92-i96

10.1093/cid/ciag098 | PMID 41692530 Get It

Abstract This publication represents the first part of an update to the clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Diagnosis of GAS pharyngitis by clinician judgment alone is unreliable, and universal testing incurs cost and inconvenience for individuals at low risk of having GAS infection. Clinical scoring systems have been used to quantify the probability of a positive GAS throat culture based on standardized criteria such as the presence of fever, tonsillar enlargement or exudate, tender and enlarged anterior cervical lymph nodes, and the absence of cough. The goal of this manuscript is to review the evidence and provide a recommendation as to whether a scoring system should be used to decide which patients should have a GAS diagnostic test (ie, rapid antigen test [RADT], molecular method, and/or throat culture) performed. We performed a systematic review of randomized and nonrandomized studies that compared the use of a clinical scoring system to clinician judgment alone in predicting the result of a throat culture. Evidence from studies in children and adults suggests the diagnostic accuracy is comparable or slightly higher using a scoring system compared to clinician judgment alone. Although the studies are limited due to small size, lack of uniformity in outcome measures, and incomplete data, the consensus of the panel is that the balance of benefits and harms favors incorporation of a clinical scoring system as part of the evaluation of patients with sore throat and suspected GAS pharyngitis.
Impact of a web‐based breast cancer surgery decision aid on knowledge and perceptions of feeling informed in clinics that care for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients: An Alliance Clinical Trial (A231701CD)
Schumacher, Jessica R. , Hanlon, Bret M., Zahrieh, David , Tucholka, Jennifer L. , McKinney, Grace, Tan, Angelina D., Breuer, Catherine R. , Bailey, Lisa, Higham, Anna M. , Wecsler, Julie S. , Arnold, Alicia H, Froix, Anthony J. , Dull, Scott, Abbott, Andrea M., Fine, Stephanie , McGuire, Kandace P. , Seydel, Anna S. , McNamara, Patricia, Chow, Selina , Neuman, Heather B. , Hanlon, Bret M. , Hanlon, Bret M , Arnold, Alicia , Abbott, Andrea M , Neuman, Heather B , Rathouz, Paul J. , McKinney, Grace, Bailey, Lisa, Abbott, Andrea M.

Cancer | February 11, 2026 | Volume: 132 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/cncr.70314 | PMID 41669989 Get It

Abstract Objective To test the effectiveness of a surgical web‐based decision aid (DA) in improving knowledge. Summary of Background Data DAs support decision making by providing information about the options. Methods A stepped wedge trial was conducted in 10 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program clinics (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology). Clinics were randomized to time of transition from usual care (UC) to delivery of a web‐based DA. Patients with stage 0 through 3 breast cancer being considered for surgery were enrolled. Knowledge (primary outcome) was measured using the Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Quality Instrument and patients were asked, “How informed do you feel?” Intervention effects were tested with linear mixed‐effects models, accounting for surgeon and clinic‐level clustering, time, and enrollment after COVID. Additional models controlled for demographics. Results A total of 44% of DA arm patients reviewed the DA and 58% in UC arm reported reviewing “any information.” Being in the DA arm versus UC was not associated with knowledge. However, “review of information” was associated with higher knowledge. In addition, non‐White race and lower education were associated with lower knowledge. The DA arm was associated with higher perceptions of feeling informed (parameter estimate 1.36; 95% CI, 0.18–2.55; p = .02); this persisted even when controlling for review of information or demographics. Conclusion Improved knowledge was not demonstrate with a web‐based DA versus UC. Interestingly, the DA was associated with a higher likelihood of feeling informed. Future research will explore the discrepancy between patients feeling informed but having low knowledge, especially for disadvantaged patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0376600
Colon-Pilot: A Generative AI Tool for Automated Colonoscopy Surveillance Recommendations and 2024 ACG/ASGE Quality Benchmarking
Garg, Sushil Kumar , Mau, Brayden , Hubers, Jeffery , Arce, Victor, Hooper, Nicole, Lindquist, Jennifer, Harper, Sarah B. , Thayer, Ann B., Mukherjee, Piyush, Loufek, Brenna, Melnick, Joe , Rost, Lauren, Robbins, Steven A. , Chaudhary, Rajeev, Harper, Sarah B , Loufek, Brenna T , Rost, Lauren M , Gomes, Rahul , Chaudhary, Rajeev , Hubers, Jeffrey , Arce, Victor, Mukherjee, Piyush, Rost, Lauren M. , Gomes, Rahul

American Journal of Gastroenterology | February 10, 2026 | Volume: 121 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 964-973

10.14309/ajg.0000000000003946 | PMID 41665228 Get It

INTRODUCTION: High-quality colonoscopy requires accurate risk stratification for surveillance per the 2020 US Multi-Society Task Force guidelines and adherence to 2024 American College of Gastroenterology/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality benchmarks. Both are operationally challenging in clinical practice. We developed and validated Colon-Pilot, a large language model—powered clinical decision support system using GPT-4o to automate and standardize both functions. METHODS: The system was evaluated in 2 operational modes: (i) a human-in-the-loop clinical decision support validation of surveillance recommendations for 596 colonoscopies, comparing concordance with 2020 US Multi-Society Task Force guidelines against expert consensus, and (ii) an automated administrative audit applying Colon-Pilot to 42,632 colonoscopies across the Mayo Clinic Health System to calculate 2024 American College of Gastroenterology/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy priority quality indicators. Recommendations were autogenerated unless predefined safety criteria triggered manual review. RESULTS: Colon-Pilot issued recommendations for 522 of 596 cases (87.6%) and flagged 12.4% for manual review. For automated cases, guideline-concordant accuracy was 97.5% (Cohen κ = 0.970) versus 69.7% (κ = 0.781) for original endoscopist recommendations. Discordant artificial intelligence (AI) cases (n = 13) most often recommended longer-than-appropriate intervals (62%). Applied to the enterprise data set, Colon-Pilot calculated performance exceeding 2024 targets: adenoma detection rate 49.8% (≥35%), sessile serrated lesion detection rate 17.7% (≥6%), bowel preparation adequacy 91.8% (≥90%), and cecal intubation rate 97.4% (≥95%). DISCUSSION: Colon-Pilot demonstrated high fidelity in applying surveillance guidelines and automated quality benchmarking, outperforming unassisted endoscopists in guideline adherence. By combining safety protocols with large-scale automated reporting, it offers a scalable solution for improving both efficiency and quality in colorectal cancer prevention.
A randomized phase 2 study of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma
Jegede, Opeyemi A. , Wang, Victoria, Ansell, Stephen M., Kostakoglu, Lale, Steidl, Christian , Natkunam, Yasodha , Scott, David W., Ambinder, Richard F, David, Kevin A. , Advani, Ranjana H, Bartlett, Nancy L., Thomas, Sachdev , Cohen, Jonathon B. , Goyal, Gaurav, Mehta-Shah, Neha, Amengual, Jennifer E. , Forlenza, Christopher Jon, Cole, Peter D. , Duan, Fenghai , Kelly, Kara M, Advani, Ranjana H. , Scott, David W. , Kostakoglu, Lale , Diefenbach, Catherine S , Jagede, Opeyemi A. , Kostakoglu, Lale , Steidl, Christian , Natkunam, Yasodha , Scott, David W , Ambinder, Richard F , David, Kevin , Bartlett, Nancy L , Thomas, Sachdev P , Cohen, Jonathon B , Goyal, Guarav , Mehta-Shah, Neha , Amengual, Jennifer E , Cole, Peter D , Advani, Ranjana H , Diefenbach, Catherine , Wang, Victoria , Ansell, Stephen M. , Ambinder, Richard F. , Bartlett, Nancy L. , Robertson, Michael J. , Ibrahimi, Sami , Goyal, Gaurav , Mehta–Shah, Neha , Forlenza, Christopher J. , Kelly, Kara M , Kahl, Brad S.

Blood | February 9, 2026 | Volume: 147 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 2041-2052

10.1182/blood.2025029546 | PMID 41662628 Get It

Abstract The phase 1/2 Intergroup study E4412 investigated checkpoint blockade with nivolumab (Nivo) and ipilimumab (Ipi) combined with the CD30 targeting antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin (BV) in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma. A total of 147 patients aged ≥12 years were randomized between BV/Nivo and BV/Ipi/Nivo; 132 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis. The complete response (CR) rate, was 64.7% (52.2, 75.9) for BV/Nivo and 70.3% (57.6, 81.1) for BV/Ipi/Nivo (1-sided P = .29). The median survival follow-up was 38.0 months (interquartile range, 32.6-48.1). Progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between the 2 arms (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78, confidence interval [CI], 0.39-1.57; 1-sided P = .24). Treatment-related grade 3+ toxicities in the adult cohort, excluding rash, were similar between both arms (38.5% BV/Nivo and 39.3% BV/Ipi/Nivo); there was a higher frequency of grade 3 rash with BV/Ipi/Nivo (24.6%) compared with BV/Nivo (9.2%). We compared PFS by stem cell transplantation (SCT) status in a planned before hoc comparison; 58 patients received SCT, and 36-month PFS (from SCT) was >90% for both arms. Sixty-six patients were progression free after the first scan and did not undergo SCT. The 36-month PFS was 73.0% (54.5, 85.0) for BV/Ipi/Nivo compared with 45.8% (26.3, 63.4) for BV/Nivo (HR, 0.45; CI, 0.19-1.08; 1-sided P = .03). The study did not meet its primary end point of superior CR rate for the triplet, but it supports the use of checkpoint antibody-drug conjugate induction prior to auto SCT, and there is an intriguing signal of disease control for patients wishing to defer or avoid SCT with the triplet of BV/Ipi/Nivo. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01896999.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Prostate, Version 2.2026
Cheng, Heather H., Goggins, Michael, Yurgelun, Matthew B. , Karlan, Beth Y., Norquist, Barbara S., Daly, MB, Pal, Tuya, AlHilli, Zahraa, Arun, Banu , Churpek, Jane, Colonna, Sarah, Domchek, Susan M., Escobar, Mauricio R., Friedman, S, Hagemann, Andrea, Hendrix, Ashley, Huo, Dezheng, Hutton, Mollie L., Kassem, Nawal , Kurian, Allison W., Laronga, Christine , Mak, Julie S, McDonnell, Kevin, Mersch, Jacqueline, Offit, Kenneth, Plichta, Jennifer K. , Rash, Dominique , Reiser, Gwen , Senter-Jamieson, Leigha, Shannon, K. McWeeney, Welborn, Jeanna, Wick, Myra , Wood, Marie , Darlow, Susan, Diwan, Zeenat, Dwyer, Mary, Churpek, Jane E. , Kurian, Allison W. , Kurian, Allison W , Plichta, Jennifer K , Churpek, Jane E , Churpek, Jane , Giri, Veda N. , Goggins, Michael, Karlan, Beth Y , Norquist, Barbara, Pal, Tuya , Al‐Hilli, Zahraa , Arun, Banu , Colonna, Sarah V. , Domchek, Susan M. , Fejerman, Laura , Hagemann, Andrea, Huo, Dezheng , Khan, Seema A. , Mak, Julie , Maxwell, Kara N. , McDonnell, Kevin , Merajver, Sofía D. , Mersch, Jacqueline A, Offit, Kenneth , Darlow, Susan

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | February 9, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 2-10

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0007 | PMID 41671423 Get It

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Prostate are intended to serve as a resource for health care providers to identify individuals who may benefit from cancer risk assessment and genetic counseling and testing; help guide decisions related to genetic testing; and facilitate a multidisciplinary approach in the comprehensive care of individuals at increased risk for hereditary breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. The current guidelines focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer and recommended approaches to genetic counseling/testing and care strategies in individuals with these P/LP variants associated with increased risk of these cancers. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding screening for prostate cancer and pancreas cancer, as well as testing criteria for nonepithelial ovarian cancer.
Clinical Features and Dental Pathologies in Maxillary Sinus Fungal Balls and Odontogenic Sinusitis
Im, E., Donaldson, Lane , Adappa, Nithin D, Chen, Y. P., Chapurin, Nikita , Espinosa, Maria, Fu, Chia‐Hsiang , Fox, Meha G, Garg, Rohit, Kohanski, Michael A. , Li, Kevin L. , Liu, Duxuan , Locke, Tran Bao, Lin, Chih‐Feng, Ottavi, Alice, Papagiannopoulos, Peter , Je, Palmer, Tong, C., Tajudeen, Bobby A. , Venkatesh, Sanjena , Wei, Kimberly , Yoo, Frederick , Yu, Alison J. , Jin, Jun, Saibene, Alberto Maria , Craig, John, Im, Eunice , Douglas, Jennifer E , Eide, Jacob, Espinosa, Maria , Fox, Meha G , Locke, Tran Bao , Makary, Chadi , Venkatesh, Sanjena , Saibene, Alberto M , Adelman, Avraham E. , Adappa, Nithin D. , D’Souza, Glen , Eide, Jacob G. , Fox, Meha G. , Garg, Rohit , Kuan, Edward C , Kwiatkowska, Marta Aleksandra , Liu, Derek H., Locke, Tran B. , Jin, Jun

The Laryngoscope | February 8, 2026 | Volume: 136 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 2913-2924

10.1002/lary.70429 | PMID 41654324 Get It

ABSTRACT Objectives While maxillary sinus fungal balls (MSFB) can be associated with odontogenic conditions (MSFBO), MSFBO clinical and dental features have not been compared to odontogenic sinusitis (ODS). This multicenter study aimed to compare characteristics of MSFB, MSFBO, and ODS. Methods A multicenter international retrospective cohort study was conducted on adults with MSFBs and ODS who underwent sinus surgery. First in MSFBs, it was determined whether different dental conditions were more likely in FB versus non‐FB sides. Second, clinical features and dental pathologies were compared between MSFBO and ODS. For analyses, dental conditions were considered individually and as two groups: infectious pathologies and dental/oral procedures with indwelling metallic materials. Results After exclusions, there were 203 MSFBs and 163 ODS. Among MSFBs, 141 were MSFBOs. FB sides were associated with sinus protrusion of root canal treatment (RCT) materials ( p = 0.040) and dental implants ( p = 0.040). Compared to MSFBO, ODS patients were younger, more likely to have MS purulence (OR = 40.9, p < 0.010), more likely associated with apical periodontitis (OR = 2.59, p = 0.010) and oroantral fistulas (OR = 6.94, p = 0.020), and less likely associated with extruded RCT materials (OR = 0.01, p = 0.010) and protruded midface screws (OR < 0.01, p = 0.010). Comparing purulent MSFBO and ODS, ODS was more associated with infectious dental pathologies ( p < 0.009). Conclusion Compared to MSFBs, MSFBOs were associated with RCT extrusion and implant protrusion. Compared to MSFBOs, ODS was more likely purulent and associated with infectious dental pathologies. While ODS is often distinct from MSFBO, the two conditions can coexist, and surgeons must determine whether patients have infectious dental pathology requiring treatment with both conditions. Level of Evidence 4.
Indocyanine green assists with sentinel lymph node mapping in pediatric and adolescent patients: A Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative prospective observational study
Schermerhorn, Sophia M. V. , Vore, Emily , Bondoc, Alexander J, Ayala, Samantha, Kastenberg, Zachary J. , Arkin, Cameron, Malek, Marcus M. , Campwala, Insiyah, Aldrink, Jennifer H. , Horvath, Kyle , Piché, Nelson , Osman, Yasmin, Brown, Erin G, Doyle, Kathleen, Abril, Paige, Roach, Jonathan P, Ziogas, Ioannis A. , Rhee, Daniel S. , Chidiac, Charbel, Debertin, Julia , Craig, Brian T. , Lee, W. N., Barkhordar, Aaron, Joshi, Devashish , Stellon, Michael , Davies, Dafydd A., Boehmer, Chloé , Dasgupta, Roshni, Kastenberg, Zachary J , Arkin, Cameron , Malek, Marcus M , Aldrink, Jennifer H , Horvath, Kyle Z , Polites, Stephanie F. , Lee, William G , Barkhordar, Aaron , Joshi, Devashish , Beckhorn, Catherine , Dasgupta, Roshni , Bondoc, Alexander , Lautz, Timothy B. , Campwala, Insiyah , Brown, Erin G. , Roach, Jonathan P. , Chidiac, Charbel , Lal, Dave R. , Kim, Eugene S. , Le, Hau D. , Tracy, Elisabeth T. , Beckhorn, Catherine B , Dasgupta, Roshni

Cancer | February 7, 2026 | Volume: 132 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/cncr.70274 | PMID 41653066 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a critical staging tool in skin and soft tissue cancers. Although technetium lymphoscintigraphy is the most common adjunct, indocyanine green (ICG) demonstrates a promising alternative in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (AYA) skin and soft tissue cancers. Methods and Objectives Evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICG in SLN biopsy (SLNB) in diverse pediatric and AYA solid cancers in a multi‐institutional environment. This is a prospective, observational study conducted at 13 member institutions in the Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative between 2019 and 2023. Eligible patients underwent SLNB for primary or recurrent solid skin and soft tissue tumors. Peritumoral ICG was administered intraoperatively. Outcomes included SLN detection rates, histopathology of excised specimens, and surgeon‐reported assessment of utility. Safety was assessed through adverse event reporting. Results Forty SLNB procedures yielded 84 specimens: 13 melanoma (32.5%), 12 squamous cell carcinoma (30%), 11 non‐rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (27.5%), two rhabdomyosarcoma (5%), one Ewing sarcoma (2.5%), and one malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (2.5%). Histologic evaluation identified 81 lymph nodes, 75 benign (89.3%) and six malignant (7.1%); three specimens were adipose tissue (3.6%). Of 81 lymph nodes, 76% were ICG‐positive. ICG had a sensitivity of 79.5%, a specificity of 33%, and a positive predictive value of 96%. All malignant nodes were ICG‐avid. There were no adverse reactions to ICG at 30 days. Conclusions ICG is a safe and effective adjunct for SLNB in pediatric and AYA soft tissue and skin malignancies.
Multi-model Diffusion MRI Signatures in Atypical Parkinsonian Disorders
Tian, Yuqi , Ali, Farwa, Machulda, Mary M., Josephs, Keith A, Whitwell, Jennifer, Machulda, Mary M. , Ali, Farwa , Machulda, Mary M , Josephs, Keith A , Whitwell, Jennifer , Ali, Farwa , Lowe, Val J. , Josephs, Keith A. , Whitwell, Jennifer L.

No container title available | February 6, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.02.05.26345656 | PMID 41674642 Get It

Abstract Distinguishing atypical parkinsonian disorders (APS) from Parkinson’s disease (PD) remains challenging due to overlapping clinical features, yet accurate differentiation is critical for prognosis and treatment. Here, we employed multi-model diffusion MRI (dMRI) analysis to characterize microstructural alterations across corticobasal syndrome (CBS), progressive supranuclear palsy-Richardson syndrome (PSP-RS) and PD, with the aim of identifying which dMRI model provides optimum differentiation. We analyzed 25 CBS, 42 PSP-RS, and 21 PD participants compared to 35 age and sex-matched controls. Using a clinically feasible 3-shell high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) protocol, we applied 11 metrics from five complementary dMRI models—diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), free-water-eliminated model of DTI (FWE), neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), tissue-weighted NODDI, and Fixel Density (FD) in fixel-based analysis (FBA) —to comprehensively assess regional white and gray matter integrity. Group differentiation was assessed using Cohen’s d effect sizes and spearman correlations were assessed between dMRI metrics and clinical scales. Distinct microstructural signatures were observed across disorders and the sensitivity of the dMRI models differed. In group contrasts, DTI and NODDI-derived metrics consistently captured the strongest effects in midbrain and peduncular pathways for PSP-RS, whereas precentral and corticospinal alterations in CBS were most prominent using NODDI and FBA measures. Free-water-corrected metrics showed attenuated group differences. Across clinical-diffusion analyses, NODDI metrics exhibited the most robust associations with disease severity, while DTI and FWE measures detected more limited, regionally constrained effects. Together, these findings highlight complementary yet distinct sensitivities of tensor, free-water, multi-compartment, and fixel-based models to APS-related neurodegeneration.
Quantitative bias analyses to address measurement error in time-to-event endpoints
Ackerman, Benjamin , Gan, Ryan W. , Zhang, Youyi, Hayden, Jennifer, Wang, Jocelyn R., Meyer, Craig S. , Lund, Jennifer L., Schneeweiss, S, Roose, James , Nadeem, Omar, NS, Raje, Giri, Smith, Hester, Laura , Brayer, Jason , Batavia, Ashita S. , Schneeweiß, Sebastian , Lund, Jennifer L , Schneeweiss, Sebastian , Stürmer, Til , Siddique, Juned , Weberpals, Janick G. , Nadeem, Omar , Ailawadhi, Sikander

American Journal of Epidemiology | February 4, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/aje/kwag027 | PMID 41645621 Get It

Abstract When using real-world data to construct an external comparator arm for a single-arm trial, there may be differences in how and when patients are assessed for disease between trial and real-world settings. Such differences can generate outcome measurement error when comparing time-to-event endpoints and lead to biased findings. Recent methods have been developed to mitigate measurement error bias in real-world endpoints; however, they rely on the existence of a validation sample, ie, data on a set of patients where both the “true” trial-like and “mis-measured” real-world measures are collected. We demonstrate how novel statistical methods can be leveraged as quantitative bias analyses (QBA) to contextualize real-world evidence findings when outcome measurement error is of concern, but validation samples are infeasible to collect. Quantitative bias analyses allow researchers to set plausible ranges for the amount of error when not directly measurable. We highlight how to conduct QBA with two recent methods, cumulative incidence curve correction and survival regression calibration, and illustrate how to generate plausible parameter values through simulation. We provide an illustrative QBA example in a cohort of real-world patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and provide practical guidance to apply QBA for outcome measurement error and interpret results.
The TNFR superfamily member Fn14 impacts immunity and survival in experimental gliomas and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in glioblastoma patients
Kanvinde, Pranjali , Seas, Alexandra A. , McFarland, Emylee, Fang, Jennifer R. , Flick, M, Connolly, Nina P, Beniwal, Angad , Sharifai, Nima , Chen, Chixiang, Anastasiadis, Pavlos , Winkles, Jeffrey A. , Woodworth, Graeme F, Chen, Chixiang , Kanvinde, Pranjali P , Sharifai, Nima , Chen, Chixiang , Bar, Eli E , Winkles, Jeffrey A , Woodworth, Graeme F , Malla, Adarsha P. , Connolly, Nina P. , Yepes, Manuel A , Tran, Nhan L.

Neuro-Oncology Advances | February 3, 2026 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdag023 | PMID 41853810 Get It

Abstract Background Fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) belongs to the TNFR superfamily. Fn14 overexpression can drive receptor-autonomous signaling, increase both cell invasion and tumor-associated macrophages/microglia (TAMMs) recruitment, and correlates with reduced survival in glioblastoma (GBM) patients and rat gliomas. While prior studies report Fn14 expression in non-tumor cells within the GBM tumor microenvironment (TME), their relative contributions to glioma pathobiology remain unclear. Methods Using tumor-host pairings of Fn14-positive and -knockout (-KO) cells and mice, we examined the role of Fn14 in glioma biology. Mouse glioma and human GBM datasets were analyzed at the cellular, protein, and transcriptomic levels to assess Fn14-associated changes in the glioma TME and survival outcomes. Results Fn14 was found to be highly expressed in tumor cells and TAMMs in human GBM and 2 well-characterized murine glioma models. Fn14 KO in both tumor and host cells increased overall survival. Notably, this survival benefit was greater in the glioma model characterized by a more immunologically activated TME. Immunophenotyping revealed that Fn14 loss reshapes the tumor-immune landscape, reducing the presence of immunosuppressive macrophages and exhausted T-cells, suggesting that Fn14 modulates both innate and adaptive immune responses. These findings were supported by analyses of human GBM datasets, where high Fn14 expression correlated with immunosuppressive shifts and poor patient responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Conclusions This study provides the first description of the contributions of both tumor- and host-derived Fn14 expression to tumor immunity and survival and identifies Fn14 as an important mediator of innate and adaptive immune responses in gliomas.