Citations

e12562 Background: Previous research has suggested that breast cancer (BC) diagnosed during pregnancy or the postpartum period exhibits more aggressive clinical features, possibly due to pregnancy-related hormonal changes, immune modulation, and alterations in the mammary microenvironment compared to nulligravid or women many years out from pregnancy. Emerging data have demonstrated potential worse outcomes for patients (pts) diagnosed in post-partum. This study evaluated the influence of timing of diagnosis in relation to pregnancy history and recency of childbirth on long-term outcomes in a modern cohort of young pts with early-stage BC. Methods: Pts with stage I–III BC age < 40y in the prospective Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study (YWBCS) were categorized at diagnosis as Nulligravid (no prior pregnancy), Nulliparous (prior pregnancy without live birth), Currently Pregnant, or Parous (subdivided by time since last childbirth: within 5 years [≤ 5y PP], and 5–10 years postpartum [5–10y PP]). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared across BC subtypes (estrogen receptor+/HER2- [ER+/HER2-], HER2+, and triple-negative BC [TNBC]). Prognostic analyses for distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) used Cox models. Results: 859 pts were included, 257 (30%) nulligravid, 50 (6%) nulliparous, 37 (4%) pregnant, and 515 (60%) parous (348 [68%] were ≤5y PP, and 167 [32%] were 5–10y PP). Median follow-up was 133 (6–209) months. Median age at diagnosis was lower in nulligravid pts (33 vs. 35–38 years); T1 tumors were most common in pts >5y PP (62%), and N0 status was highest in nulligravid pts (64%) (all p < 0.0001). Pregnant pts had higher rates of TNBC (27%), and T3 tumors (14%), N1 status, N1 (41%), and Grade 3 (81%) tumors compared to other groups (all p < 0.0001). Overall, only tumor size (T2-T4 vs T1, HR 2.03; 95% CI 1.37–3.03) and nodal status (N1 vs N0, HR 2.22; 1.48–3.34; N2/3 vs N0, HR 3.23; 1.96-5.33) were independently associated with worse DRFS; pregnancy history was not: nulligravid + nulliparous pts had no significant differences in DRFS compared to Pregnant (HR 1.46; 0.75–2.86), Parous <5y PP (HR 0.86; 0.58–1.26), and Parous 5–10y PP (HR 0.89; 0.54–1.48). Subgroup analyses by BC subtype (Table) and sensitivity analyses (excluding currently pregnant pts or separating nulligravid and nulliparous pts) demonstrated no significant associations between pregnancy history and DRFS. Conclusions: In this cohort study of very young patients with early breast cancer with contemporary treatment including management of breast cancer during pregnancy, pregnancy history and recency of pregnancy were not independent predictors of long-term disease outcomes. DRFS results by subgroup. Pregnancy Group N (%) HR (95% CI) ER+/HER2- Nulligravid + Nulliparous 173 (38.1) Ref Pregnant 16 (3.5) 0.93 (0.32–2.70) Parous ≤5y PP 177 (39.0) 0.77 (0.45–1.29) Parous 5–10y PP 88 (19.4) 0.78 (0.39–1.53) HER2+ Nulligravid + Nulliparous 77 (30.8) Ref Pregnant 11 (4.4) 3.27 (0.80–13.38) Parous ≤5y PP 113 (45.2) 1.50 (0.60–3.75) Parous 5–10y PP 49 (19.6) 1.45 (0.45–4.66) TNBC Nulligravid + Nulliparous 56 (36.8) Ref Pregnant 10 (6.6) 1.92 (0.61–6.09) Parous ≤5y PP 57 (37.5) 0.68 (0.28–1.63) Parous 5–10y PP 29 (19.1) 1.16 (0.43–3.14)

5048 Background: Ra-223, an alpha-emitting radionuclide, is the first agent of its kind approved for the treatment of mCRPC. Although a pivotal phase 3 study evaluated its short-term safety, there is a need to investigate its long-term safety. The REASSURE study prospectively examined the long-term safety of Ra-223, including secondary primary malignancies (SPMs), in a large patient (pt) population enrolled across Europe, the United States, Israel, and Latin America. Methods: We report final analyses (data cut-off Oct 24, 2024) of REASSURE (NCT02141438), a global, noninterventional study (enrolment 2014–2017). Primary outcomes were the incidence of SPMs, short- (30 days) and long-term (7 years) safety events, and bone marrow suppression (BMS) management in pts who had ≥1 Ra-223 dose. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS). Results: Analyses included 1472 pts; median follow-up was 17 months (range 0.3–95.4). Median age was 73 years and 80% of pts had an ECOG PS of 0/1. In evaluable pts, median alkaline phosphatase, prostate-specific antigen, and lactate dehydrogenase levels were 133 U/L, 59 ng/mL, and 266 U/L, respectively. Overall, 81% of pts had bone-only metastases at baseline; 19% of pts had metastases in the bone plus other sites (mostly lymph nodes). Prior treatments included abiraterone (48% of pts), enzalutamide (39%), docetaxel (39%), and cabazitaxel (9%). Pts received a median of 6 Ra-223 doses; 67% received ≥5 doses. SPMs occurred in 2% of pts (25 SPMs in 24 pts). Of these pts, 16 (67%) and 1 (4%) had received prior or concomitant radiotherapy, respectively. Overall, 3% of pts had drug-related serious adverse events >30 days after completing Ra-223. Fractures were reported in 10% of pts and were less common in pts with (7% of 605) than without (12% of 867) concomitant BHA use. During Ra-223 and up to 30 days after the last dose, there was no notable difference in the incidence of abnormal platelet counts between pts with (3%) or without (2%) prior chemotherapy; similar findings were seen for abnormal neutrophil counts (5% and 5%, respectively). BMS treatments, assessed from the start of Ra-223, were more common in pts who had received prior taxanes (38%) than in those who had not (26%). The most common life-prolonging therapies received after Ra-223 were docetaxel (18%), enzalutamide (15%), abiraterone (11%), and cabazitaxel (11%). Median OS was 15.6 months (95% CI, 14.6, 16.4); pt subgroups that survived the longest will be characterized and presented. Conclusions: This real-world safety analysis of pts with mCRPC is the longest follow-up of a radiopharmaceutical reported to date and supports the well-established favorable safety profile of Ra-223. The incidence of SPMs was low. The rate of fracture was low, especially in the presence of BHAs. Prior taxane chemotherapy use had no impact on hematological toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT02141438 .

7049 Background: Odronextamab, an investigational off-the-shelf CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody, demonstrated compelling efficacy and a generally manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated pts with R/R FL in the primary analysis of the Phase 2 ELM-2 study (NCT03888105; Kim TM, et al. Ann Oncol 2024). We present updated efficacy and safety data for odronextamab in pts with R/R FL from ELM-2 after >2 yrs follow-up. Methods: Odronextamab was administered intravenously until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity, with Cycle (C) 1 step-up dosing to help mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS) risk, as reported previously. Pts with a complete response (CR) for ≥9 months (mo) switched from maintenance dosing Q2W to Q4W. Primary endpoint: objective response rate (ORR) per Lugano criteria by independent central review (ICR); secondary endpoints: CR rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS). Results: At the updated data cutoff (Aug 15, 2024), 157 pts with centrally confirmed R/R FL Grade (Gr) 1–3a were enrolled. Median no. of treatment cycles: 19.0 (range 0.1–117.3); 96.2% (n = 151) and 82.8% (n = 130) of pts completed C1 and C4, respectively. The global cohort comprised 128 pts evaluable for efficacy. At a median efficacy follow-up of 28.3 mo, ORR was 80.5% (n = 103) by ICR and CR rate was 74.2% (n = 95); 92.2% of responders achieved CR. Responses were durable (median DOR, 26.0 mo; median duration of CR, 32.2 mo). ORR was consistent across high-risk subgroups (Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score 3–5, 78.4%; progression of disease within 2 yrs of frontline therapy, 81.0%). Median PFS was 23.0 mo (estimated 36-mo PFS rate, 37.5%), and median OS was 54.2 mo (estimated 36-mo OS rate, 62.6%). Median PFS was longer in pts who were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative (42.4 mo) versus MRD positive (21.6 mo) at Week 12. Of 47/128 pts who switched to Q4W dosing, 32 remained in CR. The odronextamab long-term safety profile was consistent with the primary analysis. All 157 pts had TEAEs (Gr ≥3, 86.0%), and 15.3% discontinued treatment due to TEAEs (most common: COVID-19 infection, 2.5%). With 0.7/4/20 mg step-up dosing (n = 89), CRS events were mostly low grade (Gr 1, 46.1%; Gr 2, 13.5%; Gr 3, n = 1; Gr ≥4, n = 0), occurred mostly in C1, and resolved in a median of 8.4 hrs. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was reported in one pt (Gr 2). Infections were reported in 79.0% of pts (124/157; Gr ≥3, 42.0%). COVID-19-related infections were reported in 38.2% of pts (Gr 5, 5.7%). Conclusions: With longer follow-up, odronextamab demonstrated durable responses in heavily pretreated pts with R/R FL from ELM-2, with robust efficacy in those with high-risk features, and a generally manageable safety profile. Overall, these compelling results support odronextamab as a potential off-the-shelf treatment option for pts with R/R FL. Clinical trial information: NCT03888105 .

3128 Background: LncRNAs have emerged as key regulators of cancer progression and therapeutic responses. In CRC, several lncRNAs have been implicated in modulating tumor growth, metastasis and treatment resistance by interacting with critical tumorigenic pathways. Here, we investigate the potential prognostic and predictive value of lncRNA expression in patients (pts) with mCRC enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405 (NCT00265850) trial. Methods: We analyzed 433 mCRC pts treated with either bevacizumab (bev, n = 226) or cetuximab (cet, n = 207) plus first-line chemotherapy. Tumor RNA expression (Illumina HiSeq 2500) of 13 candidate lncRNAs (SNHG11, HOTAIR, FGF14-AS2, H19, YWHAE, NEAT1, MIR100HG, UCA1, LINC00973, SLCO4A1-AS1, POU5F1P4, MALAT1, HCG18) was explored. Median overall survival (mOS) and progression-free survival (mPFS) in months (mo) were compared between pts grouped by tertiles (low [L] vs medium [M] vs high [H]) of gene expression. Likelihood ratio tests, hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed from multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age, sex, ECOG PS, tumor location, number of metastatic sites, KRAS , Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS), and treatment. Results: Overall, SNHG11 was strongly associated with OS and PFS after adjusting for multiple tests (Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate < 0.05). High SNHG11 expression (H group, n = 144) was associated with improved mPFS (H: 14.3 vs M: 11.2 vs L: 8.3 mo; p = 0.038) and mOS (H: 39.6 vs M: 31.1 vs L: 20.5 mo; p = 0.033) in the combined treatment analysis. Among cet-treated pts, SNHG11-H showed a numerically longer mPFS (H: 14.2 vs M: 11.1 vs L: 7.6 mo; p = 0.19) and significantly longer mOS (H: 41.1 vs M: 32.4 vs L: 14.3 mo; p = 0.012). In contrast, no statistically significant OS or PFS differences were observed in bev-treated pts. SNHG11-H tumors had a significant OS benefit from cet compared to bev (mOS 41.1 vs 36.5 mo, respectively; p = 0.016), with a nominally significant treatment interaction observed for OS (p = 0.030). No significant differences were observed in the L or M expression groups. Additional analyses showed that SNHG11 expression was high in the CMS2 (canonical) subtype and substantially lower in CMS1 (immune). Conclusions: LncRNA SNHG11 plays a significant role in CRC progression and metastasis via tumorigenic pathways, including c-Myc and HIF-1α. Moreover, elevated circulating SNHG11 levels show promise as a non-invasive biomarker for early CRC detection. In CALGB/SWOG 80405, high SNHG11 expression correlated with improved PFS and OS, particularly in cet-treated pts, supporting its role as a prognostic and predictive biomarker. Its strong association with CMS2 aligns with its reported involvement in c-Myc-driven pathways. Further validation is needed to confirm the clinical utility of this biomarker and elucidate underlying mechanisms.

BACKGROUND Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular anomalies associated with significant risks of hemorrhage and neurological deficits. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a viable treatment option, particularly for small, deep-seated, or eloquent lesions, offering a less invasive alternative to microsurgical resection. However, SRS carries risks, including radiation-induced complications such as radiation necrosis. OBSERVATIONS This report describes the case of a 24-year-old male with a left temporal AVM, classified as Spetzler-Martin grade II, who underwent SRS with a marginal dose of 18 Gy. Over a 36-month follow-up period, complete obliteration of the AVM nidus was achieved. However, significant radiation-induced complications emerged, including vasogenic edema, radiation necrosis, memory deficits, partial seizures, and bilateral visual field defects. These complications peaked around 20 months post-SRS, requiring long-term management with corticosteroids, diuretics, and anticonvulsants. LESSONS This case underscores the importance of balancing the benefits of AVM obliteration with the risks of radiation-induced injury. While SRS is effective for treating AVMs, particularly in high-risk locations, the potential for delayed complications highlights the need for careful patient selection, meticulous treatment planning, and long-term follow-up. The report also discusses the pathophysiology of radiation-induced necrosis, strategies to mitigate its risk, and the role of advanced imaging techniques in optimizing treatment planning. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25201

Background Aortic valve stenosis (AVS) represents the most prevalent primary valvular lesion necessitating surgical intervention or transcatheter intervention in Europe and North America. Its prevalence is increasing at a rapid rate as a consequence of the ageing population. A variety of mechanical interventions are available to determine the management of AVS; however, there is currently a paucity of robust data with which to perform a comparative analysis of the efficacy of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and that of conventional stented xenograft bioprostheses (BP) or sutureless aortic valves (SAV) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The present study aims to compare the effectiveness and clinical outcomes of SAVR using BP or SAV technique and TAVI in patients with severe AVS. Methods and analysis A collaboration between three cardiac surgery centres across two European countries has resulted in the conception of the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement trial. This prospective non-randomised trial is designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of TAVI in comparison to SAVR for AVS in patients at risk of severe valve obstruction. The registry will enrol successive patients who have undergone mechanical intervention for AVS between January 2015 and December 2025. Investigators will assess the difference between replacement procedures for both the standard surgical approach and the transcatheter procedure. The principal clinical outcome under consideration will be the composite degree of all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke or rehospitalisation at 10 years. The present study will also have a number of secondary endpoints, including all-cause mortality, followed by functional status, hospitalisation, neurocognition, physiological measures (echocardiographic assessment), adverse events and reoperation. Ethics and dissemination It is hypothesised that the nature of the trials will serve to minimise bias related to institutional volume and surgical experience. Each participating centre is required to have an aortic valve programme that enables proper follow-up and management of any late aortic events following replacement surgery for the AVS. The data collected will provide valuable insight into the comparative effectiveness of various surgical approaches, both standardised and advanced, in aortic valve surgery and TAVI. This comprehensive analysis will contribute significantly to the development of robust international guidelines. Trial registration number Clinical Trial Gov.Com. ID: NCT05261204 IRB. ID: 2022011057

In the INTRIGUE phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673501 ), adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor previously treated with imatinib were randomly assigned 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily or sunitinib 50 mg once daily (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). In the primary analysis, overall survival (OS) was immature. In this study, we report the final planned analysis of OS (key secondary end point), progression-free survival (PFS) on third-line therapy (second PFS; prespecified exploratory end point), and long-term safety. Final OS analysis was prespecified to occur with approximately 200 and ≥145 events in the overall and KIT exon 11 intention-to-treat (ITT) populations, respectively. As of March 15, 2023, there were 211 and 151 OS events in the overall ITT and KIT exon 11 ITT populations, respectively. Median OS was similar between second-line ripretinib and sunitinib in both populations (overall, 35.5 v 31.5 months; KIT exon 11, 35.5 v 32.8 months). Median second PFS (on third-line therapy) for the overall ITT population was similar between the ripretinib and sunitinib arms (7.7 v 7.4 months). Safety was consistent with the primary analysis. OS from this analysis was similar between arms, and second PFS suggests that receiving ripretinib did not adversely affect the PFS of third-line therapy.

ABSTRACT Background Obesity is an important risk factor associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) on recurrent AF among patients undergoing catheter ablation is not well described. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effect of GLP‐1 RA on the recurrence of AF among obese patients after catheter ablation. Methods Utilizing the TriNetX research network, we identified patients aged over 18 with obesity (BMI ≥ 30) who underwent AF ablation from January 1, 2015, to December 1, 2022, using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were categorized based on their baseline GLP‐1 RA use. Through propensity‐score matching, each cohort comprised 1558 patients. The primary outcome encompassed a composite of cardioversion, initiation of new antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy, or redo AF ablation. Additional outcomes during the 12‐month follow‐up included AF readmission, heart failure readmissions, readmissions due to ischemic stroke, and mortality, with a separate analysis done for patients with BMI > 40. Results GLP‐1 RA use in patients with obesity undergoing AF ablation was linked to a significantly reduced risk of cardioversion, new AAD therapy, and the need for redo AF ablation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72 [0.65–0.80]; p < 0.001). At 12 months, individuals on GLP‐1 agonists exhibited a lower likelihood of mortality (HR 0.61 [0.40–0.93]; p < 0.001). Although all other secondary outcomes were lower in the GLP‐1 RA group, there was no significant difference in ischemic stroke between the groups. These results were consistent among patients with BMI > 40, although apart from ischemic stroke, there was no difference in mortality between the two groups. Conclusion The utilization of GLP‐1 RA in individuals with obesity is linked to a decreased likelihood of arrhythmia recurrence following AF ablation, leading to a reduced requirement for cardioversion, AAD therapy, or redo AF ablation.

Abstract Aims We explored the manifestations of individual weight loss (WL) response to long-term lifestyle interventions on cardiometabolic risk. Methods and results We pooled data from three large long-term lifestyle WL-intervention trials: 24-month DIRECT (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00160108; n = 322; 87% adherence), 18-month CENTRAL (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01530724; n = 278; 86% adherence), and 18-month DIRECT PLUS (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03020186; n = 294; 89% adherence). We analyzed longitudinal changes in cardiometabolic risk markers, including anthropometrics, blood biomarkers, and magnetic-resonance-imaging-assessed fat depots, and measured DNA-methylation, proteomics, and metabolomics. Among trial completers (n = 761, mean age = 50.4 years; 89% men, baseline body-mass-index = 30.1 kg/m2), mean WL was −3.3 kg (−3.5%). We classified participants as Successful-WL (36%) with relative-WL &gt; 5%, WL-Resistant (28%) who did not lose or gained weight, and Moderate-WL (36%) with WL between 0% and 5%. Successful-WL achieved the greatest improvements in multiple health indicators. However, the WL-Resistant also showed some significant improvements, with increased high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDLc) and decreased leptin and visceral fat (P &lt; 0.05 vs. baseline). Overall, each 1 kg sustained lifestyle-induced WL was associated with improvements in lipid markers and insulin resistance [HDLc (+1.44%), triglycerides (−1.37%), insulin (−2.46%), HOMA-IR (−2.71%), leptin (−2.79%)] and intrahepatic-fat regression (−0.49 absolute-units)] and modest but significant change in systolic and diastolic blood pressures (−0.26% and −0.36%). We identified 12 significant methylation sites that are associated with Successful-WL (FDR &lt; 0.05; AUC = 0.73). Conclusion While only ∼one-third of individuals achieved long-term WL, the Moderate-WL and WL-Resistant individuals could benefit improvements in visceral adiposity and cardiometabolic risk by shifting towards a healthy lifestyle pattern, beyond WL. Site-specific DNA methylation may predict an individual's likelihood of successful WL. Registration NCT00160108, NCT01530724, NCT03020186.