Arocho, Yaileen D Guzman

e12562 Background: Previous research has suggested that breast cancer (BC) diagnosed during pregnancy or the postpartum period exhibits more aggressive clinical features, possibly due to pregnancy-related hormonal changes, immune modulation, and alterations in the mammary microenvironment compared to nulligravid or women many years out from pregnancy. Emerging data have demonstrated potential worse outcomes for patients (pts) diagnosed in post-partum. This study evaluated the influence of timing of diagnosis in relation to pregnancy history and recency of childbirth on long-term outcomes in a modern cohort of young pts with early-stage BC. Methods: Pts with stage I–III BC age < 40y in the prospective Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study (YWBCS) were categorized at diagnosis as Nulligravid (no prior pregnancy), Nulliparous (prior pregnancy without live birth), Currently Pregnant, or Parous (subdivided by time since last childbirth: within 5 years [≤ 5y PP], and 5–10 years postpartum [5–10y PP]). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared across BC subtypes (estrogen receptor+/HER2- [ER+/HER2-], HER2+, and triple-negative BC [TNBC]). Prognostic analyses for distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) used Cox models. Results: 859 pts were included, 257 (30%) nulligravid, 50 (6%) nulliparous, 37 (4%) pregnant, and 515 (60%) parous (348 [68%] were ≤5y PP, and 167 [32%] were 5–10y PP). Median follow-up was 133 (6–209) months. Median age at diagnosis was lower in nulligravid pts (33 vs. 35–38 years); T1 tumors were most common in pts >5y PP (62%), and N0 status was highest in nulligravid pts (64%) (all p < 0.0001). Pregnant pts had higher rates of TNBC (27%), and T3 tumors (14%), N1 status, N1 (41%), and Grade 3 (81%) tumors compared to other groups (all p < 0.0001). Overall, only tumor size (T2-T4 vs T1, HR 2.03; 95% CI 1.37–3.03) and nodal status (N1 vs N0, HR 2.22; 1.48–3.34; N2/3 vs N0, HR 3.23; 1.96-5.33) were independently associated with worse DRFS; pregnancy history was not: nulligravid + nulliparous pts had no significant differences in DRFS compared to Pregnant (HR 1.46; 0.75–2.86), Parous <5y PP (HR 0.86; 0.58–1.26), and Parous 5–10y PP (HR 0.89; 0.54–1.48). Subgroup analyses by BC subtype (Table) and sensitivity analyses (excluding currently pregnant pts or separating nulligravid and nulliparous pts) demonstrated no significant associations between pregnancy history and DRFS. Conclusions: In this cohort study of very young patients with early breast cancer with contemporary treatment including management of breast cancer during pregnancy, pregnancy history and recency of pregnancy were not independent predictors of long-term disease outcomes. DRFS results by subgroup. Pregnancy Group N (%) HR (95% CI) ER+/HER2- Nulligravid + Nulliparous 173 (38.1) Ref Pregnant 16 (3.5) 0.93 (0.32–2.70) Parous ≤5y PP 177 (39.0) 0.77 (0.45–1.29) Parous 5–10y PP 88 (19.4) 0.78 (0.39–1.53) HER2+ Nulligravid + Nulliparous 77 (30.8) Ref Pregnant 11 (4.4) 3.27 (0.80–13.38) Parous ≤5y PP 113 (45.2) 1.50 (0.60–3.75) Parous 5–10y PP 49 (19.6) 1.45 (0.45–4.66) TNBC Nulligravid + Nulliparous 56 (36.8) Ref Pregnant 10 (6.6) 1.92 (0.61–6.09) Parous ≤5y PP 57 (37.5) 0.68 (0.28–1.63) Parous 5–10y PP 29 (19.1) 1.16 (0.43–3.14)

505 Background: Increased TILs are associated with better prognosis in triple-negative BC, including in patients (pts) age < 40. However, the role of TILs remains unclear in HR+/HER2- BC and little data exist in young pts, in whom immune microenvironment could be altered by age-related host/tumor differences. We assessed the extent and composition of immune infiltration in HR+ tumors of young women and correlated with clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes. Methods: From a prospective cohort study of women with BC diagnosed age ≤40, we identified those with stage I-III HR+/HER2- BC and available pre-treatment (tx) tumor tissue. Multiplexed immunofluorescence was used to quantify cytotoxic T (CD8+), T helper (Th, CD3+CD8-), T regulatory (Tregs, FOXP3+CD3+) and exhausted T (PD1+CD8+) cells in stroma and tumor. Univariate analyses tested associations between clinicopathologic variables and immune markers by high or low expression, divided based on median. High vs. low TILs were evaluated in Cox regression analyses for invasive breast cancer-free survival (iBCFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In 390 pts, median age was 37 years (21-40), most had grade 2 (51%), T1 (65%), N0 (63%) tumors and 67% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Black pts (n = 17) had higher expression of stromal CD8+ ( P= .010), FOXP3+CD3+ ( P= .027) and PD1+CD8+ TILs ( P= .043); intratumoral TILs did not differ by race. Older age (36-40) was associated with high expression of CD8+ ( P= .033) and PD1+CD8+ TILs ( P= .031) within stroma and CD3+CD8- TILs within tumor ( P= .046). Grade 3 tumors had higher stromal and intratumoral expression of CD3+CD8- ( P= .002; P< .001) and FOXP3+CD3+ TILs ( P= .020; P< .001). No differences in TILs were seen according to recency of pregnancy, BRCA1/2 status or T/N stage. Over a median follow up of 8 years, 85 iBCFS events, 64 DDFS events and 37 deaths occurred. High stromal expression of CD3+CD8- TILs was associated with better iBCFS (HR 0.49, P= .002) and DDFS (HR 0.57, P= .046), which remained significant when adjusted for T/N stage, grade and chemotherapy (iBCFS HR 0.41, P< .001; DDFS HR 0.45, P= .008). High stromal expression of CD3+CD8- and FOXP3+CD3+ TILs was associated with better OS (HR 0.47, P= .038) and iBCFS (HR 0.58, P= .018), respectively, on adjusted analyses only. High intratumoral expression of CD3+CD8- and FOXP3+CD3+ TILs was associated with better iBCFS (HR 0.59, P= .025; HR 0.63, P= .043) after adjustment only. Conclusions: The distribution of TIL subtypes in young women’s HR+ BC varied according to race, age and grade. High stromal and intratumoral expression of Th and Tregs was associated with improved BC outcomes. Characterization of immune cell subsets could help refine the prognostic value of TILs in HR+ BC, particularly in young pts who may benefit from individualized escalated/de-escalated tx strategies.

514 Background: The 21- gene Breast Recurrence Score predicts benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), HER-2 negative (-) breast cancer (BC). We aimed to examine whether the 21-gene assay predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: We identified patients with stage I-III ER+/HER2− BC treated with NAC from the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a prospective cohort of women diagnosed with BC at age ≤ 40 years. The 21-gene assay was performed on tumor specimens removed prior to NAC either as part of clinical care or retrospectively for research. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual invasive tumor (ypT0/is ypN0). The relationship between Recurrence Score result (RS) and pCR was evaluated using logistic regression modeling. Results: 76 women in the cohort had undergone NAC for ER+, HER2- BC and were eligible for this analysis: 5 had undergone clinical 21-gene assay testing, 71 had banked specimens retrospectively tested. Median age at diagnosis was 36.7 (24.3-40). Most tumors were of ductal histology (78%), high grade (51%), progesterone receptor (PgR) positive (86%), ≥T2 (88%), clinically node positive (74%), and anthracycline and taxane containing protocols were administered in 86% of cases. RS ranged between 5-75 with 50% > 25 and only 4 < 11. Mean RS was significantly higher among tumors achieving pCR vs. non-pCR response (51.9 vs. 26.6, pwilcoxon= 0.0005). pCR rate in patients with RS > 25 was 21% (8/38) vs. 5% in patients with RS < 25 (2/38), with both pCRs in the <25 group in patients with RS 21-25. In univariable analysis, PgR negativity (odds ratio (OR) 5.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-24.89, p = 0.02), high grade (OR 9.03, 95%CI 1.07-76.32, p = 0.04) and higher RS as a continuous variable (OR 1.08, 95%CI 1.04-1.13, p = 0.0003) were associated with a greater likelihood of pCR. In multivariable analysis only RS remained significantly associated with pCR (OR: 1.07, 95%CI 1.01-1.12, p = 0.01): a 7% increase in the odds of pCR for every 1-point increase in RS. Conclusions: In young women with ER+, HER2- BC who received NAC, higher pretreatment RS was associated with an increased likelihood of pCR. Genomic expression profiling assays may have a role in decision-making in young women in need of neoadjuvant therapy. For women with low likelihood of benefiting from NAC, alternative approaches are clearly warranted. Given the demonstrated efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in post-menopausal women, further evaluation in young women should be pursued.