El‐Dean, Zein

Background Aortic valve stenosis (AVS) represents the most prevalent primary valvular lesion necessitating surgical intervention or transcatheter intervention in Europe and North America. Its prevalence is increasing at a rapid rate as a consequence of the ageing population. A variety of mechanical interventions are available to determine the management of AVS; however, there is currently a paucity of robust data with which to perform a comparative analysis of the efficacy of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and that of conventional stented xenograft bioprostheses (BP) or sutureless aortic valves (SAV) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The present study aims to compare the effectiveness and clinical outcomes of SAVR using BP or SAV technique and TAVI in patients with severe AVS. Methods and analysis A collaboration between three cardiac surgery centres across two European countries has resulted in the conception of the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement trial. This prospective non-randomised trial is designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of TAVI in comparison to SAVR for AVS in patients at risk of severe valve obstruction. The registry will enrol successive patients who have undergone mechanical intervention for AVS between January 2015 and December 2025. Investigators will assess the difference between replacement procedures for both the standard surgical approach and the transcatheter procedure. The principal clinical outcome under consideration will be the composite degree of all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke or rehospitalisation at 10 years. The present study will also have a number of secondary endpoints, including all-cause mortality, followed by functional status, hospitalisation, neurocognition, physiological measures (echocardiographic assessment), adverse events and reoperation. Ethics and dissemination It is hypothesised that the nature of the trials will serve to minimise bias related to institutional volume and surgical experience. Each participating centre is required to have an aortic valve programme that enables proper follow-up and management of any late aortic events following replacement surgery for the AVS. The data collected will provide valuable insight into the comparative effectiveness of various surgical approaches, both standardised and advanced, in aortic valve surgery and TAVI. This comprehensive analysis will contribute significantly to the development of robust international guidelines. Trial registration number Clinical Trial Gov.Com. ID: NCT05261204 IRB. ID: 2022011057

Background: Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is characterized by a pathological process impacting the left ventricle (LV) as opposed to the mitral valve (MV). In the absence of structural alterations to the MV, the expansion of the LV or impairment of the papillary muscles (PMs) may ensue. A number of technical procedures are accessible for the purpose of determining the optimal resolution for MR. Nevertheless, there is a dearth of rigorous data to facilitate a comparative analysis of MV replacement, MV repair (including subvalvular repair), and transcatheter mitral valve interventions (TMV-Is). The objective of this investigation is to evaluate and compare the efficacy and clinical outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMV-r) utilizing the edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) procedure in comparison to conventional surgical mitral valve interventions (S-SMVis) in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation. Methods and analysis: A consortium of five cardiac surgery institutions from four European states and Japan have joined forces to establish a multicenter observational registry, designated TEERMISO. Patients who underwent technical procedures for SMR between January 2007 and December 2023 will be enrolled consecutively into the TEERMISO registry. The investigation team evaluated the comparative efficacy of replacement and repair techniques, utilizing both the standard surgical methodology and the transcatheter intervention. The primary clinical outcome will be the degree of left ventricular remodeling, as assessed by the left ventricular end-diastolic volume index, at 10 years. The forthcoming research will assess a variety of secondary endpoints, among which all-cause mortality will be the primary endpoint. Subsequent assessments will be made in the following order: functional status, hospitalization, neurocognition, physiological measures (echocardiographic assessment), occurrence of adverse clinical incidents, and reoperation. Ethics and dissemination: The multicenter design of the database is anticipated to reduce the potential for bias associated with institutional caseload and surgical experience. All participating centers possess an established mitral valve protocol that facilitates comprehensive follow-up and management of any delayed mitral complications following replacement surgery or surgical repair of the secondary mitral regurgitation. The data collected will provide insights into the impact of diverse surgical approaches on standard mitral valve surgery and TEER. This will facilitate the evaluation of LV remodeling over the course of long-term post-procedural follow-up. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05090540; IRB ID: 202201143