Singh, Sanjeet Singh Avtaar

Background: Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is characterized by a pathological process impacting the left ventricle (LV) as opposed to the mitral valve (MV). In the absence of structural alterations to the MV, the expansion of the LV or impairment of the papillary muscles (PMs) may ensue. A number of technical procedures are accessible for the purpose of determining the optimal resolution for MR. Nevertheless, there is a dearth of rigorous data to facilitate a comparative analysis of MV replacement, MV repair (including subvalvular repair), and transcatheter mitral valve interventions (TMV-Is). The objective of this investigation is to evaluate and compare the efficacy and clinical outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMV-r) utilizing the edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) procedure in comparison to conventional surgical mitral valve interventions (S-SMVis) in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation. Methods and analysis: A consortium of five cardiac surgery institutions from four European states and Japan have joined forces to establish a multicenter observational registry, designated TEERMISO. Patients who underwent technical procedures for SMR between January 2007 and December 2023 will be enrolled consecutively into the TEERMISO registry. The investigation team evaluated the comparative efficacy of replacement and repair techniques, utilizing both the standard surgical methodology and the transcatheter intervention. The primary clinical outcome will be the degree of left ventricular remodeling, as assessed by the left ventricular end-diastolic volume index, at 10 years. The forthcoming research will assess a variety of secondary endpoints, among which all-cause mortality will be the primary endpoint. Subsequent assessments will be made in the following order: functional status, hospitalization, neurocognition, physiological measures (echocardiographic assessment), occurrence of adverse clinical incidents, and reoperation. Ethics and dissemination: The multicenter design of the database is anticipated to reduce the potential for bias associated with institutional caseload and surgical experience. All participating centers possess an established mitral valve protocol that facilitates comprehensive follow-up and management of any delayed mitral complications following replacement surgery or surgical repair of the secondary mitral regurgitation. The data collected will provide insights into the impact of diverse surgical approaches on standard mitral valve surgery and TEER. This will facilitate the evaluation of LV remodeling over the course of long-term post-procedural follow-up. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05090540; IRB ID: 202201143

Aortic dissection is a clinicopathological entity caused by rupture of the intima, leading to a high mortality if not treated. Over time, diagnostic and investigative methods, antihypertensive therapy, and early referrals have resulted in improved outcomes according to registry data. Some data have also emerged from recent studies suggesting a link between Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection and aortic dissection. Furthermore, the use of microRNAs has also become increasingly widespread in the literature. These have been noted to play a role in aortic dissections with elevated levels noted in studies as early as 2017. This review aims to provide a broad and holistic overview of the role of miRNAs, while studying the role of HCMV infection in the context of aortic dissections. The roles of long non-coding RNAs, circular RNAs, and microRNAs are explored to identify changes in expression during aortic dissections. The use of such biomarkers may one day be translated into clinical practice to allow early detection and prognostication of outcomes and drive preventative and therapeutic options in the future.

Objectives. The current guidelines still do not include specific recommendations on the use of subvalvular repair (SV-r) for treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). Therefore, the objective of our study was to evaluate the clinical impact of mitral regurgitation (MR) recurrence and ventricular remodeling on long-term outcomes after SV-r combined with restrictive annuloplasty (RA-r). Methods. We performed a subanalysis of the papillary muscle approximation trial, studying 96 patients with severe IMR and coronary artery disease undergoing restrictive annuloplasty alongside subvalvular repair (SV-r + RA-r group) or restrictive annuloplasty alone (RA-r group). We analyzed treatment failure differences, the influence of residual MR, left ventricular remodeling, and clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was treatment failure (composite of death; reoperation; or recurrence of moderate, moderate-to-severe, or severe MR) within 5 years of follow-up after the procedure. Results. A total of 45 patients showed failure of the treatment within 5 years, of which 16 patients underwent SV-r + RA-r (35.6%) and 29 underwent RA-r (64.4%, p = 0.006). Patients with significant residual MR presented with a higher rate of all-cause mortality at 5 years compared with trivial MR (HR 9.09, 95% CI 2.08–33.33, p = 0.003). MR progression occurred earlier in the RA-r group, as 20 patients in the RA-r group vs. 6 in SV-r + RA-r group had a significant MR 2 years after surgery (p = 0.002). Conclusions. RA-r remains a surgical mitral repair technique with an increased risk of failure and mortality at 5 years compared with SV-r. The rates of recurrent MR are higher, and recurrence occurs earlier, with RA-r alone compared to SV-r. The addition of the subvalvular repair increases the durability of the repair, thus extending all of the benefits of preventing MR recurrence.